Jack Sparrow Being Chased

I hear the argument, well Christians do it to.
It's so bs. Ehen you get down to brass tax.
The two leaders of those religions are Jesus Christ and mohammed
These religions implore you to be like these two.

Read what it means to be like Jesus.
Read what it means to be like mohammed.

Jesus is God and is still living, while Mohammed was merely a man who r@ped little girls. Christians are nowhere near the sh!t stains Muslims are. At least their religions.

True.
And I'm damn sick and tried of leftists telling me different. They're always trying to compare 1% to 99% like it's the same.
How manylives do Christians take during christmas or passover? Cuz Muslims took over a thousand during Ramadan.
It's shit like that. There's a problem with Islam and when a leftist defends it it just proves what I've been saying for years. The left has allied with Islam for their common goal of evilness and governmental control.

It's true though. You guys are learning each others tactics. While you're arguing on imgflip I'm red pilling an entire generation. This is a war of attrition. I've woke up 11 people this week alone.

Thanks.

What?

Red pilling by suggesting ahmadinejad is a bad guy? hmmm

https://wiseconservatism.com/2007/09/24/the-voice-of-evil-is-ahmadinejad/

Maybe these liberals were right about you. Nm

i suppose you hate iran and think the gulf states are the bees knees?

Their all shit.
Just a bunch of garbage sharias.
I realize there are some people who just want escape, but to sau ahmadinejad was "good." Nah, thats just ridiculous.

F**k ypu Natalie get in the kitchen and make me a sandwich and after that get in the bedroom and spread your legs. That's all you're good for THOT

Lol. And he's fully triggered now.
All the Persians are Arab now in that country. Maybe in the 70's there was something worth saving, but might as well nuke that hell hole. Anyway you look at it they are sharia practicing filth.
Making antiislam memes then defending one of the biggest commiter of humanitarian atrocities. Lol. F**king normie

cant reply nice - f**king loser

Lol. At first I felt sorry for you with your comments toward the bottom, but I now realize you're a delusional asshole.

wrong; it's theyre nt their for a start. Iranians are Persian not arab but I'm sure you're aware of that. They are Shiite not Sunni. Most terror is committed by Sunnis. Plus they are aryan and have been invaded by the semites and forced to convert. So to say they are 'all just a bunch of garbage' is incorrect and frankly insulting

Ok man lol
Have fun.

oh just f**k off

Amen

so jesus was said to be virgin, mohammed f**ked a 12 year old, so....

Mohammed didn't consummate the marriage to his six year old wife until she was 9. Then he constantly beat and r@ped her, along with his many other wives. Stand up guy, this Mohammed.

Where does the Bible say Jesus was a virgin? Please, give me a book, chapter, and verse. I'll wait here for you.

And there's scholars who say she was 14-16. Nobody knows for sure. Either way there's a big difference between a 50 year old man forcing his dick into a prepubescent girl for his pleasure and a 14 year old being impregnated without touch for the purposes of creation.

That's a false equivalence because Mary wasn't impregnated by sex. Just in terms of comparing the two, wouldn't you agree that the only fair point is that neither ones were consenual? After that I think the two scenarios are pretty different.

You've already stated that Muhammad raping a 9 year old was the "norm" so how would Mary be considered a minor if she was older?

Either way, Mary would have been a minor, yes? That's at least statutory r@pe, and in some states r@pe of a minor.

If that's rape to you, then how would you describe what Muhammad did to Aisha at 9 years old?

You're forgetting that in those days it was normal to marry early. I highly doubt there was statutory laws about underage impregnation in those days either. Also, it was NOT r@pe. If you read the Bible carefully, Mary was fertilized, probably without losing her virginity as there was no man involved. Jesus Christ was conceived as a sign of salvation from God. "Therefore the Lord Himself shall give you a sign: Behold, a virgin shall conceive and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel." (Isaiah 7:14). Notice the word VIRGIN. That was a sign God sent to signal the arrival of God's salvation plan for humanity.

Actually the original Hebrew used a word that is better translated as "young woman", not "virgin". Also, the writer of Isiah used verbage that indicated the young woman would give birth soon, not in several hundred years. The gospel writers/editors tried to shoehorn Jesus into an old prophecy to better fit the narrative that Jesus was a deity.

The concept of "soon" for history and a race of people is very different than from an individual's. For example, 100 years might seem like a long time for us, but to a whole race of people it isn't very long at all. And if Isaiah was an "old prophecy", how would you explain the numerous other prophecies about what the Savior would do on Earth. "He will have His way prepared" (Isaiah 40:3-5) (John the Baptist preparing the people for Jesus), "Gentiles will seek Him" (Isaiah 11:10) (Gentiles DID come to speak with Him as shown in John 12:20,21), "Will die with transgressors" (Isaiah 53:12) (Jesus was nailed to the cross next to two criminals), "Will be buried in a rich man's tomb" (Isaiah 53:9) (Joseph of Arimathea, a rich man gave his tomb for Jesus to be buried). There are other fulfilled prophecies about Jesus Christ, of course. There are too many examples to simply say it was a coincidence.

You've missed the point of my thread. And raza aslan isn't a creditable "scholar."

Don't be mad my memes are dank.
Basically, in a round about way, I'm saying you are a grown man who wears a mask, has a fetish for my little pony (to lure kids), drives truck all month (to transport lurked kids), and defends very underage sex. I'm beginning to put the pieces together and figure you out. :)
I'm on to you dave.

The other day I heard about a woman who took someone's infant and tried to shove it into her va**na cause she can't have kids. I called BS until I read it myself.

7 billion people - there's gonna be every flavor too. <3

All comes down to whether you're a c**t or not and you aren't.

Nice!!! :D

Shieet.
Remember how they found out who that Eric Clanton was from antifa? That guy who hit the or her dude with a bike lock?
He wore a mask too.
/pol/ doesn't fack around with chimos.

So God, being all-powerful, could not come up with a better way to save creation other then to impregnate a 14 yr old? There is also the question, why would he need to anything at all? If he is omnipotent his creation should have been perfect from the start. No need for corrections.

We weren't debating the logic of a creator but rather the moral implications of this particular subject. I'm also not sure why you're asking me. But going off your logic why would Allah have needed Muhammad?

He wouldn't have needed MoMo. That's my point. All religions are fake and flawed and used to control the masses. Religious people all agree on this as long as it pertains to OTHERS religions and not their own because of course theirs is correct.

So you're never going to get rid of religion so why would you back up and stand for one that is so disgraceful and unhuman as Islam. As a Christian myself I'm not asking for your support. I would just hope that you would look of the dangers when you associate Islam with Christianity in today's world as being the same.

What have I said that could possibly make you think I would stand for Islam? I reject ALL religions. I will stand for peoples right to believe as they wish as long it does not effect my life, such as passing laws saying I cannot do this or that because their god says so. But I also have the right to question why they believe and quote them examples out of their books as to why I don't.

Then ytf are you hassling me for? Why would you come to an antiislamic meme anyway?
Isn't that what you want? Anti religion? We're discussing why Islam is so bad and you can't help but bash christians. Just to deteriorate the discussion, nothing more.

I see your point but neither one of us are religious so we're just assuming they're real for the purpose of the discussion.

This happened because WE messed up. Adam and Eve sinned in the Garden of Eden. Why did this happen? Because God made us in his own image. He gave us the power of free thought. Science will also agree the most significant difference between man and animal is that man is sentient and can think for himself. "I think, therefore I am.", yes? But Adam and Eve, when tempted by Satan, just did not have the will to resist temptation (which, by the way, Adam and Eve were also to blame, not just Satan). And so humans fell from righteousness. Humans, even before Adam and Eve sinned, were NOT perfect, as only God can be perfect. In a similar way, an artist can create his masterpiece. It is good, better than any of his other creations, yet the paintING can never be compared to the paintER.

So we are doing exactly what God wants us to do. He is perfect, he created Satan knowing exactly what Satan would do. So Satan was/is perfect and doing things according to God's plan. If God did not want man to sin then why create Satan to tempt them? imgflip.com/i/187khw

As I've said, God gave us free will to choose wrong or right. It was the same with Satan. Satan just chose to rebel because he was proud and thought himself greater than God. "Evil spirits" are in fact angels too, angels that sided with Satan against God. What I meant by everything turning out right in the end is that God is able to turn the sins and evil actions of both Satan and men into good. For example, Henry VIII

You are missing the point...or should I say you are avoiding logic. If God is all-knowing he knew what Satan would do if he gave him free-will yet created him with free-will anyway. So what your saying by this admission is that if God created Satan NOT knowing what he would do you have agreed that God is NOT all-knowing. Now that we have gotten that point firmed up, let's move on to another. "God is all-powerful" So, why does he not stop Satan?

For the argument to the first point, read my orange coloured comment below. It will also partially answer the second point. God is using Satan to test humanity for its faith and belief in God. God's whole governance is through love, while Satan's is through hate, deceit and trickery. If God were to strike down Satan, his rule would be on fear, instead of love and willingness. We know He CAN strike down his enemies, as there are multiple accounts of Christian oppressors being smitten in the Bible. However, these actions by God have always been done to protect his chosen people or his believers when they were oppressed. God will protect those who love and obey Him, and those martyrs who choose to lay down their lives for Jesus Christ will still find eternal rest with God in Heaven.

Sorry accidentally hit the post comment button. Henry VIII created the Church of England to officiate the annulment of his marriage to Catherine of Aragon because the Pope would not officiate it. Henry VIII only created the Anglican Church out of his own selfish intentions, but God turned it into the now flourishing Anglican Church and is considered more modern, and in which each church is independent and free. Also, you seem to be implying that Adam and Eve were not at fault? They were, as they were given free choice to choose to either obey God's instructions not to eat the forbidden fruit or to listen to Satan and sin. Now, in Revelations it says that Judgement Day will come soon, and that all those whose names are not written in the Book of Life will suffer for eternity in the lake of fire, where Satan, the Beast and the false prophet have already been imprisoned. God is testing all of us, and to judge our faith and belief in Him.

I've heard stories he had a wife named "Mary magnilin." Not to be confused with the virgin mary.

9 year old actually

She was six when he 'married' her, actually.

It's really weird to me how this happens, people fleeing to the west to get away from extremist ideologies, but then refusing to condemn terrorist organizations, trying to implement Sharia law, etc. Talk about Stockholm syndrome, in the culture of my origin country we have a saying that roughly translates to "The wise man that gets burned by soup, starts to blow on ice cream" Meaning, something or someone f**ked you over? Be extra careful to avoid the danger, these are the types of people that after being burned will light themselves on fire. SMH