Jack Sparrow Being Chased

Jack Sparrow Being Chased Meme | ALL I SAID WAS MOHAMED WAS A PEDOPHILE | image tagged in memes,jack sparrow being chased | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
share
4,495 views, 90 upvotes, Made by ThereIsNoDoge 16 months ago memesjack sparrow being chased
Jack Sparrow Being Chased memeRe-caption this meme
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
19 ups, 4 replies
. | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
I hear the argument, well Christians do it to.
It's so bs. Ehen you get down to brass tax.
The two leaders of those religions are Jesus Christ and mohammed
These religions implore you to be like these two.

Read what it means to be like Jesus.
Read what it means to be like mohammed.
reply
16 ups, 1 reply
Jesus is God and is still living, while Mohammed was merely a man who [email protected] little girls. Christians are nowhere near the sh!t stains Muslims are. At least their religions.
reply
12 ups, 1 reply
. | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
True.
And I'm damn sick and tried of leftists telling me different. They're always trying to compare 1% to 99% like it's the same.
How manylives do Christians take during christmas or passover? Cuz Muslims took over a thousand during Ramadan.
It's shit like that. There's a problem with Islam and when a leftist defends it it just proves what I've been saying for years. The left has allied with Islam for their common goal of evilness and governmental control.
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
"their common goal of evilness and governmental control"

Haha. You're funny :)
reply
4 ups, 3 replies
. | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
It's true though. You guys are learning each others tactics. While you're arguing on imgflip I'm red pilling an entire generation. This is a war of attrition. I've woke up 11 people this week alone.
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
Lol :) always good for a laugh
reply
7 ups
Brace Yourselves X is Coming Meme | BRACE YOURSELF LEFTISTS HAVE ALLIED WITH ISLAM | image tagged in memes,brace yourselves x is coming | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Thanks.
reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups
What?
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Red pilling by suggesting ahmadinejad is a bad guy? hmmm
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
https://wiseconservatism.com/2007/09/24/the-voice-of-evil-is-ahmadinejad/

Maybe these liberals were right about you. Nm
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
i suppose you hate iran and think the gulf states are the bees knees?
reply
5 ups, 4 replies
Their all shit.
Just a bunch of garbage sharias.
I realize there are some people who just want escape, but to sau ahmadinejad was "good." Nah, thats just ridiculous.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
cant reply nice - f**king loser
5 ups
Lol. At first I felt sorry for you with your comments toward the bottom, but I now realize you're a delusional asshole.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
F**k ypu Natalie get in the kitchen and make me a sandwich and after that get in the bedroom and spread your legs. That's all you're good for THOT
4 ups
Lol. And he's fully triggered now.
All the Persians are Arab now in that country. Maybe in the 70's there was something worth saving, but might as well nuke that hell hole. Anyway you look at it they are sharia practicing filth.
Making antiislam memes then defending one of the biggest commiter of humanitarian atrocities. Lol. F**king normie
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
wrong; it's theyre nt their for a start. Iranians are Persian not arab but I'm sure you're aware of that. They are Shiite not Sunni. Most terror is committed by Sunnis. Plus they are aryan and have been invaded by the semites and forced to convert. So to say they are 'all just a bunch of garbage' is incorrect and frankly insulting
4 ups
Ok man lol
Have fun.
reply
1 up
oh just f**k off
reply
5 ups
Amen
reply
7 ups, 3 replies
so jesus was said to be virgin, mohammed f**ked a 12 year old, so....
reply
10 ups, 1 reply
Mohammed didn't consummate the marriage to his six year old wife until she was 9. Then he constantly beat and [email protected] her, along with his many other wives. Stand up guy, this Mohammed.
reply
12 ups
reply
6 ups, 2 replies
Where does the Bible say Jesus was a virgin? Please, give me a book, chapter, and verse. I'll wait here for you.
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
The better question is: I've heard Biblical scholars say that Mary would have been about 12 or 13 when God impregnated her; so what does that say about the Christian God?
reply
7 ups, 2 replies
And there's scholars who say she was 14-16. Nobody knows for sure. Either way there's a big difference between a 50 year old man forcing his dick into a prepubescent girl for his pleasure and a 14 year old being impregnated without touch for the purposes of creation.
reply
7 ups, 2 replies
If Mohammad had sex with a 14-year-old, you'd be okay with it, then?
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
That's a false equivalence because Mary wasn't impregnated by sex. Just in terms of comparing the two, wouldn't you agree that the only fair point is that neither ones were consenual? After that I think the two scenarios are pretty different.
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
"Just in terms of comparing the two, wouldn't you agree that the only fair point is that neither ones were consenual?"

Yes, I would agree. But like Skippopotamus said, Mary would have been a minor regardless, which makes it no less creepy.
reply
0 ups
You've already stated that Muhammad raping a 9 year old was the "norm" so how would Mary be considered a minor if she was older?
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
Either way, Mary would have been a minor, yes? That's at least statutory [email protected], and in some states [email protected] of a minor.
reply
0 ups
If that's **pe to you, then how would you describe what Muhammad did to Aisha at 9 years old?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
You're forgetting that in those days it was normal to marry early. I highly doubt there was statutory laws about underage impregnation in those days either. Also, it was NOT [email protected] If you read the Bible carefully, Mary was fertilized, probably without losing her virginity as there was no man involved. Jesus Christ was conceived as a sign of salvation from God. "Therefore the Lord Himself shall give you a sign: Behold, a virgin shall conceive and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel." (Isaiah 7:14). Notice the word VIRGIN. That was a sign God sent to signal the arrival of God's salvation plan for humanity.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Actually the original Hebrew used a word that is better translated as "young woman", not "virgin". Also, the writer of Isiah used verbage that indicated the young woman would give birth soon, not in several hundred years. The gospel writers/editors tried to shoehorn Jesus into an old prophecy to better fit the narrative that Jesus was a deity.
0 ups
The concept of "soon" for history and a race of people is very different than from an individual's. For example, 100 years might seem like a long time for us, but to a whole race of people it isn't very long at all. And if Isaiah was an "old prophecy", how would you explain the numerous other prophecies about what the Savior would do on Earth. "He will have His way prepared" (Isaiah 40:3-5) (John the Baptist preparing the people for Jesus), "Gentiles will seek Him" (Isaiah 11:10) (Gentiles DID come to speak with Him as shown in John 12:20,21), "Will die with transgressors" (Isaiah 53:12) (Jesus was nailed to the cross next to two criminals), "Will be buried in a rich man's tomb" (Isaiah 53:9) (Joseph of Arimathea, a rich man gave his tomb for Jesus to be buried). There are other fulfilled prophecies about Jesus Christ, of course. There are too many examples to simply say it was a coincidence.
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
You've missed the point of my thread. And raza aslan isn't a creditable "scholar."
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
Aww, that's a shame. I thought you had something productive to say. Just more of the same.
reply
5 ups, 2 replies
Don't be mad my memes are dank.
Basically, in a round about way, I'm saying you are a grown man who wears a mask, has a fetish for my little pony (to lure kids), drives truck all month (to transport lurked kids), and defends very underage sex. I'm beginning to put the pieces together and figure you out. :)
I'm on to you dave.
reply
6 ups, 3 replies
1. Your dankness level is far below 9000
2. I wore a bandana in my "selfie" to keep my full identity hidden, because the Internet is full of people...well, like yourself
3. Fetish? Sure, I'll give you that
4. To lure kids? Nope
5. Transport lured kids? Nope
6. Defends very underage sex? Nope again
7. I'm not sure why you think my name is Dave
8. You're basically accusing me of being a child molester. That's not only false, it's libelous, because it's false and intended to damage my reputation. Of course, this is the Internet, so people don't usually take such claims seriously without real evidence. As they shouldn't.

If I were a Christian, I would be ashamed that someone like you claims to represent my religion.
3 ups
The other day I heard about a woman who took someone's infant and tried to shove it into her va**na cause she can't have kids. I called BS until I read it myself.

7 billion people - there's gonna be every flavor too. <3

All comes down to whether you're a c**t or not and you aren't.
1 up
Nice!!! :D
3 ups
Shieet.
Remember how they found out who that Eric Clanton was from antifa? That guy who hit the or her dude with a bike lock?
He wore a mask too.
/pol/ doesn't fack around with chimos.
reply
3 ups
reply
6 ups, 2 replies
So God, being all-powerful, could not come up with a better way to save creation other then to impregnate a 14 yr old? There is also the question, why would he need to anything at all? If he is omnipotent his creation should have been perfect from the start. No need for corrections.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
We weren't debating the logic of a creator but rather the moral implications of this particular subject. I'm also not sure why you're asking me. But going off your logic why would Allah have needed Muhammad?
reply
5 ups, 2 replies
He wouldn't have needed MoMo. That's my point. All religions are fake and flawed and used to control the masses. Religious people all agree on this as long as it pertains to OTHERS religions and not their own because of course theirs is correct.
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
So you're never going to get rid of religion so why would you back up and stand for one that is so disgraceful and unhuman as Islam. As a Christian myself I'm not asking for your support. I would just hope that you would look of the dangers when you associate Islam with Christianity in today's world as being the same.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
What have I said that could possibly make you think I would stand for Islam? I reject ALL religions. I will stand for peoples right to believe as they wish as long it does not effect my life, such as passing laws saying I cannot do this or that because their god says so. But I also have the right to question why they believe and quote them examples out of their books as to why I don't.
4 ups
Then ytf are you hassling me for? Why would you come to an antiislamic meme anyway?
Isn't that what you want? Anti religion? We're discussing why Islam is so bad and you can't help but bash christians. Just to deteriorate the discussion, nothing more.
reply
3 ups
I see your point but neither one of us are religious so we're just assuming they're real for the purpose of the discussion.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
This happened because WE messed up. Adam and Eve sinned in the Garden of Eden. Why did this happen? Because God made us in his own image. He gave us the power of free thought. Science will also agree the most significant difference between man and animal is that man is sentient and can think for himself. "I think, therefore I am.", yes? But Adam and Eve, when tempted by Satan, just did not have the will to resist temptation (which, by the way, Adam and Eve were also to blame, not just Satan). And so humans fell from righteousness. Humans, even before Adam and Eve sinned, were NOT perfect, as only God can be perfect. In a similar way, an artist can create his masterpiece. It is good, better than any of his other creations, yet the paintING can never be compared to the paintER.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
So we are doing exactly what God wants us to do. He is perfect, he created Satan knowing exactly what Satan would do. So Satan was/is perfect and doing things according to God's plan. If God did not want man to sin then why create Satan to tempt them? imgflip.com/i/187khw
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
As I've said, God gave us free will to choose wrong or right. It was the same with Satan. Satan just chose to rebel because he was proud and thought himself greater than God. "Evil spirits" are in fact angels too, angels that sided with Satan against God. What I meant by everything turning out right in the end is that God is able to turn the sins and evil actions of both Satan and men into good. For example, Henry VIII
reply
1 up, 1 reply
You are missing the point...or should I say you are avoiding logic. If God is all-knowing he knew what Satan would do if he gave him free-will yet created him with free-will anyway. So what your saying by this admission is that if God created Satan NOT knowing what he would do you have agreed that God is NOT all-knowing. Now that we have gotten that point firmed up, let's move on to another. "God is all-powerful" So, why does he not stop Satan?
0 ups
For the argument to the first point, read my orange coloured comment below. It will also partially answer the second point. God is using Satan to test humanity for its faith and belief in God. God's whole governance is through love, while Satan's is through hate, deceit and trickery. If God were to strike down Satan, his rule would be on fear, instead of love and willingness. We know He CAN strike down his enemies, as there are multiple accounts of Christian oppressors being smitten in the Bible. However, these actions by God have always been done to protect his chosen people or his believers when they were oppressed. God will protect those who love and obey Him, and those martyrs who choose to lay down their lives for Jesus Christ will still find eternal rest with God in Heaven.
reply
0 ups
Sorry accidentally hit the post comment button. Henry VIII created the Church of England to officiate the annulment of his marriage to Catherine of Aragon because the Pope would not officiate it. Henry VIII only created the Anglican Church out of his own selfish intentions, but God turned it into the now flourishing Anglican Church and is considered more modern, and in which each church is independent and free. Also, you seem to be implying that Adam and Eve were not at fault? They were, as they were given free choice to choose to either obey God's instructions not to eat the forbidden fruit or to listen to Satan and sin. Now, in Revelations it says that Judgement Day will come soon, and that all those whose names are not written in the Book of Life will suffer for eternity in the lake of fire, where Satan, the Beast and the false prophet have already been imprisoned. God is testing all of us, and to judge our faith and belief in Him.
reply
5 ups
I've heard stories he had a wife named "Mary magnilin." Not to be confused with the virgin mary.
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
9 year old actually
reply
4 ups
She was six when he 'married' her, actually.
reply
5 ups
It's really weird to me how this happens, people fleeing to the west to get away from extremist ideologies, but then refusing to condemn terrorist organizations, trying to implement Sharia law, etc. Talk about Stockholm syndrome, in the culture of my origin country we have a saying that roughly translates to "The wise man that gets burned by soup, starts to blow on ice cream" Meaning, something or someone f**ked you over? Be extra careful to avoid the danger, these are the types of people that after being burned will light themselves on fire. SMH
reply
11 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
that will get you a jihad on your ass
reply
[deleted]
3 ups
reply
3 ups
reply
[deleted]
8 ups, 2 replies
reply
5 ups
front page baby, front page
reply
4 ups
reply
10 ups, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
5 ups
;)
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
10 ups
reply
6 ups, 2 replies
that will earn you a fatwa
reply
[deleted]
9 ups
reply
3 ups
as long as i dont gat a Fatima I'm golden
reply
[deleted]
9 ups, 1 reply
Child marriages, including betrothal, has been a part of human culture throughout recorded history. Most had been arranged marriages. While the betrothal of a bride to a groom (more common than the betrothal of a boy to a bride) seemed to be at any age, it was usually held off until puberty. In the case of Mohammad, he married Aisha when she was only 6, but did not consummate the marriage until she was 9. Puberty at such an early age was uncommon at the time, but considering that some of the factors that promote it were there, including eating regularly and a possible genetic disposition for early puberty, due to short life expediencies of the era, make it possible for that to occur. I know of one of my nieces that hit puberty when she was 9.

I'm not saying this is right, but at the time, it was considered acceptable, just like slavery of ancient times was as common as slavery in colonial America.

According to halakha, the legal age of consent for Jewish girls fell between the ages of 3 and 12, although rabbis did urge to wait for puberty. The girls' fathers had to agree to such marriage.

Throughout India, arranged marriages have been common for centuries, often with the girl marrying before the age of five. During those years, the bride lived with her parents until her husband could claim her and consummate the marriage. This was done because of raiders that would attack villages and **pe any unmarried girl (who wouldn't be prone to a venereal disease) but if an 8 year old said that she was married, and could prove it, the thugs would basically leave her alone. I know, I found that one hard to believe, too. The habit is still practiced in out of the way places in the country.

Throughout the Christian dominated world, again, early marriages were common. Prior the Code of Canon Law of 1917, the marriageable age for a member of the church was 7. from then on, including a reconfirmation, the marriageable age was raised to 14 years old for girls and 16 years old for boys.

One of the reasons early marriages were so common and accepted was because it took a large family to work the farms back then. You had to start early, considering that most people died by the age of 40. Depending on the family circumstances, a child bride could marry a man twice her age, and they would still be considered minors by today's laws.

So were our ancestors sickos, or practical?
reply
6 ups, 2 replies
He was 53 when you she was 9. Please stop trying to justify pedophilia
reply
[deleted]
8 ups, 1 reply
Not justifying it. Putting it in perspective. Yes, Mohammad was an old fart, but the fact is that pedophilia has been practiced, openly and legally, for the entire of recorded history. Most child brides were close in age to their betrothed, but the rare instance where a full grown man would marry. King Richard II of England married 8 year old Isabel of France in 1396. I never hear anyone b**ching about that. Marchioness Barbara of Brandenburg-Ansbach was married at the age of 8, widowed by the age of 10, and remarried before her 11th birthday.

I'm pointing out that it was not solely done by members of the Muslim faith. In predates not only Islam, but also Christianity. It's even been practiced here in the US this century by those of the Christian faith, usually ministers.

Yes, it's time that we exterminate the child brides, but at what age would that be? I remember a girl in my class that was dropping out of school to get married when she was 14. It was fairly common when I was a boy for girls as young as 13 to get married because they had "gotten in trouble".

But to point to history to condemn pedophilia, one needs to look at the whole history.
reply
5 ups, 3 replies
So you think it was acceptable for a 53 year ld man to f**k a 9 year old because of muh context. You are sick. Get off my thread pervert
reply
[deleted]
8 ups, 4 replies
Sorry if I'm calling out your bigotry, but I'm not sorry for doing it. I have not once said that I'm for pedophilia, but I AM pointing out that it was a standard practice, even into the last century, and, I understand, still takes place in modern society. Mohammad is long dead and buried, but it wasn't his teachings that allowed the likes of Tony Alamo, the leader of a Christian cult, to marry an 8 year old girl. Or take Warren Jeffs. These "men" (notice the quote marks) have practiced pedophilia in the name of God at a time when it's not normal. These are the people that you should be angry about. The Catholic church's longstanding tolerance with pedophile priests are others that should be despised. Yes, child brides exist, even today, both here and abroad. You obviously feel the need to alert people about the problem, which is good, but you fail to blame all involved. The cases I'm citing are less than a decade old. It involves people of all walks of life and faith. Have you read about the Jehovah's Witness' sex scandals? They're more closed mouth about that than the Catholic church was. I don't know how it is here in the Americas, but Australia has had a problem with their young women being sent over seas as child brides. As I understand, to Islamic countries.

The problem is today, not hundreds of years ago when some old geezer was within the law to marry a kid and have sex with her. Your rant on that is off base because you ignore the real problem that is today and those that use religion to commit child molestation.

Or are you okay with that?
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
I am Skippopotamus. You posted a screencap from Swiggys-back. Try again.
reply
3 ups
Ok that was a genuine mix up. I with draw my comment
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
8 ups, 2 replies
Tell you again how human sacrifice and slavery were morally acceptable in the "good old days"? I'll do one better and tell you how there not only acceptable, but commanded in the Bible.

Human sacrifice in the Bible:

In the Bible, Judges 11:29-40 Jepthah is held up as especially holy for offering his daughter, his only child, as a burnt sacrifice to YHWH. Later in 1 Kings 13:1-2 and 2 Kings 23:20-25 we have YHWH's prophet Jereboam commanding King Josiah to commit ritual human sacrifice. This is in addition to multiple passages commanding the Isrealites to kill, then burn (sacrifice) anyone who offended YHWH or his priests.

Slavery in Christianity:

I'm not even going to go over all the Old Testament passages about slavery; from rules on how a man should sell his daughter as a sex slave, to commandments to take foreign women as sex slaves, to advice on how to hold a recently-freed slave's wife and children hostage until the freedman begs to remain a slave for life. I'm instead going to tell you to read Luke 12:47-48, where Jesus gives advice on how a master should beat his slaves; also 1 Timothy 6:1-2, where Paul clearly states that Christians are allowed to keep slaves, even other Christians as slaves.
reply
7 ups, 2 replies
Note that it is my personal belief that killing another human is morally wrong; except in the extreme to preserve one's own life, and even then as a last resort when all other options have been exhausted.

I further believe slavery for any reason, in all it's forms, even the "soft" forms like indentured servitude and "wage slavery" is morally repugnant and thus always and unambiguously morally wrong.
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 1 reply
reply
6 ups
When did I say pedophilia/pederasty is acceptable, now or ever? Please, show me a screencap. I'll wait for you.
reply
3 ups
Ok so what about marrying 9 year olds? What's your personal belief on that?
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
See what you're doing man?
You're saying Christians do it too.
Where I'm the bible or where did Jesus day it's ok to be a pedophile?
These priests or these other people are f*gs. Th as why we say they aren't true christians, because nowhere in God's words does it say this behavior is ok.
On the other hand in islam, the surahs and Mohammed say it's ok. So when Muslims kill infidels or **pe kids or animals it's because it is justified. They are in turn just being good muslims.
reply
[deleted]
5 ups, 1 reply
Sorry, Nat, but using the Bible in an argument with me doesn't work. You see, I don't believe that fairy tale book. I do believe that the current legal system, however, is picking off these pedophile preachers as quickly as it can.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Then to use missing the entire point, when you defend Islamic acts with Christian acts, because you don't know the context.
You're just another liberal who is inadvertently indoctrinating themselves into islam.
Just sad.
reply
[deleted]
5 ups, 1 reply
If you reread my comment, you'll notice that I also include the culture of India and their various faiths, both pre-Islam and post-Islam. I also point out that it is STILL occurring in Islamic and Asian countries.

I was more direct on the Christian pedophiles because, as an American, that information is more readily available. But, based on your defense of the Christian clergy that have actually been tried, convicted, and sentenced on acts of pedophilia, the message you're sending is that it's okay for pedophiles to molest children as long as they preach the Holy Bible and Christian faith.

THAT is just sad AND sick.
reply
4 ups
If you reread my comment you'll realize you're autistic.
I think priests or "christians" that commit such acts are despicable. I was clarifying, because you seem to be confused about my post, that they are not true Christians because no where im the bible does it condone pedophilia.
To where in the quran it does condone such acts. Where you got that I was saying it was ok because they preached the bible I don't know.
reply
[deleted]
7 ups, 3 replies
Name calling? You started it with by calling me a pedophile. If you bothered to read, you would have seen that I agree with you, but face it: what can you do about an event that occurred centuries ago where all the of the people involved are long dead? I'm suggesting that your complaint is current, and that you should stick with current events. As it is, you're just bringing in a TOS violation by targeting one particular group, and using a single incident that happened centuries ago. You realize, of course, that the practice still exists in many of the Islamic nations, although I don't have any documentation of brides under 13.

For a humor site, you're sure taking this seriously.
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
reply
[deleted]
7 ups, 1 reply
https://i.imgflip.com/1qg00e.jpg

I didn't expect it to go this direction, but OP decided to take the low road. Instead of sticking to the topic of the meme itself, he went ballistic because his belief system was challenged. If I were trolling, it would have been just too easy.
reply
1 up
yeah my belief system of pedphilia being a bad thing. Controversial for you I know but hey with liberal moral relativism anything goes right?
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
Considering ThereIsNoDoge has been reduced to hurling insults and accusations of pedophilia, any argument he may have once had seems to have fizzled out.
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
As i stated before; muslims consider Mohamed an ubermensch; the perfect embodiment of man and therefore should be emulated as much as possible. Therefore muslim men think it is acceptable to screw 9 year old girls in the present. I happen to think this absolutely morally wrong; you, it would seem, think otherwise, unless I have misread you. For me morality is not relative; what is morally wrong in the present is equally wrong in the past and for all time. Moral relativism is a very dark path to go down; it leads only to degeneracy and self destruction
reply
[deleted]
9 ups, 2 replies
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
And the winner of the comment war goes to... Forceful for making me lmao
[deleted]
5 ups
Lol. We aim to please. By the way, everyone got an up vote.
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
5 ups
It's cool. Don't let these leftists get you goat, no pun intended. They've allied with islam. The ones arguing with you are grown men who play with my little ponies and argue 1% vs 99% like it's the same. Stay red pulled my young friend. Nice meme and you've done well. Sember kekwmy brethren.
reply
1 up
Things are changing around here.
reply
4 ups
Do you see how the left has allied with islam? They don't even realize inadvertently they are indoctrinating themselves into islam.
reply
6 ups
You're starting to sound like a troll on your own meme, insulting people and accusing them of supporting pedophilia, when he did nothing of the sort.
reply
[deleted]
4 ups, 1 reply
Gack Need a long hot shower after that. Wd he take a contextualized view of fgm (female g*nital mutilation)? So the evil isn't nearly so evil if the culture is evil? I'm all for avoiding projecting the present onto the past etc. But how about canibalism? Burning a dead man's suck to death on his funersl pyre? Relativism sucks.
reply
[deleted]
5 ups, 1 reply
*wife* to death Why does this stupid phone keyboard insert stuff from other parts of the writing?!
reply
[deleted]
4 ups, 1 reply
I had to reread that several times. I did get a laugh from it.
reply
[deleted]
4 ups
Msybr if i had typed "Relativism wifes" at the end. lol
reply
6 ups, 3 replies
he/she just said that it was common during that time, I'm 99% sure some one form your bloodline married at a young age (less than 18) and he didnt said it was right it was just common during that time and no verse or rules were given by god to the prophet on the issuse
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
Just because something was highly practiced in the past (wasn't practiced by Christians), doesn't mean it was okay. A 50+ year old having sexual intercourse with a 9 year old is wrong, no matter what your culture or religion is.
reply
8 ups, 2 replies
In THAT culture, they considered it okay. WE don't consider it okay in our culture. If you lived 3,000 years ago in a culture that practiced human sacrifice, you probably wouldn't think human sacrifice was wrong, because it's what you're used to, and everyone around you would reinforce that belief. It's futile to try and superimpose your moral standards on ancient people. The same goes for child marriages, etc.
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
God's set of morals is what I adhere to, as much as possible. Human sacrifice, child [email protected], murder, adultery, theft, greed, etc is morally wrong based on those guidelines which God set forth. It doesn't matter what man thinks is okay or what he deems moral. It isn't up to us to decide.
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
Ummm yeah...except God demanded a human sacrifice. Judges 11:29-40
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
Maybe you should study the Bible a little better instead of google searching verses you can twist into something that suits your narrative.
reply
6 ups
Maybe you should the bible. It is FULL of God demanding sacrifices, killing babies, commanding genocide, ripping babies from the womb, killing non-believers, condoning slavery, saying women are inferior to men, etc etc. I was once a Christian but then I read the bible. As long as the topic here is "Morality" and the bible says incest is wrong then answer me one simple question. Who did Adam and Eve's kids mate with?
reply
2 ups
so just to be clear, cannibalism, slavery and child marriage are all morally relative? If you had a time machine and went back 3000 years you would be ok with eating and enslaving people, and marrying a child
reply
5 ups
Yes there was a verse and a rule given by allah. That'show he justified you fool!
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
keep my family out of it. There's a big difference between 18 and 9 and you know it. Get off my thread pervert
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
oh look some one is offended i wonder how that feels
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
who is?
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
you any way sorry for making you offended i only meant it so that you get an idea kinda like you once were or had slave
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
i'm not saying it is right today but it was common in the past
kinda like how women weren't treated as a person on the past but it was acceptable then
reply
4 ups
Just because it was common in the past it does not follow that it was morally ok either in the past, unless you're a moral relativist in which case i guess anything goes. Anyway that is actually irrelevent because the past is the past but nowadays muslims still adhere to the teachings of mohamed and emulate his deeds. So for them child marriage is perfectly acceptable. In the west it is not. With millions of muslims living in western countries this poses a problem. Western governments have been historivcally very weak when it comes to enforcing western laws on muslims. My meme highlights that just stating a fact about mohamed in a western country would most likely get you lynched and in islamic counties executed, whille child marriage in western countries under the guise of religious freedom is tolerated.
reply
[deleted]
5 ups
reply
[deleted]
5 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups
reply
7 ups, 2 replies
well no-one at the time, not even his greatest enemys, critisced the marrige because something like that was perfectly normal at the time. i'm not defending it (it's pretty gross by todays standarts), just saying that attacking it without context is completly unfair
reply
9 ups
he was 53 she was 9. How much context do you need?
reply
6 ups
It was normal, because Mohammed made it normal. He said "allah" told him.
Read the surah about her and try not to throw up.
Flip Settings
Jack Sparrow Being Chased memeRe-caption this meme
NSFW

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
ALL I SAID WAS; MOHAMED WAS A PEDOPHILE
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back
Feedback