Tasty Big-Mac, Hitler, Face You Make

...Sad thing is, we know they'll never stop. Decades later, they are still trying to destroy Reagan's legacy as well.

LOL!

he spits on the spaghetti already

Ah, the first eminem.
Sucks he died.

I once was served a Big Mac without any meat on it, I didn't call them Hitler, but I did let them know I didn't order Gandhi Style.

3 buns with no meat. haha!

(1) hitler breathed oxygen (2) you breath oxygen too, (3) you must be hitler

What is funny is that those that compare Trump or other right wingers or conservatives to Hitler are exactly the same ones that supported Hillary or Bernie who actually were Socialists or Statists.

PhalseProfit, while I agree with what you are attempting to say here, there is a difference between a socialist.statist and a fascist/nationalist.

In the strictest sense, Hitler is the personification of the extreme right-wing, while the personification of the extreme left-wing would be Josef Stalin.

Why do you think those two hated each other so much?

True. I have heard that the political spectrum isn't really a strait line of left vs right, but a circle. Both the left and the right take their own separate paths to a similar tragic end. I guess that's what makes the US constitution so brilliant, it restrains the power of government, and keeps a nation from reaching those ends.

You have to read the Anti-Federalist Papers too, and not only the Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalist were founding fathers too. If it weren't for the Anti-Federalist, there would have been no Bill of Rights.

It is interesting to read how these guys called out the problems they saw in the Constitution as it was written (and ultimately ratified), and how those exact problems are being realized today. At the time, their concerns were dismissed as "unlikely" and "paranoid". Some of these guys were even smarter than their contemporaries thought they were. I with they had been heeded more.

True ... True.

Yes, socialism IS left-wing. But the Nazis weren't technically socialists, any more than the Soviets were a "republic". Don't even get me started on any of the so-called "republics" or "democracies" in South America that had about as much in common with either of those things as a Orangutan has in common with a '55 Plymouth.

Just because someone calls themselves something, doesn't mean that's what they are. Particularly not if you are going to use the definition of words correctly.

The Nazis, were socialists, just not Marxists. but the problem seems to be that most people mix up the economic attributes with the authoritarian attributes.

You're right, but you're also wrong too. It's a condition I often find myself in. :)

Socialism, communism, and capitalism are examples of economic systems. With socialism, the state owns everything and doles it out to "each according to his need", or so the brochures claim (incidentally, this is why people often confuse socialism with a governmental form, because the state is so central to that system). In communism, everyone owns everything and everything is supposedly shared equally (ironically, every nation we think of as 'communist' isn't even close to being that). In capitalism, individuals own what they own, and distribute it (or not) according to their own will, and the market basically runs itself and is a bit more... organic.

Dictatorship, democracy, republic, and theocracy are governmental systems. They're not absolute either, meaning you can have hybrids. In dictatorship, one person (or body of people, aka 'republic') rules/owns/manages everything, usually including the people themselves. A democracy is rule by majority referendum, and will almost always evolve into it's own 'special' version of a dictatorship. A republic is a government comprised of a body of representatives, which can be selected any number of ways (In pre-Julian Rome, the Senate was essentially hereditary, though not officially). A theocracy is basically 'church=state', and can have elements of any of the others.

Nazi Germany was a pure dictatorship. South America is a great place to find examples too (when one candidate gets 98% of the "vote", chances are your "election" was a sham). The Soviet Union was also a dictatorship, but there were elements of a republic present (honestly, I'm not up on the relationship between the Premier and the rest of that government). England started out as a dictatorship, but evolved into more of a republic (the English Monarch is more of a novelty than a ruler at this point). The US started out as a democratically-elected republic, but it has taken on more and more elements of a direct democracy over time. The Middle East is lousy with Theocracies. Post-Constantine Rome, while remaining a dictatorship with republican elements also evolved into a kind of Theocracy.

Marxism was just one man's take on republic government and socialist economy (looks great in theory). Just as James Madison had his take on a democratically elected republic government with a capitalist economy.

I am going to start a you're like hitler meme trend on this page.

:)

Lol.

UN YOU VILL HAVE A NICE DAY!.. with prices like that it's no wonder people are skipping Mc Adolf's and going to Stalin King across town instead