part II (desc) | The argument necessarily assumes that if, as has been more than once the case, and is not unlikely to be so again, the colored race should become the the dominant power in the state legislature, and should enact a law in precisely similar terms, it would thereby relegate the white race to an inferior position. We imagine that the white race, at least, would not acquiesce in this assumption. The argument also assumes that social prejudices may be overcome by legislation and that equal rights cannot be secured for the negro except by an enforced commingling of the two races. | image tagged in gifs | made w/ Imgflip video-to-gif maker

part I (read desc) | We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiff’s argument to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not because of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it. | image tagged in gifs | made w/ Imgflip video-to-gif maker

me going to typhon while the militia and the imc are distracted so i can take a nibble of the fold ark: | image tagged in gifs | made w/ Imgflip video-to-gif maker