Socialist despise self sufficiency

It’s really disheartening to see that there are people walking on this planet that think this is a good idea.

Knowing they reproduce without restraint shows how destructive liberalism can be

Animals don't reproduce without restraint. There are always predators, and resources are limited.

Uh-huh. . .and where I live people stopped hunting deer for awhile because the idiots that be thought there was a risk of overhunting and driving deer into near extinction. . .there was a rise in predatory animals that treated the whole thing as an all you can eat buffet which included small game, traffic accidents, and cases of deer tick/lime disease with people.

Deer population goes up, then predator population goes up, then with more predators, they eat more deer so the deer population drops, then the predator population drops because there is less food. That's the cycle.

That's actually a good thing. Often the problem when hunting deer becomes limited is that there's a population explosion with the deer because there aren't predators, at least not large enough, to keep population numbers in check. Raccoons and bobcats don't always make for the most efficient in population control when it comes to a larger animal like deer. Even coyotes won't suffice.

With the elimination of wolves and cougars in the area long ago, well, you don't have to do the math because the results are right outside the window,,,

A simple DuckDuck go search explains what happens when hunting is limited

Search Assist

Deer populations can explode when hunting is reduced, leading to increased spread of diseases like chronic wasting disease (CWD). This disease is highly contagious among deer and can have severe impacts on their populations.

Wild boar populations have exploded in the U.S. due to a lack of natural predators and insufficient hunting regulations, leading to their rapid expansion across at least 35 states. They can carry and transmit 30 diseases and 37 parasites, posing significant threats to livestock, pets, and public health.

but.. yea.. you know resources are limited.. heh

You just proved my point. When the deer population goes up, so does that disease which kills more of them and brings the population back down

I wasn't aware of any hunting restrictions on feral hogs and I know they are very detrimental in places

do you not understand disease spreading through deer is not a safe population control method, hunting is the proper method of population control.

Actually it's not.

Hunting, that is, so called sports hunting - aims - quite literally, for the biggest bucks with the biggest racks. They don't go for smaller males, males with deformed antlers, or females. Since females are the ones directly reproducing, the more that there are, the more of them there will be.

Smaller males take up less room and might be less challenging to other males, so therefore after the hunting season not only is there proportionately more of them, more of them can fit in a given area.

More females and smaller males thus increase population density. This makes them more prone towards disease spread.

Larger males, being territorial take up more room, and drive others away. This helps to relieve environmental pressure. They also improve the general strength of the herd by passing on genes for larger & stronger males. So what happens with regular hunting by people is that you end up with runts that are less likely to be in prime physical condition.

Over time you end up with populations with an increase in deformities, more readily observable with their antlers, as well as increased susceptibility to disease. This is a phenomenon that's easily observable in a place like Britain where predators had been eliminated long ago, and sports hunting has produced such deer as a result.

Natural predators, of course, weed out the weaker and the smaller, improving the overall health and strength of the breed, reducing pressure on the habitat, as well as forcing deer and other prey to wander farther away in order to keep away from their predators, reducing habitat degradation even more.

There also has been a general decline in hunting, so while some killed, overpopulation tends to be an increasing problem, outcompeting smaller species of animals as well as not allowing for proper regeneration of their habitat as they basically eat small saplings and anything else they can consume, leaving what looks like a healthy forest, but one that is actually in general decline as it ages.

Unfortunately, libs do though

Reproduce without restraint? I thought the prevailing conservative talking point was that conservatives are having children but liberals aren't.

And it sure wasn't liberals bragging about having over a dozen kids because their church told them to, kids they can't even take care of and need their older kids to raise the younger ones.

So it’s more humane that they die of disease and starvation?

I hope they like out of control animal populations because this is how you get out of control animal populations!

Im gonga start CATFISHING even!

On the internet

Subsistence food hurts the feelings of the Elitist Globalists