Imgflip Logo Icon

If liberals weren't so full have hatred maybe they wouldn't shoot so many people. Oh yeah... and if they weren't insane.

If liberals weren't so full have hatred maybe they wouldn't shoot so many people.  Oh yeah... and if they weren't insane. | Why won't conservatives give up their guns? Because leftists won't stop shooting people. | image tagged in a brain is a terrible thing to waste,liberal brain atrophy,trump derangement syndrome | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
97 Comments
8 ups, 4w,
1 reply
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
3 ups, 4w,
1 reply
You're right. They prefer to shoot school children and college students. Republicans are next on the list.
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
I may have made a mistake at some point but I have tried to be careful to say leftist and not Democrat. There isn't much difference these days but not all leftists are Democrats.

So all you have to do is start with Columbine (and probably before) and look at every single school shooting. The shooter was a leftist.
0 ups, 3w
every single school shooter was a leftist, huh? Well you're certainly entitled to your opinions. This is America. We have freedom of speech. Just as long as you understand that nobody who studies these things would agree with you. You can't find a single academic or researcher who believes that every single school shooter was a leftist.
8 ups, 4w,
3 replies
I see the trolls are already distracting from the meme because it is spot on, the violent left is why we carry. The left is violent and unhinged; we are armed because we are not victims.
6 ups, 4w,
3 replies
I carry to put the fear of God into our government, protecting myself from trans shooters is a nice side benefit.
4 ups, 4w
I don't fear the current government, but things can change quickly.
0 ups, 4w,
2 replies
everything about this is based expect for adding trans. I mean sure it's good to defend yourself but why mention trans specifically when most mass shooters are cis?
3 ups, 4w,
2 replies
And what is the skin of a lot of these cis shooters like in Chicago?
0 ups, 3w
0 ups, 4w
Why are you making it about skin color?
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
When you remove gang violence per capita there's more trans shooters than others and the last few have been trans.
0 ups, 3w
Which ones?
5 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Either dead or in prison.
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
You don't seem to understand my question. I'm asking where are all the incidents of transgender people carrying out mass shootings?
2 ups, 3w
I never said mass shootings. Trans people are doing one offs, not mass shootings. Although mass shootings start a 4 people. It's not hard for a trans person to kill 3 extra people to earn the title of mass shooter.
5 ups, 4w,
1 reply
They hate the truth. They would much rather live in their fantasy world where conservatives are the cause of everything bad. The trouble with that is they vote and then they make everything suck for all of us, even them.
5 ups, 4w,
2 replies
Hurt people hurt people. The left has never had strong loving families or role models, and it shows.
6 ups, 4w,
2 replies
I think the most dysfunctional families are leftists. I do know of a few conservative families that are pretty dysfunctional but I think the majority are leftists. That's because leftists are anti-family in everything they do. The phrase "traditional family" is an insult to them.
4 ups, 4w,
1 reply
I agree, the only strong families I personally know of are church members. I know a lot of people in my community, interact with all types. There are huge differences not only in politics but action. The live to party types, tend to have out of control children and it cares into adult hood. Even the most successful of them seem to have at least one that falls into drugs. Drugs have taken a lot of the youth around here. To be fair, so has alcohol, I live in an area known for car crashes, usually they are stoned or drunk. Several of them have rolled onto my property. It can take 15-30 minutes before a first responder arrives; most don't make it. So far this year we have had 4 fatalities within 1/8 of mile from my home, the last one died in my driveway. She was on her way home and a drunk passed out crossed in front of her and killed her. She was lucky, never saw him, the one before her screamed for a long time before she finally died.

Locally we try and take care of our own. I know one older man that I have helped numerous times, he was a friend of my father. I have kept him out of jail, drove across town to haul him home, that kind of thing. Once he is with me all he talks about is how Trump ruined everything. As far as I know he has never worked, except for odd jobs, his only income is SS, one kid is in jail, another who knows, he left and never returned. His life's choices carried into adulthood and wreaked havoc on his own, still it was never his fault. In a way talking to him reminds me of CC and the other trolls, in their heads they are good people, in reality not so much.
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
If you don't think I'm a good person that doesn't matter because you don't know me. You've never talked to any of my friends or family who know me in real life. All you see is someone online who disagrees with you and that's enough to make you think I'm a bad person.

And I guarantee you know people from strong families who don't go to church, because going to church doesn't make you a good person and not going to church doesn't make you a bad person
3 ups, 4w,
1 reply
So in your head, you are a good person.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
And according to the people who actually know me
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Can other people see them?
0 ups, 3w
Cope harder
0 ups, 4w,
2 replies
So you're basing it on your feelings instead of facts

Conservatives often use the phrase "traditional families" as a dogwhistle to for their bigotry. Opposing bigotry is not the same as opposing families.
3 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Leftists *think* that "Conservatives often use the phrase "traditional families" as a dogwhistle to for their bigotry. Opposing bigotry is not the same as opposing families."

When will the left get over this code word nonsense. What are we supposed to do when we hear those code words? Seriously? What??

So if we actually did use "traditional families" as a "dog whistle" or code word are we supposed to grit our teeth and start hating gays extra hard? We don't hate gays. We just don't try to placate them or tell them they are part of an oppressed class. There is no oppression in this country.

We use the phrase "traditional family" to mean a father, mother and any number of children. That is it. It has nothing to do with gays. That's you guys who got your panties in a bind and made it about gays. We never said anything about gays. We just said that children are more well balanced when they are raised by a mother and a father. Science has proved that over and over but then leftists consistently deny science when it doesn't fit their agenda.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Dog whistle words exist for a reason, so people can say something that only a certain group is meant to understand the true meaning of.

Yes, many conservative people hate gay people. Maybe you do, maybe you don't. But you don't speak for all conservatives so atop pretending you do.

Yes oppression exists in this country. It may not be on the same level as in some other countries but it does exist.

The point about propping up a heterosexual couple excludes gay couples by definition, sometimes explicitly

And yes, research shows that kids raised by same sex couples turn out just fine.
0 ups, 3w
Actually I think he speaks for most of us, when compared to you who has a habit of assuming the worst about people. Just about every one of your posts drip with bitterness.
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Sounds like you are bigoted against conservatives and traditional families to me.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
You're free to think whatever you want. What did I say that was bigoted
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Well for starters... you just called my wife, 4 kids, 8 grandkids and 4 great grandkids a "dogwhistle to for their bigotry". I have no idea how you produced such twisted hatred in your mind. Did someone do something to you to make you hate so much?
0 ups, 3w
I didn't call your family any of those things
2 ups, 4w
The kind of damage KKKarl Marx's manifesto has caused.
4 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Except two people already showed the evidence.
1 up, 4w
No they didn't. They posted a chart with no sources or data.

Where's the data? What's the source for the chart?

I can make up a chart that says dwarves named Todd are 100% of mass shooters, does that make it true?
5 ups, 4w
I can hear imgflip.com/user/Shinobii watching a video of liberal gun violence right now 😂😂 points prove themselves
6 ups, 4w,
4 replies
5 ups, 4w,
2 replies
Asian men???? Wow. I didn't expect them to be so high on the mass shooting rates.
7 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Surprising. . .maybe Gun-Fu is a real thing?
3 ups, 4w
😂😂😂
6 ups, 4w,
1 reply
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Source?

Didn't think so
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Not when you remive gang related shootings
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Wha?
1 up, 3w
The chart is accurate when you remove gang related shootings.
1 up, 4w
"transgender individuals were responsible for less than 0.1% of mass shootings in the last 12 years"

factcheck.org
Show More Comments
NSFW
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • Glock
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    Why won't conservatives give up their guns? Because leftists won't stop shooting people.