Soros is getting his money's worth. Puppet Lefties just dance on that string. Predictable. PATHETIC.

Upvoted.

"B-B-But nothing is EVER wrong when leftist agitators breaking the law do it!" shriek the leftists blaming federal agents, when members of their collective are violating the law and directly -- and illegally -- interfering and sometimes attacking those very same federal agents.

Once again for the braindead -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8

Yes, classic Chris Rock and utterly true. But you see our leftists BELIEVE that the laws apply to everyone except to themselves and to any minority group that they are currently patronizing for future votes.

The videos proved he didn't assault the ICE agents or pull out his own weapon. You guys are knowingly lying about this. Yes, he had a gun, but he didn't pull it out. And if you're for the second amendment, you'd be perfectly fine with him having the gun considering that's fine as long as he didn't threaten anyone with it. And he didn't

LOL . . . all of the agents had their required body cams operating and so the answers -- rather than leftist political propaganda -- will be coming along in the future. But the fact remains that if he had either obeyed the agents to begin with or surrendered after he pushed things beyond that point, he would still be alive to go on about his daily business now. It's called . . . consequences -- something that for some reason seems to baffle the political Left's collective.

Carrying a loaded gun is one thing. . .carrying a gun plus a couple of extra clips is another.

assaulting an ICE agent whilst being armed is like poking a bear with a stick.

Alex Pretti, the Minneapolis protester, had a prior run-in with ICE just a WEEK earlier. He obstructed an immigration op, got tackled by agents (broke his rib), but they released him on the scene.

The same crowd screaming "police state" will ignore that he already assaulted officers once and walked.

BULSHIT! WATCH THE F**KING VIDEO! he was protecting a woman getting shoved around by the ICE agents, so they pepper-sprayed him, disarmed him (The gun was holstered the entire time) Shot him 10 times in the back, and started clapping. He never attacked them. You're a fascist, have a white day.

He didn’t pull out his gun it was taken from him while 5 guys pinned him to the ground and he was shot 10+ times

So why don’t you get the facts right you sissy liberal

You clearly haven't seen the video.

First off, he had a permit to carry the gun. You conservatives always complain when liberals support gun rights, but the second someone you don't agree with even touches a gun you start whining.

Second, he didn't pull out the gun, and he had no intention to. All he did was filming, and even if filming was illegal in this situation (it probably wasn't), it's no excuse to murder someone.

Third, the gun was taken away from him. Which already makes it impossible for him to be a threat, meaning there is not a single reason to shoot him.

Fourth, he wasn't a criminal, he wasn't a terrorist, he wasn't some kind of threat to the nation, he was a civilian. A nurse on top, a person whose job is to help people instead of harm them. And conservatives like you think it's ok to make fun of such a person, but instantly get mad when someone says something slightly negative about Charlie Kirk.

First off, he had a permit to carry the gun.

Irrelevant, it is not legal to carry a weapon to a protest. Especially when working for a group known to disrupt ICE operations

Second, he didn't pull out the gun, and he had no intention to. All he did was filming, and even if filming was illegal in this situation (it probably wasn't), it's no excuse to murder someone.

Irrelevant, and mostly opinion. You nor the officers know his motivation. Your opinion the shooting was murder is just your opinion. All LEO use of force will be investigated and if the shooting was not justified, they will be charged.

Third, the gun was taken away from him. Which already makes it impossible for him to be a threat, meaning there is not a single reason to shoot him.

Wrong, in a dog pile sight plays a role, when the weapon that should never have been there in the first place was removed and by whom will come out eventually. Who saw a weapon not in the hands of an officer and who screamed gun (the order to fire) also matters. The shooting was as predictable as the Good shooting, play stupid games in high stress areas at high stress times and you could get hurt.

Fourth, he wasn't a criminal, he wasn't a terrorist, he wasn't some kind of threat to the nation, he was a civilian. A nurse on top, a person whose job is to help people instead of harm them. And conservatives like you think it's ok to make fun of such a person but instantly get mad when someone says something slightly negative about Charlie Kirk.

The term for him is insurgent. He was a member of a known cell who job it was to obstruct, record and stop law enforcement agents from performing their duties. The left is not mad a protestor died, they are mad a trained agitator did. The country is better off without him.

100% agree on this comment

Thank you. I just call it like I see it.