Imgflip Logo Icon

Jane Fonda fesses up about why celebs really care

Jane Fonda fesses up about why celebs really care | Hanoi Jane Fonda fesses up about why celebs really oppose Deportation of Illegals. "If they're successful at deporting Illegals we won't be able to hire maids, butlers and gardeners for $5 an hour under the table." | image tagged in blank grey,mary jane | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
721 views 36 upvotes Made by Hardraker 3 weeks ago in politics
72 Comments
12 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Al Franken | (This Elite Scum actually said this) "My Limo isn't going to wash and wax itself" | image tagged in al franken | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
9 ups, 3w
uniparty rules
8 ups, 3w,
3 replies
Democrats never gave up on the idea of slavery.
6 ups, 3w,
1 reply
And between Andrew Jackson and Margret Sanger, no problem with trying to genocide whole groups either.
3 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Oh Modda, Modda, Modda. Why must you always find the negative. You know how I feel about slavery. I have told you hundreds of times but you want to dig up my family history and accuse me of it. Those ancestors died long before I was born. I don't even know them. I would like to meet them in the next life because they are family and I am pretty sure they understand just how evil slavery was by now.

It is real easy to look at the horrors of the past and condemn that but turn a complete blind eye to the horrors of the present. There are lots of people in this country who have convinced themselves there is absolutely nothing wrong with murdering a baby.

Just imagine how you would feel, minding your own business, thinking life is pretty good so far. And then some "doctor" starts by ripping you to pieces. But before you get shredded, you hear your mom, the one who is suppose to protect you mutter something about this is her body. And you're thinking wait!!!! I am in your body but I am not your body. Why do I have to die? You want to kill me just because I am an inconvenience? What kind of a sick monster are you?

So tell me again what is your opinion of abortion? At least I reject slavery in all its forms which includes socialism.
4 ups, 3w
Psst. We are in the 21st century now - not the antebellum era.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Republicans got Southern Democrats to "jump on board" with the new Labor Scheme initially.

You know. The alleged scheme that Karl Marx advised Charles Adams to inform Abraham Lincoln, was a great way to build 5 new Transcontinental Choo Choo Tracks. Expand the economy by exploiting Chinese, German, and Irish Labor, and then populate The West.

Civil War was more Cost Effective than Wilberforce's British example, that Marx had witnessed for freeing Slaves 3 decades prior. Going Cold Turkey with Slavery via War, may have seemed a better solution than to implement an apprenticeship program to ease out of it like the Brits and their stepchildren countries like Canada and Jamaica did.

Plus, nobody in the south were going to make a dime off New Railroads, and all the
"Railroad TITANS of Industry" were handpicked to only Donate in the foreseeable perpetuity to the new Political Party on the scene, what with making southern Dems focus on that pesky Reconstruction business and retraining camps.

Just remember that next time
that you watch a progeny Vanderbilt on CNN; Anderson "Pooper" sCooper.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Slavery-Abolition-Act
https://www.trains.com/trn/railroads/history/famous-tycoons-who-shaped-americas-railroad-industry/
2 ups, 3w,
2 replies
I didn't think Marx had any clout when Lincoln was president. But I don't know everything. That explains why Lincoln nearly destroyed the 10th amendment to end slavery.

But why would Marx care about ending slavery? He hated blacks, but then Marx hated everyone. Perhaps that's just his opinion on how to end slavery if you wanted to end slavery. He probably didn't care one way or the other.

That makes me wonder, did Lincoln oppose slavery just for political reasons and not for moral reasons. Because there's absolutely nothing moral about starting a war for any other reason than the preservation of liberty. Especially a civil war that pit family against family in some cases. Even in Lincoln's case because Jefferson Davis was Lincoln's cousin.

Sure the war wasn't fought, in part, over the transcontinental railroad? I know it was fought because rich people wanted to keep their slaves and that and other economic and governmental representation reasons lead the South to want to secede from the Union. Lincoln was obsessed with keeping the South from leaving.

I had no idea Marx had any involvement with the Civil War. I thought he was too busy, at that time, writing love poetry to Mephistopheles. Well I guess his Communist Manifesto had already been around several years before the war. I didn't think any one took anything Marx wrote seriously until after he died. I guess there has always been stupid gullible people, even in the mid 1800's.

Anyway, this is fascinating. I love learning new stuff. Thanks for this. Ill have to look into this and learn more.
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
All Good.
Just Recall that Jeff Davis was Secretary of War for Franklin Pierce, created and was in charge of the Topographical Corps of Engineers. Of which later Railroad Co. President Democrat George McLellan was placed in charge of Surveying two of the five Transcontinental connecting routes in the State of Washington, One N/S from San Diego to Tacoma/Seattle, the other E/W from Minneapolis to Tacoma/Seattle. Regardless, the Officers that were part of the Aztec Club of 1847, were predominantly involved as opposition to each other for the spoils of that war, as were immersed in the U.S. Civil War. Jeff Davis wanted the 2 southern routes of the 5 he had ordered surveyed completed first, as that would keep Atlanta as the main Trade Hub, and build it with Slave Labor. The middle route was completed by 1869. The other 4 that were all planned by subordinates of Jeff Davis, took a bit more time, yet were all Completed in U.S. Grant's lifetime.

The Free Soilers that became the Republican Party in Ohio, (Team of Rivals staunch Abolitionists, such as Salmon P. Chase, as well as Ohio Republicans Sherman's brothers, and Grant's father) and Northern Democrat Slave Owner Stephen Douglas and Lincoln maybe wanted Chicago to be the RR Hub instead of ATL, and got it done.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/iwma/documents/1864/lincoln-letter.htm

Maybe,
Marx didn't care so much about ending slavery, as he did providing labor for his constituents, and win/win at the same time work for his working men of Europe to Migrate for the work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_members_of_the_Aztec_Club_of_1847
121 members of this exclusive club, were Generals on both sides in the US Civil War
(the new "Sons of Cincinnati" of Revolutionary War)
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
https://history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/1851-1900/The-Credit-Mobilier-scandal/

Might what is happening today in Minnesota & California out of the Covid Lockdowns be the
Modern Version of Credit Mobilier, for the 4th Industrial Revolution of AI Tech in Silicon Valley, in comparison with the 3rd Industrial Revolution of Iron/Steel production and Railroad track/ties, Steam Engines and Freight-Cars manufacture? Maybe, maybe not. Curious though.
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Richest Man On Earth:

Is Elon Musk to the 4th Industrial Revolution, C4IR Frontiers in Innovation & Technology the modern day version of what Howqua was to the 3rd Industrial Revolution?

https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/celebrity/article/3175760/who-was-19th-century-merchant-howqua-chinese-bill-gates

Always, there seems to be a FORBES wanker hanging around Sino-Markets ;
Such as John Kerry, a FORBES, w/stepson Chris Heinz at Rosemont Seneca LLC, with BHR

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BHR_Partners
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Steyer Gent that hired John Kerry

"Full Time at Galvanize Climate Solutions Addressing the Energy Transition"-John Kerry 2025
Source:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Go1_ur2dedY
3 ups, 3w,
1 reply
I just copied and pasted all of your comments with the hyperlinks into a text file so I can start looking into all of this. I hope you don't mind that I did that.

Anyway, thanks. I got a lot of reading to do now (and a YouTube video to watch).
2 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Upvoted.
All good
It is satisfying to learn something new every day.
Possibly,
The U.S. Civil War to Baby Boomers that lived through JFK, RFK, MLK, the summer of Love, sex, drugs, rock n roll, The Beatles, 'Nam, Kent State and the Civil Rights Act all collectively feel a hippie connection to things and can be irrational and radical,

...as can't you understand how it FEELS to be them and CARE so much more than any other human to ever live. As such, if one says U.S. Civil War to most of them, they either hide, change the subject, or get agitated and scream IT WAS ALL ABOUT SLAVERY.
& They are correct. Whether they be descended from African Americans, Caucasians, Native Americans, Asians, or Hispanic and on and on. IT WAS ALL ABOUT SLAVERY.

Yet, maybe for more reasons and contributing variables than they've cared to consider,
and that's understandable, as it is heart-wrenching material to work through.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
I think it was mostly about slavery at least as far as the rich folks were concerned. The southern states were not getting the representation they thought they needed in Congress.

I think how Lincoln handled it was wrong. I don't know how we could have ended slavery without violating the 10th amendment. It had to end. I think it was on it's way out anyway. Automation replaced the need for slaves/farm workers. We should have abolished slavery at the founding and we almost did if it wasn't for South Carolina and Georgia. We needed to have a unanimous support with all 13 colonies because we were going up against the world's super power to get our independence. If we excluded any state they might have supported England.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Regarding what has been stated above;
Ironically, it was Georgia, the 13th established of the 13 colonies, originally was set up as
as the only SLAVE FREE Colony by James Oglethorpe. The roots of Methodism the Wesley Brothers Charles and John were with Southern Baptist hero Rev. George Whitefield
& THE GREAT AWAKENING each, and all have their origins in Savannah.
Maybe that could be the metaphor for the feather of Forest Gump at the park bench.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/12/treasury-tweet-slavery-compensate-slave-owners

https://www.britannica.com/biography/George-Whitefield
2 ups, 3w
I also originated in Georgia. I was born there but my family and I moved to Utah when I was a 1 year old. Then to So. Cal when I was 5 years old and that is where I grew up and lived most of my life.

I never knew that they were initially a slave free colony. I know they were a British penal colony at one time, just like Australia. I just know that Georgia fought to keep slaves at the founding.

The other thing that I kind of think is funny. For years the Georgia state flag had a blue field on the left with the seal of Georgia on it and on the right was the Confederate battle flag. Then leftists panicked over a piece of cloth and demanded that they change the flag. They did. The removed the Confederate battle flag and replaced it with the flag of the Confederate States of America. I just find it funny how ignorant people can be.
1 up, 3w
It took Great Britain 182 years to pay off the loans they took to free their slaves with Just Compensation for Property Loss to the Owners of said property.

What if Lincoln had taken out a loan instead and bought the slaves freedom as was the Precedence set ? What if Lincoln and his team had followed the Constitution at the time, and adhered to the 5th Amendment and it's eminent domain clause rather than just stealing the value of property from the owners, however vile that may seem today. Was the UK more Civil in keeping their peace through compensation in the progress of change?

Going to war for to be moral, for anything other than Liberty rings true in the US Civil War example, the Liberty of the Enslaved is Moral. Yet taking others legal property w/o just compensation for their loss is not moral. Nor is killing your neighbor a moral act.
There is that to consider as well.
The UK just recently got out of Slave Owner Compensation debt in 2015. 11 years ago.

The USA could have had it paid off by the year 2043 (1861AD + 182yrs = 2043CE)
Maybe less time, as the USA only had about 1/2 the number of Slaves as the UK.
This is an apples to apples comparison with the nation that BROUGHT THE SLAVE TRADE TO the America.

In particular North America, as well as SPAIN & Portugal bringing Many more humans in bondage to South America, Central America, as well as the Caribbean.

https://taxjustice.net/2020/06/09/slavery-compensation-uk-questions/
2 ups, 3w
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/iwma/documents/1864/lincoln-letter.htm
3 ups, 3w,
1 reply
It's just so odd how many DEMOCRATS just can't let go of their history of slavery. It's like that trying to relive it or something. Right?

"Imagine, just knowing that a couple of generations back somebody's family owned and abused other people because they were too lazy to do their own farm work?"

NO ONE PERSON AND NO GOVERNMENT HAS THE RIGHT TO OWN ANOTHER PERSON. THAT IS JUST PURE EVIL.

It is evil if one man claims to own another man. Even more evil is oligarchy who, by force, have claimed ownership of everyone living in under their rule. Socialism, fascism, nazism, communism, Marxism and any other form of collectivism first takes private property rights and that includes the right to your own life. You are OWNED by the government. There is no variation of collectivism that does not take private property rights. This is why there is no doing socialism right this time.

Slavery is slavery. It doesn't matter if it is a person or a government who does it.
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
"It's just so odd how many DEMOCRATS just can't let go of their history of slavery. It's like that trying to relive it or something. Right?"

It's your history.

Democrats in the North did not own slaves.

Is this something new to you?
3 ups, 3w,
2 replies
My history. No. I never was a Democrat. I did make the mistake of voting for Jimmy Carter but that was in the general election and I just turned 18 and I had no clue what a horrible president Carter would be.

Democrats own slaves in every state that allowed slavery. And for awhile that was all of the original 13 colonies. But at the time of the Civil War no one in the northern states owned slaves. It had been abolished in the northern states.

After slavery was abolished in the northern states some states, like Ohio, passed laws that made it a crime to be in Ohio while being black. Other states had similar laws.

And do not forget, the Republican party's entire reason for existing back then was to abolish slavery.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
It's a tad bit something of a wasteful (and embarrassing) expenditure of time for someone to make up wannabe partisan hack fabrications and bear false witness when they've literally heard first hand about what it was like to own slaves from their very own grandparents.

Democratic Party 1828. Googlé.

Jamestown 1607. Googlé.

Cristobal Colon. 1492. Googlé.
0 ups, 3w
Who is baring false witness to the bare bone here, Modda ?
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
...that entire reason,
and maybe the 3rd Industrial Revolution with 5 transcontinental Choo Choo Tracks to lay
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
That might have come after but the Republican party started from the abolitionist wing of the Whig party after the Whig party fell apart.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
What of the Free Soil Party of the State of Ohio Governor, Salmon P. Chase ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Soil_Party
0 ups, 3w
If I had ever heard of the Free Soil Party, I had completely forgotten about them. I didn't know/remember that they had also joined the Republican party.

I kind of think, although I am not sure, that the abolishment of slavery was more popular with the citizens of the United States then those who were in favor if keeping it. I think it has been that since the founding. I have nothing to base that opinion on, it is just a general feeling.
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
I hate to spring it to ya' Modda, you sound so convincing;

...yet, the NORTHERN DEMOCRAT CANDIDATE FOR POTUS in the 1860 election
actually, through his wife DID OWN SLAVES, and ironically suspiciously and mysteriously died the very day and eve of the first two offensive and unprovoked attacks by the Union upon the Confederates.

What a CO-INK-A-DINK
.....errr, coincidence.

Is this something new to you ? It's your history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_A._Douglas
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Fairfax_Court_House_(1861)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Philippi_(1861)
1 up, 3w
My history as a United Statian began in 1898.
So it looks like I missed the party.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Your Quote: DEMOCRATS IN THE NORTH DID NOT OWN SLAVES:

FACT: In March 1847, he (Stephen A. Douglas, later Northern Democrat Candidate for POTUS in 1860 vs. Honest Abe Lincoln, John Bell, and John C. Breckenridge) married Martha Martin, the 21-year-old daughter of wealthy Colonel Robert Martin of North Carolina. The year after their marriage, Martha's father died and bequeathed her a 2,500-acre cotton plantation with 100 slaves on the Pearl River in Lawrence County, Mississippi.
1 up, 3w
Ahh, North Carolina. I get it, Carolina North.
I've been touché'd/
3 ups, 3w,
2 replies
It's so odd Demorhhoids try to forget the Confederate Army was all Demorhhoids. And when they lost they created the Klan.
0 ups, 3w
& When the Republicans like Stanton schemed to give away U.S. Citizen legal property 400,000 acres they stole/conquered/eminent domain clause w/o compensation like the work of a Tyrant.
POTUS Lincoln signed it, and Sherman started carrying it out.
.
Then, when Grant accepted unconditional surrender at Appomattox; those "Confederate Demorhhoids" all became full countrymen again, yet some of them already had their estate property confiscated prior to the terms of surrender, which allowed them to legally keep their real estate,
so there was that to deal with....
...when former slave owner VP Andrew Johnson (Democrat) became President #17, Special Field Order 15 disappeared, and he was impeached over it, ...unsuccessfully.

https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/shermans-field-order-no-15/
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
No, it wasn't, in fact there were zero, repeat, zero, Democrats in the Confederacy States.

Confederates were, however, all Southerners in the South where, coincidentally, the Confederacy was located. Because math.

Hope this clarifies things.
1 up, 3w,
2 replies
BS, the demonrat party formed in 1828 and was the bulk of the confederacy.
0 ups, 3w
Can anyone, Northerners or Southerners, actually be surprised that uneducated, ignorant dipwads that had their property taken, and watch their neighbors have their legal property taken, might do something stupid and galvanize together to form a silly clown club such as The Klan ?

Reconstruction took 12 years, yet Abolitionist, and former Ohio Governor Salmon P. Chase as
Chief Justice of SCOTUS oversaw both the impeachment of Johnson, and Reconstruction.
He had run against Lincoln in the 1864 Republican Campaign for POTUS, mind you. Confederates in the aftermath of the War, likely loved and trusted Salmon P. Chase, right?

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Reconstruction-Acts
1 up, 3w
The Democrat Party was the majority party in the entirety in the United States of America. That includes the North. The Union North. Even during the Civil War.

Because math is a thing.

And so is history.
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Maybe it only seems odd to some people,
because maybe those Southerners have a lot more than just slavery to let go of in their history,
in order for Northerners to be satisfied that these basketful of deplorables have gotten re-education by their camp enough. Or, was that the goal of Reconstruction ?

So odd how Northerners valued life so much as to go to War with their neighbors rather than be Civil,

...while at the same time commandeering all 5 Transcontinental railroad contracts and steel production to support such an industrial endeavor; and use Howqua financing and his supplied Labor to accomplish the tasks.

https://taxjustice.net/2020/06/09/slavery-compensation-uk-questions/
0 ups, 3w
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-slavery-lawmakers/

Ironic, how a UK news service Reuters, frames the title and story this way with this:

{Few are willing to talk about their ties to America's “original sin”}

America's Original Sin? Is this REALLY the origin story UK's own Reuters goes with?
Good thing they'd have one believe that Slave Owning only originated in 1776 in North America, Jamaica, Caribbean Sugar Plantations, Canada Jamestown etc. etc.
God love James Oglethorpe and
Selina nee' Shirley Hastings, Countess of Huntingdon. That is some 'Amazing Grace' Song.
Isn't John Newton as appropriate as any for the POSTER CHILD of America's "Original Sin" as Reuters coins it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Newton

The hubris is remarkable, as it ought be humbling.
God Love Wilberforce, yet not John Brown tactics, as he lie 'muldering in the grave.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Oglethorpe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selina_Hastings,_Countess_of_Huntingdon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Legge,_2nd_Earl_of_Dartmouth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Wilberforce
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
My statement was misleading if seen out of context.

"Some" was actually a reference to one, a particular one, who as can be seen, was trying to establish a narrative that slavery was a Democratic Party thing. The irony, as referred to in later comments, was that he was originally from Georgia and has stated multiple times over the years that on his mother's side of the family was not just one but two sets of grandparents that came from slave owning families.

Despite this personal history, he has persisted over the years in trying to blame me and my family for slavery despite having no involvement with it. He did this because of some assumption he made about me and party affiliation and that I never ever had. Ever..

I cleared this up a couple of months ago in a comment I was actually going to delete but did not get around to it in time then later forgot. Those like him invest so much time in their favorite false narratives and bogus assumptions that I figure the least thing I could do is play along.
0 ups, 3w
Another bogus narrative he likes to weave in is that of the gallant effort by the Republican Party to free the slaves from the Democrats. As we all know that was not the case, it was just about Lincoln trying to hold territory and subjugate those who don't break away. Freeing the slaves later was secondary, the main purpose of that was to break the South economically and keep them thus dependent on and tethered to the North in perpetuity, preventing it from trying to break away.

Did the same thing in my mother's (the one he called a slave owner) home, Puerto Rico, in which the US quickly dismantled its main economy and source of revenue, the sugarcane industry. Granted, most people were pretty poor there (second only to Haiti in the Americas in poverty), but by breaking its economic engine, they would have no revenue to stand on their own and thus would be also perpetually dependent by the United States.

To this day, the US heavily subsidizes growing sugarcane in Florida, using massive amounts of fertilizer and water to accelerate growth as quickly as possible over two seasons,, when basically all you got to do in Puerto Rico is plant the canes and wait a few months till harvest time in the same year. But that would be too easy and logical. Same with oranges and a whole bunch of other tropical goods Florida is known for which grow with ease in Puerto Rico. We'd rather get bananas from Central and South America than Puerto Rico itself.
7 ups, 3w,
1 reply
2025 John Kerry, Galvanize Climate Solutions... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt2Vi-Cm1ig
Tom Steyer ...reporter Ezra calls Kerry "Old King Coal, you're a coal man now."
1 up, 3w
Hanoi Jane before aerobics! That is classic.

And she's been making the rounds lately too, looking for some sort of relevance when she was near forgotten
6 ups, 3w,
1 reply
When you hear the demonrat elite bragging about providing jobs to illegals your brain should translate it automatically to they steal jobs from citizens to support criminals and enrich themselves.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
The so-called family farm would cease to exist overnight without illegal aliens doing the work while the family farmers spend their time not on Xbox at Walmart taking selfies to post on Walmart Culture pages on Facebook. Yep, that's culture all right, country style.
3 ups, 3w,
1 reply
You never worked on a farm did you? I grew up on one. Back then nobody hired illegals. That came with Nixon after China bribed him to pass "Free Trade" scams.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
No, that came with the Immigration Act of 1924, which severely restricted Chinese immigration to the US, adding to a situation started by the Chinese Exclusion act of 1882...

Coupled with the Mexican Revolution, and, well, you already did the math,,,
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Like I said, I grew up farming. There were no illegals here in the 70s when we grew corn, beans, Lettuce, etc. Nor in the 80s either.
What city did you grow up in?
There were no illegals here until 1999. In 98 Don Blankenship got the genius idea he'd import illegals from Lexinton to work in coal mines for $8 an hour. He didn't want to pay people from Ky & WV $16 to do that.
He rented school busses from the BOE and bought FEMA trailers and had them installed at a mine in Pike County. He got safety trainers to Fudge the paperwork claiming they had required safety training.
The 1st accident caused when the Mexicans weren't fluent in English led to a huge strike. He gave his illegals 24 hours to get off his property and leave his FEMA trailers.
They wound up working in restaurants all over the tri County area. Many got construction jobs working as contractors on a federal government flood proofing project.
My old neighborhood became a Barrio, which wasn't bad as they were good neighbors and I had friends among them who watched over my elderly grandmother. But eventually all but 2 moved back to Mexico. They sent their earnings home and bought homes and businesses. Garages. Convenience stores, etc.
Let me guess. You've never seen an illegal either, let alone worked on a farm?
0 ups, 3w
No illegals til the 1970s? Are you talking about Europe?
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 2
  • Black background
  • Blank grey
  • FB_IMG_1769224189760.jpg
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    Hanoi Jane Fonda fesses up about why celebs really oppose Deportation of Illegals. "If they're successful at deporting Illegals we won't be able to hire maids, butlers and gardeners for $5 an hour under the table."