right?

That might explain why she behaved the way she did when ICE asked her to step out of the vehicle

they also told her to drive off. Which should she have done?

And then... can you point to the law that allows a federal agent to fire into a moving vehicle when the driver has failed to obey a verbal order?

So what, she pointed a deadly weapon at him and pulled the trigger. You’re mad she missed and angry he didn’t.

Away from him, how did she hit him then?

Well that’s all on video from multiple angles. Never seen a side swipe? She assumes he will get out of the way or get run over. She assumed wrong. She was being arrested and tried to flee. She didn’t care if he got out of the way. Your logic says that protesters can be run over if they don’t get out of the way. Ok, let’s do it.

By logic you mean settled case law at the Supreme court- which specifically applies to federal law enforcement officers; if they step in front of a car they can't use moment of threat.

But have you seen the frame where he's clearly standing unharmed as the mini-van drives past him and he is holding his gun? Because he fired 2 shots through the open window.

How does one do that if they've been run over by a car anyway?

He didn’t step in front, he was already there. She wasn’t moving. She decided to gas it just like the criminals in Portland. All got shot. Stupid games, stupid prizes.

The car shows a Shot through the front window. How did he do that from the side? Oh yeah he was in front of her.

Pffft, if I point a gun at you it doesn’t matter what you say. She directed deadly force and paid the consequences. Babbit directed no deadly force.

Normal has nothing to do with it. What deadly force did she threaten? You cheered a cop murdering an unarmed woman who was no apparent threat, but now you want to change your narrative.

You are wasting your time with the trolls; all of their excuses and justifications are stupid. None of democrats would have protested had the officer been murdered. They will always pick the evil side; it is who and what they are.

True but rebuttal must be posted for those that would otherwise only see one side of the argument.

Not true, no one that matters bothers to read much less believe their crap. They wouldn't need alts to agree with themselves if they used facts, evidence or made use of actual points over debunked talking points. They troll us we do not troll them.

Blah blah blah

There it is. The stupid radical left refusing to listen to the other side because they think that because we think differently, we are wrong. If you hate the US, GET OUT!

The trolls can't do that, we don't read their memes, so they come to ours. They troll us, we do not troll them.