Tim Walz fraud

Yea Im sure they did. You Democrats would defend Satan himself, if it was to oppose anything Trump does.

If you don't believe it, then try it out for yourself. Go to a daycare with a bunch of cameras and ask to have access to random children and see what happens. You think they'll let you in?

Republicans don't see him as Satan himself
C'mon now

More like Christ

Yeah it's kind of true that some people look at Trump as the new God or Messiah
If anything, Trump is trying to bring back what Ronald Reagan used to have back in the '80s. That's his main goal of plan
For some of you younger imgflip users take a history lesson trip, go and watch everything that happened from 1984 until Reagan's last day in office
Go and ask somebody what was it like when Ronald Reagan was president and take notes record it videotape it
You will see that life was good back under Reagan's administration ( I should know because I grew up under that administration ) yet times were a little tough through the whole whole Oliver North ordeal. The Contra that happened the explosion of the space shuttle Challenger

If I had to relive the '80s again I would want to have it with Reagan being president. He made life a lot easier for a lot of people in more ways than one, but yet the ones I didn't realize it were just too blind to see it

No, Trump is not trying to bring back what Reagan used to back in the '80s, other than copping a slogan, that is.

And yeah, life was great on the Reagan if you enjoyed massive growth in homelessness as well as the Crack Epidemic courtesy of the biggest cocaine dealer in all of history. He got the Ayatollah Khomeini to hold the hostages till his inauguration, and he gave Osama bin Laden funding to start what became Al Qaeda.

10.5% unemployment, double digit inflation, and the first time we cracked a trillion dollars in debt.

As much as it pains me to say I was just a wee lad during the early to mid 80s

No, under US constitutional law, President Trump did not do anything illegal in capturing Maduro. Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution designates the president as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, granting broad authority to direct military operations in defense of national interests, including limited strikes to apprehend indicted individuals abroad, as established by historical precedents such as the 1989 capture of Manuel Noriega and the 2011 raid on Osama bin Laden. The operation, based on existing US federal indictments against Maduro for narco-terrorism and drug trafficking, falls within this executive purview without requiring a formal congressional declaration of war for such a targeted action.

I don’t see how Maduro was being a threat to national security if anything Trumps more of a threat

Who says it’s illegal? Russia is the only one I’ve heard. Well you and Russia.

The Nuremberg trials of 1945

The Nuremberg trials? Uh…those were trials how did they make it was illegal?