The HORROR of those countries forced to live under serious Islamic Sharia law!

Why not? And where do we draw the line? If somebody makes fun of Scientology, should they be punished?

I forgot Scientology was a religion 😭

Also basically any (major) religion

In Pakistan, there were some men doing some road work, and their boss asked a woman he saw nearby if she could bring them some water. So she went and got some water, went up to them and offered it. She was arrested for insulting Islam because she was a Christian and she looked at those man's faces as she spoke to them. She was sentenced to death for this. Sentenced to death. For disrespecting Islam. Because she gave these thirsty men water. After she was asked to. Sentence to death. Death.

If there really is any sort of omnipotent God, and if he is so weak and delicate that he can't take a woman looking at men to their face because she is not related to them and she's of a different religion, then that God should not be a God, because he is not a God. Cry babies are not Gods.

There was a big outcry about this, so I don't know if that sentence was carried out, and I really don't want to know because I don't want to find out that she got killed. Maybe they executed her and apologized post mortem just like the Prime Minister apologized to that woman who was sentenced to get raped by the men in her village because her 15 year old brother was raped by men but he was too young to execute for getting himself raped, so they punished her instead by gang rape. But after an international outcry, she got an apology. An apology. For getting raped. Because her young brother got raped.

Of the three or four men that raped him? They got 10 lashings and a scolding to not rape boys again because it is not nice. Rape. Rape.

How is it possible to disrespect a religion when it calls to the for the most heinous violations of innocent people, for the sins of others, no less?

Islam is full of contradictions like that.

Pretty much all religions are.

The genocide of the Rohingya in Myanmar began during a Buddhist procession. There was a whole bunch of people marching down the street celebrating whatever holiday, and then some Buddhist monks pointed at the Rohingya and said, go get them, and the crowd just waged riot on them for absolutely no reason and just started killing them. And it expanded from there. But it was Buddhist monks that started it. Buddhist monks don't hurt anybody. Except Rohingya.

Yep, just about all religions are like that. The only one I've found that isn't is biblical Christianity and those churches are so rare you'll probably never see one.

Biblical Christianity is a corruption of Judaism. It's very existence is a contradiction, and a very deliberate one at that, its very foundation.

Mmm no. It's clearly the fulfillment. Several hundred prophecies were fulfilled as well as predicting Several events in the new testament (no stone will stand on another).

No, the Jewish Messiah is for Jews.

God's law is God's law. It's not limited to the Top 9/10

Read the verses again, It's all there including a mention of Moses @John 7:19

Yeah no. You missed the prophecy like the capstone will be rejected and become the cornerstone, and other prophecies that clearly say the jews will reject the messiah in the old testament, and why not? At the time they rejected most of the prophets, only after their prophecies came true did they venerate them.
You need to do more studying.

Hate to break it to you, but quite a lot of people were killed after not being too well liked in Judea either. That's not fulfillment of prophecy, that's just not winning any local popularity contests.

No matter which way you look at it, Jesus did not do a single messianic thing. Not a one. He did not drive out the Romans, he did not usher in an era of peace and prosperity. He didn't even become king. Heck, the Romans drove out the Jews, and God didn't do squat except switch sides, according to Christians. Not much in the God department there. Taps out and joins the enemy.

This is why Muhammad did not opt to become either Jewish or Christian. He saw Christianity as a corruption of Judaism, and he saw Judaism a hard religion to try to encourage people to join as their God allowed his people to be vanquished and scattered without lifting a finger to help. So he opted instead to rewrite Judaism.

Sorry no. He specifically predicted that "no stone would stand on another" and in 100AD the romans destroyed the temple and ordered "no stone would stand on another" and they proceeded to literally remove any stone that was standing on another.
Pontius pilate literally called him king of the Jews and put a sign up saying "king of the jews" on his cross.
God was keeping his covenant. He originally said when the jews become unfaithful and stopped obeying his commands that they would be driven out and killed, and when they started following his commands again he'd gather them back up. It helps if you read the Bible and become familiar with it.

The temple that was destroyed in 70 AD, is that the one Jesus rebuilt in three days?

No stone would stand on another, yet the Wailing Wall does.

Also the 'prophecy;' was written decades after the event occurred. With no proof that Jesus or anybody else predicted it, that basically nils that.

And he still didn't do anything Messianic.

2,000 years, and the Jews are still waiting for this someone that they never heard of when he was supposedly alive to do something Messianic.

He rebuilt it when he defeated death. The temple is in our hearts and souls where the holy spirit dwells. He performed a ridiculous number of miracles and quite literally change history. We literally owe our moral system to the spread of Christianity. That's plenty messianic, even if you don't believe he was divine.

1. He did not repel the occupying enemy
2. He did not then reign over an era of peace and prosperity over Judea.

He pulled some fish out of hat, walked on water, and told his cousin to get up because he didn't walk all that way to attend his wedding just to find out that he went and died on him before Jesus arrived.

He couldn't even predict that an anti-christ named Saul would hijack the religion and reconfigure it to suit the agenda of Rome.

We owe our moral system to an anti-christ who changed his name to Paul and stole the Church from Jesus's own Apostles. From jesus's own brother. The so-called Church is the Beast, headquartered in Rome. As prophesized.

Now, if Jesus was to return, bend space-time, and go back to the first third of the First Century and pushed Rome out of Judea and free the Judeans and rule over them, then, yes, he will be another one of their messiahs and forgotten like most of the rest.

1. He defeated the occupying enemy. Rome literally became a Christian nation under Constantine.
2. When the Christians ruled Judea there was unprecedented peace.

His miracles were way more than that. Dude was dead and buried and Jesus called him out of his grave.

You fail to know the Bible. Jesus literally spoke to Saul and asked why he persecuted him. Saul converted to Christianity calling Jesus the Chris and Messiah, something a traditional Israelite would never do.

Jesus ruled over most of the world through the early church before the whole Mary thing corrupted it.

Jesus didn't defeat anything, except maybe some growling stomachs on the day he decided to pull some manna out of a hat.

Rome was an anti-christ. Constantine was an anti-christ. The Council of Nicea was an anti-christ. Saul/Paul was an anti-christ. The Church was/is an antichrist. They are a corruption of the Word.

Christians never ruled Judea.
No one has ever claimed anything even remotely like that.

Jesus did not speak to Saul. Jesus was already dead. Jesus did not tell Saul to go bump off Peter and Jesus's own brother James and the rest of the Apostles because Saul killed so many of his followers that Jesus just wimped out and gave in.

Jesus was never a messiah.

Jesus couldn't even rule over Judea, let alone the world. He couldn't even rule his own number two guy, his petros that he was going to build his church on.

"God? I don't know him, never heard of him"

Cock-a-doodle-doo

Classic.

Lol. That just tells me you don't know history or the Bible. Please read up on both.

What prophecies were fulfilled? He didn't fulfill a single one, not even the messiah bit of being a messiah.

Then there were his parting words to them about his return before their generation came to pass. Now it is possible that his apostles are hiding out in Jerusalem somewhere, but that would mean that their rather gruesome deaths never happened, and guys that are over 2,000 years old waiting for Jesus to return to vanquish Rome from Judea? Well that's one gig he's a little late for.

You don't seem to understand. The law was for the messiah to be born and save all nations. The law he's talking about is the 10 commandments, not the extended law that Moses laid out for the Israelites. He fulfilled the law by dying as a replacement for each of us. People that are truly saved have the law etched on their hearts. They desire to do right, rather than being forced by punishment.

As to your misinterpretation of that prophecy go back and read the parallel passages in the king James. It talks about him coming back in a certain generation in the future after certain events happening. The key is looking at the questions they asked him: when will this happen (the no stones on each other), your return, and the end of the world. They thought these happened all at the same time. This is why a literal translation is important.

How would you define both "disrespecting" and "religion", exactly, and what would be the penalties for "disrespecting" religion? Sounds a bit autocratic to me. 🤔💀 I think I prefer things the way they are: don't go out of your way to hate on people's beliefs, don't stir up violence or prejudice against anyone based on their beliefs or ethnic origin, but you're free to criticize and critique their beliefs without fear of retribution.

Idk like…. Jail?

Jail for doing what, though? And for how long? And how does that jail time help improve society?

If you make a meme about Trump dressed as the Pope you can go to jail? Or write an article textually analysing a sacred text from a skeptical point of view and pointing out inconsistencies or logical fallacies, which might offend some devout believers?

Seems like a very dangerous slope to start sliding down... Not the kind of thing you'd expect in a liberal secular democracy. Who gets to decide what constitutes "disrespect"?