Imgflip Logo Icon

Facts

Facts | IF YOU WANT TO FIND OUT IF RACISM IS STILL ALIVE IN THE UNITED STATES... SIMPLY BE OF BROWN COLOR AND TELL A LIBERAL YOU'RE A MAGA SUPPORTER. | image tagged in miss maga | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
668 views 52 upvotes Made by LetsGo_Elect_Brandon_JR 6 days ago in politics
Miss MAGA memeCaption this Meme
110 Comments
12 ups, 6d,
3 replies
Yep . . . leftists get very racist real fast in that case.
9 ups, 6d,
3 replies
Now that I think about it. Slavery is also a hive mind/collective like socialism/communism. Why? Because every slave owner considered the people they enslaved equal to or less than farm animals.
7 ups, 6d
Yes.
1 up, 6d,
4 replies
They did? Many times slaves were considered a part of the household, treated like family, included in the will (as beneficiaries) and even at times emancipated upon death of the master of the house.

The slavery you're talking about is large-scale slavery on plantations (much more rare), which . . . come to think about it was pretty much the same as the industrial factories of that era.
5 ups, 5d
You're referring to indentured servants which is a much different situation than a slave.
2 ups, 4d,
1 reply
"They did? Many times slaves were considered a part of the household, treated like family, included in the will (as beneficiaries) and even at times emancipated upon death of the master of the house."

See? Even with slavery, democrats attempt to pit the 'house' slaves against the 'field' slaves, because the left and the democrat party can't exist without the fuel that hatred creates.
0 ups, 4d
Are you calling me a democrat?
1 up, 5d
In Roman times
5 ups, 5d,
1 reply
So you're saying they got treated as property instead of people.... Via rape.
1 up, 5d,
2 replies
No, that's not what I'm saying. That's why I didn't say that. If I was saying that, I would have said that.

I'm talking about chattel slavery, not some BDSM kink ritual.

I would copypaste myself so you can see what I said, but then I'd be chancing getting a timer like I did in June for a mocking myself. Mocking myself.
4 ups, 5d
You used rape twice... And everyone else is supposed to think you're not talking about rape? That's uncanny
4 ups, 5d,
1 reply
Wait what? You can get timers for mocking yourself? Well there goes my self deprecation plans for the night. Thanks for the heads up! 🙂
1 up, 5d
I can.

You won't get them for mocking yourself. You can't even get them from mocking somebody else.
4 ups, 6d
go back to posting stuff about women in skimpy clothes, modda
6 ups, 6d,
3 replies
Remember this-

7 ups, 6d,
1 reply
Yes . . . but remember that nothing is EVER racist when the Political Left does it. Apparently that's a Constitutional amendment or something.
9 ups, 6d,
1 reply
I'd like to go back to a time when people were identified by their country of origin or the country they immigrated to. A person born and raised in Ethiopia would be called Ethiopian no matter where they travelled to. However if the person moved to the US and gained legal citizenship then that person would have been called an American and so. Skin color wasn't much of a thing among 'polite/civilized culture'. It was the racists/race baiters that fretted over that kind of thing.

And sudden epiphany - we might have been moving back to that and finally dismissing the foolishness of skin color in recent times(maybe the past 100 years or at least post MLK Jr) because people began to embrace their heritage more than their skin color. However the racists and race baiters came up with new terms(at least in the US) like African American, Chinese American, and even something like British American. While it doesn't look like it, those terms still put a focus on skin color because of the unconscious/coconscious thought of which skin color is dominate in those areas.
7 ups, 6d,
1 reply
remember when Biden said "If you vote for Trump, you ain't black!"
5 ups, 5d,
1 reply
A White Nationalist isn't a White Supremacist. White Supremacists believe White people are a superior race. What nationalists happen to love their country and also be white. Those two aren't the same thing no matter what the liberal media says.
2 ups, 5d,
1 reply
That's an interesting take. Let's compare!

Nazis: Nationalists, also white, participated in the eradication of Jews after Hitler kicked the Jewish bankers out of the country and made their own currency. Made Jews wear special identification such that those people could be treated unfairly. Was a Socialist Party. Refused to work side by side with Jewish people. Wouldn't purchase goods or services from businesses that hired or were ran by Jews.

Modern White Nationalists in the USA: nationalists, also white, haven't eradicated or participated in any kind of eradication of other Ethnicities. Haven't kicked any bankers out. Haven't made their own currency. Haven't forced people to wear any kinds of identifying items such that other Ethnicities would be treated unfairly. Work side by side with people of all sorts of ethnicities. Purchase products and goods that are built or sold by Corporations that hire diverse ethnicities. Have diverse political party affiliations.

So you've got two likenesses & and a lot of things that are not like between the two groups.

With only thinking that White & Nationalist means racist... That makes you, the racist.
0 ups, 5d,
1 reply
That's an interesting response. Let's counter!

My original point was that while it is definitionally true that white nationalists are people that love their country (albeit fanatically) and that they 'happen to be white', the same is true of Nazis.
They love their country, (albeit fanatically), and are also white!

But the problem isn't that the followers of these two ideologies are white, or that they love their country; the problem is what makes up the vast rest of their ideologies.

They are promoters of hatred, of race-war, of not only an oppressive, overbearing state, but also of capitalism; of suppression of free speech and liberty, of military aggression, of permanent anger, and of anti-intellectualism.

White nationalism (or black nationalism, or any other kind of nationalism that is based on 'race') is a despicable anti-worker and inhuman force that has no place in a good future. It WILL be crushed, because it MUST be crushed.

As for your blatant misinformation regarding Nazis; they were not a 'socialist party'. They rejected class conflict and internationalism, two core tenets of socialism; they viewed socialism as a Jewish conspiracy and they murdered and oppressed socialists. They only called themselves the 'Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei' because they wanted to sway workers to their cause, not because they stood for socialist principles.
To turn the Nazis into socialists, you have to do some serious historical erasure and denialism, and that takes you down a dangerous path, my friend.
1 up, 5d,
1 reply
Lmao. Do a Google search on the Nazi party. National Socialist German Workers Party. Literally was a socialist movement - where Hitler pandered to folks that felt disenfranchised by the Jewish Banking & majority Jewish Business model that kept Germans from finding employment.
0 ups, 4d,
2 replies
Wow. I come back with such a strong counter-argument that all you can say is, "Lmao, just Google it, bro."

I have done innumerable searches on the Nazi party - 'know thy enemy' if you will.
All you can say to counter the historical facts that I presented to you is to say 'it literally was a socialist movement', and then all you can say to back up this vague claim is the fact that it was called the National SOCIALIST German WORKERS Party. This means absolutely nothing, and is completely irrelevant in the face of overwhelming evidence that proves that Nazism was state capitalism, not socialism.

As I have said before, there is nothing socialist about Nazism in practice. In messaging, and branding, sure. That was part of the plan; the Communist Party was climbing in support rapidly as more and more Germans realised that the bourgeoisie was screwing them over, so the Nazis adopted the name 'socialist' in order to appeal to these Germans.
Note that before Hitler became the Nazi leader they were simply called the 'German Workers Party'.

They didn't feel 'disenfranchised by the Jewish Banking and majority Jewish Business model', they felt let down and betrayed by the democratic government who signed the surrender to the Entente at the end of the First World War. But for Hitler and the Nazis it wasn't enough for the people to hate democracy, so they gave the German people a new enemy, a new group of people to blame: Jews, and communists too.
Of course, this was all ridiculous, as they didn't pin the blame on where it deserved to be pinned - the capitalist class - they just blamed powerless minorities towards which there were already feelings of distrust.

This makes them decidedly non-socialist.
1 up, 4d
Do you not know anything about the Banking system that existed in Germany before the Nazi Party took over? They even literally rebranded the Government banks.

Exploitation of private banks
The Nazi regime forced financial institutions to buy government bonds, effectively transferring their capital and private deposits to the state.

They promoted public-sector banks and discriminated against private, joint-stock banks, which they disparaged with antisemitic rhetoric.

For a time, the government used a shadow currency system of promissory notes called "Mefo bills" to secretly finance massive spending on rearmament. Financial institutions were obliged to accept these bills, which allowed for their ultimate plans of eradication of Jews & invasion of Poland & other European nations.

This process worked so well - that they encouraged and guided Austria to do the same thing.
0 ups, 4d
For some reason, @LetsGo_Elect_Brandon_JR, I can't reply to your comment below this one.
So I'll respond to it here.

If you are correct, and the Nazi regime forced private financial firms to purchase government bonds, or they 'promoted public-sector banks', that doesn't make their ideology socialist, in any way shape or form. That's just state capitalism, which is completely and totally different to socialism.
Your point just doesn't stand up.
1 up, 4d,
1 reply
"And I suppose Nazis just happen to love their country and are also white?"

I'm not going to comment on the general them of these exchanges, but I want to comment and mention that whatever "logic' or "thought process" was used to come up with that statement, needs to be re-evaluated on an incredibly urgent basis. Yep, just my $0.02 worth.
0 ups, 4d
You don't engage in good faith debate; and regardless, this isn't your debate to join in whenever you feel like it. If you'd read the rest of my comments, you would understand the point I was trying to make.
1 up, 4d
There you go again, cheesy.

Hint: extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence... or at least some evidence, or at least a lie presented as evidence.

Or at least a name. Who are you talking about? Is it Miller? If so, that's patently absurd and hilarious on its face. So, I took the easy route and just googled "is Stephen Miller a white nationalist?"

On the first page there was nothing but leftist propaganda from 3rd rate media outlets that I doubt even you have heard of. Apparently, they can just decide that someone is a white nationalist based on their feelings. It then gets reported by other leftist propaganda that there are credible reports of Miller being a white nationalist. And so it goes, on and on, with the sheeple believing the lies they're told. That's how propaganda works.

And the bad news for the lying media and the left in general is whether they like it or not, Trump has done a lot of good for the average American. Hell, even gas prices have come down here in my neighborhood in Taxifornia, in spite of the spike in state gas taxes that took place on 7/1/25.

Oh, and he's a peacemaker, not a war monger like Bribe'em, Hillary, neo-Cons, etc., etc.

Here's one article my search revealed, which is amazingly even handed in its reporting, despite coming out the ass-end of the MSN 'news' pipeline:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/general/tiffany-cross-calls-it-an-actual-fact-stephen-miller-is-a-white-supremacist-during-wild-cnn-panel/ar-AA1LfrJE

I didn't watch the video, but apparently one of the panelists believes that the rest of the country should believe Miller is what you say, just because she thinks so, which makes it an "actual fact".

There's a fine example of Leftard logic, which is not logical at all.
2 ups, 5d,
3 replies
Like conservatives said about Obama?
5 ups, 5d,
1 reply
I didn't see a bunch of conservatives saying anything about Obama other than he wasn't actually a natural born citizen. And that he violated the Constitution by forcing people to purchase a product under penalty of government fines.
1 up, 5d,
3 replies
Many conservatives compared him to a monkey and said other racist things about him
4 ups, 5d,
1 reply
Define "Many" because I doubt it was more than 1 percent of Conservatives. KKK supporters only account for about 10,000 people. Proud Boys only make up about 7,000 people. Compare that to conservatives that voted Trump in 2024. 72 Million votes - which 1 percent of is 720,000 people. So roughly 3.5 percent of 1 percent of voters for Trump could even fall into that category of racist.

the term Many doesn't apply when you do the math. In reality, it would be much applicable to say hardly any conservatives are racists.

So, no a bunch of racists did not compare him to a monkey & said other racist things, but hardly any did when you consider the numbers.

Conservatives aren't racists. Racists - aren't conservatives. Racists are racists - conservatives are conservatives.

White & Racist does not equal Conservative. Just like Black & Racist doesn't equal a BLM Supporter.

Are hardly any BLM Supporters racist? Yes. Does that mean all BLM Supporters are racist? No.

Call out a racist for what they are - racist.
3 ups, 5d,
1 reply
This is the exact reason why I'm tired of people thinking that anything right-wing is far-right, because for some reason, they think conservatives are klansmen, neo-nazis, neo-confederates and white supremacists. Right-wing does not equal far-right.
1 up, 5d
Exactly
1 up, 4d
"Many" is not a legitimate metric for this. Why, cheesy? Because it's about as close to being totally imprecise as possible.

But hey, that's how the left communicates (well, lies and propagandizes)

Fortunately, it seems that "many" (should be some, but I couldn't resist!) on the left are waking up to this being done to them. Here in MAGA, we have known all about it since 2015. Sure, I'm disappointed that it took me as long to figure it out as it did, and some dems so long to connect the dots. But as long as we all arrive at the truth, eventually, that's all that matters.
0 ups, 5d,
1 reply
He tosses out an artificial figure of 1% then proceeds to apply it to Conservatives, Right Wingers, Republicans, Trump voters, Trumpers... as if it was an actual accurate figure instead of one he made up to minimize to the maximum what got them a big surge in the first place. As if being racist reactionaries angered by Obama getting elected wasn't THE cause of the birth of the Alt Right.
1 up, 4d,
1 reply
Alt right (or as y'all like to call them: neo nazis, skinheads, etc...etc...) existed long before Obama and long before Obama they've been disavowed by the right.
What actually happened in the last election is hardcore leftists voted Kamala and the other 2/3rds looked at what the dems served up (an un primaried, person that claimed a race she was not, lied about things, stole ideas, and failed to answer questions in the one interview that she didn't get them ahead of time) and voted for Trump.
I predict the sane democrats will try to get rid of super delegates and force contenders to win the favor of the people to run as president and maybe just maybe you'll have someone that can compete with Vance.
0 ups, 4d,
1 reply
That's the Far Right.

The birth of the Alt Right can literally be traced to two comments posted on Twitter upon Obama's inauguration (I believe it was, as opposed to his election).

1/3 of registered voters voted for Trump.

1/3 of registered voters voted for Kamala.

1/3 of registered voters did not vote at all.

Outside of the MAGA base, the rest of the 1/3 that voted for Trump in 2024 voted for him simply because of the high prices of groceries and other goods.

Trump's declining poll numbers would include those people.
Interestingly, the numbers that support him now are just about equal to the numbers that had supported him in his first term, basically being his MAGA base.
0 ups, 3d,
2 replies
The left likes to redefine words. Far right, alt right. Same people: extremists that do not hold the same views as the majority of conservatives.
Many democrats voted Trump along with minorities and others that normally vote left. His approval numbers still beat the left by a large margin.
Dem approval ratings are 33% to 40%, Trumps approval ratings are 39% to 45%
0 ups, 3d,
1 reply
The term "Alt Right" was invented by a Far Right Winger.

Trump won by a mere 1.5%. if Kamala had entered the race a few months sooner, she would have beaten him handily. Another debate or two, and we would have never heard from him again. He'd be gone quicker than anyone could say "Biden"
0 ups, 2d
You might be right about "alt right" but I'd need to see sources.

Personally I think people on the left were most pissed off that they didn't get to vote in a primary and a lot of the people that usually swing it (poll workers, vote harvesters, people that campaign, etc...etc...) simply chose to sit this one out.

Which is why I'm wondering why Trump isn't cleaning up the voting by doing DoJ investigations into how the voting system is vulnerable and starting lawsuits to force states to protecting voter integrity. Even if Vance has Trumps blessing for 2028 he's not gonna get enough votes to overcome the dem machine. Trump barely had enough with bad competition.
0 ups, 2d
I might be right. Yeah, sure, whatever you say. As long as you give me permission to be, yes?

I'm always right, at least what I post is. Not because I know all the facts, but because I only post facts that I know. It makes it easier that way, rather than just tossing out some whatever assertion to fit whatever narrative without having whatever basic knowledge of it to begin with, I just post what actually is factual and therefore cut out all that middle man fussing back and forth ping pong nonsense.

I don't have to prove anything because it's already been proven as a given simply by typing it. It's really great too, people I know think I'm a know it all, I kid you not. Me. A know it all. And you know why? Because I only talk about things that I know are factual. I leave the fluff out for everybody else to waste their time on and get busted from being incorrect. And it's no big secret, I tell this to people and advise had to do the same. They don't listen of course, ego boosting is more important than simply stating the truth to them. My ego cannot be boosted, so I skip that and just stick to facts.

Anyways, the claim is yours to prove, not mine:

"lokiare

Alt right (or as y'all like to call them: neo nazis, skinheads, etc...etc...) existed long before Obama and long before Obama they've been disavowed by the right."

Kamala got in the race with just 100 days left to go. 100. And she came that close.
People voted against her or just sat this one out because of inflation. The economy is basically the deciding factor when it comes to elections.
1 up, 4d
Here's where some objectivity could come in handy, cheesy.

Yes, there were plenty of racially charged cartoons, memes, etc., about Obama that any objective person should find offensive. As I've always said about Obama, why hate him because of the color of his skin (which doesn't matter in the slightest) when there are literally hundreds of actual good, high quality reasons related to his politics, to hate him?

So let's compare what was done to Obama to what was and is being done to Trump. Because if it's wrong to treat Obama that way, and it was, why isn't it wrong to compare Trump to Hitler, or nazis? Because Trump is no more a nazi or comparable to Hitler in any legitimate, provable way, than the claims made about Obama. Those making such claims have zero knowledge of what Hitler and the nazis were truly about.

So, now is where it gets complicated for the left, because two wrongs don't make a right. Right? Right? Just because idiots who don't have a clue what Hitler was about, like to compare Trump to him, does not retroactively legitimize the racist bullshit said about Obama.

So for every parent who has told their kid(s) that two wrongs don't make a right, how can they explain the gerrymandering going right now here in Taxifornia with prop 50?

The ads are incredible! They say Trump hates Taxifornia, that he'll take away womens' rights, and say voting for prop 50 will ":stick it to Trump". Were I still a dem-leaning middle of the road type, I would feel absolutely insulted that the politicians I ostensibly support, would just flat out lie to my face like that.

I guess here in Taxifornia, the libtards learned nothing from the way a few dumbass conservatives treated Obama.
1 up, 5d,
3 replies
Also, the term is hurled at all Trumpers, not a select group.
4 ups, 5d,
1 reply
You're thinking of the term MAGGATS. That was tossed around to everyone. Liberals like to use Uncle Tom & Trumpanzee on people of color that support MAGA.
1 up, 5d
No, I'm not. You are.
You do not speak for me.

No, they do not.
You're confusing them with the young Republicans who just got busted the other day with their illustrious chat.
2 ups, 5d,
1 reply
0 ups, 5d,
1 reply
"I asked AI to say something for me and it did"

Yeah, sure, ok, you got GroX to repeat your bogus assertion. That's nifty.
1 up, 5d
I asked "is Trumpanzee a racial slur?" & That's what it gave me. Soooooo
2 ups, 5d,
1 reply
While I can agree that when used at a White Person, it is not racist ... The item you're replying was specially spelling out a Black MAGA Supporter. So when you say the term is Hitler at all Trumpers, that's not accurate.

In context - we are specifically referring to Black People that Support Trump, being called Trumpanzee.
0 ups, 5d,
1 reply
No. It is not.

It's referring to Trumpers as being trained circus whatever.
You've heard of "sheeple"? Like that, only more raucous.
1 up, 5d
If the audience isn't black - sure. But to every black individual in MAGA - it's a racist slur. Also that was a typo, I don't know why aimed got autocorrected to Hitler... But Hitler is supposed to say aimed.
3 ups, 5d
Wait... Joking? As in "not serious"? As in - "In Jest"?

I make tons of Battered Wife, Pedo, Cult Death, Sexist, Racist, perverted & otherwise offensive jokes. It's called Dark Humor. There's even a Meme Stream on this site specifically for Dark Humor.

Does that mean I beat my wife, or that I'm a pedo, or that I'm going to start a death cult, that I'm racist, perverted or otherwise going to do offensive things? No. No it does not.
Show More Comments
Miss MAGA memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
IF YOU WANT TO FIND OUT IF RACISM IS STILL ALIVE IN THE UNITED STATES... SIMPLY BE OF BROWN COLOR AND TELL A LIBERAL YOU'RE A MAGA SUPPORTER.