Or Smoothie King. Or Charcoal Pellets (Kingsford). Lebron James will have to hand back his crown... Gonna have to cancel Martin Luther King Day. No more King Crab legs at Red Lobster. If British Knights shoes are still a thing - ban those, as they work for a King. Budweiser is going to have to be cancelled as they are the King of Beers. No more King or California King size beds. We need to rebrand Midas Auto work centers - they are named after a king.

They protest agaist UK

“We dropped the whole ‘no kings’ theme of the protest so as to not upset the monarchy” is so unbelievably funny

7 million protesters against Trump.

Democrats are desperately flooding social media with claims that a gazillion people attended the no kings rallies. They have shamelessly used old photos of crowds to promote their lies.

I believe your right wing source are projecting Trumps desperate attempts to perceive his inauguration day as the "greatest in history" vs the No Kings rallies actually being the largest national protests in modern history.

Senator Markwayne Mullin was on Fox News on Saturday with host Kayleigh McEnany to discuss the “No Kings” protest and its ties to Communist Party USA.

“First, I want to talk about this so-called ‘No Kings’ protest. Your team exposed this, and you found a poster, apparently, they are touting the communists?” McEnany asked.

“If you look at their sponsorship of the ‘No Kings’ rally, it says CP USA, which is the Communist Party of the United States of America,” Mullin explained.

Senator Mullin explained that the “No Kings” protest is anti-American because of its ties to communism and its hatred for President Trump.

Let me break it to you gently, Fox news runs fake news segments designed to make Trump happy.
And, apparently, his most cultish supporters.

Man, I wish we had a time machine so we can bring them back in time to actual history so they all could learn. Yet again, libs would just ruin it for everyone.

Go back to school

What's the matter? Running out of quips and fact checks

No, if you think about it the Founding fathers were very radical liberals of their time

They were neither liberals or conservatives. They were revolutionaries that dreamt of a better nation. They've accomplished more than either you or I ever will.

Who knows maybe you and I will do something. Can’t decide it all right now

You can't be a liberal (or conservative) when neither party existed. They were simply men & women that wanted freedom from an overstepping Monarchy.

They are the only No Kings protest this country ever needed.

So liberal.. which is the idea of changing and going against status quo

Which would apply if the liberals in the United States were protesting when their party won. You know the form of Government that elected Joe Biden... If they are against the form of Government, they would have done so then.

When they are only protesting because a Republican won the Presidency, they have selective outrage about the form of Government, which means they aren't against the status quo (the form of Government)...they are just mad they lost.

They aren’t protesting cause he’s republican just on his policies and actions as president a kid could see that….

Ok so agree republicans destroyed the capitol cause they were mad they lost

His actions: deporting Criminal Illegal Migrants, reducing government spending when the government has got us 30 Trillion + in debt, increasing Tariffs to bring revenue to the Government, removing Boys from Girls spaces...reducing taxes for just about every citizen that has a job, eliminated taxes on Tips & Social Security, ended multiple wars by brokering peace???

Sooooooo tyrannical. Imagine being such a Tyrant that you remove people who don't belong here, give people back more of their paychecks, reduce how much spending you do, broker peace & keep men out of women's sports and bathrooms and locker rooms. What kind of horrible dictator monster does that?!????

I'll agree that some people at J6 were there because they were mad the Conservative ticket lost, because that's too mathematically probable to not be a real thing.

But the majority of people there were there because of election oddities that never got their day in court because Liberal Judges refused to accept the lawsuits that were filed... When some of the judges said they didn't hear the case because there would be violence in the streets. They were intimidated by the destruction of cities during George Floyd protests by BLM & AntiFa agitators. That's why most of those people were there & their frustrations were warranted as forensic audits years later showed enough problems that would have changed the outcome of the election.

Honestly though what is wrong with them-

a2sttg.jpg (click to show)

We don't need one but with President Trumps success rate he would make an excellent King.

True that!

Trump does acts of a KING not that he is a king

Let me ask you this why do republicans get so mad at a protest of 7 million when their protest of only a couple thousand resulted in a riot and a death

For starters 7 million is a lie. A lot of people showing crowds are posting videos from 2017 where the numbers were much larger at a separate event. Secondly - Republicans aren't mad, they are laughing at the folks that are brainwashed into protesting something that doesn't exist.

Wow - first person to call a protest & a riot - a protest and a riot. You get 100 bonus points for not calling J6 an insurrection.

No the numbers where from this weekends protests

No they weren't lol. Even if it was... 70 million people voted for Kamala Harris, only 10 percent showed up to protest a fake king. Which means according to the 19 percent approval rating was only half of the supporters still left on the Democrat side.

7 million people the 3rd largest protest in American History. I’m not saying it wasn’t 2 percent of this country. But when you have 7 million people protesting about something you did or are doing, they’ve probably got a reason other then you’re a “fake” king

50% would mean that there is a considerable issue. 2% or 7 million, is almost nothing.

You don’t even have 7 million dollars let alone ever met 7 million people

Yeah.. their reason is they are sore losers. Name me one anti Biden protest that was held during his term. You can't, because the only protest happened before his term.

Why? Because conservatives aren't sore losers.

Then again - the numbers... 70 million some odd votes for Kamala Harris. Since the election, approval rating has went down to less than 20 percent, but we will call it 20 percent for the sake of argument. 20 percent of 70 million is 14 million.

So of the 20 percent who still approve of the Democrats, only half of them showed up to protest No Kings.

That means that 90 percent of the people who voted for Kamala Harris couldn't give two craps about the No Kings protest. And that's assuming 7 million is proper reporting.

You have to consider - the folks claiming 7 million are also the folks that said COVID Jabs would stop the virus & not allow you to catch it or pass it on. They were the ones underreporting the wide open border and numbers of illegal crossings. They were the ones who said the 2020 election was the most secure and accurate election ever despite many inconsistencies. They are the ones who said Joe Biden was sharp as a tack & mentally fine.

So pardon me if I don't believe their accuracy in reporting of 7 million. Also - most of the protests were bussed in & people bussed out at precisely at the exact time agreed to. Everybody got back on busses & bounced. All to protest something that doesn't exist.

It would be akin to a "No flying spaghetti monsters" protest.

So Jan 6th wasn’t a loser last grasp to win? Burning and destroying the capitol? Raiding and rioting?

Buddy you’ve clearly never played a game cause the people who jump you after losing the football match are the biggest losers of all.

Maybe the reason there were no protest is because 1. Democrats can get organized and not destroy stuff

2. Biden didn’t anything worth protesting about

1. Democrats surely showed that they don't destroy stuff when they organized & protested against a Black career criminal getting killed during a police arrest, right?
1a. Democrats surely showed that they don't destroy stuff when they set fires to the Tesla Dealerships because Elon sided with Trump right?
1b. Democrats surely showed that they don't destroy stuff when they rioted in Los Angeles over ICE Raids right?
1c. Democrats surely showed that they don't destroy stuff when Milo Yiannopoulos was scheduled to be a Berkeley in 2017 right?

2. Biden did plenty worth protesting about - mental gaffs, keeping the border open for illegal migrants, pushing billions in Aid to Ukraine where actual Nazis live, a history of falling down, a history of shaking hands with ghosts, being corraled in by the Easter Bunny, and a History of wandering off or dozing off during events. All of those things were worth protesting over -- as it was clear he shouldn't be in Office.

Rather than go out and make a big deal out of it though - Conservatives simply made jokes about it & let the Democrats destroy their chances of winning the 2024 election by lying about Old Man Joe. Why? Because Conservatives aren't sore losers. conservatives protested during the last moments of Trump's presidency & then packed it all in and went home when their efforts were for naught. They didn't organize a bunch of Anti Biden protests - because Biden was doing the work for them.

All I heard was

Fake… fake…. Fake…. Conspiracy

Are you a bot?

No but you might be if you think recorded facts are "fake fake fake" LMAO

This shit peaceful

https://www.reddit.com/r/CringeTikToks/comments/1oasyyt/this_is_actual_footage_from_jan_6th_it_was_not/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button?

Considering there were nearly 300 plain clothes feds stirring up the crowd, Nancy Pelosi refused to have support from Trump for the National Guard, & Investigative audits have shown that there WERE election Shenanigans... I would say that was a lot more peaceful than it could have been.

If we had a King, we wouldn't have a Government shutdown. If we had a King, we wouldn't have a "No Kings" protest. If we had a King, we wouldn't offer illegal criminal migrants the option to self deport. If we had a King, we wouldn't have had a free and fair election where Trump was elected as President. If we had a King, we wouldn't be looking for a budget to be passed by Representatives from both sides of the political spectrum. If we had a King, we wouldn't have Congressional Districts. If we had a King, we wouldn't have a Constitution that guarantees folks the right to Free Speech to have a "No Kings" protest, BLM Marches, Charlie Kirk memorials, & media outlets that can report on whatever they choose to.

But sure - go ahead and deem Trump your King, peasant.

The funny thing is they are crowning Trump their king by saying "No Kings" in the first place. I know nobody on the right considers him a king, nor wants him as a literal king, but they are making him a king with these protests lol

The irony is hilarious.

Exactly

Actually, we have a government shutdown because Trump refuses to let the Republican party engage in negotiations- an important part of the democratic process.

So.... yeah. He is trying hard to be a king.

Those kinds act independently from Trump. They all voted Yes to the budget C.R. only needed 7 Democrats to say yes. 53 R yesses - every other vote was a No, every other vote a Democrat.

So the shutdown isn't on Republicans. It's on Democrats demanding items that have been cut to be put back in. Things like LGBTQ items in foreign countries for example.

You can think it's Trump & Republicans all you want, it doesn't make it any more true than Trump being a King.

1) you've already admitted that you will excuse Trump from any lawbreaking, anything, because you support him. So... anything you propose or support is going to ring hollow. 'Cause it is.

2) they could have done a continuing resolution bill, which only requires a simple majority in both houses, and we wouldn't be in this situation. But that's not what Trump wanted them to do. And, when the Democrats and Republicans met in the Oval Office, Trump litereally said "Go F**k Yourself." when the Dems presented what they wanted.

So... we are, in fact, literally here because of your boy and his "art of the deal".

Nope. We are here because the Dems demanded things for foreign countries and illegal migrants. Democrats sold out every Democrat citizen to protect the interests of foreign countries and criminals. There's nothing you can say to change that fact.

See? you believe his lies and don't demand things like facts and evidence or critically think about them at all.

But let's pretend that Trump & Vance aren't lying about what the Democrats started their negotiations with. Trump & Vance are lying, but let's pretend that they're not.

They could have passed a simple continuing resolution to keep things running because that requires a simple majority.

A thing they didn't need the Democrats to do.

AND THEN proceed to negotiate with the Democrats on what should be included in the bill.

Instead, they pushed a bill out of the House KNOWING it was going to get hung up in the Senate because the Democrats wouldn't support it.

We're here because your boy wants the government shut down.

Republicans only have 53 total members on that vote. 60 is needed to pass a resolution.

53 yes votes all from Republicans - Democrats all voted no when only 7 needed to vote Yes.

Speaking of let's pretend, you're in imagination land right now thinking Republicans can pass a resolution without 7 Democrats LMAO

I'm glad you understand that the path the Republicans chose to follow was one that would require them to negotiate with the Democrats.

The part you stop at is the realization that they refused to negotiate with the Democrats.

Again, they could have gone with a simple continuing resolution that only requires a simple majority, but they didn't do that. They went with a resolution that requires 60 votes, which they don't have.

Which means to get to 60 they have to negotiate with Democrats to get the votes. Then promptly refused to negotiate and shut the government down.

Yes because funding to foreign countries & various LGBTQ items outside of the country & reduction of spending is what the country voted for. They are representing the will of the popular and electoral vote & of all the swing states results that the country asked for

Oh, giving money to foreign countries is upsetting? Would you say it's a deal breaker? LIke, if a politician did give money to a foreign country you would stop supporting them? Maybe even demand that someone primary them and remove them from the office?

Whistlelock Said: "Oh, giving money to foreign countries is upsetting? Would you say it's a deal breaker? LIke, if a politician did give money to a foreign country you would stop supporting them? Maybe even demand that someone primary them and remove them from the office?"

I'm referencing what the people voted for, not my personal opinion about Tax dollars going to foreign countries. I personally don't care that $$ goes to less fortunate countries

You can post that to his previous comment.