For all the Leftists who still think they can lie on the internet and not be fact checked

Yep, Donald Trump also kept offering Nancy Pelosi the National Guard BEFORE Jan 6th and she kept turning him down because she WANTED an example of the Right practicing civil disobedience. One of her guys murdering Ashli Babbit was just the leftist icing on the cake for her.

National guard? For what?
....was it a "guided tour" or wasn't it?
😂

It was expected to be a very large crowd, its standard procedure to have national guard assist in situations like that.

"It was expected to be a very large crowd"

Who expected that and why?

Source?

Bro, catch up. This was years ago.

What's wrong? You scared to post something about this that might accidentally disprove your ridiculous claim from years ago that the people at J6th actually weren't trump supporters? 😂

Setting aside the fact that the House Speaker has no authority over the D.C.N.G., that same large crowd was expected at the day's political rally on the Ellipse -and yet the guy with sole control of the D.C.N.G. also didn't call them in.

Reply to Pelosi's lie...

"Ma’am, it is long past time to be honest with the American people. On January 3, I requested National Guard assistance, but your Sergeant at Arms denied it. Under federal law (2 U.S.C. §1970), I was prohibited from calling them in without specific approval. That same day, Carol Corbin at the Pentagon offered National Guard support, but I was forced to decline because I lacked the legal authority.

On January 6, while the Capitol was under attack and despite my repeated calls, your Sergeant at Arms again denied my urgent requests for over 70 agonizing minutes, “running it up the chain” for your approval.

When I needed assistance, it was denied. Yet when it suited you, you ordered fencing topped with concertina wire and surrounded the Capitol with thousands of armed National Guard troops."

Then there people like Ray Epps, Roger Stone, and Micky Flynn.

What did Roger Stone supposedly do?

Stirred the pot with the Proud Boys. As a matter of fact he basically took it over and ruined it. Make no mistake Stone(and Flynn) hate Trump because he straight up fired them during term 1. Also Flynn and Stone were Obama holdovers.

Uh no. You need to check your facts.

In September 2023, Sund testified before the United States House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight. He argued that intelligence officials were responsible for the Capitol attack, and that they had neglected to properly share warnings about the potential of the event becoming violent.

In other words, the guy you're pointing to in attempt to lend creedence to the "Pelosi's fault" bullshit talking point actually snapped it in half over his knee under oath.

Oops.

They should get all the names of all the people who denied the request....

And release the list.

They have. Nancy Pelosi is at the top of it.

Is Trump on this list or is ihe on it but it's fake news written by Obama back in 2015?

This all came out years ago. There's nothing new in the news today. The Jan 6 hearings showed that Trump was days ahead of this and authorized the use, but the immediate barrier was Nancy Pelosi's office, her as the head. Her sergeant at arms was the one who received the requests and has testified that they were denied at her request...something about optics. They wanted this to happen for political reasons. Nancy then had the records destroyed when they were subpoenaed. And your TDS isn't remotely funny, even though you are using it remotely.

If this all came out years ago, why are y'all talking about it now?

Is there thing that you desperately don't want to talk about? Biden autopsy, Obama treason, Hillary emails.

What has y'all so desperate that you are bringing back debunked nonsense?

Because it seems like you don't want to talk about the Epstein files now that we know Trump is all over them.

If early reports are accurate, Maxwell, as a sex offender, wasn't supposed to be transferred to the minimum security prison in Texas. Someone had to sign off on it specifically. AND she's been given a work-release.

That's the same deal Epstein got back when he was convicted.

So...you still want to focus your attention on Nancy?

Because it's back in the news and you guys are acting like it's the first time you've heard any of the "other" story. All of these investigations were thwarted or stopped at the time.

There's this thing called multi-tasking. I know it's a difficult concept, but you can talk about more than one thing at a time. It's just that your media can't. I know you all are desperate to find Trump somehow in the files in some way other than a nebulous phone contact, but it likely won't happen. I know you want to think that "files" means evidence of wrong doing, other than just paperwork that has someone's name on it, but that's just TDS. There's no medication for you yet, but we're working on it.

Y'all are not capable of paying attention to more than one thing at a time. Want proof? For the next 2 weeks, check the top page of Politics. They're gonna be the same subject. And that subject?

Whatever stick Trump tosses for you to chase.

That's why he stole the FIFA trophy. That's why he had Gabbard accuse Obama of treason. That's why he invaded DC over some low-level street crime.

That's his MO. He does something stupid. It blows up in his face. He does something outrageous to distract you. Then he does it again. Then again. And next you know, we're 30 dumpster fires later and you've forgotten that AG Bondi had 1000+ federal agents combing through the Epstein files to flag any mention of Trump in March. Then had a meeting with him to tell him that 1) there's child porn in those files and 2) He's in them.

Do you remember when Bill Clinton happened to meet up with AG Lynch in an airport, and by both their accounts had a social conversation that didn't discuss her ongoing investigation of Hillary Clinton?

Do you remember the absolute shit-fits Republicans had over that meeting?

Because that's the reaction you should have had when it was reported Bondi meet with Trump about the Epstein Files- files that contain a crime and that he's in those files.

But nope. Not you. Because he's got you chasing some other stick.

Yeah, whatever. Steve Bannon wasn't even in the administration at that time, so who cares what he says and how it somehow draws a complicit Trump into your fairy tale. They knew there were going to be large crowds, and Trump told them as well as removed any barriers to calling in the National Guard. Pelosi is the one that refused them before the event and 6 times during the event...even while people were bangin on the doors...but you keep on trying to deflect to Trump. It only works on your fellow TDS braindead lackies.

I don't know if it's TDS or dementia that ails you. But, I hear NY has good places for people like yourself. And we're still waiting for a "list", a list that is specific and not some pile of contacts that has zero relevance. Problem is...we're waiting on more than your "Clinton" list. There are bigger scandals that still need resolving and I don't care if I ever see an Epstein list if it means I can see the Democrats in charge of the BS that went on from 2016 up to 2024 called out and jailed. It would be cool to do both, but I can see why you'd want to deflect away from the bigger issue.

You do understand that he was denied because it's not within the House Speaker's powers of office to issue commands to the DCNG, right?

But the House Sergeant-at-arms has some pull and he reports to the Speaker.

Which brings things back to the matter of the House Speaker having no authority to order deployment of the DCNG. That power resides with the POTUS or Sec. Def. (at the direction of the POTUS).

SEE: https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/IF/PDF/IF11768/IF11768.1.pdf

Which then brings us back to the other matter at arms that the House Sergeant at Arms reports to the Speaker of the House. At the time it was Nancy Pelosi. Even if the Speaker is devoid of authority on the matter, he or she is not devoid of influence or suggestion.

Exactly -influence & suggestion, not authority. As the intel arm of the U.S. is subordinate to the Executive Branch and given Sund, as the de facto chief of security for the Capitol at the time, argued under oath that he was furnished no threat-level data indicating NG deployment was warranted, how can Pelosi be at fault?

Conversely, as Trump was in control of the intel arm, dangled the NG absent justification, how can Pelosi be to blame for making the fiscally responsible choice of not requesting a security force of said same?

Further, as the crowd that attacked the Capitol was the same crowd which attended the 1/6 rally on the Ellipse, if follows that if there was known, credible threat of violence, Trump should have taken the initiative, summoned a NG security detail beforehand. But that didn't happen. How can Pelosi be to blame for drawing the same administrative conclusion if even the person with authority to order NG deployment *ostensibly* didn't view it as necessary?

And finally, when the shit started hitting the fan, where was the NG? Why didn't the only person -whom is documented to have been watching it play out on TV- with authority to order its deployment step up, live up to his oath to defend America from all threats foreign and domestic?

*correction: duty to defend America from all threats foreign and domestic.

"Ma'am, I think it would be a good idea to bring in the National Guard. Our Chief even requested them 3 days ago."

Pelosi: "Just trust me, we are going to be fine. We have enough cops as it is it would be fiscally irresponsible to supply ourselves with more security than we truly need."

"Yeah, I guess you're right."

That's what influence can look like and it's perfectly logical.