Imgflip Logo Icon

How it's going

How it's going | RELEASE THE FILES ! Wait , not those files ! | image tagged in hillary clinton,jeffrey epstein,maxwell,hurry up and wait,corruption,democrats democratting | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
27 Comments
7 ups, 3w
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Roach | HELLO, HILL WHICH FILES ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? | image tagged in roach | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 3w
BTW, I did that without AI
1 up, 3w
Release'em. If the Clinton's were involved in criminal activity... arrest them, have a trial, and if found guilty send their asses to jail.
0 ups, 3w
Damn Trump and Clinton’s name must be on there a whole hell of a lot cause Trumps taking the time to wipe his name
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
That doesn't sound hot at all...
0 ups, 3w
It could probably lead to certain discomfort.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
No, because they are under a judge's seal and not even a president or SCOTUS have the power to override that.
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Hence Trump's refusal to release them after they were on Pam Bondi's desk?

Court testimony and findings that can reveal the identity of victims and witnesses potentially at risk could they be exposed is not the Epstein Client List™.

Bondi has the list. Patel has the list. Bondino has the list. Trump has the list. Maxwell has the list. None of them are under court order to not release the list that they have. In fact, Maxwell is about to be pardoned so she won't reveal the list that she has. It's surprising she hasn't been transferred to Mar-A-Lago to serve out the rest of her sentence or deported.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Thank you for showing him it

The SCOTUS doesn’t have the list and even if they did they would release because they would have no reason not to and non of them are most likely on the list.

Trump has it and is trying to get people away from it he said the other day “Why are people still talking about Epstein it’s boring boring stuff” Maxwell has the power to tell the world but I’m guessing wouldn’t in fear for her life.
0 ups, 3w
Maxwell is in fear enough of her life to have backup. Should something happen to her, she probably has it's set up so that whatever information she has gets released. That's why there's even talk about pardoning her, which shouldn't be a subject for discussion to begin with, and why she got transferred to an even more ritzy prison that the one she was already transferred to in Florida.

They can't fake her death like they did with Epstein because that would be too obvious, and those who would fall for it would that be looking at who's in charge as responsible for killing them both, so it would backfire.
0 ups, 3w
at risk should* they be exposed
4 ups, 3w
Truth never dies
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
New evidence was recently found that the FBI hid.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Is this the "evidence" that Dir. Patel found in an unused random room in a burn bag?
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/newly-declassified-appendix-to-durham-report-sheds-additional-light-on-clinton-campaign-plan-to-falsely-tie-trump-to-russia-and-fbis-failure-to-investigate
https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/DIG/DIG-Declassified-HPSCI-Report-Manufactured-Russia-Hoax-July2025.pdf
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Yeah, that is the stuff that Patel "found" in a random room that was full of hard drives and all sorts of things you wouldn't believe, including this burn bag full of evidence!!!!!

Although, I do have to wonder what kind of job Dir. Patel is doing if he's got the time to be wandering around FBI buildings opening up random doors and digging through bags.

Because this isn't a movie. This is real life. Why do you believe that the Director of the FBI has the time in his work week to go through FBI buildings room by room to look through random bags of stuff. AND JUST SO HAPPENS to find the exact evidence of the thing that Trump is accusing Obama/Clinton/Biden of.

"Evidence" that was collected by John Durham, the Trump Appointed Special Prosecutor, to investigate the Russia investigation.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
So your conspiracy theory is refuting that he personally searched the buildings? Talk about strawmaning.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
It is not rational to think that the Director of the FBI is spending his time going room to room in the FBI headquarters. And then searching the room. and lo! he finds the exact piece of information he needs to expose the whole system! THE WHOLE SYSTEM!!!!

This is trash writing for a bad 80s action movie.

But you know what? Let's set that aside. Let's pretend it went down exactly like that. Laughable, but, okay. let's go.

It's a classified unreleased section of the Durham report. Durham is a conservative prosecutor. He was appointed by AG Bill Barr. So, he's on a mission from Trump to expose Obama/Biden/Hillary and anyone else.

He finds these emails and reports. These seem to be a 'smoking gun'. Why didn't he include it in his report.

Where did they come from? They came from a Dutch spy agency. Where did they get it? They stole it from the Russians.

So, here we have a set of documents that have been translated from English into Russian. Then translated from Russian into Dutch. Then from Dutch back into English.

That's one hell of a game of Telephone. AND it assumes that the American documents are 1) real and 2) have not been altered.

Because, remember, these came from the Russians.

How can you believe any of it? And that's why Durham didn't include ANY of it. Because it's Russian and can't be trusted.

So, do I think Dir. Patel was rooting through the back rooms of the FBI building? No.

I think someone in the FBI knew about this annex to the Durham report. Handed it to him. And then Trump and his reality tv-show brain concocted this story about finding it in a bag in a back room. ooo, the drama. Tune in Next Week when the real housewives of DC invade the ball room!

And all of it is in service of getting you to forget that it is very likely Trump was involved in some serious pedo shit, and the only reason he stopped hanging out with Epstein is that ol Jeff kept poaching little girls Trump considered his.
0 ups, 3w
You made a claim so you can debunk it instead of what actually happened. A strawman to support your conspiracy theory.
3 ups, 3w,
1 reply
What's the statute of limitations on killing your dog?

Comparing top secret documents to a dog is pretty... well, not wanting to get a timer, let's just say you could have picked a more valid comparison, with any effort at all.

And you do know that the very recently declassified Durham Annex contains information that even the potted dimbotard plants in congress were not allowed to see, until it was recently declassified, right?

I mean, you do know at least some of the details of what you're commenting about... right?
1 up, 3w
They don’t any details. Not one. They make shit up to fit whatever narrative MSM fake news is currently peddling, and then regurgitate it like anorexic leaving an all-u-can eat buffet.
1 up, 3w
Have you heard about ruffgreens?
2 ups, 3w
I'm not surprised in the least that you (appear to, at least) find that comment worthy of exclamation.

It's just that pathetic.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • Frau Farbissina
  • Hillary Clinton
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    RELEASE THE FILES ! Wait , not those files !