Roll Safe Think About It

Since school boards are comprised of elected officials and elected officials are always part of a governmental structure, doesn't that make a school board telling people what books they're allowed to read government censorship?

Because they are high, so they can't use brains.

Stop trying to make leftists THINK. First they hate that; and, second, they won't do it anyway.

As far as I can tell, school boards are a fuster-cluck anyways so their opinion doesn't matter. Also if you are afraid of your children asking unconformable questions about things they have read to you, you aren't a good parent. Let your kids be exposed to things, let them shape their own identity rather than sheltering them from anything that opposes your world view. This isn't Austin Powers. They aren't your own Mini-Me

If I were married and had children I would thank you to keep your own counsel about how I would raise them.

When you have kids raise them how you see fit, but for my kids Butt the f out. You and the school board are not fhere to propagandize and indoctrinate children into LGBTQ lifestyles.

"propagandize and indoctrinate children into LGBTQ lifestyles"
TF?

They learn it from somewhere

So what are you implying? That you could force someone to be [insert any non-binary gender] if they are not and do not personally identify as such?

Children are impressionable. They can be manipulated into such a lifestyle by adults, especially if those adults are people placed in a position of trust like a teacher. Research has shown that most with gender dysphoria — who groomer/teachers want to transition, grow out of it if they are just left to develop normally.

And by "normally", you mean?

If I have to define “normal” for you, you have more problems than can be addressed at a meme site

It's actually unclear what "normal" means in this case, since gender dysphoria is not common flu and will not go away if you stay at home...

PS: I don't take ad hominem for an answer

Here’s a working definition of “normal” then. That which is necessary for the continuation of the species. Also, if you won’t take ad hominem for answers, don’t give ad hominem for your arguments.

But then what do you do if someone is actually unhappy with their birth gender?

You wrote below: But then what do you do if someone is actually unhappy with their birth gender?

I somehow missed the part where that’s my problem, or anyone else’s in society’s for that matter. If you’re unhappy with it you can seek help to learn to accept yourself for who you are, or if you’ve come to years where your brain is fully developed, you can make believe all you want — but just know that you can’t make others believe it with you. It’s your circus, not mine. I’m not the one with the mental condition.

What do stories of gay sex promote to elementary school children? How about Drag queens twerking and garbed in revealing clothing? Chomos GTFO. Leave the kids alone!

I always find it funny when y'all talk about indoctrination and how much the left does it when some of y'all literally teach your kids that science is fake

You mean like wearing masks stops the flu? Or that men can get pregnant?

In response to your first claim, masks do not 100% stop the transmission of airborne diseases but they can reduce the likelihood of said diseases being transferred from one human to another.
As for your second claim, cry about it.

Science says you lie. Men can’t get pregnant and boys can’t become girls just because they say so. Cry about it.

*angry seahorse noises

So a male seahorse is able to get pregnant — that’s science, but big deal. Science says a HUMAN male can’t. Check. Mate.

Sorry your seahorse is angry

https://animals.howstuffworks.com/fish/male-seahorses-give-birth.htm
:)

Ya but your not a seahorse and you can’t be one.

Neigh, neigh motherf*cker!

*angry bearded dragon noises

Now now, you can cry on your pillow

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/how-bearded-dragons-switch-their-sex
womp womp

So you want to be a lizard?

No one teaches science is fake. We do sometimes teach that some people's conclusions about the science is fake.

Ok, like what?

Science spotlights three dimensions of nature that point to God. The first is the fact that nature obeys laws. The second is the dimension of life, of intelligently organized and purpose-driven beings, which arose from matter. The third is the very existence of nature. But it is not science alone that guided me. I have also been helped by a renewed study of the classical philosophical arguments.

Antony Flew

I am a christian(but not a creationist- yes, there is a difference) so I do agree with you on this

You can’t be a true Christian and not be a creationist.

So you are saying that I can't be a follower of Christ's teachings without believing every single thing in the bible word for word?

God set His Word above His Name. If it is false in one point, perhaps it’s false in another

I believe His Word, but that doesn't mean I think the world was created in a literal 7 days

Like the stoeckle mitochondrial study that shows 90% of living creatures don't have common ancestors.

Like how gene and protein networks prevent the mutations needed for the theory of evolution to work.

How several planets in or solar system spin the wrong way for the current theory of his or solar system was formed.

For your first claim, that deals with the classification of species which is a fuster-cluck and I'm not equipped in any manner to give my opinion and expertise(unless we are talking about the eastern wolf)
Your second claim is just straight false(In fact, proteins support the theory of evolution)
And for your final claim, it's as simple as one giant mass hitting another, reversing it's rotation

Let me elaborate.
The Stoeckle study explains that 90% of current living creatures don't have a common ancestor as far back as the mitochondrial DNA goes (which strangely goes back to a certain point in time and just stops) this breaks the evolutionary tree of life and causes the theory of evolution to be falsified.

Gene and protein networks. Gene networks are genes that compliment each other, if you change one Gene it disrupts the network and causes death. Same with protein networks.
Proteins could not have evolved. It takes 72 mutations for the two most like proteins to evolve. Most of those mutations would make the protein toxic and kill the creature. So in order for it to have evolved it would need 72 mutations simultaneously.

When you really look into the observable science it becomes clear.

Just because I'm okay with my kids knowing what porn is, doesn't mean the school should give them access to it or even make it required reading.

You wanna know something cool? My local library has a whole week where they showcase banned books front and center. They have programing explaining the dumb why they were banned and why you shouldn't restrict access to literature. The cherry on top is that they put the Bible on display too. Be more like my local library

No, there are appropriate ages for things and 5 years old is not appropriate for knowing what anal is.