"It's not revenge he's after , it's a reckoning"

Just like Putt Putt Putin. . .in truth Trump didn't want anything to do with either except to keep them in check. . .something that Biden failed to do. . .

those are the avengers

:0)

That's his alibi now

what the actual f**k

Lincoln raised an army to fight against his own people, suspended habeas corpus and jailed political opponents without trial. Woodrow Wilson did the same during WW1, putting people into internment camps for the crime of criticizing his regime. He also encouraged violence against random American citizens of German descent.

no buddy, Lincoln was absolutely not a tyrant. he exercised his powers as Commander in Chief during a time of ultimate crisis. get over it.
plus, if he really was a tyrant, he wouldn't have been willing to stand for re-election.
maybe you want slavery reimplemented, I don't care, because the opinion of a single crazed lunatic who spends his/her life on the Internet doesn't mean much to me.
have a nice day 😊✨

Check out Forgotten History’s series that features Lincoln. You can find it here. This is the opinion of a history professor.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=W8PCOWaUhro

You can also take the words of Dr. Walter Williams on the subject. As for a crazed lunatic spending his life on the internet: you are likely looking in a mirror when you post that.

1) yeah no I'm not gonna watch some dumbass YouTube video just to make up a reason to hate Abraham Lincoln.
ahem.. although.. I might watch it if I find the time.
2) sheeeeeesh bet you thought you were reeeeally clever for that last bit, huh? I hope you realize you basically said "no u". for the record, the crazed lunatic here is the one who feels inclined to complain on the Internet about the small imperfections of a dead man. not just a dead man but a dead man who pushed this country into real advancement during his time. who did something no one else seemed morally ready to do. no, he wasn't perfect, but i know you hardcore liberals only look for the worst in people. I know your type. you hate America, and that hatred is what fuels you. maybe it's because we're too white? not trans enough? or are you just mad that Abraham Lincoln was a registered Republican?
...
welp that was a yap if I've ever yapped(and you better believe I'm a yapper lol)

Tell me something. Do you believe it was right to deliberately shell civilian areas? Lincoln turned a blind eye to it at the very least and authorized it at the worst. That and poisoning wells, deliberately burning cities that had already been captured, and other atrocities. There’s a reason southerners still call it the War of Northern Aggression.

as a southerner I've never heard it called the "war of northern aggression" so I'm assuming you're a kid who lives in an echo-chamber area filled with idiots who agree with you.

the civil war was bad on both sides. I don't deny Lincoln probably made unnecessary harsh decisions during the civil war but thats nearing up on 200 years ago at this point and I think it's high time you got over it. this isn't even politics at this point.

Although I’ve lived in the south twenty years I heard it called that back when I lived in the Midwest. But then I didn’t just take the history books written by the conquerors and looked at all sides of issues.

Lincoln's "people" stopped being his people after they decided to make they're own "country" which failed horribly 😭😭

Lincoln still viewed them as being Americans.

who were delusional enough to make they're own country because they didn't agree with the North's idea of "hey, maybe this slavery thing is bad!"

Not any different than when the colonies decided to make a country over taxes.

it's actually VERY different because slavery and taxes are two completely different topics which fall under two completely different categories

Actually they aren’t. Legally slaves were the money of the owners, and having them taken away without compensation was theft. Taxes is also taking money by theft.

taxes is not taking money by theft (it does feel like it sometimes and definitely can be sometimes but please don't be too emotionally driven here) it's more like a fee for living in the country.
having slaves taken away was not comparable to a tax despite the legal technicalities and was also not theft. stealing a person's freedom, on the other hand, is more comparable to theft. giving the freedom back is simply returning it to the person, because it never rightfully belonged to the slave owners. the slave owners themselves were more comparable to thieves. is this making sense?

Much of slavery could have been settled without a war, like it was in Britain. There the minds of the people were persuaded against it, but it takes time to do that. Radical abolitionists in northern states (which had undergone that process themselves) couldn’t see that and tried to force it on southerners. I tend to believe that advances in technology would have made slavery in agrarian societies obsolete.

if someone steals something, you shouldn't have to convince them over a long time to give it back. anyone with a half decent moral compass knows stealing is wrong. the war is the fault of the southerners who couldn't see that.
it was a terrible war and should never have happened, but so was slavery.

I think you’re looking at it through the lens of the 21st century. We can agree taking people into slavery was and is morally wrong. But we see it through the lens of today. It would take some time for people to see it from the 18th and 19th century, just as religious freedom took time to see, and the rights of free commoners in general. Affairs of states march slowly and sudden change is to be looked at skeptically.

Well maybe dont commit felonies. . . You know ts not that hard

Like cocaine usage, quid pro quo, bribery and extortion, use of a private e-mail server for top secret communications etc.

Wow sounds like things I've heard Republicans doing . . Ok a private email? Aren't all emails private

Tell me you’ve never heard of national security protocols without telling me you’ve never heard of national security protocols. Hillary’s private server being used for official top secret communications — one that is unsecured and easily hacked.

i think, to modify his point, it could be said that no politician is completely innocent

ok ok you're based for this lol

Its

*it’s

Yea honestly maybe we should ignore joe being on the list and consider the 2nd 3rd and 4th person

maybe not worry bout Biden

how do you guys go

He arrested political opponents and orchestrated the rigging of the election but then say Sleepy joe it doesn't make sense

Yeah... and dems were oblivious to Biden's dementia right up to his debate against Trump last summer... Then every one of those liars acted shocked to discover the truth...

Joe was the figurehead: a puppet for someone else to manipulate.