Eyes Don't Lie

Where exactly is the dictatorship? Site specific examples, please....

Biden's DOJ is ramping up the censorship of political rivals...

Tim Walz set up a tip line for people to anonymously report their neighbors for defying his lockdown mandates.

Stop lying. That’s not what happened in 2021 and you know it. It was $10k for a legal win in court.

You, very obviously, have not even read the bill you talk about. Typical.

It’s 25 pages long. It has lots of subsections. Good reading! Don’t talk about shit you know nothing about until you educate yourself.

https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/87R/billtext/pdf/SB00008F.pdf

Sure, sure - a lot of subsections changes the fact that the Texas Nazi Party, er GOP, put out bounties for snitching on your neighbors.

That is absolutely ridiculous! President Trump has no desire to abolish voting, only to have eligible voters vote.

Okay, you're batting zero right now...wanna try again?

1. two quotes combined into one quote equals zero quote.

2. the two quotes that are being combined, are edited and taken 100% out of context, so if there could be something less credible than "zero quote", that would be it.

3. this is what happens when the sheeple believe so called "journalists" who have lied about about Trump since 2015.

TDS is not an excuse for making an irrational comment unsupported by facts. You have two strikes, CtrlF, one more and you are OUT.

TIRED of leftist lies making a mockery of truth.

Grumpy Cat Defines TDS

imgflip.com/i/7w49p4

Math is a thing? Dems don't care about math because it's racist!!! 🤣🤣🤣

"Of course not - we can't listen to the words that actually come out of his mouth, it's what -you think he means- that's important, right?"

It's hard to believe the same person who posted what's in the quotes wrote what you just wrote.

Why is that?

It's because you're NOT listening to the words (all of the words) that come out of his mouth relative to these butchered "quotes". If you had, and you're still making these claims, that would make you a liar, and I know you're not a liar. Being ill-informed and willing to believe anything negative one hears about Trump doesn't make that person a liar.

The first video title: Trump Says He Won’t Be a Dictator ‘Except for Day One’.

Trump said he is closing the border & drilling on day one and after that he won't be a dictator.

The second video references he needs to be elected to right the wrongs (from the left) and then we will be on track again going forward.

Your premise of turning our country 'into a dictatorship' remains unsubstantiated (and in fact, you are digging yourself in deeper showing you have no facts in the game).

The way liberals think is on full display here. You do realize that in that video, he's trying to get people to vote, right?

ONLY liberals could take a quote designed to get people out to vote and try to twist it and squeeze it into Trump saying he won't let people vote in four years.

Liberal comprehension at it's finest! (meaning not at all...)

Why can't you just use the real quote?

Actually, I'd be stunned if you answered that question at all, let alone honestly.

But, just so you can see how you've been misled, here is the quote:

"in four years, you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote."

OBVIOUSLY, nowhere in there does it say you won't be able to vote.

Since you're ignoring (intentionally?) the context, I'll help you out. He's talking to Christians, a group of voters that as you might imagine, he struggles with. They vote for him for the same reason most people vote for their candidate; they're the lesser of two evils (in their eyes.)

So all he's saying is vote for him this time, even if you wouldn't ordinarily, then you won't have to vote again (and here's the bragging part) because he'll have things so fixed that they won't need to vote.

This is not very complex, which could lead some to think you're being disingenuous. Even though we both know that would not ever happen. Am I right?

Liberal are unable to tell the truth, even when there is video evidence showing them what the truth is.

Trump denied wanting to be a dictator, except on day one. He said he wanted to be a dictator on day one, only, so he could “close the border and drill baby drill”. You guys should really get your facts straight before you hate, it’s not a good look.

https://youtu.be/dQkrWL7YuGk?si=a06Wunf082lplXlM

He denied it, except for when he said it.

Got it.

Jesus you guys are gullible

That is 100% bass-ackwards. Go figure.

The "quotes" that the media uses are not quotes. They're parsed, and hacked up; in other words edited. Edited to make Trump look as bad as possible for the mindless sheeple.

If "we" actually listened to the words as they came out of his mouth, then "we" would know that the media is lying to us. Again. Over and over.

The beauty of using quote marks, if they're used correctly (not commonly done here on the mighty imgfip) is that everything in between them is supposed to be accurate; nothing added and nothing deleted.

But that's not how the media that the libtards worship goes about their business.

IF they had the integrity (let alone the professionalism) to use the actual quotes, and in full, they couldn't write their hit piece.

If that happened, the sheeple might actually find out the truth. (gasp...!!!)

Quotes are quotes.
And being quotes, it's very simple to look them up. You can look the quotes up if you really want to find the full context. It's out there, it's public, it's not a secret, it's not a rumor, it's not editorializing that somebody heard on The Rachel Maddow Show.

Why do you continually lie when there is ACTUAL video evidence to prove you are lying?

He said he was going to only be a dictator on day one so he could “Close the border and drill baby drill.”

Liberalism is a disease.

https://youtu.be/dQkrWL7YuGk?si=a06Wunf082lplXlM

What are the quote marks for?

Since you used quotes, you can source this, right?

Don't they report all our political news over there?
You're claiming that you literally never heard Trump say that?

Good grief, if that's the case, the dems are absolutely not Americans.

Only dictatorships and socialist hell holes trump up charges against their political enemies in blatant attempts to prevent them from running for and winning political office.

Oh please, you knew he was a stupid criminal and a conman when you picked him.

Prove it’ll be a dictatorship if he wins, prove he said it’ll happen

America has a long history of influencing elections all around the world by both parties.

Iran, 1950s...Latin America, 1950s-60s...Ukraine in 2014 by Obama which directly led to the mess we are in now. And, most recently, the Biden administration in Israel and Brazil.

So, why should we act surprised when Russia tries to influence our elections?

Did the "Russian influencers" identify themselves as Russian influences? No.

So the 'shills' you allude to had no knowledge of the resources behind whomever they were dealing with. That sounds more like interference than collusion. What say you?

Do the people the media is telling you the "Russian influencers" are attempting to influence don't even support Trump?

You see, the media will leave out all the critical details that an objective person would use to determine whether or not there's any meat to this story. Especially if those details do not paint Trump with the same lying strokes they've used to paint him since he announced in 2015.

It's called perspective. But that is something liberals lack, especially when their brains are fogged over by raging TDS.

Good point!

And this after it just came out that a load of political 'social media influencers' found out they were getting duped by their Russian bosses whom they didn't know were Russian? But who did they think their benefactors were, Uruguayans?

Who are you pretending doesn't know the state they live in, modda?

Incorrect. Putin has endorsed Kamala.

You're just regurgitating liberal media / DNC stooge talking points. And that is sad.

Trump isn't going to leave NATO. You have to understand that Trump is playing chess, but the media can't comprehend anything more difficult than checkers. Trump whipped NATO into shape. They're not just sitting on their asses now, expecting the US to foot the bill for them. If not for Trump, I doubt NATO would be able to have the coherent, united response to Putin invading Ukraine that they've had to date.

"Putin's trolls are spreading lies and propaganda on social media sites to influence the election."

The only influence Putin wants is chaos. The liberal stooges in (well, and...) the media are more than happy to help him out with that.

As always, all liberals should ask themselves why would Putin favor Trump? He can't get away with shit while Trump is president, yet he invades countries left and right while Bush, Obama, and Biden are president. But he favors Trump? Libs, please apply some common sense to your thinking on this issue.

Like you?

Like who?

Maybe cause they’re you and all the other people acting like Kamala is Jesus Christ reincarnate.

Why would I promote Russia? I consider it a sh*thole country with an evil dictator that rates about as even as North Korea.

Why are you promoting Kamala?

Kamala Harris is better for America than Trump. She will work for all Americans, unlike Trump who only cares about himself.

What proof or data do you have that Trump only cares about himself, and that Kamala cares about everyone? Pretty bold blanket statement. Care to back it up? I’ll take the businessman. You can take the woman who has never had a real job, other than taxpayer-funded work.

By the way, her father was a career civil servant being paid by the taxpayer. Her mom and dad were career civil servants being paid by the taxpayer, and she’s a career civil servant being paid by the taxpayer. This family has not done shit for America, and has only taken and taken and taken.

What proof that Trump only cares about himself? Trump's first term - he sold his position as president to make a profit for himself (just one example:. charging SS agents outrageous sums for rooms at his resorts whenever he stayed there).

She’ll work for Americans? Or Illegal Mexicans and Terrorists?

You can name names. You're just unwilling.

She can’t name them because she is making it up. In reality, 99.99% of conservatives here on imgflip and in America hate (with a passion) both Russia AND Ukraine, and we think that both are equally corrupt. We hope they blow each other off the face of the map.

Look at the profiles - does a casual imgflip user make a hundred comments a day, and 30 creations a day, day after day, 7 days a week? I doubt it - only paid trolls do that.

Like… you?

My profile stats don't support it, neither do yours.

Oh believe me, I wish I was being paid to support Trump, I currently do it for the reward of having a working conscience, but a little money on the side would be pretty cool too.

Why don't you join his campaign. He needs the help.

So to your way of thinking, anyone who supports Trump is a "Russian shill".

Nothing screams objectivity as much as something like that does.

We both know who the Russian shills are on imgflip. Too bad we can't name them. What's even worse is, they do it for free. They do it to feel liked, following around the top Russian trolls like obedient little minions.

In one post you say they are paid.

In your next you say they do it free.

Which is it? It can’t be both, but it could be neither.

Russian trolls (Russians working for the Kremlin troll farms) are paid. The Russian shills on imgflip (American traitors) who promote the trolls and their agenda, likely aren't paid. Russian shills such as conservative influencers Tim Pool, Dave Rubin and Benny Johnson are paid. Educate yourself about Russian influence if you care about America.

I wonder if you really care about America seeing you’re likely a China shill or troll.

I care about America, but I have my doubts about some of the people replying to my comments.

The mere fact that you state, as a fact when it's not, that Putin is pro-Trump shows that you believe what the media tells you without the slightest bit of intellectual skepticism.

And that is sad.

The reality is that Putin doesn't care who wins. He will hate either of them because they're both American and he hates America.

So what is he doing? He just wants chaos. And that's exactly what the libs/dems/media (I know, the 3rd one there is redundant...) do for him. They're his useful idiots.

If he did have a preference, I think he would definitely favor Harris. Why? because she would be the next presidential stooge in line for him to walk all over. First Bush (Georgia) next Obama (Crimea), then Biden (Ukraine), and now Harris? Are any names conspicuously absent from that list of recent presidents that Putin has walked all over?

Why does any of this matter, you may be wondering? It's because when the media reports on this, they're mentioning Trump's name as often as possible, counting on the useful sheeple idiots to conflate Russian interference with the pathetically fake Russian collusion narrative. They are two different things, but when they report about Russian interference and work Trump's name into it, the sheeple jump to sheeple-like conclusions, as they always do.

Why does this latest Russia scam matter? Because there are still swampy Republicans and undecided types (Libertarians, etc.) who may fall for this blatant election interference. If anyone actually trusts the Biden DOJ and in particular that feckless waste of carbon known as Merrick Garland after all the stunts they've pulled, then they really need to start doing some research. But they won't, being sheeple and useful idiots for the dems and Putin.