“REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.” @ChanelRion @OANN
The easy way to know when statements like these are true is watch and see how much money is spent to debunk it. A quick search shows they are trying hard, my vote true. Trump has the proof and will hold on to it until just days from the start of the vote.
The @KamalaHarris
@KamalaHQ
Presidential campaign has chosen an anti-white racist and black supremacist who said we need to “DIVEST FROM WHITENESS” to host their EVANGELICALS FOR HARRIS @Evangels4Harris
Zoom Call on 8/14/24.
Ekemini Uwan @sista_theology
has a history of making very derogatory and racist anti-white comments and has publicly called on Evangelicals to “divest from whiteness”.
Ekemini has also called for white people to pay reparations.
Let's hope they start with Kamala... Her ancestors owned slaves...
Anyone pretending to be an Evangelical for harris only fools the left, no Christian that I know would vote for the evil woman or her party. Her racist friends need a better con.
[deleted]
3 ups, 3mo
How long have we been told by almost everyone on the left that straight white men are the problem? White privilege this. Mansplaining that. So, who does Kamala select as her running mate? 🫄
Margret Thatcher, Deborah from the Old Testament/Torah, Marjorie Greene, the female CEO of HP who ran in 2016, Harriet Tubman, Queen Mary of Scotland, Marjorie Merriweather, Amelia Earhart, Madame Marie Curie, Cleopatra, etc, etc, there are plenty of women that men do look up to as leaders, innovators, and history makers. . .it's just that any man with a sense of morality won't accept laying deceitful women like Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris.
Oh, and as for why I'd never support Harris is right here. No jokes or sarcasm with this one-
You forgot the first thing. Here, I'll quote you for you, "of a class of people."
You skipped your own part. Woman is a noun used to identify a person.
See, not hard at all.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Sorry silly liberal - You can’t use the word you are trying to define, within the definition. Nice try though.
For those of you playing at home, you see how difficult it is for a liberal to simply tell you what a woman is? In 2024, liberals are afraid to say there are differences between men and women and that they aren’t fluid.
Barry. I used your definition of a noun. YOu said, and I'll quote the whole thing for you, A “noun” is a word (other than a pronoun) used to identify any of a class of people, places, or things, or to name a particular one of these."
Then you asked "So, you saying a woman could be a place or a thing?"
You left out the "identify any of a class of people" of your own definition within that same post. I don't know why you elected to leave out part of your own definition with your question, but you did.
So, for those of you playing the home game, you can see how difficult it is for a conservative to understand their own misogyny because in an attempt to 'own a lib' they strip women of the idea of being a person. Conservatives don't think of women as people, they're things.
Any criticisms against Camela = " you are either racist, or a misogynist". Can't be because she is an incompetent DEI hiree that could not break 1% in the primiares and has no independent thought what so ever.
That you deliberately misspelled her name is more clear evidence of your misogyny. That you characterize her career as an elected official as a "a DEI hired" is proof of your racism.
Cry about it, you spelled Trump's name wrong to this day. Turnabout is fair play. She was selected as a VP with Joe 's Own words "I am going to select a black woman as vp" BOOM definition of DEI.
Its not me saying that was the only reason, that was Biden himself " I am going to pick a black woman for VP" I know you can't face facts about this pathetic DEI hiree, but she is what she is.
No. He said one of the things he would consider is her heritage. He didn't say that was the only one. Because insisting that the ONLY reason Harris is there is right back at the color of her skin.
The only reason he picked her was for her race and gender, dude. Why else would someone pick a vp that could not break 1% in the primaries? You picka vp that can help your campaign, you don't pick the most disliked person ever to run on a democratic ticket.
Do you see what you're saying? "The only reason". You don't know that. He never said that. He said that one of the criteria for his selection would be a woman of color.
He never said that's the only one.
Your assumption that is the only criteria, is your internalized racism and sexism.
And as to past performance being an indicator of future performance- in 2000, Trump dropped out of the Reform Party Presidential primary before it even got started. He received, in total, around 15,311 in California. And he defeated literally no one in Michigan because no one ran against him there.
But he'd already dropped out so it didn't matter. So, by your 'logic' he shouldn't have run for President in 2016.
Barely 4 years bro, nothing changed. Nothing changes in that small amount of time, we are not talking about 10 or 15 years ago.. Her unpopular positions on policies have not had time to change .. those are fundemental stances, anti fracking, Gun buy backs, Open borders.. you dont 180 on those issues in 22 days. I understand you gotta back her becuase you have no one else.. Which is a real shame.. I don't understand what this new dela is wih the democratic party.. they really don't have anyone better than these far left puppets? Why did they abandon the moderate democrats?
Not long enough to change? Are you new to following politics?
Consider Trump's stance on crypto in 2019. He wasn't a fan and said they were used to buy and sell drugs. What's his position now? What about tiktok? He wanted to ban it but now he defends it.
Politicians change positions all the time, for a variety of reasons. Just like everyone else.
ugh, if you want to pretend and spin Harris into some magical creature like the media is doing, fine. IDC. Truth is truth. IN Nov. of 2020 she was at 1% in the primaries.. that is truth.
It's been 4 years. The world has changed. People are different.
What was Biden's percentage in 2008? Handily, Wikipedia has that all gathered into one spreadsheet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationwide_opinion_polling_for_the_2008_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries
He peaked at 5%. He sat around 2% in all the other polls.
So, again, history shows that what happened in the past isn't a marker for what will certainly happen in the future.
Caption this Meme
