oh, books, huh? 43 of them? ARe they all published by the author? Not, say, through a credible science journal?
Because if they were real science books with real facts, it seems like they should have been able to get them into journals. But let's say that somehow the people who have dedicated themselves to science deny all 43 of these papers, why didn't they start their own website? or even use a free one like Wix or even a service like Blogger.
Because Blogger still does exist.
Why didn't they get this vital science information out to the public for free? Rather than a for-profit book selling website. That, to me, suggests their number 1 priority was to make money. Not save lives. Or expose a deadly conspiracy.
It seems, to me at least, that they were just trying to grift off of the conservatives who were scared of science and facts.