California day dreaming

It occurs to me that if we actually did live in the Star Trek universe then leftists would ally themselves with the Borg.

Or get just get wiped out by Khan or some other violent faction during the worst of the 'dark ages' on Earth before Cochran created the warp drive for humans.

Khan embodied a lot of what modern leftists desire or want - Khan was a GMO, survival of the fittest, desired globalization by any means, and was 'my way or the highway' about everything. Yet for all that I doubt Khan or even Kirk would tolerate the leftist's attitude of being spoiled brats in adult bodies.

Maybe if Khan was a stoner and didn't want to work. "I don't feel like conquering anybody today. I'll start next week."

Khan was a dictator, a would-be king, referring to his own self-described superiority as justification for his supremacy. Autocratic rule is a Far Right gig, its appeal is to the base.

CALIFORNIANS live in a illusion they created themselves.

Several whistleblowers from Area 51 have stated the government already has anti-gravity technology they reversed engineered from crashed UAPs. I think physicists are still trying to understand what anti-matter is.

Antimatter is pure science fiction comparable to "California High-speed Rail" or all "zero-emission vehicles by 2035."

Although it sounds like science fiction, antimatter is real. It is the opposite of matter. Matter is formed from the particles that we see in the world around us – atoms that are made from protons and electrons. The opposite of a particle is called an anti-particle.

https://energywavetheory.com/explanations/what-is-antimatter/#:~:text=Although%20it%20sounds%20like%20science,is%20called%20an%20anti%2Dparticle.

The point is California's unrealistic policies and projects. I don't know anything about antimatter.

Yes but harnessing them for fuel cheap enough to compete with gas is complete lunacy. People don't understand that star trek is a utopian communist society.

I like to imagine that in the future goes beyond capitalism. I don't understand why anyone still supports communism. Shouldn't we be looking for a system that is better than capitalism, and not one that is proven inferior?

Continuing with gas will kill us all and destroy the planet. Is that what we want for our descendants?

The end is nigh! Climate sinners repent!

Stay safe with all the climate change storms, flooding, hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, killer heat waves.

No one denies climate change, but the proposed cure is worse than the disease. Banning fossil fuels will kill the poor. How about we follow the science instead of the hysteria? Unethical politicians are exploiting climate change by scaring people.

No one denies climate change because it's been a reality on Earth for 4.5 billion years. That's the beauty of the concept. Well, creationists and Static Earth Theory proponents ("the Earth has been the same always as it has been as things have been measured in the last century!") might deny it, but we'll let Santa and the Easter Bunny break the news to them.

Limiting fossil fuel use will keep our cheap priced society going, because if you don't conserve it there won't be any in a few decades to fuel said cheap society. It takes more energy to produce ethanol then it produces, hey there ain't going to be any 747 flights to Japan powered by solar. You can say goodbye to plastic too. Yeah, let's see how far your dollar goes when you got to pay for hand carved furniture again.

"That would be impossible for them as neither is in the Bible. In fact, their claim is that errant rocks and out of place fossils (Crocodiles in Alaska? Caribou in the Mediterranean?) are alluvial deposits, the results of Noah's flood.

That's where "Static Earth Theory" (which is something I made up way way way back to mock Global Warming and the Creationism that frames it) comes from, the notion that everything has been relatively the same since Genesis, albeit with the occasional unusually chilly summer."

Completely wrong. You need to study up on creationism. It takes into account all modern science and comes up with an explanation for everything.

Creationism DENIES science. It's quite literally what the purpose of it is, the reason for existence, why it became a thing. It's anti-science.

Scopes Monkey Trial. Google. It created Creationism.

Actually creations think the ice ages and super hot periods are a result of the flood and believe in climate change too.

That would be impossible for them as neither is in the Bible. In fact, their claim is that errant rocks and out of place fossils (Crocodiles in Alaska? Caribou in the Mediterranean?) are alluvial deposits, the results of Noah's flood.

That's where "Static Earth Theory" (which is something I made up way way way back to mock Global Warming and the Creationism that frames it) comes from, the notion that everything has been relatively the same since Genesis, albeit with the occasional unusually chilly summer.