Alex jones

The billion dollars in punitive damages is by definition unconstitutional. The case should be overturned for that reason alone.

absolutely correct. he exposed the truth and they used weapons weaponized lawfare to shut him down

USING weapons to shut US/HIM down, they are still doing US all like dogs. Was his "crime" some sort of speech ?
A) He can't SPEAK
B) Nobody can LISTEN
whether someone does or doesn't listen or want to, is IRRELEVANT, as you obviously know because you were bold enough to post about him.

yes there is . bastards.

all of the politicians that you worship just want power , and control . I'm talking both parties . it's all a game to them , they consider us livestock. none of them give 2 💩💩about us . our taxes are their revenue . we are their slaves . we are no longer a constitutional republic but a taken and overthrown nation . however , you all won't wake up and see the farce until it's too late . the new world order is on your doorstep . will you comply or stand against it ?

like what was said before , it's a purely political motivated issue and case . Gestapo style shutting down of political opposition. The liberal communists.are triggered when told the truth and their sins are found out . they are like the God they worship . Satan himself . end of discussion.

His conviction is politically motivated. There's nothing but politics behind his conviction. It's an attempt to shut him up. They can't just be satisfied with doing what I do, I don't watch or listen to his show.

Nope. The Press -Jones very loosely included- operates under auspice of the First Amendment with a good-faith assumption that their output is factual, absent malice and an obligation to issue an official retraction when in error. Should a reporter or press agency be hauled into court for slander, defamation, it is incumbent upon the plaintiff (burden of proof being on the accuser) to demonstrate error, malicious intent & damage incurred; this is the reason why most lawsuits against the press are unsuccessful. In Jones' case, the plaintiff(s) were able to demonstrate he was knowingly in error, intentionally/maliciously disseminating false information (re: Jones' under-oath acknowledgement of plaintiffs' "Perry Mason moment", admission of culpability) and damage resultant from his actions.

One may make the argument that the First Amendment guarantees it's not illegal to lie -and that is accurate... with limitations --the line between protected speech by way of deception and criminal act being crossed when damage-resultant outcome of said deception occurs whether such is intended or not. To wit: an individual falsely yells "fire" in a crowded theater and patrons thereof end up trampling someone to death in the rush to escape; the deception of yelling "fire" is not, by itself, a crime but deliberate incitement of panic resulting in death is. Conversely, yelling "fire" (erroneous publication) in a crowded theatre but immediately following up with "just kidding" (retraction) is top-tier a-holery but does fall into the category of 1A protected speech.

you have given a well thought out and rational answer, which is rare these days sadly . this is the type of dialog we need more of , and when we do , division lines between people can be erased . However , what if Alex was right ?

Jones *could* be right... and that's a disturbing possibility. Although, given the high societal stakes of that possibility, monetary stakes of the lawsuit, it seems reasonable to expect he'd divulge any and all evidence in his possession substantiating his claims in interest of the public good or, at the very least, lending creedence to his defense attorney's arguments.

alot of deception these days in the media and our governments world wide . oh yeah , keep being a smart ass . that and a sense of humor will get us through thr roughest of times .

Defamation and libel is not protected speech.

then there's all the shit they've said about conservatives and all the lying bullshit during the covid plandemic .

You mean like how conservatives lie about LGBTQ people are trying to groom kids in school by making them watch porn that never happened?

Oh how conservatives claim that litter boxes are being provided for furries when they are for when active shooter situations so kids can relieve themselves without giving away their positions.

Or are you reffering to when conservatives attempted a coup on our nation?

And if the pandemic was about control and exerting power why did it destabilize the economy so badly and gave way for more distrust in scientific institutions than ever before?

Ex: Matt gaetz slept with a minor. It’s provable and and thus not libel/defamation.

Boebert was kicked out of beetlejuice for getting “handy” and vaping during production.

Nick Fuentes declared himself a nazi and then got caught streaming gay porn on his stream…TWICE.

Meanwhile jones has been knowingly lying about sandy hook since before those kid’s bodies were in the ground to push p**is pills and brain supplements that arnt even regulated by the fda.

all mainstream media propaganda talking points . twisting reality to cover up the truth . so much hate and division in our society today . I think it's time for a national divorce . you all can form your country and we'll form ours .

Not all speech is protected. No charge.

well , when you are exposing lies and corruption they try to shut down the source .

Slander, defamation, and lies are not protected by the 1st amendment