Jim Halpert Explains

STILL THINK COVID........"LEAKED"

🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸
@Travis_in_Flint
SHOCKING: In new documents obtained by Senator Rand Paul, the entire COVID Wuhan story is exposed. A group called DEFUSE went to several government agencies to receive funding to engineer a virus in Wuhan similar to Covid, and Fauci’s lab in Montana was listed as a partner. This happened in 2018 before Covid was released.

15 different federal agencies knew about this and not a single one of them has come forward and exposed this. Senator Paul has had to fight for years to get these documents released.

Why was a group working on a coronavirus in 2018? How did an almost identical virus just happen to leak from Wuhan? Why did Fauci hide this information, and why was he using government funding to pay for this?

Did the US government release a virus onto its citizens and globally just to win an election and gain more power?

Leaked to change election laws which means states were involved. Who were the key players at state levels? They need to be investigated

Oh... another "coincidence"

The first Covid death in America happened on February 29th of 2020. The very next day, Runbeck, a private printing company in AZ placed the largest-ever order for ballot envelope stuffing machines. How did they know?

I am still waiting for Gym Jordan to open the investigation on J6. When will he?

You mean investigation on the corrupt committee of course. Hopefully soon but since they destroyed a ton of evidence it might be hard to do.

I am sure the same republicans that testified under oath, will testify again. Not Gym of course, Subpoenas dont apply to him

And how ironic it is, Stanley, that your DOJ is now ignoring congressional subpoenas.

Well, I'm sure they'll end up in jail, just like Peter Navarro, who did the same thing.

Oh wait...! Complying with congressional subpoenas is not required when you're a demotard... how could I forget?

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents entrapped the U.S. Capitol rioters on January 6, 2021. -

Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), who chairs the Homeland Security Committee’s border subcommittee

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents entrapped the U.S. Capitol protesters on January 6, 2021. -

FYFY Mr. Higgins.

A CIA Officer/former FBI official is on an undercover video boasting about using the might of the federal government to ‘jail anyone’ by ‘setting them up.’

Gavin O’Blennis, a Contracting Officer for the CIA told an undercover journalist with Sound Investigations that the FBI “can put anyone in jail…set ’em up!”

Fun Fact... after the Biden regime took over, the US now has over twice the number of political prisoners than Russia... and the number is growing...

Are you counting the traitors from January 6th or not?

Actually the traitorous J6 Federal Agents provaquetuer have not been jailed YET.

What are you talking about?

The truth.

Gonna have to be more specific.

No you have to learn to open your mind

That’s rich coming from you

Nice "Maybe I am, but what are you?" comeback!

You don't even try.

I might if you were worth my time

Stop replying then.

There were zero Trump supporter traitors on Jan 6 and absolutely NO insurrection

Yeah good luck convincing me that something I saw with my very own eyes didn’t happen.

We all saw it. You just imagined it to be something it clearly wasn’t. There was no attempt to overthrow the government at all. Just like you lunkheads imagined Trump was trying to fabricate evidence against Biden with the Ukraine phone call. The transcripts made it clear you were deluded. Same with January 6.

Yeah, like breaking windows, defecating in important offices, and chants to execute the vice president by hanging is a “peaceful protest”, give me a break.

Even if all those things happened (which of course they didn't), it's still not an overthrow of the government. No insurrection happened. Go back to sleep.

It is when it’s all in response to deny the results on an election. Watch the footage with audio if you don’t believe me.

What is the reason for your willful ignorance? Loyalty? Nostalgia? The Sunk Cost Fallacy?

Nope. Challenging the results of the election is perfectly legal and normal. The protestors wanted their voice heard so that those with the authority did not rush to certify the election until all valid challenges were heard. There was no need to rush and every reason to wait. What happened on Jan 6 started as perfectly legal and necessary protest. What it became, while never insurrection as we all saw, was not great, but certainly not worse than the RIOTS in Minneapolis and around the country in the wake of George Floyd's accidental death (yes, that is what it was, not murder).

I'm sure you wanted Al Gore and John Kerry brought up for insurrection when they challenged the results in 2000 and 2004 too, right? Sure you did. Same thing Trump did. Nothing less.

You stand corrected.

Perhaps we are from alternate timelines then, where what transpired on January 6 went differently. Or our perceptions of what happened that day differ because one of us actually saw it and the other mere sound bites. In any case, to debate facts from here is moot.

Good day.

Yeah. You should have been paying attention to the reality and not getting your talking points/interpretations of events from your liberal hive mind. Thinking for yourself is a good thing and a key requirement to being conservative and patriotic.

There’s a difference between a legal challenge (Bush V. Gore) and a violent storming of the capitol building (January 6). What’s more is that several of y’all can’t decide whether is was a “peaceful protest” (which I can guarantee it wasn’t given what I saw in real time) or whether it was a set-up by the Democrats to make Trump’s base look bad.

Ever wonder why Speaker Johnson refuses to release uncensored footage of January 6? Because it would show exactly what I’m talking about and prove these “peaceful protesters” are what they really are: traitors.

And I’m not gonna listen to those who sympathize with traitors. Good day.

There was no “violent storming” and regardless that was not Trump, but his supporters. Nothing traitorous either except the left pretending it was insurrection. It was a peaceful protest that went temporarily awry. Encouraged by rogue fbi agents of course. The only person killed was a protester who was murdered. No cops hurt. No real damage. Nothing traitorous at all.

As for why the video not released, you have no idea so your liberal wet dream claims of why have no merit.

Again facts win and you’re corrected.

Why not move, buddy?

Why not rescue and restore our country instead of surrendering to liberal Marxist evil?

Is that what is happening in your state? That sucks. Move to Florida. I have a lot for sale....rotflmao!!!

cant afford insurance though, oh, and dont say GAY

They say gay all the time in Florida. Was never made illegal to do so.

you're funny, and misinformed. Have you attended any of the book burnings? and insurance is not affordable there

Nope. Not misinformed. Desantis/Florida bill never prohibited "saying gay". That was a lie created by foul leftists like yourself. You stand corrected.

Standing, sitting, whatever he's doing, Stanley can be corrected 100 times a day, and he absolutely will not change his opinion from the lies he's been told.

I think we all should tip our cap to Stanley for his dogged determination in the face of overwhelming evidence that proves nearly every single thing he says is wrong.

"you're funny, and misinformed. "

Good grief, I thought I was reading a reply to one of your posts when I saw that, Stanley! 🤣😂🤣

btw, Stanley, insurance is unaffordable here in Taxifornia as well.

How does that fit into your ridiculous liberal conspiracy theories?

Insurance is not affordable anywhere.

truth

100% correct.

Stanley should try paying for it here in Taxifornia!

Of course, that won't compute with him, because only states run by evil people like DeSantis charge boatloads for insurance.

There's no way a state run by Gavin Nussolini could ever do anything wrong, right Stanley?

My gawd, Stanley.

Your posts are nothing but regurgitation of liberal talking points that have been proven wrong, over and over again.

You do know that the Florida legislation that the lying media calls the 'don't say gay' bill, literally, as in LITERALLY, does not have the word gay in it?

That's okay Stanley. We know standards of truth do not apply to you and liberals.

I said COUNTRY. Can't you read?

The country is a republic. Each state is its own country, in essence.....btw...the bill states you cant discuss sexual orientation in class....literally domt say gay.....

According to the text of the Bill, its aim is to prohibit “classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity in certain grade levels” in Florida’s primary schools.

Rotflmao!!! Go back to sleep, Ronald is tak9mg good care of you!

"btw...the bill states you cant discuss sexual orientation in class....literally domt say gay....."

That's hilarious. You describe the bill, and immediately claim it "literally" says what people can't do, even though that's not what you said.

Question for you PL, and this assumes you've read the bill (you did sort of quote from it... cherry picking a tiny bit to try to support your point) but what grades does this restriction apply to?

Assuming you're willing to take the challenge, which I believe you are because you are not shy... I would ask you to defend discussing sexual orientation and gender identity in class, with kids who are in kindergarten thru 3rd grade. Because that's all the law bans. Please proceed.

Yes, there's some other things about other grades, but they are flexible, intended to allow people who don't want to ruin kids' lives to discuss these issues rationally, as opposed to what libs want to do to these poor kids.

I've said it over and over, but it needs to be said again, the left (the normal people on the left) can get a lot done on these social issues if they don't try to jam them down peoples' throats AND most importantly, they have to leave the kids out of it. The left (more like 'the Squad' left) will get nowhere when they drag the kids into it, because most of those on the left/center and even more to the left don't want to drag the kids into it either. It's just the nutjobs who insist on doing that.

What does the bill say again then?

If you want to engage in a serious conversation, you'll need to do that more frequently, modda.

Why is it that you're always unaware of what one single comment immediately above or two says?
Do I really have to copypaste the comment every single time in order for you to understand what you are discussing?

Why would I want to do that, let alone, here?

But skip the deflection and indulge me anyways, what does the bill say then?

Why would anyone want to indulge you?

Read the bill. Then we can talk, if you're serious.

But that's a big IF, because so far you can't be serious when you write a post to me.

It is age appropriate...that is the wording. Any other dumb qiestions?

No dumb questions here... apparently dumb answers are just fine though.

If you want to address my actual question, I'd be happy and just as surprised.

So again, I asked "what grades does this restriction apply to?" The bill is very clear about that.

So, it looks like I ASSumed incorrectly, that you had read the bill. Sorry for that assumption, and I won't make that type of mistake with you again.

You know, PL. It looks like I had you all wrong. I thought you were serious about discussing issues, but a flippant reply like that shows that you're just the same as modda.