Trigger Word

Go listen to the entire comment. Trump did not say there would be a bloodbath if he's not re-elected.

Don't read the media edited version, go and find the entire comment.

It's not a matter of. "he didn't mean it" it's a matter of the "bloodbath" comment was taken way out of context.

He was talking about China moving their auto manufacturing to Mexico. Trump said if he re-elected he will impose a 100% tariff on any Chinese auto manufacturers who operate in Mexico without hiring America workers. If he's not elected then the tariffs will not happen and it will be a bloodbath in the automobile industry in America.

This is not Trump back tracking to clear up what he said, this is what Trump said and the propaganda arm of the Democrat party (aka the mainstream media) intentionally took it out of context.

I think this will be the setup for more FBI instigated violence that will be pinned on Trump for another insurrection charge. Because that's how the left works. They lie about everything and so does the mainstream media.

The meme stands. Trump says something with clear intenet and y'all rush in to say he didn't mean that. The context is that he was talking about Chinese factories in Mexico. How if he were elected, he'd put a 100% tariff on cars made in those plants.

And then he says if he's not elected, there were be a bloodbath. And that will be the least of it.

Then he goes back to the cars for a sentence on how they won't be able to sell those cars. That's the context.

He talks about 2 different things. The first is what will happen if he's elected. Then what will happen if he's not elected.

You just have to twist Trumps words all sorts of ways to make it fit, don't you?

Trump is in no way talking about a threat to the nation if he loses the election. Trump was talking about auto manufacturing and nothing else. It is just so clear I really don't know how anyone can misinterpret it. I guess you guys just want to misinterpret it.

8jucjb.jpg (click to show)

Twist? I parsed what he said. If he had said, "economic disaster" it would make sense. I'll even go so far as to say if he'd said, "economic bloodbath" it would make sense. A poor choice of words, but it would make sense in connection to Chinese car production.

But he didn't. Then he added, "that will be the least of it." Which makes it a threat. If we don't elect him, there will be violence (bloodbath) and it will get worse (that will be the least of it).

And this is the guy MAGA Country claims is a super stable genius with the best memory that is playing 4D chess with us all. So, if that's true, he picked those words on purpose.

Isn't it obvious that is what he meant? It would be an economic disaster for US automakers.

What he did not say, mean or imply that the nation would be in a bloodbath just because he lost the election. "That will be the least of it" is just Trump's typical exaggeration. He exaggerates everything. Everything he does is "the best", "the greatest" and everything his opponents say is "the worst" or "horrific".

There will be a civil war in this country, that is inevitable. And when Biden is installed, not elected, for his second term that could be the catalyst but I don't think it will be. The civil war might be triggered when the Dems start confiscating firearms. But that might not even start it. But it will be started because of some policy that destroys liberty that the left imposes on us in their march towards tyranny. And that will be a bloodbath, with or without Trump. And when it happens I hope it will happen after I am long gone from this world. I, for one, just do not want to see this nation ripped apart by violence. I don't want to see the carnage.

But I think the entire reason for the Dems open border policy was not just to get more voters, keep the human trafficking business thriving, or keeping the drug trade going. I think the main reason is easy access to the country from foreign hostiles. We are potentially letting a foreign army freely cross our border. And I am NOT talking about Hispanics escaping the tyranny of their own countries. Nor am I talking about Hispanics who are coming here because the Dems are handing out money to them. In fact I am not even talking about Hispanics at all. There are 100's of thousands of people from Muslim controlled countries that we know of who have crossed our border. There are nearly that many Chinese nationals who have done the same.

Do you see what you did there?

You said 'bloodbath' was an economic term and not a call for violence if Trump isn't elected. Then you literally threatened violence with the assurance of a civil war if Trump wasn't elected.

You are showing that it was a call for violence and it's one you heard loud and clear.

I've been watching the left grow more and more hateful as the years have gone on. I saw that civil war coming back when Trump was still a Democrat. Trump has nothing to do with this coming civil war. And it still mostly opinion but I still think it will happen. In fact I would be shocked if it didn't.

It will be caused by the left. They will take the first shot. The right has no interest in starting a war but we will fight back.

What Trump said had nothing to do with this impending civil war. He most likely doesn't think it will happen.

I just know when any group of people start on a campaign of hate, like what the left is doing, it usually ends in violence.

It's real popular for you guys to label us as the haters but you never asked any of us if we hate anyone, you just branded us as haters and you keep building on that false foundation.

We do not hate anyone. All of that stuff about prejudice and discrimination that you guys used to preach at us constantly, was all for a show. Because your side are the biggest discriminators in the world. It's not based on skin color, it's based on ideology. We want to be free and you want us controlled by the same people who you want controlling you.

You hate us and call us all sorts of names trying to shame us but we're not ashamed of freedom. And that just pisses you guys off even more.

That's why it is the left who will fire the first shot.

What Trump said was clearly metaphorical. It has to do with the American auto industry vs the Chinese auto industry. China wants to disrupt our economy as much as the Democrats do.

Of course you're the real victim here. I mean, that's the best card racists like to play.

We don't have to ask who conservatives hate. It's obvious. You are trying to legislate out of existence trans and gay people. You're taking away healthcare for women.

You hate anything that isn't white, male, and your specific brand of Christian.

And the left fire the first shot? How? I thought we were all weak beta-male soi boys who want to give birth? If we don't even own any guns, how are we going to fire the first shot?

By making sure you have healthcare? By making sure your boss has to pay you a fair wage?

You say you want to be free? But you don't want anyone else to be free. You want them to have to live the way you approve of. You want them to be who you say they have to be.

When people say no, you immediately threaten violence. Even the thought of people not living the way you approve of here, you threatened a civil war. No mention of coming to a consensus. No thought of working through differences. Nope. Straight to murder.

Civil war against what? Who's going to fight whom? Where? You seeing any trenches being dug?
That's a civil war right there, and didn't time for them to go back to the trailer for Mom to go warm up their Hot Pockets to go along with their Bud Lights.

"Fella thinks this is CNN vs a Tucker Carlson Best Of 7:48 min clip!"

What clip? You watch something and you think the entire world has seen it.

"Like I said, you AIN'T from here."

Sooooooo happy that I AIN'T from New York City. You got that right, "fella" (who even uses that word anymore? Is this the 1930's?) I'm from the best parts of the United States of America. Not the liberal hellhole called New York City.

"But it's my Puerto Rican Taino ancestors' fault, according to you."

What are you even talking about? Are you having conversations with me in your head again?

If I remember correctly Christopher Columbus had established a close relationship with the Taino people. There was a nearby tribe that had been kidnapping the Taino people and eating them. Columbus sent his soldiers to rescue those who were just kidnapped and in the process the killed several other of the tribe. I think they were called the Carib or something like that because the Caribbean was named after that cannibalistic tribe. There was also another cannibal tribe that was terrorizing the Taino also but I can't remember their name. And it might have been that tribe instead of the Carib, I just don't remember.

Liberal historians see that Columbus's men attack the Carib and purposely ignore the reason to paint Columbus as a bad guy. This is just not true. Columbus established a great relation with the Taino people. The Taino were NOT cannibals.

The Taino people were all over the Caribbean. I believe this happened in Hispaniola and not Puerto Rico. He came to Puerto Rico later.

That is all I really know about the Taino. So what do I think is there fault?

Very close.

No, you don't remember correctly.

Within a few decades of Cristobal Colon's invasion, the Tainos were nearly completely wiped out.

"It was broadcast live. On television. Well, here in America, anyways.
Americans saw it as it happened. You didn't."

Wait..... Now you think NYC is America?

What was "broadcast live" was exactly what the Democrat Party wanted you to see. The hours and hours and hours of the Capitol Bldg security footage shows an entirely difference event. Not to mention the hours of cellphone video images that have been collected.

Unfortunately for that narrative that you are holding on to so dearly, Jan 6th was one of the most videoed and photographed event.

What is always shown on the news is lies. The Dems set this all up and you still believe it??? The Jan 6th committed was a hoax. They purposely left out evidence. They took testimonies from police offices who said they were there when it happened but when the security footage was release they were no where in sight at the event they testified seeing. One cop talked about a woman in a pink MAGA shirt. Then in an other testimony the woman had a pink MAGA hat.

Unfortunately for that cop's testimony, there was no woman at the time he said in wearing any thing with MAGA on it. There was, however, a dude wearing a pink hoodie with no message at all on it.

YOU, YES YOU!!! HAVE BEEN LIED TO. But I don't suspect you are ever let a little thing like the truth ever convince you that you are believing a lie.

Fella thinks this is CNN vs a Tucker Carlson Best Of 7:48 min clip!

Like I said, you AIN'T from here.

Hey Modda. I just saw this on ImgFlip today and I thought of you 8k7s61.jpg (click to show)

But it's my Puerto Rican Taino ancestors' fault, according to you.
Classic

Modda, Modda, Modda. What am I going to do with you? I try and I try to educate you but you just keep hold firm to the lie.

You already know that Jan 6th started off as just a protest. And that's all it ever would have been if the Capitol Police hadn't started firing rubber bullets and flash grenade into the peaceful protest. Then FBI agents coerced some of the protesters into the Capitol Bldg and even though the vast majority were just wandering around in the Capitol Bldg some of them (probably FBI agents) broke stuff.

It wasn't even much of a riot. All you need to do is watch footage from the Capitol Bldg security footage to see what happened.

It's a great big nothing burger with extra cheese. It was a protest that a small fraction of became rioters.

But because the news media (with no supporting evidence) called it an insurrection, that has become your gospel truth.

It's always the same with y'all. Trump says something that has very clear intent, and you rush in to defend it by saying he didn't mean that. That it's out of context.

The context is that he was talking about Chinese factories in Mexico. How if he were elected, he'd put a 100% tariff on cars made in those plants.

And then he says if he's not elected, there were be a bloodbath. And that will be the least of it.

Then he goes back to the cars for a sentence on how they won't be able to sell those cars. That's the context.

He talks about 2 different things. The first is what will happen if he's elected. Then what will happen if he's not elected.