The Climate Narrative in a Nutshell

883 views • 46 upvotes • Made by Magnuson 8 months ago in politics
John Kerry I was for it before I was against it meme
57 Comments
AmericanViking
7 ups, 8mo, 1 reply
World Economic Forum demands $3.5 trillion per year to 'decarbonize' the planet, 'reach net-zero and restore nature'



According to the whitepaper, which is creepily titled, “The Role of Public-Private-Philanthropic Partnerships in Driving Climate and Nature Transitions,” private organizations should surrender their autonomy to governments in exchange for an endless amount of credit and a backstop of protection should their business fail in the open market.



This is essentially the exact governmental structure of the Chinese Communist Party, which WEF founder Klaus Schwab has hailed as a model for governance. Must be a major coincidence!



Putting that $3.5 trillion in perspective, it’s almost 60 percent of the annual U.S. federal budget. And if we know anything about international public-private efforts, it seems that U.S. taxpayers are first to get shaken down in the process.
Magnuson
6 ups, 8mo
There are many enemies to humanity, the WEF being a major one.
pfifekopf
4 ups, 8mo, 2 replies
Magnuson
4 ups, 8mo
How many "end of the world predictions" by science have come true?
Magnuson
4 ups, 8mo, 1 reply
By the way, I believe in gravity. The climate has been changing since the formation of the Earth. Your attempt to straw man your opponents isn't working. You are the ones who are trying to stop climate change. Good luck with that. LOL.
pfifekopf
5 ups, 8mo, 2 replies
You have completely misunderstood me. Read the bumper sticker again. It says "I believe in climate science change". I completely agree with your meme, statements and comments, LOL. My good Sir, let's grab a beer
Magnuson
3 ups, 8mo, 2 replies
LOL, my man, I am really having trouble understanding that bumper sticker then. I feel like there are a few possibilities but it's hard to get any of them lined up properly.
pfifekopf
4 ups, 8mo, 1 reply
The bumper sticker isn't even real. This meme was made by cartoonist Josh, who makes excellent cartoons about the climate, or rather about climate nonsense. I found the cartoonist Josh years ago at "Watts up with that" by Anthony Watts. I think it's a brilliant idea to suggest that the word "science" has been added to the sticker afterwards. Cheers!
Magnuson
2 ups, 8mo
No worries. I'm a goof for not getting it.
AdamSmithsInvisibleHand
2 ups, 8mo
Don't feel bad, I didn't get it either. I'm glad I read pfifekopf's comment explaining it.
Modda
1 up, 7mo
Not to mention reminding of that song, which now is rotating in my head and I didn't even like it back then either!
AdamSmithsInvisibleHand
4 ups, 8mo
WayneUrso
4 ups, 8mo, 1 reply
I’m an old guy who was born in the 1950’s. For as far back as I can remember, there have always been variations of ‘The End Is Near’. And I’m still standing. Additionally, there have always been people who worship the Earth in fanatical ways. Traditionally they have been called Druids.
Magnuson
4 ups, 7mo, 2 replies
Yeah, but the activists are shameless and the grift keeps going no matter how many times they end up being proven wrong. Every single Al Gore prediction has not happened. Every one!
WayneUrso
3 ups, 7mo
So very true!
low rated comment (click to show)
[deleted]
0 ups, 7mo, 2 replies
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo, 1 reply
LOL, we never predicted the end of the world about any of those things. What are you smoking? I'm against some of those things but who said the world would end if those things happened? I don't even think Jerry Falwell was saying that. BTW, Falwell doesn't represent me, but he has said some heinous things. Westboro baptist church has said some heinous things, too. All nine of them!
low rated comment (click to show)
[deleted]
0 ups, 7mo, 1 reply
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo, 1 reply
We're not doing so well in terms of society right now and gay marriage is part of it. But probably more than anything that's ruined us as well as the rest of the west is the elevation of women into positions of power that they do not deserve and they haven't earned.
[deleted]
0 ups, 7mo, 1 reply
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo, 1 reply
I have a very heterodox view of marriage by today's standards but an orthodox view by old standards. I think marriage is less about feelings of love and more about uniting families and producing children. Gay people can't do that. Usually leftists use a simplistic tautological equation that dictates that "love is love" but they don't mean that when they say it. They mean sex is love. And it's not. People have sex with people they hate all the time. I posted about racist Michelle Wu elsewhere. Her husband is white. If she loves her husband why is she throwing a party on taxpayer dollars that he can't attend?



The issue spreads further than this and further than I can write about in comments so I'll cut it short but what I have is a start.



Yes, I don't think women should be in any positions of power. See Michelle Wu. Women do not have traits for leadership that come naturally to men no matter how many leftist lies people want to spout about there being no differences in the sexes. That's ridiculous. Ayn Rand actually said it best when she said women should not want to lead men. No institution has ended up better for efforts to promote women into positions of power artificially and without merit.



I'm not saying there haven't been good women leaders. Far from it. You have Queen Elizabeth, Margaret Thatcher, and Cleopatra, etc. BTW, those all go against the narrative that men have been running things since 10,000 B.C. (as stated by Will Ferrel). What I'm saying is there is no institution that has adopted the practice I have specified that has done better for it. Not one.



And institutions that adopt practices to accept or hire people based on race rather than qualifications don't do better for it either. When they lowered the standards for air traffic controllers to meet racial quotas the instances of near-misses on commercial airplane flights went up so high they had to stop counting them lest B.O.'s reputation suffer severely and we all know how far the liberal entities will go to protect "the first black president."
[deleted]
0 ups, 7mo, 4 replies
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo
People should get married based around the idea of uniting families and off the assumption that they are fertile. If they have trouble conceiving then that doesn't mean they should give up. You know how many people have been told they'd never get pregnant and then got pregnant? A man will not impregnate a man and a woman will not impregnate a woman. Humans weren't built like that no matter how much you've been lied to and you believe in the lies.
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo
Some societies and religions actually dissolve marriages that are discovered to be infertile. I don't say that should be done because Sarah and Abraham in the Bible were thought to be infertile and look where that ended up. Jews wouldn't exist if they didn't have Isaac.



Why would anybody say "love is love." That doesn't mean anything. Water is water. Light is light. An axe is an axe. That's completely idiotic and simplistic if that's what you mean when you say that and if you seriously mean that then you're dumber than I am.



I didn't say they necessarily fall apart although I'm sure there are examples. I said they don't improve from non-qualification based practices. And they don't. I guess I won't say that women should be formally barred from all those activities but they shouldn't be affirmative actioned into roles they didn't earn, either. Interestingly societies that have achieved the most parity have the most polarization between the sexes anyway so I'd let that happen and let the cards fall where they will.
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo
How certain are they that they will never get pregnant?
Magnuson
1 up, 7mo
"Should a woman who has had her uterus removed not be allowed to get married?" Yes.



A number of people think marriage is for everybody. The divorce rate says otherwise.
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo
I'll say we did say the world would end up going to hell in a hand basket. And if you'll look around you that's the exact situation we're in right now, Cheech. Check the YouTube video I'm posting below.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EoNVC0oNdKs
CraigThompson
3 ups, 8mo
Vote for us or the world will end. That is quite a hustle.
AdamSmithsInvisibleHand
4 ups, 8mo, 2 replies
They've been trying to float this lead blimp for over 25 years now and not one prediction has ever come close to being true. But they just will not let up on it.



That's because there is no climate change, there is no global warming. What there is are a lot of power hungry people who want to control the world and that is why every single solution to climate change proposed by the UN and the WEF involved you giving up all of your freedom to them. None of which will have any affect on the planet.
Magnuson
3 ups, 7mo, 1 reply
I think it actually all started in the 70's with Rachel Carson's bullshit book Silent Spring. If you've ever read it you'd be surprised the planet didn't end in the 60's. Yet people gulped it up and banned things like DDT that didn't actually harm anything except what it was supposed to and ospreys.
AdamSmithsInvisibleHand
2 ups, 7mo, 2 replies
I haven't read that book but I do know that she is responsible for the deaths of maybe into the millions of Africans in some of the countries in Africa who banned DDT because of her. They weren't able to keep the mosquito population down and as a result hundreds of thousands (maybe millions) of Africans died of malaria.
Magnuson
3 ups, 7mo, 1 reply
Yeah, the book was chock full of junk studies that had all kinds of problems in testing. I think they figured it out because when they replicated the studies they did not get the same results and so had to figure out where the people doing the testing went wrong. It turned out if they tested DDT on rats the food they used was moldy and that's what caused adverse effects. In the replicated tests they used proper food and walla- no adverse effects.
Modda
1 up, 7mo, 1 reply
It caused the thinning of eggshells which caused them to crack easily before hatching, and basically there wouldn't be many species if any birds around right now if it wasn't for the banning of DDT. Also turned out decades later it causes breast cancer as well, places like Long Island where it was used profusely have higher rates because of it.
Magnuson
3 ups, 7mo
B/C NOTHING ELSE in Long Island would be giving women breast cancer.
Modda
1 up, 7mo, 1 reply
False.
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo, 1 reply
LOL, no actually it's true. Even your own leftist sources have DEBUNQUED the shoddy studies.
[deleted]
0 ups, 7mo, 1 reply
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo, 2 replies
Which one do you want? The New York Times? The New Atlantis? The Daily Beast?
Modda
1 up, 7mo, 1 reply
I've seen it. Lived through it. With my uncle's ducks, no less. 



It was a reality. It's past now. No need to get whatever over what was over decades before you were born.
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo
You didn't live through it. If what Rachel Carson's book said was true the world would've ended in the 60's. That's how wild her claims were.
[deleted]
0 ups, 7mo, 1 reply
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo, 4 replies
I'm glad you've found something other than the soundness of my claims to discount my argument because you sure can't do it otherwise, can you? No biggie. Most people lose arguments with me. It's not a shame.
[deleted]
0 ups, 7mo, 2 replies
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo
Chill, bruh. I said losing to me in an argument is not a shame. Your English takes a dive when you're triggered like this.
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo
What makes you care about birds so much, anyway? Are you an ornithologist or perhaps someone who keeps them for other purposes? Don't get me wrong, I'm sure your reasons are noble. But even Jesus didn't care about birds - A. and B. Is your care for the birds by any chance superseding any care you would have for the millions of Africans who've died from thoughtless pesticide bans?
Modda
1 up, 7mo, 1 reply
You don't have an argument. You're not even trying to present one, other than denying realities from the past. Peregrines and Bald Eagles, etc, didn't go extinct, despite coming real close. Heck, I've seen both. IN THE BRONX (tbh, the "Peregrine" might have been a Kestrel, but they did nest in Fordham U, and I lived a block away, and same diff, so.....)



Here, maybe you can use this to lead you in the right direction. I ain't a pro, but I can weave circles around y'all on the subject:



imgflip.com/i/899nh2?nerp=1702786131#com29025121



Now check out why 'Climate Change' has skipped over Cuba and how deep under water Florida should have been under for the last 10,000 (Eh, I just went back and posted a pic of it for ya now). I got a few in my Poli_Temps stream but I gotta eat dinner.
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo
What she has said about birds in her book are the only parts of it that are true. That's because DDT saturates more and more as it goes up the food chain or gets eaten by more and more animals. It's only by the time it reaches the birds part of the food chain that it can do any harm. Other than on insects which are the target of the DDT in the first place so that's how it should work.



Now that I've stated my argument after you denied it without hearing it (which is laughable) I've presented you with a few choices for sources on the debunking of Rachel Carson. Which one do you want?
[deleted]
0 ups, 7mo, 1 reply
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo
I've stated my argument well enough. I think you're going through repression right now. That's a Freudian term. It's when a person comes across something they find so repugnant or in your case so harmful that they won't even recognize it. It's as if I said nothing when I've pretty well laid out my argument. And that's fine. I said there was no shame in losing to me but you seem to still think there is. Sad.
Modda
1 up, 7mo, 1 reply
Did you say Jesus? Now THAT'S someone who is a tad late for his end-of-the world party, nearing 2000 years for his return and that whole Apocalypse thingy. "Before this generation comes to pass" indeed.



Dinner's ready. Laterz.



Don't forget to look up what I told you to boost your 'argument'
Magnuson
2 ups, 7mo
You got better things to do than wait for the end of the world? Enjoy your dinner. I'm grabbing some shut-eye.
Modda
1 up, 7mo
Actually their actual solution is trading it like a commodity. 

Polluters pay a small fee which they'll recoup from consumers, add some nifty little products, and you have a hefty new stream of varied goods, all for profit. 



Global Climate farce is Capitalism going below even derivatives (remember that factor in Bush's Great Recession?). St Al Bore has made millions off it already, and is the major shareholder of the world's biggest carbon trading market. Movies, books, his charities.... he's reaping a ton.



The point of a scam is always monetary gain. This is reality, not some 70s dystopian fantasy movie where The Corp controls all,,,
Show More Comments
Caption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
NOT A SINGLE END OF THE WORLD PREDICTION BY "CLIMATE SCIENTISTS" HAS HAPPENED SINCE THE ADVENT OF "CLIMATE SCIENCE."; BUT THEY'RE RIGHT THIS TIME, DOGGONIT!