Mail-In Voting

Most people forget that even CNN reported on this from election night security camera footage from Atlanta in Fulton County, that for the 1st time ever, poll workers stopped working at 10pm and were told to go home, while other poll workers remained and counted hidden ballot boxes without the required election official supervisors. Any election fraud is fraud!

They can't forget what they never saw in the first place. (referring to neolibs...)

What I find interesting about the libs here on the mighty imgflip is that unlike most of their news-deprived fellow dims, is they know about all the crap that the mainstream media refused to report (since we correct thinking people point it out all the time) and they *still* think there was no fraud, particularly in Georgia.

Same with Hunter's laptop. Most under-informed demo-sheep hadn't heard of it before the election, and most still haven't, but the libs here on imgflip know all about it and still pretend like it's a non-factor.

That's willful ignorance on their parts, probably resulting from chronic cases of TDS.

Here's the scary part. . .once upon a time in Germany in many of its villages and small towns there was the smell of rotting bodies that permeated the air in the village. . and to paraphrase one your lines - they *still* thought Jews and others weren't being murdered by the thousands.

Sure there are insults and jokes about liberals being no better than Nazis. . .but sometimes the joke or insult feels like a bucket with sea water that floats around Antarctica/Arctic plus a lot ice cubes being thrown right into the face with of open wounds. . .

"and they *still* think there was no fraud, particularly in Georgia."

And wasn't it Michigan that had 110% voter turnout?

" That's rich, coming from someone who probably was "outraged" when SCOTUS obeyed the constitution and overturned Roe v Wade. "

I'll keep thiscomment if scotus ever overturn gun laws to be determined by state.

Apart from 2A, what gun regulatory laws are determined by the federal government? Honest question.

If there are any, then scotus probably *should* overturn them, since they are by nature unconstitutional, just like Roe v Wade was unconstitutional.

As for state laws regarding gun control, isn't it ironic that the states with the strictest gun control laws have the worst gun violence rates. The US is something like 4th out of 195 countries in terms of gun violence, but if you take out the two liberal states with the strictest gun laws (one being California, I forget if the other was New York or Illinois) the US drops to 187th on the list.

So, to answer your "honest" question...

2A does not dictate what sort of firearms you can keep in your posession. Or the manner in which they are kept.

You can still keep your guns, you're simply not allowed to carry them in public areas. If you feel you're unsafe in your city, move. Or to quote a MAGA: "If YoU dOn'T LiKe iT lEaVe!" But no one is taking your guns away. You still have them. Nothing unconstitutional is taking place.

Sorry you're confused.

I remember after the 2020 election, some sensible Democrat voters were confused about hearing for the first time accomplishments that happened under Trump. 15% of those who voted for Biden in 2020 said they would've voted for Trump had they known about the U.S. low unemployment rate across all demographics, the 1st time in U.S. history being a net exporter of energy and of course, the famous Hunter laptop. But in those Democrat voters because of media bias and online filtering had never heard about the positive accomplishments under Trump.

15% of Democrats were uninformed. Trump made a very clear case how his administration was affected by Obama's administration. Obama primed Trump's administration for success. Just like Trump's father did for Trump's wealth. Trump is not self-made in any stretch.

Well, when Trump wins 2024 and his administration is once again successful, we'll know that's a crock of shit, since no way is Pedo Joe leaving anything but a mess for the next president to clean up.

You mean the mess he's cleaning up now? Because it sure as hell wasn't left in tip-top shape. Trump tanked it.

He's not going to win anything in 2024 except a Prison term.

Even if the courts are so corrupt that that happens, you act like that could prevent him from being president. 🤨

So, if they convict him, they're corrupt. If he's innocent, they're based? Typical MAGA thinking. Reminds me of 2020.

"So, if they convict him, they're corrupt. If he's innocent, they're based?"

Yes, that is indeed how logic works. The same way as you saying "if they convict him, they're based. If he's innocent, they're corrupt." would be a logically accurate (albeit incorrect) statement.

And I'm no MAGA, particularly because I'm not American, I'm Canadian, but when your president is left-wing, it adversely affects my country to a high degree, to the point our "leader" (who won despite losing the popular vote, even though we don't have an electoral college) is becoming a genuine dictatorial tyrant.

I never said you said that, merely used it as a hypothetical example, thus the words "would be". Why so defensive?
>> I think you're reading too much into what I said. I think that's called apophenia. Your phrasing was confusing when you had made a declarative statement and using me as the example when you had no evidence I had ever made such a statement. It sounded like you were trying to assert a fact. I was correcting you to clarify.

As for the Turd, he called actual peaceful protesters "terrorists" and used the emergency measures act to freeze their bank accounts, so their families couldn't buy food, with highly questionable legality and morality.
>> What? Sources? Never heard this before. Do you have any examples of people this had happened to? Or, is this political rhetoric using subjective labels and playing the victim when (I am assuming we're talking about J6 rioters) were the assailants...?

He also issued the equivalent of a King's Decree, banning the sale, import, and transfer of all guns.
>> What? No, he didn't.

You know, Google is sometimes a wonderful tool that you can use to verify *common friggin knowledge*!

You should try it sometime.

Do you also not believe the Holocaust happened?

Oh, and this video might help, too.

https://youtu.be/3daPmi49u3A

"The same way as you saying "if they convict him, they're based." You're putting words in my mouth; making a strawman argument. I never said any such thing.

" is becoming a genuine dictatorial tyrant." That's def. an opinion.

I never said you said that, merely used it as a hypothetical example, thus the words "would be". Why so defensive?

As for the Turd, he called actual peaceful protesters "terrorists" and used the emergency measures act to freeze their bank accounts, so their families couldn't buy food, with highly questionable legality and morality. He also issued the equivalent of a King's Decree, banning the sale, import, and transfer of all guns.

"You know, Google is sometimes a wonderful tool that you can use to verify *common friggin knowledge*!"
>> You mean that thing that Right Wing was saying was rigged against them and biased agains them? It is really hard trying to keep up to your standards to maintain communication with you guys smdh.\

"He also issued the equivalent of a King's Decree, banning the sale, import, and transfer of all guns."
>> Your own source says the sale of "handguns."

Reading.

You should try it sometime instead of alarmist, extremist, knee-jerk reactionary takes about something you obviously don't fully understand.

And this trucker thing? Not gonna get into it because *no one* has been able to prove through a double blind, randomized, controlled trials, that has been able to place vaccines as dangerous for you. Often, people cite heart problems for those who get the vaccine. They're afraid of getting the vaccine because of Myocarditis. Which is stupid, because you're far more likely to catch COVID than get myocarditis. And if you catch COVID, you're 15x more likely to get myocarditis.

Here's an excerpt in the following reply with the cite which references a meta analysis of 55million test subjects. (And then some.)

(Read following reply)

"Myocarditis seven times more likely with COVID-19 than vaccines"
( https://pennstatehealthnews.org/2022/09/covid-19-infection-causes-myocarditis/#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20findings%2C%20the,risk%20related%20to%20the%20vaccines. )

Investigators conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 studies published worldwide from December 2019 through May 2022. The studies included nearly 58 million patients who reported cardiac complications and belonged to one of two groups: the 55.5 million who were vaccinated against COVID-19 compared to those who were not vaccinated (vaccination group), and the 2.5 million who contracted the virus compared to those who did not contract the virus (COVID-19 group).
In the vaccination group, the researchers separately compared the risk of myocarditis for various COVID-19 vaccines, including mRNA (Pfizer, Moderna), Novavax, AstraZeneca and Johnson and Johnson. The median age of the study population was 49 years; 49% were men; and the median follow-up time after infection or COVID-19 vaccination was 28 days.
The researchers found that among those diagnosed with myocarditis after receiving the vaccine or having COVID-19, the majority (61%) were men. Of patients diagnosed with myocarditis in both vaccination and COVID-19 groups, 1.07% were hospitalized and 0.015% died.
“COVID-19 infection and the related vaccines both pose a risk for myocarditis. However, the relative risk of heart inflammation induced by COVID-19 infection is substantially greater than the risk posed by the vaccines,” said Dr. Paddy Ssentongo , a resident physician in the Department of Medicine at Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center and the lead author of the study. “We hope our findings will help mitigate vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccine uptake.”
=========================================================

That said, the truckers were creating a blockade and destroying the supply chains and *Gasp* put our economy into freefall when supply and demand was already throttled. Joe Biden isn't at fault for the economy. People like those truckers are, and also Greg Abbott, Gov. of Texas who let 200 million dollars in food perish at the border. To do "Routine checks" when there was no reason to. After that much food perished, he put a stop on it. Too bad it took so long to do it.

Trudeau? Seems like he had the wherewithall to know what's best for the country and do it in spite of the ill-informed suggesting otherwise.

Read more.

"You act like that could prevent him from being president."
*Deep breath*

"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."

All we need is a guilty verdict. Let the courts decide.

Oh and by the way... "Members of the Civil Grand Jury are selected from a volunteer pool or are nominated directly by a Superior Court judge. The final 23 members are selected randomly by computer. Each July these citizens are sworn in as grand jurors for a 12-month period ending June of the following year."

This means that random average citizens were selected randomly to decide whether or not to bring charges against Trump. If you have evidence that could prove guilt, then the Jury votes yes. This is the first step before actually having a trial where you actually have cross-examinations. So, you may *think* it's corrupt. But it's been decided by We, the People.

It's called the 14th amendment of the Constitution. Anybody who engaged in an insurrection or rebellion against the United States or given aid or comfort to its enemies cannot hold public office ever again either in Congress or the Presidency.

Not to mention the shame of having a jailbird for a president, would be a Slap in the face to Abraham Lincoln & George Washington who stood against tyranny and oppression.

That's all aside from the fact many states are already considering banning him from their states Ballot in 2024. Lol.

I don't doubt some ppl will still vote for him though.

Hell, I'm sure somewhere in this country you can find some white supremacist nazi flag waving son of a B**** scum of Humanity that would vote for Adolf Hitler and Mussolini for President today if they said they wanted to Make America Great Again.

There are far too many Real Patriots that use logic and common sense to not fall for that and see right through their Bullshit.

From the New York Times, a notably "liberal" publication.

To be or not to be. That would be hilarious. The GOP law & order party would never survive having a Convict run for Potus.

That's rich, coming from someone who probably was "outraged" when SCOTUS obeyed the constitution and overturned Roe v Wade.

Except his stretch marks.

Well, 100% of Democrat voters were uninformed, but according to post-election surveys 15% of Democrat voters said they would've changed their vote had they known about Trump's accomplishments during his 4 years. It's more revealing of how internet media is heavily filtered based on users' location and likely voting concerns, where these Americans never heard of the same news that others heard from their preferred media outlets.

Well, 100% of Democrats were informed about what he was doing wrong. Democrats are a party where the ends do not justify the means.

That's a MAGA thing (see: J6 Insurrection.)

And then there was the whole thing how he downplayed Covid. Then how he tried to offer a lot of snake oil to cure it. Then demonized anyone who opposed him. Anyone who spoke out against him was "Crazy" or "unhinged" or some ad hominem.

Don't believe me? Show me two times where he said something nice about someone who spoke against him in the following two weeks after someone testified against him.

He's a crook.

It was

Bullshit that was debunked a long time ago.

Remember even CNN's Rachel Maddow reported this on election night and pointed out that just 5 people were inside State Farm arena in Fulton county with no required election official observers, which invalidates all of those ballots.

FACT

Trump lost.

That's not the issue. The issue is that 1000's of election violations occurred, which are very serious crimes, and they were unprosecuted, which is even more alarming.

No proof. That's the issue.

Like Trump hid out in the White House watching the insurrection on TV?

Not the same at all.