Back in the 90s there was a guidebook floating around that came from a big global summit in brazil (i think), kind of like the w.e.f but earlier. Someone stole a whole bunch of them and photocopies of them got passed around and I got a copy of a couple pages.
I remember a certain paragraph that talked about the effect of education on the environment and the paragraph said something like this :-
(paraphrasing of course, this as nearly 30 years ago)
'People who receive a high standard of education tend to be more successful and as a result they generate a higher expendable income, leading to more purchases (more stuff, bigger houses etc), leading to a bigger negative effect on the environment. It would therefor be beneficial to the environment if people had less education and lower rates of success'
I dont know whether it was implemented or just an idea
but education sure as hell dropped since then.
I don't doubt that for a minute. They are using the environment as a tool to gain power and control. At the core they are just toxic narcissists who want to manipulate and control the world. They look at their fellow men and women with nothing but contempt.
They have been preaching population control since the days of Karl Marx. Our educational system was taken over by the Progressives close to a century ago. Ever since then they have completely dumbing us down.
Those people may not have directly implemented their plan but it has been implemented.
That is true but did see one video of a drag queen twerking in front of small children with parents present. Those parents should be charged with child endangerment. I don't know it this was at a school or not. I didn't watch for more than a second because it disgusted me.
It really saddens me that if you go back 10 or maybe more like 20 years ago there was not a single liberal in this country who would have allowed a drag queen anywhere near an elementary school.
There's a lot of drag queens questioning why they are being asked to come to perform in front of small children. Many of them have spoken out and said that they are appalled that other drag queens have consented to perform. They know who they are and who they are is not appropriate for small children.
Why do you want to punish anyone let alone because of their culture? Actions I can understand, depending on the action. Anyone who breaks the law should be punished. But if someone says or does something, that is legal, that you don't like then the problem is with you not the other person.
We already have people from all over the world living in our country as legal citizens of this country. I don't have a problem with any of that.
What I have a problem with are those who want to take over the world and will exploit any many necessary to do that. For example, it is clearly the goal of Islam to dominate the world with a global caliphate. So what Muslims have been doing is slowly infiltrating nations all over the world. They wedge themselves in to positions of power and start trying to implement sharia law. They've done this in the southwestern Asia. Islam is the majority religion in Indonesia and becoming that way in Malaysia and other countries.
There Muslims in key positions in our government who know things like troop movements and military strategy.
That type of behavior I do not tolerate and neither should anyone in this country. That's because their aim is to destroy our God given rights and force us into their stupid religion. Fortunately the majority of Muslims in this country don't want anything to do with any of that. Some of them are happy to have escaped all of that sharia nonsense.
Illegal immigration is a serious problem. Our economy cannot compensate for the invasion that is happening. It will collapse us. I have absolutely no problem with the different cultures coming from south of our border. I do have a problem with drugs flooding over our border killing our people. China is supplying all of the drug cartels with fentanyl to be moved into America. Fentanyl is the leading cause of death for people between 18 to 45 year olds in America today. That has to change and Biden is only facilitating it.
Aside from any of the above, as long as people immigrate legally I have no problem. I would change our immigration laws to be like many other nations and only allow people to immigrate if they had a skill we needed or they already have a job waiting for them.
Where have you been? America's been falling behind for decades for reasons that have nothing to do with drag queens or whatever else you're trying to blame it on.
It started just over a century ago with the birth of the Progressive era. That's when lefties started tampering with our educational system. Take any college graduate and give him or her a test that was used in the 8th grade in 1900 and the majority will fail. The reason is the left never wants people to be taught how to use their brains for themselves. They turned our educational system into an indoctrination camp. Students are told what to think.
The idea is that uneducated people are easier to control and the in the early 20th century the people who highjacked the word "liberal" are all authoritarians and want to control the world. They have brainwashed millions with their authoritarian dribble. They have become experts at cherry picking facts and warping them to try to make stuff logical. And if they can't do that then they call us nazis, racists, fascists, homophobes, sexists or any of the standard set of insults the hive mind has authorized.
Seriously???? Marxists cannot exist unless they create oppressed/oppressor classes. It is all about getting the "oppressed" to believe they are constantly persecuted by the "oppressors". More recently you guys have created a new version of this with intersectionality. If you are a woman you get one intersectionality point. If you are a black woman you get two. If you a black lesbian you get 3. The more points the more "oppressed" you are and the more value to your status as a victim.
If that isn't an entire political ideology based around a persecution complex then I have no idea what is.
My only problem is morons who want to take my freedom away.
The reason why Marxism has taken so long to get the foothold that it has is because the United States was based on a classless society as well. The difference between this nation and Marx is that we didn't create a classless society by forcing the rich to give all of their money to the poor until everyone was poorer than ever while the ruling elites have all of the luxuries of life.
The US was based on liberty. Where you ended up on any economic scale was up to you and it did not make you better or worse than any other person in this country.
Oops I think I may have exceeded my limit of the amount of text you can read. And now here comes the accusations of lying because I made the mistake of replying to you.
Marxism has never no shall ever get a foothold past a cooperative or commune, themselves not lasting.
The USA was NOT based on liberty. Hence why those so-called God-given rights the Founding Fathers whipped up originally were granted ONLY to those of their own class and ethnic & religious background.
It is doing it right before your eyes. It's called public/private partnerships. It's called sustainable development. It's called smart cities.
Those rights that were enumerated in the Bill of Rights and were discussed centuries before were intended for all men and women. However, there were laws with some peculiar requirements for things. Like only male landowners could vote. Where did that come from? England. As we began to shed the last vestiges of English rule, we began to understand that freedom wasn't freedom unless we all were free.
First slavery needed to be abandon. Then women were given the right to vote. BTW these are not progressive ideas. The left tries to claim these items as their own but the have nothing to do with Marxism.
That is true. Utah was the first state to give women the right to vote. Oh how horrible of those conservative Christians in Utah allowing women to vote.
Democrat president Woodrow Wilson hated the woman's suffrage movement and only gave into them because it was politically expedient to do so. Liberals today only look at Wilson as a champion of the women's suffrage movement but it is complete crap. Wilson had some of the suffragettes put in prison and he personally told the prison guards to have their way with them.
However, the "woke" cancel culture twits have canceled Wilson because they found out that Wilson showed the Birth of a Nation in the White House. If they ever cared to dig much further they would have found out that Wilson was a huge fan of the KKK and used them as a sort of Secret Service. Wilson was a horrible president and he was no different than any other Democrat president that came after him, with two possible exceptions, Truman and Kennedy. But Kennedy treated women horribly and was completely unfaithful to his wife. I think for as bad as the left wants to portray Trump with his womanizing (and Trump was bad), I think Kennedy was much worse. You also have to remember that Trump was a Democrat most of his life and even supported Clinton's assault weapons ban.
"Utah was the first state to give women the right to vote"
No it wasn't. It was Wyoming. Look it up.
"Oh how horrible of those conservative Christians in Utah allowing women to vote"
Considering that it was conservative Christians who fought against the 19th Amendment, and some even today don't like women being allowed to vote...
"Wilson was a huge fan of the KKK and used them as a sort of Secret Service. Wilson was a horrible president and he was no different than any other Democrat president that came after him"
Right, because all the Democrats since Wilson have openly supported the KKK...I especially remember Obama praising the KKK in his inaugural address.
Oh my gosh! NOT progressive? They're THE reason Conservatism came into existence in the first place. Those two issues plus additional in the 20th Century, such as child labor and marriage age, immigration and international relations, Evolution Theory, LGBT, and pollution & energy.
No, it's not. That's corporatocracy.
What you refer to as "sustainable development" and "smart cities" are cute cons usually seen on paper to make it look like someone is trying to do something about whatever which will never see the light of day except on rare occasions like these buildings in Milan in the pic.
The term "sustainable development" is a too broad one, as much of the materials used are billed as recyclable which, of course, they usually end up not being. The usage of actual recycled materials tends towards minimal, the usage of, say, bamboo instead of the usual trees isn't as pleasant ecologically from the bamboo's perspective nor the creatures dependant on that niche. Same with palm oil, where vast swaths of tropical forest are being leveled in an excuse to save them on the rest of the planet.
Who benefits? Why, the companies charging a pretty penny for them, that's who. That's not Marxism, that, again, is corporatocracy, from municipal contracts to subsidies.
Do yous never consider the fact that on occassion yous actually might be right?
Yes, Global Climate Shamming IS a sham.
Rights? Try millenia ago, as in 2.6.
LIBERals - now try to follow me here - are responsible for the push towards and actions taken to LIBERalize the expansion and application of laws and so-called rights and grant these LIBERties to those that formally they were resticted from.
Conservatives, by definition, seek to conserve these restictions in society as they would apply to those not in the entitled privileged class, upending the status quo they benefit from at the expense and exclusion of others. They are reactionaries against LIBERalization and that for their own selfish ends and overly delicate egos.
There you go again with your lies. Just lying your butt off all over the place. Lie after lie after lie. There. Now I got that out of the way.
Before you define "sustainable development" you should go to the UN's website and see what they say. Before you define "smart cities" you should go to the WEF's website and find out which cities in the world and in the US which are working on becoming smart cities and what a smart city actually is.
Liberal. From the same root word as liberty, meaning freedom. A liberal was a person who believed in liberty at the individual level. They valued freedom as one of the highest virtues.
At the time of John Locke, a liberal was a person who believed that mankind was basically good and did not need a government that controlled them. Years later Lysander Spooner took this definition to say that mankind does not need any government at all and can function much better without any intrusion into their lives.
Libertarian. From the same root word as liberty, meaning freedom. A libertarian is a person who believes in liberty. They value freedom as one of the highest virtues. They realized that because those claiming to be liberals no longer value freedom at the individual level, so that they created their own political movement and eventually political party. They also look at conservatives with similar contempt.
Conservative. From the same root that words like preserve and reserve come from. The con prefix means with or together. The idea is that these people want to maintain or hold onto values and principles from the past.
In the time of Thomas Hobbes these were the people who wanted to hold on to the monarchies because they believed that mankind was basically bad and needed a strong government to maintain law and order.
In the early 20th century when the Progressives decided that because the United States was founded on liberalism and they believed in a new kind of freedom, collective freedom, they took to calling themselves liberals. Anyone who disagreed with them were conservatives.
Conservatives began to accept that label but departed from Hobbes and instead seek to conserve the values and principles of those who were once called liberals. Many conservatives share a lot more in common with Libertarians that Libertarians like to realize.
Hi Modda. How are you doing? Just checking to see if you made it this far. I hope all is going well for you. Have a good day.
That's the spirit, even when we're in agreement, you just double up on the lies and say I'm the one doing it.
Again, you're RIGHT. There is no profit in Socialism, hence the lumbering mess on an ever-downward spiral the USSR was and China too till we decided to infuse the latter with cash so it can take a liking to his Capitalism thingy, ironically turning that Communist country into the world's 2nd biggest economy.
With all due respect to the silly conspiracionists that's such an easy outgrowth of backwards Conservatives, there is no grand conspiracy to take their perceived traditional privilege away. For one thing, they've always tended towards poor, even before the 'War of Northern Aggression,' and there is nothing to be gotten from them anyways, profit being what makes it all worthwhile n all.
Sure, the backwater contingent despises their forced entry into the modern world, but the 19th Century is so passe, no matter how hard they try to - what is it, bring back slavery? - it's still 2022. Progress is inevitable. You can't stop it. Not even in Alabama.
They're so busy being reactive they never even pause to consider what basic words mean and if any of their spiel is actually even slightly connected to reality. They contradict themselves simply for the sake of perpetuating their lies.
Our educational system is falling way behind the rest of the world. Can someone please explain to me why it is so important to push drag queens into our schools rather than an actual education that will benefit everyone? HAS ANYONE THOUGHT FOR A MOMENT ABOUT THE FUTURE? How are these kids supposed to function without a good knowledge math, science, history or English? How is having an extensive knowledge of all of the made up genders, being taught dick jokes and how to twerk from drag queens supposed to build a great future?
Caption this Meme 
