Twittergate

There is no such thing as domestic election interference - Lib 101

What the? When in the name of god did he say that?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGRnhBmHYN0

Let's be real here. The guy barely knows what planet he's on, and he's a walking gaffe factory. So ol' Dementia Joe most likely meant to say "anti-fraud", but with the dementia and all, well... you know.

And he got away with that and did not get better after.

Sorry man, so many court cases were thrown out that I will never believe any of Trump's accusations of fraud had real substance.

As far as social media goes, well, if people use their individual agency to vote like morons instead of researching anything themselves, then that's kinda their right...It's the same thing with term limits; they're rather undemocratic. Let the people be stupid if they want.

"Sorry man, so many court cases were thrown out that I will never believe any of Trump's accusations of fraud had real substance."

It was never about the court cases, at least not for anyone with a keen grasp of the obvious. Well *before* the election, anyone with two brain cells to rub together knew that big tech was collaborating with the democrat party to suppress right of center speech on Twitter and other media platforms and now we know for a fact that it happened. Not to mention nothing but negative coverage from so called mainstream media.

"As far as social media goes, well, if people use their individual agency to vote like morons instead of researching anything themselves, then that's kinda their right"

Absolutely! You've pretty much hit the nail right on the head when it comes to the average voter. Most trust the media, so they're not going to go looking for a story that they don't know exists, and by that I'm mean the laptop.

The mere fact that 1 in 6 Biden voters would not have voted for ol' Dementia Joe had they known about the Hunter laptop, combined with what we now know about the FBI working to suppress the story on Twitter and Facebook (and you have to wonder how many other media outlets... I guess time will tell) was enough to throw the election. Voting machines, manufactured ballots, etc., yeah all that may have taken place (or not, it really doesn't matter, imo) but most likely not on a scale that could tip the election, even in swing states or very close precincts in those states.

We really need to start thinking high tech when it comes to things like voter fraud. This ain't Mayor Daley's Chicago any more.

I mean, at that point I think we both agree then that Big Tech needs to be seriously slapped into place. But I draw the line at arguing 'fraud'. Manipulation? Certainly. But that's just the power demagogues have over the masses...Plato warned about that thousands of years ago in Gorgias and we still haven't learned our lesson.

That's funny because after 70 court rulings saying that not one single vote was ever proven to be fraudulent, I never wanted to hear you complain about a stolen election and yet here we are.

Yo, I returned after over a year of being gone and you're still here with the same point I just made. It's good to see ya.

You gotta get yourself into the modern world, thesis. It's not about fraudulent votes, hacked voting machines, manufactured ballots, etc. I've been saying that all along. Sure, some of that probably took place (hell, on both sides!) but not to any degree significant enough to throw the election.

Well *before* the election, anyone with two brain cells to rub together knew that big tech was collaborating with the democrat party to suppress right of center speech on Twitter and other media platforms and now we know for a fact that it happened. Not to mention nothing but negative coverage from so called mainstream media, which refused to objectively report about the laptop.

The mere fact that 1 in 6 Biden voters would not have voted for ol' Dementia Joe had they known about the Hunter laptop, combined with what we now know about the FBI working to suppress the story on Twitter and Facebook (and you have to wonder how many other media outlets... I guess time will tell) was enough to throw the election.

We really need to start thinking high tech when it comes to things like voter fraud. This ain't Mayor Daley's Chicago any more.

You suffer from TDS

Trump won, election was stolen. Its common sense.

And what did the 70 court judges say to the "it's common sense" approach?

Irrelevant. This was a high tech theft. See my previous post to you thesis.

You are a negationist of the fraud.

https://hereistheevidence.com/

2,036,041

Ballots Touched By Anomalies
923

Fact Witnesses
50+

Courts Blocked An Evidentiary Hearing

No, that WAS the evidentiary hearing. The courts blocked you going to trial - BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T HAVE EVIDENCE WHEN ASKED!!! You're supposed to have evidence for your accusations and you didn't!

No matter how much you write in capital letters, you are not going to try to change what has happened. Trump won, and the globalist elites committed fraud and engaged the world in a war to advance their agenda.

.....ummmm....YOU'RE the one trying to change what happened.

Because Biden's president now. That's what happened.

trump lost dillhole, shh

AhahahahaahahahahahahHahahahahshHHHshBBH

New Twitter CEO Elon Musk, who has described himself as a “free speech absolutist,” is now threatening to sue his own employees who leak information to the press, according to an email he sent to workers reportedly leaked Saturday to a media organization.

Musk issued a message warning the company’s workers against leaking “confidential” information, and threatening to sue “for damages” those who violated non-disclosure agreements, according to the email obtained by tech outlet Platformer. Managing Editor Zoe Schiffer then distributed Musk’s message — on Twitter.

"New Twitter CEO Elon Musk, who has described himself as a “free speech absolutist,” is now threatening to sue his own employees who leak information to the press..."

So Stanley, for years we heard that Twitter was a private company and could do what they want.

Why has that suddenly changed, now that Musk owns it?

It's a serious question, so if you're serious about what you post, you really should take a whack at answering it.

And btw, if they signed an NDA, and they leak the very info they signed away any right they may have had to leak, then the company has every right to fire them.

You must not have much work experience in the real world, hey?

Bwa hahahahahahahahahahaha

Twittergate

Go grab some pussy

Use the full quote "they let you grab..."

Your hero's results

You really need better news sources