Bird Box

Because they’re too busy dick riding Xi and CCP haha 😂
#FreeTaiwan

Maybe you're talking about on TV vs internet (?) Idk

gee wiz, your world is so simple.. if China shuts down their exports our economy will tank, and who will make the new maggot hats?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79fZxoTMDJ4

if only imgflip had the same attitude towards american protestors in the same way they did to our chinese allies

We’re not allies with China, bro.

Biden is.

more importantly, they were protesting against the police and authoritarians. people should be allowed to run over them like in Florida :)

The police that have can do pretty much whatever they want and face no repercussions for it (we have a thing called the 4th Amendment you know, as well as Miranda v. Arizona, and many other court cases and regulations on police behavior in the US.)

they were protesting COMMUNIST/SOCIALIST authoritarians. You conveniently forgot to add that part. (:

No matter how desperately you try to spin this, they're not arguing for your side.

Nice try, but no.
https://gigafact.org/fact-briefs/did-florida-pass-a-law-granting-total-immunity-to-people-who-drive-through-rioters-amid-blm-riots

Also, on that same note...https://www.wpr.org/waukesha-vigil-remembers-victims-christmas-parade-attack-anniversary

"they were protesting COMMUNIST/SOCIALIST authoritarians. You conveniently forgot to add that part. (:"

authoritarians is authoritarians, no matter how you sway it. :)

"authoritarians is authoritarians, no matter how you sway it. :)"

Well, yes and no. Most authoritarians are indeed bad (some, though very, VERY few, have done good, like Constantine I), but there is a difference between RIGHT-wing authoritarians (like Pinochet or Chiang Kai-Shek) and LEFT-wing authoritarians (like Xi, Kimmy, Mao, Stalin, etc.)Those left-wing authoritarians believe in socialism, something that many on the American left believe in.

Besides, that doesn't negate the fact that they were still protesting AGAINST the lockdowns, something you guys wholeheartedly support.

"but there is a difference between RIGHT-wing authoritarians (like Pinochet or Chiang Kai-Shek) "

conveniently, you've forgotten to mention one of the most influential right-wing authoritarians of all time. though congrats on bringing up the guy who invaded taiwan.

"Those left-wing authoritarians believe in socialism"

that's a nice way of spelling "state capitalist oligarchy."

"still protesting AGAINST the lockdowns"

their lockdowns involved police. ours did not.

Who?

OOOOOH, you mean Adolf Hitler of the National Socialist Party. Yeah, I hate to break it to you, but he's not a right-wing authoritarian. Kind of a center authoritarian, lean left. I left him out because that's kind of a "everyone I don't like is Hitler" sorta thing.

State capitalist? In a way, but they still believe in communism, just not as extreme as Mao.

Is that so, now?

ttps://www.forbes.com/sites/alexandrasternlicht/2020/04/06/arrested-for-violating-coronavirus-stay-at-home-mandates-police-are-jailing-alleged-scofflaws/?sh=1f80a4bf68a4

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/03/americas/canada-covid-19-lockdown-arrests

Yeah, maybe tell them Gab bois to remove their sainted darling off their fap wall,,,
The only way anyone can get farther right than Hitler is to strip off their clothes and go live in a cave.

Calling your opponents' arguments "fanfic" and "Partisan hack" doesn't mean anything. Nice try, though. A+ for effort.

"Anywho, facts are facts, fantasy isn't."

Correct. Now if only you would realize that....

"You do you and keep posting that St Petersburg script. I'm sure some of the others can find it useful."

Ad hominem.

Beannachd leat!

"PS: Ever simply just look at a dictionary before wasting a day on such nonsense that no one - not them, not the "we," and certainly not me - will bother reading?
Hitler said what he said, did what he did, ain't any amount of clicking them ruby reds together gonna change that..."

Oh the irony... 😂

...doesn't make it true. Indeed, it's actually very similar to Stalin, another influential socialist at the time.

I'll bring to your attention another Hitler quote, from Mein Kampf: "The racial Weltanschauung is fundamentally distinguished from the Marxist by reason of the fact that the former recognizes the significance of race and therefore also personal worth and has made these the pillars of its structure. These are the most important factors of its Weltanschauung.

If the National Socialist Movement should fail to understand the fundamental importance of this essential principle, if it should merely varnish the external appearance of the present State and adopt the majority principle, it would really do nothing more than compete with Marxism on its own ground. For that reason it would not have the right to call itself a Weltanschauung. "

Guy, you're cramming my notifs with your fanfic.
Do you KNOW what the chief problem with fanfic is? Of the partisan hack sort don't make it any better.

Anywho, facts are facts, fantasy isn't.

Speaking of which, I'm in the middle of reading about how in keeping with the truth Goofellas was, and came back briefly to finish a reply. You do you and keep posting that St Petersburg script. I'm sure some of the others can find it useful.

ciao!

PS: Ever simply just look at a dictionary before wasting a day on such nonsense that no one - not them, not the "we," and certainly not me - will bother reading?
Hitler said what he said, did what he did, ain't any amount of clicking them ruby reds together gonna change that...

So you're not going to bother reading something because it might disprove your argument?

Why am I not surprised...

anyway, it doesn't end there.

He "privatized" to fellow loyal National Socialists. If they countered him, well, let's just say they tended to mysteriously disappear. He believed in "controlling without owning," because he didn't want to divide the German people into a class war, as the Bolsheviks had done in Russia.

He did, in fact, outlaw trade unions.

Then he immediately replaced them with something else, known as the "German Workers' Front." It was essentially a big, government run trade union, advocating for "better working conditions" or whatever trade unions claim to do.

He banned the Communists because he saw them as a threat to his power, and because he saw them as too globalist. Another difference is that he saw socialism as the goal, not a step on the way, as the Communists did. He simply added the racial element. It's also worth noting that he banned nearly (if not totally) all other political parties, not just the Communists in particular.

Yeah, I'm guessing you didn't actually read my comment.

The rest of them were addressed above. As for the judeo-bolshevism, that proves my point- he thought the Communists had the right ideas, but were doing about them completely wrong, and were being too friendly to the Jews.

In Hitler's own words, "the racial Weltanschauung is fundamentally distinguished from the Marxist by reason that the former recognizes the significance of race.... and has made t[this] the pillars of it's structure."

So what I said then?

What argument? I don't have an argument.
You CAN, however, if you wish, argue with Marx and Hitler. Well, not really, but...

See if you can try to pay attention:

Socialism is internationalist.
Nationalism is not. "Nationalist" in the Nazi Party's name too, you know.

Further, Hitler's brand of Nationalism was race exclusive. He killed a whole bunch of 'non-Germanic' people in the name of this, not sure if you heard.

He also killed off the Socialist arm of the Nazi Party - the Brownshirts, once he was done utilizing their thuggery abilities.

He then proceeded to wage war against the United Soviet Socialist Republic. Perhaps you haven't heard of that either.

Prior to it coming to that and setting off a little shindig now oft referred to as World War II, Hitler was actually praised and thought of fondly by the West for resurrecting a country in economic freefall, but also for his stance against Communism and so-called Communist states, a much appreciated bulwarck against their spread - or so they thought.

I begin to grow bored with this repitition?
Yes, Hitler DID get rid of various Socialist orgs and replaced them with those he owned and controlled. That's not rule by consensus, that's Autocracy. Right Wing Autocracy. Is this really that confusing to you?

laterz,,,,,

repetition*

LMAO did you actually read that or just copy+paste? Because those quotes (assuming they are actually real quotes, I'll trust you on this one), the last two in particular, actually prove my point. And while we're on the topic of Hitler's words, the 25 Points of the NSDAP tell the same story. Here are a few:

"We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens. "

"Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes. Breaking of rent-slavery."

"We demand the nationalization of all (previous) associated industries (trusts)."

"We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries."

"We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare."

""The state is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national
education program, to enable every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education and subsequently introduction into leading positions. The plans of instruction of all educational institutions are to conform with the experiences of practical life. The comprehension of the concept of the State must be striven for by the school [Staatsbuergerkunde] as early as the beginning of understanding. We demand education at the expense of the State... ."

That's a screenshot, or rather, a panel of multiples.
And no, I ain't got time to waste on reading fanfic nonsense.

Hitler was a person, not the body of the citizenry deciding by consensus.

Yeah, no. Not "what you said then."

Don't play games with me. ^^^

No. Socialism is a "big-tent" ideology, much like "conservatism" or "liberalism." Likewise, there are factions among socialists, just as there are among conservatives and liberals (For example, "paleoconservative" or "neoliberal"). While the vast majority of socialists are, in fact, international, that internationalism is by no means a key tenet of socialist thought. Someone can be socialist and also be extremely nationalist, like... Hitler!

"Further, Hitler's brand of Nationalism was race exclusive. He killed a whole bunch of 'non-Germanic' people in the name of this, not sure if you heard."

Where, exactly, did this come up as a point of contention? Also, he was racist and killed people. How does this prove he was not socialist? Actually, if you add "socialism" in there after "nationalism," you'd be absolutely correct!

"He also killed off the Socialist arm of the Nazi Party - the Brownshirts, once he was done utilizing their thuggery abilities."

Actually, this is an inaccuracy. He killed them off to alleviate the concerns of the German Military about the SA and its role.

"He then proceeded to wage war against the United Soviet Socialist Republic. Perhaps you haven't heard of that either."

Actually it was the UNION OF Soviet Socialist REPUBLICS. But anyway, this still does not prove he was not socialist. There have been plenty of examples throughout history of nations of the same ideology going to war with each other, and even more of tensions that never fully led to war. A prime example is in 1979, when *Communist* China went to war with *Communist* Vietnam.

Because many of them thought he was was a good leader to be able to get his country out of the crippling economy of the Weimar Republic. What they didn't know is what he was like behind the scenes.. NOT BECAUSE HE WASN'T A SOCIALIST. This doesn't prove he was a socialist, because, as I have already explained, just because someone is racist, or anti-Communist, doesn't mean they aren't a socialist.

I don't know, do you grow bored with "this repetition"? That's the wrong punctuation, my friend.

"Yes, Hitler DID get rid of various Socialist orgs and replaced them with those he owned and controlled. That's not rule by consensus, that's Autocracy. Right Wing Autocracy. Is this really that confusing to you?"

He got rid of less centralized socialist "orgs" and replaced them with a centralized one. Just saying it's right wing...

"OOOOOH, you mean Adolf Hitler of the National Socialist Party"

lol i meant putin. nice cope though ;)

"Yeah, I hate to break it to you, but he's not a right-wing authoritarian. Kind of a center authoritarian, lean left. I left him out because that's kind of a "everyone I don't like is Hitler" sorta thing."

ttthhhhheeee cooopppee llmaaaooo

Oh, welcome back.

But no, the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian War is turning into a stalemated war of attrition.

I do find it funny, however, that you just have to feel the need to be contrary and "get the last word in" even in acknowledging I am right and agreeing with me.

Well, that's what most leftists say, so excuse me for not reading your mind.

lol PDS...

But seriously, Putin's just an idiot. He's not what you're making him out to be. And we're not talking about Putin to begin with. We're talking about Xi.

"ttthhhhheeee cooopppee llmaaaooo"

Someone's coping here... and it isn't me.

Also gotta love how you deftly ignored the rest of my comment. In your own words, "ttthhhhheeee cooopppee llmaaaooo"!

"But seriously, Putin's just an idiot. He's not what you're making him out to be"

if i wanted to prove putin was an idiot, i lost that race the moment he set foot into ukraine.

Constantine? The anti-Christ Constantine? The Beast, 666? Son of Jackal seated in Rome who would steal the Word of the Chosen and corrupt it beyond recognition then call it his own, as prophecy foretold Constantine? THAT Constantine?

As opposed to?

Can you stop cramming my notifs with nonsense?
thx

Whatever one you are referring to.

Can you please do the same? Especially if you don't actually want to have a rational discussion and just want to troll?
thx

it's worth mentioning that china isn't suspending their constitution :)

I'm assuming you're referring to the out-of-context sensationalist headlines in the "news" recently.

delicious :)
seeing this reply makes me very happy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ub8zQKlenn0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ke6GLT8yN9o\
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4C80VA6UA4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek-HvNEa28o

Glad I could make your day (: