The definition of misinformation is in the eye of the beholder. Use facts, ethics & common sense to arrive at your destination.

:0)

Reminds me of the "Boot to the head" group.

Censorship is hate speech, you are going to have to calm down

Does this meme advocate for viewing more than Tucker and Alex Jones?

It advocates for doing your own research. Please keep up.

Seems to advocate for misinformation.

I’ll stick with the facts, thanks!

Why do leftists flee from logic?

Let’s say you’re right. What does that have to do with my assessment that the meme advocates misinformation?

Because the meme doesn't. You are literally fleeing from logic by denying facts.

Your first accusation made more sense than your second. That’s what I get for offering a theoretical concession. It went right to your head!

First, if I was literally fleeing, I wouldn’t be be here still arguing. Do you mean I was figuratively fleeing? If so, how am I figuratively fleeing?

I have no problem with the overall message that one should think for themselves and use facts and logic; even making up one's own mind; but not in the contextual determination whether facts are misinformation or not.

The meme titles itself with the seemingly flawed notion that the "definition" of "misinformation" is in the "eye of the beholder" which, I am taking to mean that "misinformation" can be whatever we want it to mean by the logic of the meme. Which I would say is inherently flawed premise if the overall message is to use facts and logic to determine what is true. I think we should use facts and logic to determine what is true and factual. But not at the cost of losing the definition of misinformation.

See, that is me explaining my objection with logic.

I truly fail to see what he could've possibly meant other than that which is misinformation can be wrongly attributed. That much is true, but to say misinformation is up to interpretation is not. A fact is a fact. Misinformation is the opposite of a fact. It is a lie, inaccurate information, or simply false.

Claiming it is interpretable is akin to saying that there are alternatives to facts. There are, of course but these are called lies.

Feel free to state where I'm figuratively fleeing from logic (or facts, which this meme contains none. It actually contains opinions, which I do agree with up to a point), or rather where I am misinterpreting the meme. It's entirely possible, I'm wrong. But I have yet to see how. By all means. Prove that I am with logic and facts. Have at it.

You reveal your ignorance of the premise when you say things should be refuted with facts and logic. Dems and leftists don't use facts or logic. They constantly lie and use emotional arguments that are not logical.

That’s your opinion. Prove it.

Again check your facts.

You’ve stated no facts but opinion.

The OP appears to believe the definition of misinformation is subjective.

That is not a true. Misinformation can only be false, a lie, or misleading. Not at all subjective beyond the context of it’s definition.

Rather than prove your opinion, you try to place the burden of proof on me.

Apparently making you the one fleeing both facts and logic.

Especially if you fail to reply to this comment.

However if you do reply to this comment, I applaud your efforts to continue to debate even if the content of your debate has much to be desired.

I will happily continue this conversation once you reply with something of substance. Meaning your reply must make a claim, prove it with a fact, and source that fact.

Until then, you are free to claim I’m now withdrawing.

However, if you make this claim without posting a claim, fact, or source; you’re incontrovertibly wrong and unwittingly proving me right.

Freewill means you can watch whatever you want. You can even waste your time watching that mentally ill, blowhard, Cenk Uygur, and the Young Turds on YouTube.

Sounds like someone didn’t thoroughly read their Orwell if you think you can make up your own definition of misinformation.