To those who enjoy murdering babies, don't cry. It's not the end of the world. You'll still get to murder babies in your blue

Here's what you need to focus on. The Declaration of Independence and the 14th Amendment both protect Life and Liberty. The Declaration of Independence then says Pursuit of Happiness while the 14th adds Property.

The point is that both documents begin with 2 of the most basic and fundamental unalienable rights. So then, where in the Constitution did they find a right that directly contradicts the 1st of the most fundamental basic right that all humans have?

It's not in the 10th.

In addition a right is a freedom that does NOT infringe on someone else's rights. There just cannot possibly be a "right" to take another person's life because it violates their fundamental right to life. There is just no way you can twist the Constitution to justify abortion.

This is what happens when you get leftist activist judges who throw the Constitution out the window just to get their way. They care nothing for you right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness and property. In fact they would all be happy to take all of that away from you because those fundamental rights destroy Socialism, Nazism, Fascism and Communism. The left wants to promote those kinds of government, not destroy them.

"In fact they would all be happy to take all of that away from you"

No, they all wouldn't. That's a hasty generalization. Your logic is severely flawed

"those fundamental rights destroy Socialism, Nazism, Fascism and Communism. The left wants to promote those kinds of government"

No, the left doesn't want to promote Nazism or fascism. Those are far-right ideologies.

Why? The Nazis valued animals to be worth more than humans, supported eugenics, Hitler convinced himself that he was oppressed and it was everyone else’s fault that he didn’t get into art school or get good grades, and Hitler was Atheist who hated Christians and Jews.
Let’s look at your typical leftist. They value animals over humans, supports abortion (with one of their leading arguments being children having disabilities), claims that they’re oppressed, and they hate Christianity ad Judaism.

"The Nazis valued animals to be worth more than humans"

All humans? No they didn't

"Hitler convinced himself that he was oppressed and it was everyone else’s fault"

Like many conservatives today

"Hitler was Atheist"

No he wasn't. He made numerous references to believing in God. You can't find a single source where he says he was an atheist.

"Let’s look at your typical leftist. They value animals over humans"

No, not all leftists do

"supports abortion"

Yes, many on the left want abortion to be legal

"claims that they’re oppressed"

Some are

"and they hate Christianity ad Judaism"

Yes, there is a lot to hate in organized religion

“No he wasn't. He made numerous references to believing in God. You can't find a single source where he says he was an atheist.”

Alright fair, I suppose he’d fall under some more similar to agnosticism.

“No, not all leftists do”

I said “typical” not all.

“Some are”

Sure, but very few.

“Yes, there is a lot to hate in organized religion“

I suppose that’s true.

The discussion is when does life begin. Roe vs Wade said at a heartbeat, which is why they are getting rid of it.

I truly hope they do get rid of it. Abortion is worse than slavery, which are both supported by Democrats.

Name some democrats alive today who have said they support slavery

Any dem that supports the middle east.

I’m thinking of starting an abortion tourism company in a blue state. You have to provide your voter ID from your red state to book a trip. MAGATARDS pay 5x more then libtrads.

Do you know why the are more conservates and Libertarians than leftists? Because leftists keep killing off their next generation. That's why you side has been cheating in every election since JFK. You (the generic you, not necessarily the specific you) have no morals and no common sense. I would call you guys barbarians but that would be an insult to barbarians.

Just so you know there are a whole lot more leftists killing their babies than those on the right. So good luck with your tourist business.

Also, I'm not a "MAGATARD". I didn't think Trump was all that great of a president. But at least he work FOR America and not AGAINST it like that moron in the White House.

"That's why you side has been cheating in every election since JFK"

No, we haven't

"You (the generic you, not necessarily the specific you) have no morals and no common sense"

Yes, we have both morals and common sense

“Yes, we have both morals and common sense”

Yeah, real saints ya’ll are. I’ll list a few parts of your long list of moral code.
#1. Don’t kill people, unless they mildly inconvenience you.
#2. Violence is bad, unless of course you’re the one acting violently.
#3. All people deserve equal rights, unless they’re part of a majority.

Real scientists ya’ll are as well, masters of critical thinking and logic. Here’s a few of the smartest things you’ve said.
#1. Gender is a social construct. Therefore we should make 75 more.
#2. Don’t set unrealistic standards for women. Women can do anything a man can do just as well if not better.
#3. It’s transphobic for a cisgender man to not be attracted to a trans woman.

Alright, never mind. Upon further review I have determined that you guys have no consistent moral codes, nor are you capable of practicing critical thinking.

"I’ll list a few parts of your long list of moral code"

I smell a strawman from a mile away

"Don’t kill people, unless they mildly inconvenience you"

I don't believe that, and I don't know any liberal who does

"Violence is bad, unless of course you’re the one acting violently"

I don't believe that, and I don't know any liberal who does

"All people deserve equal rights, unless they’re part of a majority"

I don't believe that, and I don't know any liberal who does

You're zero for three

"Real scientists ya’ll are as well, masters of critical thinking and logic. Here’s a few of the smartest things you’ve said"

I smell another strawman on its way

"Gender is a social construct. Therefore we should make 75 more"

I never said that, and I don't know any liberal who did

"Women can do anything a man can do just as well if not better"

Generally speaking, yes, women are capable of doing what men can do

"It’s transphobic for a cisgender man to not be attracted to a trans woman"

I never said that. And if someone does say that, I'd say they're incorrect.

"Alright, never mind. Upon further review I have determined that you guys have no consistent moral codes, nor are you capable of practicing critical thinking"

By "further review" what you actually mean is your strawman arguments, none of which I ever said. If you want to know what my actual set of morals is, all you have to do is ask me and I would gladly tell you.

“I don't believe that, and I don't know any liberal who does”

Uhh, yeah, sure. Abortion is literally terminating someone’s life ‘cause you find it to be inconvenient.

“I don't believe that, and I don't know any liberal who does“

We had a full year of leftists burning down buildings, destroying statues, and stealing items to protest police violence.

‘I don't believe that, and I don't know any liberal who does“

Tell that to all of the big tech companies hiring people purely based around being more diverse, or better yet the jack-off you guys voted for having his main deciding factor for a SCOTUS nominee being that they were black and female.

“Generally speaking, yes, women are capable of doing what men can do“

Clearly not. Men on average are 6” taller and 45% stronger in upper body and 35% stronger in lower body than women.

“I never said that. And if someone does say that, I'd say they're incorrect.“

I’m glad to hear that.

“By "further review" what you actually mean is your strawman arguments, none of which I ever said. If you want to know what my actual set of morals is, all you have to do is ask me and I would gladly tell you.“

Ok, if you so wish you can list your moral code.

so in 18 years the first wave of millions of unaborted Libtards will start voting and millions every year after? LOL Good job Rightists.

But millions more of potential "Libtards" will never get the opportunity to vote because mommy couldn't be bothered to have them. They would rather "shout their abortion". They're doing they're part in being good little Marxists and decreasing the surplus population.

It's " shout my abortion" crap that gets me. I do think abortions should be legal. But the movement to normalize it bothers my. Abortion is always a horrible choice. It may be the least horrible choice of the choices at that point (i.e. rape, medical reasons). I mean, if a woman want's/needs an abortion it's because something already went wrong.

That is why I think overturning Roe v Wade will best decision. Aside of the unconstitutionality of the Supreme Court making law when they are not supposed to, the question of abortion will go to the states. The state legislators will debate how best to adjudicate abortions. Red states will most likely end abortions just for the sake of inconvenience or economic hard ship but will allow it for the health of the mother (which in nearly all cases is solved by the mother just having the baby), rape or incest. Some of the Bible belt states might make rape or incest abortions illegal, and instead insist on adoption as the solution rather than abortion.

Blue states might even go to the extreme of giving the mother the choice to kill her baby after it is born. The governor of either West Virginia or Virginia (I can't remember which) is advocating for post birth abortion.

Regardless, this issue can be decided on by the voice of the people and not an un-elected government branch who is forbidden by the Constitution from making law. In fact I would like this current court to review all cases where the Court was used as the legislative branch. But then I would like to end the practice of the Executive Branch of creating laws by Executive Orders, Executive Actions and by creating new or expanding the scope of government agencies.

We as private citizens are far too over regulated and over legislated. We are not the land of the free. We are the land of the controlled, indebted and taxed to death and all we are getting from both parties is more and more and more and more.

"Aside of the unconstitutionality of the Supreme Court making law when they are not supposed to"

They didn't make law in Roe v Wade

"but will allow it for the health of the mother (which in nearly all cases is solved by the mother just having the baby)"

If a woman needs an abortion because her health would be in jeopardy by continuing the pregnancy, then no, continuing the pregnancy to give birth would be the wrong thing to do.

"Some of the Bible belt states might make rape or incest abortions illegal, and instead insist on adoption as the solution rather than abortion"

Adoption requires a woman to carry a pregnancy for nine months, even if that would be dangerous to her health or emotionally traumatic because the pregnancy was forced on her against her will.

"advocating for post birth abortion"

There's no such thing as post birth abortion

"In fact I would like this current court to review all cases where the Court was used as the legislative branch"

That has never happened

“Adoption requires a woman to carry a pregnancy for nine months, even if that would be dangerous to her health or emotionally traumatic because the pregnancy was forced on her against her will.“

What the heck? Wait, so the thing that traumatized her wasn’t some guy raping her, but rather that fact that a baby exists. She was just like “Oh, well I mean that guy was packing more than I expected, so I don’t mind too much.” then took a pregnancy test and was like “Sh*t, I got pregnant. Well, although he had to have had at least eight inches I now have to have a baby… I HATE BABIES!”

"What the heck? Wait, so the thing that traumatized her wasn’t some guy raping her, but rather that fact that a baby exists"

That's not even remotely what I said. I didn't say it was an either/or situation. The rape itself is traumatic, and for many women, if they were forced to continue a pregnancy that resulted from rape, that would be traumatic as well.

"She was just like “Oh, well I mean that guy was packing more than I expected, so I don’t mind too much.” then took a pregnancy test and was like “Sh*t, I got pregnant. Well, although he had to have had at least eight inches I now have to have a baby… I HATE BABIES!” "

That's a pretty f**king disgusting scenario playing out in your head

“That's a pretty f**king disgusting scenario playing out in your head“

Agree.

“We as private citizens are far too over regulated and over legislated.”

Lol the irony is Roe didn’t MAKE anyone get an abortion. That would be “over regulating and legislating. It allowed for the choice to have an abortion. But the overturning of it will take away the choice, which is actually over regulating and legislating over a woman’s body.

Do even see the irony of your statement?

When did I say Roe ever made anyone get an abortion? We are over regulated but that has nothing to do with abortion. Abortion law should be written by the states and not SCOTUS. The Constitution forbids SCOTUS from making law but in Roe and several other cases that were adjudicated by leftist activist justices. They have no regard for the Constitution, just like everyone on the left.

Those who wanted to murder babies knew they could never get their state legislators to make abortion legal so they got an un-elected branch of the government to make a "law". The left wants to live under a dictatorship (that is why there is a fascination with Marxism on the left) anyway so it is no problem when the Judicial or Executive branches makes law. Getting laws passed by the will of the people does not make leftists happy.

Well, if that happens that will be too bad, but I’m not so petty as to wish death upon people with opposing views as myself such as you guys.

He's not on George W Bush & Donny Trump's side, the only two who can be accuse of having attempted to steal an election.

Conservatives have been decreasing in numbers since 1775 in the USA, and since the end of WWII & the beginning of the Marshall Plan for the rest of the planet. They've been in the minority for quite a few decades now, and their GOP has been heavily dependent on Gerrymandering for winning elections and have won the Presidency via the popular vote only once in the last 3+ decades.

accused*

https://youtu.be/uHRaUUlD00w

Carlin nailed it.

Carlin was an idiot. Seriously? He thought that if we were against the government raising our kids then we didn't care about them? What a moron. Occasionally Carlin got somethings right but this is not one of them. He's playing to a leftist audience who can't think their way out of a paper bag.

Who are the ones pushing for home schooling, not the left. There are more single income married couples on the right were mom stays home to raise the kids then on the left. The left demands mom put her kids in the hands of the government to be raised because her career is the most important thing in her life. Once again they are being good little Marxists because it takes a village and the government owns your children.

"Carlin was an idiot"

He was vastly smarter than you

"He's playing to a leftist audience who can't think their way out of a paper bag"

Like people who need a magic book or dead child predator with golden tablets to tell them what to think?

"There are more single income married couples on the right were mom stays home to raise the kids then on the left"

You think that's a woman's job, to stay at home

"The left demands mom put her kids in the hands of the government to be raised"

No they don't

LOL where are your "facts" from? And no, I won't look it up or prove you are wrong. That's not how making a claim works.

Observation.

I know, right? If you said “Dogs bark” your average libtard would be like “Show me a study done by a licensed animal psychologist that confirms that remark” or for the rare leftist that has very base level critical thinking capabilities they’d say “That’s into true. What about Basenjis and Dingos?”

So it bothers you that liberals actually ask people to provide evidence for their claims?

No, that wasn’t my point. Why do you try to see the worst I everything anyone says? What my point was is that even if it’s something that anyone with an IQ of more than 60 should know, you’d still want some sort of evidence. You need your PHD in mathematics in order to tell a leftist that 1X1=1.

Even when you do show them where the data is they still reject it. They find some way to rationalize it away and when they cannot think of anything else they call it fake news.

Sounds like conservatives

Just show actual facts. "Dogs bark" is a pretty universal observation. So obviously there isn't a need for actual proof. Saying "There are more single income married couples on the right were mom stays home to raise the kids then on the left. The left demands mom put her kids in the hands of the government to be raised because her career is the most important thing in her life. Once again they are being good little Marxists because it takes a village and the government owns your children." Isn't necessarily a universal observation, so actual data might help. It's like saying "All the trump supporters are morons but not all morons are trump supporters" That a fact based on my personal observations. Would you accept it as true? Of course not. But I didn't say that. I didn't make a claim. You did. So back it up with verifiable facts. If this is SO true, it would be easy to prove not just easy to claim.

So again: I won't look it up or prove you are wrong. That's not how making a claim works.

Saying all Trump supporters are morons is not based on observation, it is and insult based personal opinion, ignorance and bias.

Saying that there are more single income married families on the right is not an insult, a personal opinion or bias. It is based on observation, and reasoning. I have not seen any surveys or studies on this. There probably are but I am not aware of them.

So what I am left with is observation and reasoning. What I see is the constant preaching from leftist Hollywood that the highest level of achievement for a woman is a career.

Because there are more Christians who are on the right and because Christianity, for the most part, still teaches traditional family roles, then there are more people who see this as a benefit to society to have a strong family. Those who can afford it will mostly be single income families. However, most people are middle class to poor in America regardless of political opinion and that requires both the husband and wife to work. But when there is a choice most traditional families will opt to be single income families.

There are traditional Christian families on the left but they are a lot fewer than on the right mainly because of attitudes and ideology.

When I said "the left demands mom puts her kids in the hands of the government", that also is by observation. Hillary Clinton's book, "It Takes a Village" advocated a milder version of the government taking control of you children. She wanted government agents to frequently visit the homes of every family to monitor how they were doing. While the more radical leftists want to take children from their parents and raise them in government facilities.

Child Protective Service agencies was created to protect abused children but there have been too many cases where the abuse did not occur but the government took the child or children from the parents. This implies government ownership of children, which is a Marxist idea. Eventually this will become more and more apparent. It should be apparent with the current law that was passed in Florida and how the left twisted what it was about and blew it out of proportion. The called "Don't say gay" but the bill was about preventing sex education from being taught to K through 3rd grade and protecting parental rights.

Then there is home schooling which is constantly lampooned by the left even though it has been shown to produce better educated kids in all studies. Home schooling is either heavily regulated or either illegal in blue states, not so much in red states. It was illegal in California for a while but I think that law has been struck down.

What the left really seems to hate is when Christians form a small home schooling group. They are still taught by parents in the home but parents share the responsibility among several families. This is done so that families where both parents have to work can raise their children more inline with the values that they want for their children.

Now if you have observed the opposite or something different then please let me know where you think I am wrong. If you know of stats that prove me incorrect then point me to them.

I am not saying that leftists don't love their children as much as people on the right. I think that love transcends political parties. I do, however, think that there is more divorce on the left than the right. More abortions on the left than the right. More dysfunctional families on the left than the right. But I think that has more to do with the leftist mentality that the government exists to do everything for us, including thinking. Or in other words, liberalism is a mental disorder.

"Home schooling is either heavily regulated or either illegal in blue states"

That's just a flat out lie. There is not a single state where homeschooling is illegal

"families...can raise their children more inline with the values that they want for their children"

That's what you guys call "indoctrination" when liberals do it

"If you know of stats that prove me incorrect then point me to them"

People correct your mistakes all the time and you keep making the same ones. You don't actually care about the truth.

"I do, however, think that there is more divorce on the left than the right"

Conservative Christians get divorced at about the same rate as non-Christians

"More abortions on the left than the right"

Maybe more, but there are still many conservative women who have them

"More dysfunctional families on the left than the right"

Prove it

"the leftist mentality that the government exists to do everything for us, including thinking"

That's not the leftist mentality

"liberalism is a mental disorder"

If you say that liberalism is a mental disorder then don't get upset when people say that Christianity is child abuse (here's a little secret you didn't know: neither one is true)