The world was safer and less expensive with mean tweets

. . .and cheaper.

Trevor Noah thinks so...

I saw that. Hilarious

EVEN Trevor Noah! Libtards listen to that!

Lefties can't admit the truth... so

Not “mean tweets” it’s “meme tweets”

LOL yes

All those haters in the comments can go jump a cliff

Okay. Break it down for me. Why am I supposed to believe Trump’s impulsive, petulant, NATO ally-bashing, Putin nutsack-licking “leadership” would be better for America right now?

I need more than bare assertions and wishful thinking. That may work within the RWNJ thought-bubble, but it doesn’t work on the Democrats and independents whose votes you’ll need if you ever want a Republican to win the Presidency again.

Remember Trump literally withheld military aid from President Zelensky in an effort to boost his election chances. It got him impeached — for the first time! And all the while Trump’s social media goons praised him for it.

Putin has been planning a full-scale invasion of Ukraine since at least 2014. If Trump were on his second term, it’d have happened sooner.

Every day I’m thankful Biden is President, as the one steering the U.S. and Western world through the most serious Russian-instigated security crisis since the Cuban Missile Crisis, maybe ever.

There are smart Republicans who are wise to the danger of Russia — most of them, in fact — who I wouldn’t mind being President right now, but Trump and the whole Trump wing of the GOP has been balls-deep in Putin’s charm offensive for years and has no credibility left.

Trump gave Russia missiles first. Obama rejected them. Biden only sent them after twiddling his thumbs for 2 weeks.

Putin waited until price of oil peaked when he invaded, Chechyna, Georgia, Crimea, and now Ukraine... ALL while Democrats in power. He does this because they're main product is oil, and it pays for his wars. HE LOVES the Green New Deal.

Trump never would have let the price of oil get so high, which would prevent Putin from making money off of war. Furthermore, he would NEVER let Putin bully him with threat of nukes. When Russia raised their Nuke Alert level, Trump would have done the same. Putin may have more nukes, but not a lot of big nukes like the US does.

Putin also attacked because he know Biden is a mail order chicken. No way would Trump have canceled the Pentagon's ICBM test cuz' Putin.

Between Dementia Joe and Kackling Kamala, this country is ruined... in less than 1 year.
Flip Settings
Featured in politics
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
The world was safer with mean tweets; Admit it Lefties
hotkeys: D = random, W = upvote, S = downvote, A = back
Imgflip Pro GIF Maker Meme Generator Blank Meme Templates GIF Templates Chart Maker Demotivational Maker Image Cropper About Privacy Terms API Sla

You’re wrong about the nuke thing — Russia’s strategic nuclear arsenal is slightly greater than the U.S. arsenal.

We can threaten Russia with mutually-assured destruction, but we don’t have a missile shield that could stop them all. Direct conflict with Russia is unthinkable as a result. The difficult, plain truth is that Russia’s nuclear arsenal is the only thing on planet earth that could wipe out the U.S. and a huge chunk of the world along with it. A full-blown Russia-U.S. nuclear war, if humanity survives it at all, would inevitably result in China inheriting the world — not a great outcome for freedom.

Putin’s a gambler, playing with fire, and nobody but him asked for this Ukraine war. His mental state is unknown and with his back against the wall, he could do anything. The images out of Ukraine are heartbreaking, but Biden is right to choose economic sanctions and military aid to Ukraine rather than direct engagement. Every other NATO ally agrees, by the way. Our current stance on the Ukraine war commands broad international support that it’s hard to imagine Trump could have built.

We never would have been in this mess if Trump had been POTUS.

He lost. Get over it, Komrade.

"Trump gave Russia missiles first."

Ooof... that Russian nationality obsession is showing.

Typo. Should have been Ukraine. So you don't have to be obsessed,

Nice try. Thinking Ukraine is a part of Russia is only natural if you support Putin. The obsession is yours.

I don't think Ukraine is part of Russia. Neither does Trump. What part of Typo Error is so hard for a lefty to understand? Or do you kust like to make things up... like Biden blaming inflation and Gas prices on Putin. Inflation and Gas prices were up well before Putin invaded Ukraine. But that's what the left does.

Well, for one thing, I’m not a lefty just because I disagree with you.

I’m not so sure what you don’t understand of my accusation of your Freudian slip. You claim typo, I claim Freudian slip.

Biden blaming gas prices on Putin is idiotic. But having a war just as the world recovers from a pandemic can have an effect to the global economy. Gas prices are rising everywhere and Biden using Putin as a boogeyman makes far more sense than saying it’s all Democrats fault. It isn’t. The primary source of inflation across the economy remains the 2020 pandemic which will continue to make the market unstable possibly for years to come.

No, you are a lefty because you have far left political idiologies.

Just because I don't support fringe Republican cronies doesn't make me a leftist nor a supporter of ideologies.

In fact, you know what? While I don't actively support them, I don't have to favor the strict alternative that you push either.

The truth is, Moderates are not on the side of Trump but they're open to Republican candidates.

The 2020 election proves this. Denying it or trying to undermine it only feeds right into our enemies hands.

There are a lot of RINOs in the repub party. You wouldn't be the first.
Your ideology proves you are a leftist. You can shout republican from the rooftops, but your other comments show you are a die hard leftist.

So, you have nothing to add to the discussion other than personal attacks. Lovely.

I accept your forfeit of the discussion that Trump would've done nothing better to remedy the situation in Ukraine.

So what, you’re a leftist in thought

Your thought perhaps.

Are you thankful for Biden trying to use our Russian enemies to negotiate a nuclear deal with our Iranian enemies? Are you thankful that they are considering removing the Iranian Revolutionary Guard off the terrorist list to entice them?
Are you thankful that Biden doesn't have the sense to know that lifting sanctions on Iran is why Saudi Arabia and OPEC won't answer his phone calls, knowing full well that Iran is there greatest terrorist enemy?
Are you thankful that Biden wants to give Maduro a thumbs up if they'll just sell us a little oil?

You voted in an incompetent. Admit it.

Iran and Saudi Arabia are both repressive, brutal petrostates. They’re at each others’ throats for their own reasons. Does the U.S. have to accept the Sunni vs. Shia, 1000-year old genocidal conflict that will have them at each other’s throats for the next 1000 years? Does it make sense for us to choose between them in their stupid religious squabble? Honesty?

If Iran gets nukes, then Saudi Arabia will get nukes, and every other country in the region will get nukes too, vastly increasing the risk of WWIII. That’s the bottom-line reason for a deal with Iran — not because we like them, or think they’re great, or better than Saudi Arabia. They’re not. But if you don’t like Iran now, wait till they’re nuked up.

Venezuela is another horrible basketcase repressive petrostate. But at the moment, Russia is worse. Way worse. Russia is actively genociding another country while holding the rest of the word hostage on a high nuclear alert, Venezuela isn’t.

So yes, let’s open up petrochemical trade with Venezuela for now, until we can dump them like a hot potato as soon as we are able, and work on true energy independence in the meantime. That means fracking, yes — but also nuclear, and also clean, green energy. An all-of-the-above energy independence strategy.

Many U.S. fracking projects went bust under Trump in 2020, a fact lost on many right-wingers right now. A second-term Trump would be facing all of these same dilemmas.

LOL - So I take it you're not actually thankful for Biden then...Eh?

Biden supports everything I just said, so… where’d you get that?

Anywho. Trump? Other than stupidly opining that Putin is a “savvy genius” — which was detestable — he’s made no statement on what he’d do about the Ukraine War. All you Trump fanbois have is speculation and wishful thinking.

Suffices to say I wouldn’t have wanted the most loose-cannon President in our history to be facing the most serious security crisis since the Cuban Missile Crisis.

So what. It was savvy of Putin knowing Biden would twiddle his thumbs and fret. No rocket science there.

Biden twiddles, Ukraine burns.

Who could have seen that coming?

Uh, everybody?

Meme from 3 weeks ago:

imgflip.com/i/661h7z

"All you Trump fanbois have is speculation and wishful thinking."

You have less than that. Trump has offered no real solution to the Russian invasion at all.

Because he has none.

There wouldn't have been an invasion in the first place. Putin would never have taken the chance, because Trump was unpredictable. Remember that chocolate cake with Xi Jingping?

Well, if you want to play it that way... I guess we should've elected Hillary so that there would be no Covid.

We should've elected Romney so that there would be no Ukraine uprising.

We should've elected McCain because then there would be no ISIS.

We should've elected Gore because then there would be no climate change or 9/11.

We should've elected Bush a second term because then there would be no White House blow jobs.

It's just asinine to think Putin gives that much of a shit as to whom is President about what he does on what he believes is his own sovereignty and birthright.

Obie & Hillary created ISIS

We withdrew from Iraq for much of the same enthusiastic reasons we withdrew from Afghanistan. Yes, destabilizing a region will frequently open it up to a power vacuum. Especially when the people have no investment in our so-called liberation.

That’s very likely what Putin is going to see very soon.

This war didn't start in 2022. It began in 2014 and Trump has done little to nothing to stop it. Oh, sure. He provided weapons and other military aids (that he tried to stop it but was forced to go along with it or risk actual impeachment.)

But it isn't Mean Tweets fault nor LGB-dude man's fault.

The fault lies squarely on the man who started the war and no one else.

Putin.

Believing Putin to be reasoned with or negotiated with? That's not the terrible thing you're made to believe it is.

It's just politics.

Which is just an alternative to war.

So you think Trump should have stopped Putin from invading Ukraine while Obama was POTUS?
LOL - That make perfrct sense to s leftist I suppose. You all blame everything on Trump even though Obama created the conditions that enabled Putin to finance his move by capping off oil, and pushing non-feasible electric. Do you even remember Solyndra? Do you remember the price of oil when Putin did this? Did you even know we were buying oil from Russia at the time?

So, do you want to address how Ukraine has always been at war all this time or do you want to complain about the price of gas some more?

Totally two different topics between the world being safer and gas prices, my dude.

I'm guessing you didn't even know that Ukraine gave up their nukes to Russia with the express promise that Russia would never attack them. They broke that promise on Obama's watch, and Biden's watch. They didn't on Trump's watch. Get over it.

And You're the one who mentioned price of gas. Don't blame me your man is incompetent while America foots the bill. Just keep being thankful for the inflation his policies caused, and keep thanking him him during the recession were going to see. Let's go Brandon!

Lol. Except the war continued. So they absolutely did on Trump’s watch. That’s why the Ukraine aid was more military in nature. The on-going civil war in the regions. So, this false narrative that the war was at peace when Trump was President, especially in Ukraine, is total bullshit.

Russia did not Invade Ukraine on Trump's watch. Quit pretending like they did. Russia started building up Troops on Ukraine's border starting Mar 2021, right after Biden cut off oil production (which was one of his main campaign promises in spite of the lies he's telling now).

As much as you pretend, you should probably take Psaki's place. She's a great pretender too.

Russia has been sending mercenaries and militias to Ukraine since 2014 and been preparing for this for a long time. So, while the invasion didn’t begin, it was prepped and ready to go.

Pretending whom is President here would make any difference is asinine.

You mean Russia was strengthening his position in Crimea. He hadn't been sending mercenaries and militia into the rest of Ukraine until now. Please stop making thing up. You're as bad as Psaki.

No, not just in Crimea. I'm talking about Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine. Crimea was annexed specifically as an option for pro-Russian Ukrainian refugees to flee to. Putin could've easily done the same to the Donbas regions. Instead he went for all of Ukraine. Dumb move.

The Crimea was taken because of Sevastopol. Russia would never give up the primary naval base on the Black Sea. Despite the propaganda Kiev was a capital for a Viking group called the Rus and lent their name to Russia and Byelorus. The Don Bas area was Putins’ version of the Sudetenland annexation and Obama played the Neville Chamberlain part. Trump sent them weapons. That’s more than Obama and Vp Biden ever did. Biden did nothing to help until they were under invasion and almost too late. It still may be, but that’s part of the plan isn’t it.

I appreciate your insight and willingness to be a part of this conversation. While your spellings are... questionable.. Belarus... Donbas... I'm glad you're at least looking into this situation with more seriousness. I only bring up your spellings because I have no idea what you mean by "Sudetenland"... I think you were comparing these Switzerland.

Here I will have to disagree as Switzerland was never surrendered nor held by military might but the government willingly committed to staying out of the war while allowing refugees. Refugees are not flooding the Donbas region as that is where the fighting has remained heavily for years. Crimea, as I understand it, has seen no fighting. So, it would be more accurate to call Crimea the safehaven... even if NATO and Russia disagree about the legality of Crimea as being willfully and democratically held. I've seen no evidence to really support either narrative so I'm unprepared to say Crimea is really this safehaven it's made out to be but... I do agree it was taken strategically as a place to harbor pro-Russian refugees. Whether that was actually what happened remains to be seen. But I do believe that was the intent.

Switzerland maintained armed neutrality, and was not invaded by its neighbors, in part because of its topography, much of which is mountainous. It was never annexed nor did it participate in the fighting so I would not call Crimea or the Donbas regions applicable to comparison to Switzerland's role in World War II. Of course, I'm only assuming you mean Switzerland here so my entire interpretation of... your interpretation may be flawed.

I do appreciate you trying and I'm very interested to hear more about your interpretations of events rather than drolling about your obvious political biases here at home. I already know those, my dude.

The Sudetenland was the German speaking part of Western Czechoslovakia that Hitler rolled into and took over despite the strong protest of weak Western governments.

Ah, then I can see a comparison.

Good observation.