Biological Men competing in women's sports should stop

That's not a "her", and you know it.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

"Liberalism is a mental disorder"

People who actually understand mental disorders say you're 100% wrong, but don't let facts get in the way of your feelings

She went through male puberty- that creates innate physical advantages over a biological female that don't disappear with the testosterone.

"You’ll support Caitlyn Jenner when it’s convenient, as she is a conservative."

No, I will not.

1. Not a real Conservative, for conservatism goes well beyond the boundaries of politics.
2. There are things far more important than politics, or being a liberal troll™ on imgflip. Things like where a person will spend eternity once they leave this life. For a person to so insult God by stating that He did not have the right to create them as male or female is not the attitude of a heart that is going to Heaven.

And by now, you know that "[meeting] their testosterone requirements" does not level the playing field. If that man's bones are dug up 200 years from now, and all they did was examine the structure of his bones, they would be able to determine that those bones belong to a man. The very fiber of them is different, making them stronger. And, of course, the accompanying muscles, including the heart, are today STILL superior to that of a real woman.

You need for this to be OK, either because you are confused about your own sexuality, or because you need there to be no absolute Arbiter of right and wrong; you need for there to be no God Who will one day judge you against His holy standards, as communicated to us in His Word.

No such universe exists, you therefore remain dead in your trespasses and sins.

And yes, it is sinful to support men beating up on women, both figuratively as they destroy all records previously held by real women, to literally, as they pummel actual, weaker women into defeat.

But you support "women's rights"? You do not know the meaning . . .

Upvoted, but explaining science to brainwashed liberal morons clearly doesn't work.

"Upvoted, but explaining science to brainwashed liberal morons clearly doesn't work."

If it did, they would no longer be liberals.

But there is hope. I was exactly like this person is . . . before I grew up.
Of course, there are many geriatric liberals out there, especially in DC, so tc isn't out of danger yet.

They will lose big this Nov... guaranteed. Even the libs are getting tired of the Dem bullcrap.

You're talking to someone who believes the earth is 6000 years old, and you think the science is on his side?

What are you babbling about now dearie?

Who's babbling? He thinks the science is on his side and yet he believes the universe is only 6000 years old. The science is absolutely not on his side. Do you understand now, or should I explain it again?

Exactly where did he say he believes the Universe is 6000 years old? That is far from a universal Christian belief. That's an awfully broad brush to paint the beliefs of millions of individuals with.

Brony Boi has been stalking me for a long time. He resents my faith in God because he can't have it too. Of course, he could have it too, but because he insists on having it on his own terms instead of God's terms, he whines like the little pissant that he is.

6000-7000 years for the age of the universe is NOT a universal Christian belief, but I in fact do hold to it. Since God did not specifically point to such a date, it is only implied by the very specific genealogies given to us in the Bible.

I also have no problem defending it from a scientific standpoint. Pony-child refuses to accept basic facts and science, because he has already made up his mind and has no intentions of allowing anything in that disagrees with his immorally held positions.

If you want pertinent information regarding this subject, I will be more than happy to answer questions, and you can decide for yourself. As I often say, there are too many things we see in this universe that simply cannot be were it 13-14 billion years old, a number, btw, that had to be constantly changed whenever they discover something new that proves what they believed to be true yesterday, wrong. The biblical genealogies have not had to be changed once in over 4,000 years.

On one hand, I recommend using the message system for your questions, if only to avoid the angry little pony from muddying up our conversation. On the other hand, his responses would serve as excellent counterpoint, showing how vapid his positions truly are.

Plus, in order to keep this child from blowing up my notifications, I have him blocked. This allows me to choose when and where to reply to his nonsense, while not having to wade through proof that he has no life outside of being a troll.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3B8KkSZp_E

He has never said the universe is 6000 years old.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3B8KkSZp_E

You are babbling about something that is not the subject at hand. Stick to the subject or STFU

Science doesn't say there are 72 genders and it doesn't say there are only two genders. Gender is a complicated issue that scientists are still trying to understand, but like with most things in biology, it's not as black-and-white as people like you want it to be.

Science doesn't say there are only two genders

That's not science. That's someone's crazy fantasy.

It was absolutely the subject at hand. I'm sorry if you can't remember what you were talking about

I was talking about the non-science of more than 2 genders. Keep guessing though.

https://www.insider.com/lia-thomas-teammates-oppose-trans-swimmer-on-womens-team-2022-3

Do the math: there are 37 members of the team. 16 of them sent the letter you are referring to- that's NOT the whole team. The articles I'm referring to states that only 8-9 team members are hard core supporters. The other half of the team members who signed the letter you are referring to probably signed it to avoid "Cancellation" before they have left college and started their careers.

It's not fair to the women. Don't you care about "women's rights" anymore? Lol

I do care about women’s rights, and trans women are a part of that. This really isn’t difficult.

"I do care about women’s rights, and trans women are a part of that. This really isn’t difficult."

"Trans women" are men pretending to be something they are not.

So, no, you clearly do NOT care about women's rights. And so says all of the women being left behind because men lacking in honor, fair play, and good sportsmanship are trampling them down.

As is ALWAYS the case, what the Left accuses the Right of doing/being is precisely that for which they are most guilty themselves. "RiGhT wInGeRs wAnt tO hOLd wOmeN bAcK!!!!" What is even more disturbing is that in some of these sports, these evil men are actually cracking the skulls of the real women. It is THE definition of physical abuse, and their domination over real women is mental abuse.

If you want to rebel against God in one of the most personal ways possible, have at it, but quit beating up women.

A biologically male boxer who fights another biological male in the same weight class is competing on a vastly more equal level than a biological female competing with a transgendered woman.
“I’ve fought a lot of women and have never felt the strength that I felt in a fight as I did today. I can’t answer whether it’s because she was born a man or not because I’m not a doctor. What I can is that I’ve never felt so overpowered ever in my life, and I am an abnormally strong female. I still disagree with Fox fighting. She can pursue any career but when it comes to a combat sport I think it just isn’t fair.” – Tamikka Brents, a biologically female MMA fighter whose skull was fractured in a bout with Fallon Fox, a transgendered woman fighter who sent two opponents to the hospital with skull fractures before she retired early.

"Trans women being forced to live their lives as men is pretending to be someone they are not. They aren’t faking anything or pretending. They identify as a different gender than they were assigned with."

They were "assigned" their gender by God when He created them; doctors included this information on their birth certificates. Long before any liberal devil could put evil nonsense like this into the child's head, it was blatantly obvious which gender/sex they were.

"I’m sorry you had to learn the hard way that sports are physical and confrontational, and even lead to injuries."

I'm sorry you had to learn the hard way that criminals like to crack heads when robbing you. There is a real difference between competing with others who are essentially on the same plane as you; it is something altogether different when liberals insert their immoral politics into the sport you have trained in for years and years. But your point is valid in this sense- every woman who ends up standing next to one of these cowardly men should get "set, ready, . . .", and then just stand there, and allow this unsportsmanlike barbarian run/swim/wrestle/box/etc. the race by themselves. That is effectively what he is doing anyway. And if the people in charge of these sports in the schools had one shred of decency, they would count whichever real woman finished 2nd as 1st, 3rd as 2nd, etc.

"God doesn’t exist. Maybe realize you are imposing your craziness onto other people and hurting them in the process. It’s amazing how people hide behind God to promulgate their bigotry."

Saying this does not make it so, and only a total fool holds to the atheist world view, given that you cannot disprove God's existence.
The only people hurting other people are, a) those males competing in women's athletics, b) those who are enablers of this abuse (like you), and c) those who encourage mental illness like this. It is a mental illness, even if it is just a sick desire for attention.

It is not bigotry to acknowledge and defend such obvious truth, but this accusation, an ad hominem attack, is standard fare from the liberal's playbook. You cannot win the argument, especially one that is so obviously lost for you, so you cry "bigot! racist! misogynist! etc!", and as usual, you accuse me of that which you are guilty of. In this case, your bigotry is aimed at innocent girls and women, who want nothing more than to have a fair chance in the sport they love to be involved in. You are bad.

"Trans women" aka delusional men. They have the same physical abilities as men, which are generally faster swimmers. It's unfair. This is something you can't defend yourself on.

Actually, the difference is even more pronounced in swimming. In a sport like wrestling, at least the biological woman would be up against a trans woman in her weight range (though there is a viral image of a terrified looking high school girl wrestler be thoroughly dominated by a trans girl). In swimming, all the biological women have to compete against a biological male who can be a head taller than them, with all the biological advantages that a male proportioned body will provide. Additionally, Lia not only went through male puberty, she also grew to full male adulthood while rigorously training for competitive swimming. This whole situation is like a featherweight boxer going up against Mike Tyson in his prime.

"No they don’t. You don’t understand how much muscle and ability they lose and diminish during transition. It’s through treatment that they are able to compete in women’s sports at all."

Losing muscle and ability, and yet still retain more than real women have. Or are men not breaking every women's record in the sport they are competing in? Reality trumps your immoral views on this issue, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist, nor trained statistician to figure it out. Men are breaking all the records previously held by actual women, in spite of whatever diminishment they have experienced through abusing their bodies using hormone therapy.

Your liberalism has blinded you to the obvious. As it always does in those who hold to it.

"No they don’t. You don’t understand how much muscle and ability they lose and diminish during transition. It’s through treatment that they are able to compete in women’s sports at all."

And it is truly sad that you are unable to see that which is so glaringly obvious . . .