Imgflip Logo Icon

Mean Tweets 2024

Mean Tweets 2024 | image tagged in donald trump approves,mean,tweets | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2,168 views 105 upvotes Made by anonymous 2 years ago in politics
64 Comments
9 ups, 2y,
4 replies
Mean Tweets will make Russia Surrender!
11 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Russia never had the balls to attack when there were mean tweets...so...
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Nah... they were and still are in your head.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
You brought up their balls, not me.
:)
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
you best go see a doctor then...
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Maybe we can go together. Lol
Hey let's ask the doctor what they think about the pandemic, masks, and vaccines while we're there.

Anyways as far as what you said indirectly referencing the "Putin waited for "weak" Biden" narrative, none of the other people here parroting that have really been able to answer this yet, maybe you can... If Putin had been allegedly waiting for Biden to become president to attack Ukraine, why did he wait more than a year after Biden got elected to do so?
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
How long did it take for oil prices to rise under Biden? Wars cost money...
1 up, 2y,
5 replies
??
The price of oil began rising under Trump
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
All your graph shows is that it went down under Trump, and just before Chy-Na Joe took office, it was starting to go down again. You need better propaganda if you want to make a false point like this.

Markets that are traditionally volatile immediately react to a whole host of stimuli, especially the results of elections. Knowing that Democrats were taking over most certainly negatively impacted the markets, as Democrats always choose to do what is in the best interest of our enemies, not that of America.

If you want, I can photoshop that little downward trend to the end of Biden's disasterous results.
2 ups, 2y
Yup... Oil imports from Russia increased due to Biden's policies... the prices doubled in a year... all equals cash for the Putin war machine... Thanks, dementia Joe... Who knew going green starts wars?
1 up, 2y
My graph was to disprove Viking, and that's exactly what it did.
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
"My graph was to disprove Viking"

I'm sure your mother is very proud of you . . .
2 ups, 2y
That kids head isn't nearly football-shaped enough to be saying that. Lol

But ya my mom is proud. I think this might be the first time someone's tried to drag her into a discussion.
Anyways I currently own oil and other commodity stonks and I'm thinkin of cashin out..... :D
Maybe I'll hold out for more $$$ idk
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Sorry... come back when you can discuss it honestly...
1 up, 2y
Ditto.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Thanks for more lies.. So people didn't know who won the election until Jan 20? WOW..

And yes you just proved my point. Oil prices more than doubled under Biden... IN A YEAR's TIME...

"If Putin had been allegedly waiting for Biden to become president to attack Ukraine, why did he wait more than a year after Biden got elected to do so?"
1 up, 2y
Bruh people even right now still seem to not know who won the election. Trump will be reinstated any day now though.......... I can feel it!
;P

You implied that the prices began rising a year after Biden was elected.... Clearly false. They have been rising more or less ever since the covid crash. I think at one point the price was actually negative.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
"Bruh people even right now still seem to not know who won the election. Trump will be reinstated any day now though.......... I can feel it!"

The funniest part of all of this is that the Democrats in DC seem to be the only Democrats/liberals in the country that know Biden isn't really the president. Even Biden's "doctor" wife called Kamala the president, something Biden does with regularity. Of course, Psaki would disagree with them both, having recently cited 0bama as the one running the show.
0 ups, 2y
Kamala and/or Obama is actually running the Biden presidency?? Sweet!! If he runs again I'm voting for him 100% then!
5 ups, 2y
it sends shivers down their spines!
3 ups, 2y
1 up, 2y
spread the word brotha!
5 ups, 2y
4 ups, 2y
:0)
3 ups, 2y
MAGAA!
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y
Man, I'm glad I'm anti communist.
2 ups, 2y
The first thing i agreed with on this stream
2 ups, 2y
3 ups, 2y
No one's complaining about mean tweets. Shut the f**k up with that already 🤦‍♂️
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
[deleted]
4 ups, 2y,
2 replies
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Very true
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Clearly you've never played Risk against somebody that doesn't know what they are doing.
0 ups, 2y
What’s risk
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
If Republicans can't nominate anyone but a loser, then they've already lost.
5 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Our loser is better than your loser!
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Both of them being losers doesn't make your guy any less of a loser. And at least Biden wouldn't be a sore loser like your guy has been
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Anyone that has something stolen away from them is hardly a sore loser, for they would not be the loser in the first place.

As more and more comes to light about what happened in 2020, I plan on enjoying the delicious karma all the pathetic libs that chose to look the other way will experience.

Or not. Y'all are really kinda boring . . .

www.magapill.com
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
"Oh, right. There is none"

You just need to get out more . . .
2 ups, 2y,
3 replies
You know, when someone asks for evidence, not providing it and basically telling them to look for it themselves means you've got none
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
"You know, when someone asks for evidence, not providing it and basically telling them to look for it themselves means you've got none"

That, of course, is an irrational argument. Could it be that I find liberals to be annoying, and engaging in lengthy dialogue with them proves pointless?

Yes, it could definitely be that.
1 up, 2y
Or you just don't have the evidence to back up your claim.

It's been dismissed by the very conservative leaning Supreme Court that there was widespread voter fraud that cheated anyone out of an election in 2020.
1 up, 2y
I'm a Libertarian is the problem with that point you just made lol
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
"I'm a Libertarian is the problem with that point you just made lol"

Good for you- you found the only thing worse than being a Democrat.

lol

Libertarians can be idiots too.
2 ups, 2y
Whether or not I'm an idiot is irrelevant, at least I'm not in denial
0 ups, 2y
"Whether or not I'm an idiot is irrelevant, at least I'm not in denial"

I never said you were an idiot, but whether you are or not is incredibly relevant . . . to you. The mere fact that you take such an odd approach to the idea does not bode well for your non-idiot status.

There is evidence dropping all the time. The mistake you liberal libertarians make is that you exist in a bubble, a Safe Zone™, where you do not have to deal with it.

You don't have to agree with the conclusions that those presenting the evidence have come to, but you cannot logically claim there is none.

And let me get this out of the way in case I decide later that I am done with arguing with a liberal who is in denial about being a liberal- ad hominem regarding the source, the authors, the conclusions, is only proof that you cannot refute it with facts.

http://republicbrief.com/voting-probe-chief-urges-decertification-of-the-2020-elections-in-wisconsin/

It's one thing to approach the *content* with a skeptical mind; it is altogether something different to dismiss it because of where the content is located.
2 ups, 2y,
3 replies
And if I insisted that Hillary run again in 2020, I would be equally as stupid as you.

Fortunately, I'm much more intelligent and since I'm a Republican, have no desire for Biden to remain a two term President.

Those who would waste the 2024 election on Trump, I think, want Biden in office more than I do. Which for me, is not at all.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
"It's been dismissed by the very conservative leaning Supreme Court . . . "

1. You seem to be well enough informed to know that they did not dismiss hearing the case because it lacked merit. Rather, they dismissed it as a "no standing" issue, which many actual conservatives disagree with.
2. Many Conservatives would argue that some of the decisions coming from the newest members is anything but conservative.
0 ups, 2y
1. Correct. It's not within Texas' jurisdiction. The people who should've come forward if there was evidence of election tampering in those four states were the governors and those individuals who oversaw the election. They did not because there was zero evidence for them to do so.

2. I'm sure they did. I suppose Trump's newest members were poor choices to him and many of his supporters when they proved they weren't corrupt.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
"And if I insisted that Hillary run again in 2020, I would be equally as stupid as you."

I would only suggest that Hillary run again in 2024 (?) for the entertainment of it all, but that wouldn't make me stupid.

"Fortunately, I'm much more intelligent and since I'm a Republican, have no desire for Biden to remain a two term President."

Yes, we've crossed that bridge before, and it is obvious that it is nothing more than a tactic you use to try and annoy others. There is nothing "Republican" about you, unless you are a RINO. RINOs do make the mistake of believing they are the better Republicans. Or maybe you're just in denial, and it's time for you to come out of the closet and admit you're a Democrat.

I can believe that reasonably intelligent Democrats want Biden out, but only for nefarious purposes. If they actually cared about the country they live in, they wouldn't still be Democrats.

That you exist solely in the realm of emotionalism when it comes to Trump is all the evidence you need concerning which Party you truly belong to. Trump's policies resulted in far too much good to ignore, he was clearly very good for this country. Possibly you prefer the lifelong career politicians who only "serve" this country for what they can get their hands on for themselves while in DC- perhaps Jeb Bush! is your man?
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
"I would only suggest that Hillary run again in 2024 (?) for the entertainment of it all, but that wouldn't make me stupid."

Hillary run as the Republican representative. Against Biden. That would be most amusing. Extremely unlikely though it may be.

"There is nothing "Republican" about you"

Tsk, this isn't about me. Even if I was a fuzzy pink elephant with bat wings, it wouldn't make a difference with whom I vote. It doesn't change the fact that placing all your bets on Trump is just as moronic if liberals did the same in 2020 with Hillary.

"I can believe that reasonably intelligent Democrats want Biden out, but only for nefarious purposes. If they actually cared about the country they live in, they wouldn't still be Democrats."

I'm sure Thanksgivings and Christmases are wonderful at your house. It's either very quiet or very loud.

"That you exist solely in the realm of emotionalism when it comes to Trump is all the evidence you need concerning which Party you truly belong to."

Hmm, in the last few messages I've made contempt's against Hillary, Biden, and Trump. I guess I'm some sort of Third Party... or, you know, your assumptions are horseshit.

"perhaps Jeb Bush! is your man?"

I thought I wasn't a Republican? Tsk. I have recently said I would've voted for Jeb at the time. But only because I thought he'd be the frontrunner since my last two preferred had already stepped up to the plate. McCain and Romney. This was before they went all RINO soft, so don't get your panties in a twist. While Jeb is listed here... I honestly would've preferred Rubio as my top pick:

imgflip.com/i/66yetf#com17598883

It's an interesting read. It really outlines my "emotionalism" with facts. Maybe you'd be brave enough to address issue 3?

I've always found Trump Supporters remarkably silent on that.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
""perhaps Jeb Bush! is your man?" I thought I wasn't a Republican? Tsk."

If you think supporting Jeb! makes you a Republican instead of a RINO, we need no further proof that you are not!

"3. His inexperience also threatened due process and very nearly gave the federal government a blank check to disarm the public regardless if a crime was actually committed."

"Also threatened" "nearly gave" = never happened.

Accusing someone of doing something they never did is absurd. Trump reversed himself on many, many items, and typically came down on the Right side of matters.

We can play such nonsense games until the end of time, and while it may make for interesting play on the Interwebz, it does not address real issues.

So there- red herring #3, I mean, point #3, dealt with.

Are you, by chance, related to that immoral Modda that frequents this site? Similar thought processes, along with the same style of condescension.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
"If you think supporting Jeb! makes you a Republican instead of a RINO, we need no further proof that you are not!"

One choice alone does not make me what you say you are.

On issue 3, seems fortunate... I've yet to hear a single Presidential Candidate say they'll come and take our guns.

OH! There was one. Just one, that I can think of. Beto O'Rourke. A name long forgotten to anyone who would make such a claim. He ALSO "threatened" "nearly gave" but it didn't happen. He people stopped voting for him. As they did with Trump. Except one was a primary election and the other an electoral. Tsk.

"Are you, by chance, related to that immoral Modda that frequents this site? Similar thought processes, along with the same style of condescension."

Is Modda a Republican too? I honestly thought they were more Democrat Socialist... or maybe left-leaning moderate. I can see why people who see me as a liberal for criticizing people for betting solely on Trump as a yuge mistake. But I've never been able to see what people see in him. His hypnotic charisma just has no effect on me whatsover.

I don't see politics as something to be entertained but something that shouldn't be in the front page news at all if it can be helped. I can see why it is beneficial for people who don't like to do much digging or homework but other than that... it's not too hard to do your own research without letting MSM or any other clickbait news do it for you.

See, the big difference between me and Modda? I believe you can be better.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
"I believe you can be better."

I believe you can be "better", too, but not on your own, and most certainly not using the logic displayed here.

John 1:12-13
But to all who did receive Him, who believed in His Name, He gave the right to become children of God, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God.
2 ups, 2y
John 16:32-33

"...and yet I am not alone, because the Father is with Me. These things I have spoken to you so that in Me you may have peace. In the world you have tribulation, but take courage; I have overcome the world."
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Desantis 2024
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
I don’t know if he’ll have the same broadening appeal but he has a better chance with moderates. We have the numbers for an electoral win but we a popular win would be better.
0 ups, 2y
I don't know either. I think he would be better than Trump again, and anything is better than Biden, but we shall see. He has a lot of enemies in media for sure, but I like him. I live in Florida and its been great, regardless of what's on t.v.!
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Remind me, did she run in 2020 so Trump could win again?
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
You're the dick, figure it out, win a pulitzer.
0 ups, 2y
Nobody wins anything by remaining stubborn and ignorant.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • Y1Dijsj.jpg