Imgflip Logo Icon

Hate To Break It To The Libtards..

Hate To Break It To The Libtards.. | HATE TO BREAK IT TO THE LIBTARDS BUT THE ONLY BLACK PERSON; SERVING ON THE SUPREME COURT WAS PERSONALLY ATTACKED, DEFAMED AND SLANDERED BY JOE BIDEN BEFORE HE VOTED AGAINST HIM... | image tagged in racist,creepy joe biden | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2,897 views 135 upvotes Made by anonymous 2 years ago in politics
290 Comments
19 ups, 2y,
3 replies
Up-voted. Fortunately for the Dems, however, ALLL THEY KNOW of history is what their socialist/Marxist minded teachers and professors taught them . . . and so Joe Biden being a racist hater of Blacks . . . never happened.
3 ups, 2y
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
ICYMI
0 ups, 2y
Where, are the Marxists?
16 ups, 2y
Joe Biden worries | WHY DO YOU HAVE TO BRING UP FACTS AND MY HISTORY AT A TIME LIKE THIS?! | image tagged in joe biden worries | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
15 ups, 2y,
1 reply
If they wander off of the democrat plantation... they deserve no fair treatment... democrat 101
11 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Sure... that's why your party calls blacks that are republican Uncle Tom blacks... LOL
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
AmericanViking responded to cartoon pony boy with " that's why your party calls blacks that are republican Uncle Tom blacks." he did not say cartoon pony boy said it.

White knighting epic fail.

What you would say or would not say about cartoon pony boy is opinion, not fact.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Yes it has. The Democratic Party says and teaches that white people are “oppressors.”
[deleted]
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Oh, it’s just the leaders of the party you ascribe to. Name one who refutes it.
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
2 ups, 2y,
5 replies
Name one leader of the party that refutes that. Please link any public comment where that was said. I can link several supporting it.
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
0 ups, 2y
The leaders direct which policies are supported and promoted by the individuals.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
I didn't ask you for permish to answer for you the question I asked you, guy.

But here, allow me to clear up your confusion.
What I asked you over 9hrs ago was:

"Modda 1 up, 9h, 1 reply

What a good idea! Why don't you post just where and when and how you got this: "The Democratic Party says and teaches that white people are “oppressors.” "?

crickets"

This silly dodging begins to bore me a lot?
0 ups, 2y
I asked the question first obviously. Post an answer or pipe down.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
No
&
You didn't because you can't, so shush, the crickets make more sense than you.

Your comment, btw, before you post a pick of Sharpton and say he said something about the perpetual poor victims of being simply misunderstood:

▶️ "Bluessol

The Democratic Party says and teaches that white people are “oppressors.” "

⏩ "The Democratic Party says and teaches that white people are “oppressors.”⏪

⏭️ "The Democratic Party"⏮️

"The Democratic Party," not some teacher ranting on FB.
0 ups, 2y
Crickets are what are in your head. You can’t post any leader denying CRT or whites are oppressors doctrine, as Octavia admitted. If you could you would so I guess you can’t so I won’t:
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
1 up, 2y
Am I? You mean the leaders do t represent the party? How did they get to be the leaders? I guess it’s at least good you admit that not one of them has spoken against such tripe though.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
What a good idea! Why don't you post just where and when and how you got this: "The Democratic Party says and teaches that white people are “oppressors.” "?

crickets
1 up, 2y
Hahaha it’s very simple. Supporting CRT is supporting this. It’s one of the basic precepts. I’ll post when you post one Democrat Leader who refutes the whites are oppressors BS or CRT.
2 ups, 2y,
3 replies
These inbred bricks don't even know who Derrick Bell is, they're just fascist rubes, online brown shirts purposely lying about progressive ideology.

All they're doing, witting or unwittingly, is to turn an entire party that represents more than half of the 330 million people living in the US into a strawman, as part of a psyop, Imgflip being infested with them.

Fascists don't have an ideology of their own, just reactions against any form of change in the status quo that might affect the privileges of the owner class, privileges they're fooled into believe they somehow share (the temporarily embarrassed billionaire derangement syndrome), scared into thinking that owner classes losing privileges is the same as them losing rights.

That's why it's frustrating to fight their vile message, but once you get accustomed to it, it becomes second nature to see not just the bullshit, but read between the lines and unpack everything wrong.

And English isn't even my mother language, so, yeah, there's no excuse.

Good luck.
[deleted]
5 ups, 2y,
1 reply
So basically...you just like reading your own comments, because you don't really contribute anything to the discussion other than a scathing criticism of yourself overgeneralizing a group of people while you're criticizing their overgeneralizing of another group or situation. A pathetic attempt to sound intellectual, while committing a host of logical fallacies.

"Fascists don't have an ideology".
Dumbest comment on the internet today. Fascism IS an ideology, one that shares more with modern progressives than conservatives.

"And English isn't your mother language"

Yeah, no shit.
1 up, 2y,
3 replies
"Dumbest comment on the internet today. Fascism IS an ideology, one that shares more with modern progressives than conservatives."

Thanks for proving my point, the fact you have to lie about fascism having anything to do with modern progressives, is proof that fascism's only ideology is whatever it helps the ruling class to maintain power, no matter whom they have to copy and which mythical past that have to invent.

What do modern progressives have in common with Fascism anyway?

Which part of glorifying a mythical past to justify the perpetuation of a capitalist status quo, are modern progressives advocating for?

What's, in your own words, a modern progressive?
[deleted]
5 ups, 2y,
1 reply
You throw the term "fascist" around like an orphan going from home to home. I don't think you even know what it is, which explains your misuse of it. I'll not waste time on another P2 alt that just blows up posts with the same shit you changed your name to get away from anyway.

Modern Progressives and Facism are similar in the authoritarian leanings of both. Progressives seek power over every aspect of those they control. Now, it seems you've coopted big tech into doing what the Constitution won't allow. Brilliant, if not plagiarized from any number of dystopian novels written in the 20th century.

Modern Progressive...in my own words? Cool. I'll leave the standard definitions alone and just state that a modern progressive is a kool-aid drinking, authoritarian, useful idiot, that has a high likelihood of not even knowing their own gender, who advocates for the brainwashing of children, and probably jacks off to furry porn. Good enough for ya?
1 up, 2y
No, you're the ones throwing it like a kid who calls their teacher fascist for forcing them to take a tetanus shot.

You also throw the words communist and socialist with even less care of what they mean or if they apply at all to any of your jabber.

" I'll leave the standard definitions alone and just state that a modern progressive is a kool-aid drinking, authoritarian, useful idiot, that has a high likelihood of not even knowing their own gender, who advocates for the brainwashing of children, and probably jacks off to furry porn. Good enough for ya?"

So, a fascist strawman, that's not an interpretation of what being progressive means, that's just a bunch of highly specific jabber that you pretend to pass as the definition of progressive.

If you were to ask me what Conservatism means in my own words, I'd say that it's a political movement that aims to temper the enthusiasm of social, economic and technological progress in its healthy form, which turns into an empty headed, highly emotional reaction against change and social progress when it threatens the privileges of the owner class in its toxic form, which is what we call fascism.

Progressivism is the political movement that aims for technological and economic progress to be reflected in the betterment of the social conditions of all the population in the most equitable and fair way possible in its healthy form, and a potentially misguided counter reaction against the aforementioned reaction of the ruling class, weaponizing conservative politics to maintain their privileges.

Or I could just say that a conservative is just a kool aid drinking, authoritarian useful idiot, that has a high likelihood of not even knowing if their raging homophobia means they're gay af, who advocates for the brainwashing of children into perpetuating unjust social systems, and probably jacks off to lawn mowers.

Which honestly isn't as much a strawman as yours was, didn't have to change much to make it work.

Grow up.
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Honestly...you're like a blind monkey throwing his own shit at himself. I appreciate the vernacular, but behind all the pompous verbosity lies the same trite, condescending "if you don't agree with me you're a racist, misogynistic, homophobic blah blah blah insert ad hominem here" bullshit that you self-righteous nut sucking commie bastards fling at everything different from you hoping it'll stick.

Even your pathetic attempt to take a high ground fails underneath the weight of your own hypocritical stances.

Progressive: we must continue moving forwards.

Conservative: but you're heading for a cliff.

Progressive: You're a racist!

Your ideology in a nutshell.
0 ups, 2y
"Honestly...you're like a blind monkey throwing his own shit at himself. I appreciate the vernacular, but behind all the pompous verbosity lies the same trite, condescending "if you don't agree with me you're a racist, misogynistic, homophobic blah blah blah insert ad hominem here" bullshit that you self-righteous nut sucking commie bastards fling at everything different from you hoping it'll stick."

I've made on of the most unbiased and good faithed, personal description of Conservatism, that anybody considering themselves leftist and progressive, could possibly ever give in 2022, yet you maliciously reduce it it to me calling you "a racist, mysoginist homophobic, bla bla bla".

Can you have worse faith than this? of course you can, by turning my elaborate, unbiased, own interpertationYour simplification of my metaphor is as purposely simplistic as the strawman you want to paint of progressive ideologies:

For starters, why does it have to be a dead end road towards a cliff?
Why can't it be the joint exploration of the coastal cliffs, as metaphor for the course of the nation through history?, something more close to reality like this:

Progressive: We must move forwards.

Conservative: Be careful, there's cliffs up ahead, and we gotta re-pressurize tires at the next gas station, the road gets tough up ahead.

Progressive: Yeah, sure, but don't worry, we don't need to move so slow.

Conservative reaching a grown ass compromise: You're probably right but you can't forget about the cliffs.

Progressives doing the same: Yes, maybe we don't need to make a UBI of a million dollars a month like your immature cousins joke about in imgflip, but 2.000 isn't that bad, also, yeah, I should not drive neither as slow as you suggested me, nor as fast as I wanted to go initially.

Conservative acting like an adult: Alright then, want to stop at that roadside Wendy's?

Progressive doing the same: Does the pope shit on the woods?

Grow up.
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
1 up, 2y
Simplifying something in such a fashion is a deconstruction, not a strawman.

Then strawman comes first, AFTER deconstructing a concept, WHEN you can either manipulate the pieces to make a strawman, like you've done and now try to justify with that blocky, single paragraph brick, unironically worse to read than an ironically dense to read leftist meme.

Or you can use the deconstruction to make an honest approach to understanding whatever concept you're reducing to its most base elements.

BTW this is not a troll account bozo, it's a 16 years old Youtube account that has been fused to a Google account shortly after, which is why I have this imgflip account, which I also had for quite some years now as well, and which only now I'm starting to use for honest, intellectual leftist activism.

Seriously, try to get less triggered, you'll be able to write something that isn't an insult to the eyes to read.

Paragraphs are a thing, grow the f**k up.
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
3 replies
1 up, 2y,
2 replies
BTW I'm a white, 1.80 m buhurt bro with blue eyes, short hair, and the ability to impersonate a perfect Bay Area accent (or even an old timey Transatlantic accent for the lulz), so, yeah, if I were talking to you, posing as a right winger, you'd buy into it like a mark.

That's when I infiltrate your buddy's white supremacist millitia or whatever, and f**k their shit up from the inside.

Grow up.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Who cares. I’m not looking for a date. Especially not a sanctimonious elitist. Keep looking one day you may find a date. Lol white supremist? coming from a colonizing Spainiard who is also considered Caucasian that’s funny. It does belie your ignorance. Was Spain set up for the benefit of the Spanish people? Was China set up for the benefit of Chinese people? Oh yes they were because every country was established for its people. Why you believe that America was any different is just lefty propaganda.
0 ups, 2y
And I'm not offering one either, I would've posted a meme with my flexing arm while holding a montante (a great sword) in one hand, or posing shirtless with it's blunt blade resting behind my neck in an anime pose, and I'd be doing it in Tinder, not here.

Describing my ethnicity and ability to pass as an American irl (at least for a while, can't last more than 4 minutes in voice chats XD without effing up at some point), as a comeback against the supposed low quality of my English (Which I'm willing to bet is the prime reason your comment got deleted in the first place), doesn't make me a white supremacist in any way, specially considering the context.

Also, apart from the occasional, sometimes ngl blatant syntax fluke (mistyping doesn't obviously count), I think I'm pretty much bilingual, specially considering the topics I'm handling and the vocabulary they require.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Ha when and where did I attack your English? Self conscious much?
0 ups, 2y
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
No matter how you look at it, it's a vaccine, and these vaccine mandates aren't any more different than any other mandates everybody living in the first world has grew up with, than what you skeptics want them to be.

I'm not the one generalizing about skeptics in 2022, you guys generalize about, and strawman yourselves for me just fine, I'm just trying to pull your wool off your eyes, which also feeds my "selfish" desire for the pandemic to end.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
No matter how you look at it you are wrong. Repeatedly.
0 ups, 2y
No I'm not, and I already explained why, on detail, in many a post before, and after the one you're replying to, have a nice day, leave me alone unless you actually try to rationalize your explanations, like I otherwise have the courtesy to do.

Thanks.
1 up, 2y,
4 replies
No, I'm only calling an inbred brick to those who believe in bro science, and have hallucinations of a medical fascism that doesn't exist, or whom are too illiterate to understand, even with the most basic of explanations, how a vaccine works, contrary to how they believe they should work.

Are you able to understand the simple, tacit statement: "Antiviral, mRNA vaccines simplify the spike gene absorption process compared to classic, antiviral vaccines, because they skip the steps involved in breaking down entire, viral spike proteins from inoculated weakened viruses, delivering the exact same thing (Ribo-Nucleic Acid, just a bunch of spike protein enzymes bruh, nothing mysterious or deep state sci fi about it).

It's the same thing delivered differently, people getting triggered by this very simple piece of medical science, is what they get called an inbred brick, not because they disagree with me, I disagree with everybody I know in a lot of things but that doesn't make them inbred bricks, just human.

Grow up.
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
3 replies
0 ups, 2y
"yet claim mental superiority."

Yeah, that sure was an insult when you used on me too a couple of months ago too...
1 up, 2y
I live in the country that named half the places in yours, the country that had black slaves (slavery is always bad, but there's a spectrum ;) ) buying their freedom back as Conquistador mercenaries, touting guns in American soil while talking in Spanish, centuries before the first 2nd Amendment hogs were an idea in their daddies' minds.

I live in a country where more than one American Discord buddy has told me they'd kill to live, and they're not precisely bums, some of them are already well paid there, but know that being paid less but getting better public services in return, makes life more affordable, which is how you actually save money, they're people who know the difference between macroeconomic propaganda, and actual, daily live economy.

My social security paycheck deductions pay for Universal Healthcare, pensions, unemployment benefits, welfare, education, and there's still some for corrupt officials to still get something from it, whereas yours only pays for corrupt officials.

You live in the United Scams of America, your nation's wealth is an illusion

Have fun paying both taxes and out of pocket money for conditional Healthcare.

Also, if all the hundreds of thousands of people in the US that every single year, refuse to go to the doctor or straight up die nowhere near a hospital or clinic, were suddenly able to go because of mysterious donations or whatever, the waiting lists nothing argument goes out the window and commits seppuku before hitting the pavement.

I live in a country with 5 times less food insecurity, with data from 2018 to 2010

Spain-1.8% of its population had food insecurity.

United Scams of Muhrica- 10.5 % food insecurity, 3.9% of which, was very low food insecurity.

These are percentages.

You're the new Rome and you refuse to admit you've lost.

You're on the wrong side of history bucko.
1 up, 2y
And I'm pompous because I can afford it, so, thanks for the compliment, here's an upvote!!
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Calling people inbred bricks is an insult I think. Where’s that lefty Mod that deleted my response.
0 ups, 2y
You guys are calling the liberal + ableist slur constantly, inbred brick is so tame it' almost a dad joke at this point.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
The size and population are only irrelevant when you believe that managing a small business is the same as managing a corporation. How many Spanish warehouse workers are rich? None? Work on your own problems. Spain’s glory passed centuries ago.
0 ups, 2y
Lol, come back when you say something that hasn't been debunked yet by the very post you're replying to, which you're obviously only addressing selectively.

Our average low-middle class incomes, positively offset by what I've explained to you about better public services, thanks to taxes that give us orders of magnitude better returns in the form of said public services being either free, or extremely available, and with a quality that's averagely similar, or superior when it comes to, for example, healthcare and access to public education.

Waiting times? a useless on its face argument.

Hundreds of thousands of Americans don't go to the doctor to the doctor every year, and in some cases, one of them ON TAPE, ask for people in the viccinity not to call an ambulance, despite laying on the ground with an open f**king fracture.

If they all suddenly got the money to go there via a mysterious donation or whatever, your hospitals implode, like they almost did during the pandemic (and no, recording empty hallways because that's how far you can snoop in quarantined hospitals isn't proof of anything, Dr. Karen from the Facebook clinic is not a reputable source, she's a quack).

I'm talking about Per Capita, and the economy of scale allows for different levels of centralization, meaning that it's not that hard to organize as your little brain thinks.

Thinking of countries as provinces of a planet isn't that hard, your scope is too small to even visualize what territorial administration looks like.

Grow up.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
So you are an old Franco supporting fascist who hates America? Bwhahahaha. That’s Rich 🤑. Gee it’s not hard to understand your authoritarian bend now. You live in a country that is barely larger than California in population. You rank way down the list in GDP and your unemployment rate is higher than most. You have a weak economy and many other problems. We could delve further but no need.
1 up, 2y
Where did on Earth have I say anything, that remotely supports Franco's regime?

If anything, you could maliciously use Albion's Black Legend rhetoric, to loosely blame Spain for pioneering racial castes, centuries after Juan Valiente's first expedition, which you'd be right about but doesn't excuse the brutality of the transatlantic trade, or the fact that there's barely indigenous population left in most ex-British colonies, compared with the whole bunch of new ethnicities that spawned after the "Conquest of The Indies".

The size and population of my country is irrelevant, we're talking about management here.

GDP and macroeconomics are propaganda and I've already explained why, go bother someone else with your circular arguments.

"You rank way down the list in GDP and your unemployment rate is higher than most. You have a weak economy and many other problems. We could delve further but no need."

I'm fully aware of my country's problems but, are you even half aware of yours'?.

Your argument is worth nothing, it's useless, empty dribble because you're ignoring my food insecurity problem numbers, which, AGAIN, are 1.8 % of food insecure households in Spain, vs 10.5% in the United States of Scamerica.

I don't care about unemployment when their jobs don't pay enough to eat.

Plus, my public utilities are less expensive with my taxes than what you have in that, Ponzi scheme you have the nerve to call a country, where you pay more in taxes for healthcare than I do from my Social Security deduction, which pays for more stuff like free public education (your head should implode just by reading that last sentence), while on top of that, you still gotta pay an insurance, copayments, deductibles, fly by doctoring, being taken unconscious after a crash crash to the wrong hospital and paying for a bed and ambulance ride like you got to a Hilton Hotel in a Limousine (jk lol, it's probably even way more expensive than that, and the food was worse than at home).

As I predicted, your reply was gonna use the Macroeconomic propaganda, but I got knowledge of the nitty gritty because dialectical materialism so, yeah, writhe and cope.

Grow up.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Those sound like insults, where is that lefty mod?
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
You're actually asking for a post to be deleted? Cancel Culture much?

That post your referring to is kinda tamer than some of the ones remaining, and way more so than the rightfully deleted ones, which are those where I got too rude and insulted, even if it's not an ad hominen, just rudeness, the person instead of sticking to attack the argument, or simply stepping out of the line of what's already allowed, which is more than enough.

You can say I was kind of counting on them to be deleted, and the gist of what I wanted to say remains more or less intact so there's no way I could compare it with censorship, or make a cheap 1984 joke like most rightoids do whenever facing the consequences of using their freedom of speech.

However tho, all my vitriol in here is directed exclusively towards both the comment, and America (yeah, ask to get a post cancelled for insulting a country's government and modern culture, that won't set any precedents), and me telling you to grow up is tough love more than anything.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Well I think rules should be applied fairly shouldn’t they? I know you and your ilk don’t agree and think only your voice should be heard and allowed to violate the terms. You started out with personal attacks and insults so don’t pretend it’s about the issues. We both know your not looking for thoughtful debate.
0 ups, 2y
"Well I think rules should be applied fairly shouldn’t they?"

I'm not complaining about their application, read again, I'm complaining about the accuracy of the reason stated. I don't have a problem with posts deemed too disrespectful being deleted, and I've made myself pretty darn clear about it.

"I know you and your ilk don’t agree and think only your voice should be heard and allowed to violate the terms"

My voice wasn't allowed to violate the terms of civility since every post that didn't conform to those terms, has been promptly deleted.

"You started out with personal attacks and insults so don’t pretend it’s about the issues"

It is about the issues, every insult and personal attack (except for the all caps lessgo branden one, which I posted even with the knowledge that it was most certainly gonna be deleted).

Like I said and I'm saying again, every ad hominem is an insult, but not every insult is an ad hominem, an ad hominem is when you substitute an argument with an insult.

The act of insulting alone, by itself, doesn't qualify as a logical fallacy, it's just rudeness.
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
HATE TO BREAK IT TO THE LIBTARDS BUT THE ONLY BLACK PERSON; SERVING ON THE SUPREME COURT WAS PERSONALLY ATTACKED, DEFAMED AND SLANDERED BY JOE BIDEN BEFORE HE VOTED AGAINST HIM...