Imgflip Logo Icon

"A Republic, If You Can Keep It." ~~ Benjamin Franklin

"A Republic, If You Can Keep It." ~~ Benjamin Franklin | image tagged in politics,trump,biden,brandon,franklin,leftists | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,444 views 96 upvotes Made by vBackman 2 years ago in politics
74 Comments
10 ups, 2y,
1 reply
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Another great meme, vBackman!
6 ups, 2y
Fat_Elvis! | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
I so appreciate it!
8 ups, 2y
Dicaprio walking | YEAH, THAT ABOUT SUMS IT UP | image tagged in dicaprio walking | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
8 ups, 2y
8 ups, 2y
[deleted]
8 ups, 2y
Ain't it the truth. Upvote
6 ups, 2y
5 ups, 2y,
1 reply
great meme! 1000 thank yous.. and oh.. detestable ignorant scums like prager and gumshoe are sad creatures deserving of only pity.. and in fact, just on earth to infect anyone around them (or wthin the confines of the cybernet and their mothers' basements where they live..) with endless ignorance and conjured up fantasy, bullshit and vomit not worth our time.. haha much like cnn actually.. *Castrated Neutered Nonsense.. it's everywhere it seems.. good day xo :-) #Trumpwon MAGA
5 ups, 2y
[deleted]
4 ups, 2y
Lmao xD
3 ups, 2y
2 ups, 2y
10 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Turn on CNN and get red pilled.
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
I didn't say they did. I don't watch CNN so I don't know if they said that or not. I'm guessing not since they would get lambasted for cussing like that on air. But that isn't what I was responding to, genius.
5 ups, 2y
I didn't say anything about them saying "f**k hoe Biden," you did AFTER I responded to your original comment about the whining. Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, huh?
9 ups, 2y,
1 reply
You obviously missed the point of my comment.
9 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Crying isn't just literal tears when you're hurt. I told him to check out CNN cause they are crying over "let's go Brandon" and they're doing even more now since Biden got trolled. Nothing about my comment is a lie. They're literally crying on air about it.
6 ups, 2y,
2 replies
I dont care what YouTube is doing, if you watch an hour of CNN or MSNBC you can see it for yourself. You claim to have watch CNN, but you're denying my claim.
2 ups, 2y
I don't watch CNN so I searched for clips on the internet.

I wouldn't advise watching CNN. They're heavily biased for Democrats. If there is any tears being shed, I'd love to see it but if all you have is imagined shit that didn't happen, then I'm not going to find squat.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
In fact, the only person crying is Jared Schmeck who didn't think his comments would have any repercussions. From what I hear tell, he's not just hearing flack from leftists, liberals, and Democrats but Republicans and conservatives who have a bit more couth, not to mention children, whom they have to now explain the rather adult joke. Or lie to them. People don't like having to lie to their kids. It kinda makes them angry, ya know?
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Just Google it and you'll see it.
2 ups, 2y
I did. I didn't.
5 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Then you're doing it wrong. I just googled it and I also searched YouTube and found a bunch of evidence.

One of the top videos on YouTube is Jimmy Kimmel whining about it and talking about how it should be criminally investigated. Also whined about Donald Trump showing up to a baseball game.
2 ups, 2y,
3 replies
Oh, is Jimmy Kimmel on CNN? Wow. I guess they're desperate. Or he is. Both? Both.
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orqwb9JuBw8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uA2CSYijYZg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgbt452UMOQ

Since you can't seem to find anything yourself, I've given you three videos from YouTube for free. You're welcome.
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Ohhhh, now I get it. Cause I mentioned CNN you're sticking to that. Okay, but yes, CNN does cry about it like the rest. But good job splitting hairs.

I'm talking about the left, not just CNN.
1 up, 2y
Cool. I saw no tears from Kimmel. You let me down.
4 ups, 2y
"Cool. I saw no tears from Kimmel. You let me down."

Like I've already said, crying doesn't always involve tears. Bitching, moaning, whining, complaining...it's all tied together with complaining.
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
But - good for you - I'm proud you said F Trump F Biden and F CNN equally. That's a huge step forward
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
And I'm sure all 60-70 some million aren't worth their salt...
2 ups, 2y,
2 replies
It pays the bills sure.

Just doesn't win that popular vote.
1 up, 2y
Not the one that counts.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
I'm liking you as a memer more and more lately... You do have good talking points from time to time
2 ups, 2y
I try. Thank you.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Actually the people chanting it are meaning what they say. It's a mockery of what a newscaster tried to hide when the crowd clearly was saying F Joe Biden. The news reporter switched it up - so everyone continues the tradition.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Yeah, at an event Biden had nothing to do with so her confusion was understandable.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Any event that happens in the United States is happening in Biden's coverage area network - he's the President of those United States. Ergo - regardless of whether he wants to be a part of events or not - he is.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Yes, but, you can see the confusion for the average American, yes?

I get what the intent is but I think you're confusing people's lack of understanding of your intent with something more nefarious. It isn't.

There are no Biden rallies.

Thank God.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Hey now, I saw 5 to 9 people at a rally for Biden. Not 5 to 9 K... Just 5 to 9.
1 up, 2y
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Thinking "Let's Go Brandon" is but a pubertal silliness shows that the uppity left is completely out of touch with rank and file people. There is way more behind that chant. People are fed up with media lies and won't have it any longer their rights being taken away. Black Rap Culture is picking up the slogan. People loathe the Biden presidency and are done with the political establishment.
That's why "Let's Go Brandon" isn't going away.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
“Let’s Go Brandon” isn’t going away because the window lickers who think it’s funny are the same window lickers who cried about “respecting the office of the President” when Don the Con was in office.

It’s not about anyone being out of touch…right now ‘conservatives’ have that market cornered with the bogus election fraud claims and the preoccupation with playing the bully-victim…it’s about ‘conservatives’ having an utter lack of imagination.

F**k Joe Biden.
4 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Most.Popular.President.Ever.
Crushed Sanders in the primaries!
81 million votes my ass!
unprecedented!
They even had to extend the deadlines to meet the press of Biden voters- imagine that!

he hardly even campaigned!

High-energy Biden rally: https://youtu.be/dZTrErfdkYc
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Just because Biden won the most popular votes doesn't mean he's the most popular President ever.

Trump made such claims of himself from time to time despite never winning the popular vote.

Perhaps, Biden didn't win the popular vote (and the electoral vote) because he was so popular but rather because Trump overestimated his own popularity.

Views, followers, and crowd sizes (most of those which can be watered down with international numbers) are not enough to guarantee a popular win.

Stability, unity, growth of character - these are the things that can make a President who won without the popular vote to eventually gain it in their second election. It requires hard work, dedication, intelligence, and a modicum of competence. None of which Trump appeared to have to the general public.

Now, fortunately, that doesn't guarantee Biden a second Presidential win.

Unless all Republicans have to offer is Trump, or someone like him with more of his lazy sensationalist rhetoric.

Yes, the American people ARE fed up but they also want to see results.
1 up, 2y,
3 replies
So Biden won because Trump was an unpopular President?!?

The statistics simply doesn't add up to match that narrative.

If Trump really was that unpopular:

• how come President Trump won 11 million more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016, and 8 million more than Clinton did that year, and even more votes than Obama in 2008?
• historically he who wins the Bellwether counties wins the presidency. How come President Trump won 18 of them and Biden only a single one.
• how come Biden scored a record low 16.7% of counties but a record high of votes in history?
• If the only motivation was just to vote President Trump out of office- how come such a vast number of Biden votes were cast after Nov3- risking forfeit or being thrown out?
• how come this wasn't a nationwide trend but occured in six populous counties in crucial swing states that stopped the count on Nov-3, assessed the election outcome then extended the deadlines until they flipped?

also with that line of argumentation of Biden being the lesser of two unpopular choices:
How do you explain Biden becoming the establishment's candidate to begin with?
Bernie Sanders was way more popular, polling way ahead of Biden and doing great in the primaries.
0 ups, 2y
• how come President Trump won 11 million more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016, and 8 million more than Clinton did that year, and even more votes than Obama in 2008?

The same reason President Biden won 8 million more than Clinton did that year. The majority was conflicted over Hillary. They were not so conflicted over Trump.

• historically he who wins the Bellwether counties wins the presidency. How come President Trump won 18 of them and Biden only a single one.

That is a huge question and I will try to condense my answer, but I'm happy to expand upon it. Bellwethers tend to only reach back a good 40-70 years. It should be noted, that we're only seeing the latest deviations and that only the longest running bellwethers are being counted. Biden may very well have more Bellwethers just not in the 1980-1944 range. In 2016, we saw a very large deviation of bellwethers as well. From what I understand, there were 32 bellwethers who'd accurately predicted who'd be President up to1980 and earlier (while 1981 later were not counted). Of those 32, Trump won 18 while Hillary won 14. This fits with your assessment that the winner tends to win more bellwethers. But that means we had an even smaller pool of bellwethers for 2020. Only 1 county has remained consistent with it's prediction of votes of whom becomes President by it's counties votes since 1980. Next Election, they're very likely to include a whole new generational set of bellwethers that reach back only 43 years. And that shift in range of reliability is common for each general election. It is very rare but not impossible for a bellwether to extend further than 70 years. I believe only a handful have done that in the last 30 years. But it will be another 30 years before we potentially see such a bellwether county again.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
• also with that line of argumentation of Biden being the lesser of two unpopular choices:
How do you explain Biden becoming the establishment's candidate to begin with?
Bernie Sanders was way more popular, polling way ahead of Biden and doing great in the primaries.

Biden held the lead for the more popular candidate the longest. Bernie only won the popular candidate for 9 weeks, not concurrently, while Biden had 17 weeks worth of wins before Bernie dropped out.

I got the feeling Bernie dropped because many of his supporters seemed to have flipped to Trump and it was determined that they were unlikely to flip back to Bernie if came down between the two. Despite what the polls said, Bernie leading against Trump, it is doubtful Bernie or the DNC would be so reliant on them this go around since those same polls had Hillary leading over Trump.

Biden was just the safest choice given his connection with the then-most popular vote Obama.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
"Biden was just the safest choice"
haha u're right!
Biden was "the safest choice". The safest choice for the corrupt DC establishment.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I97VhfkcRUA
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Yes, and he won fair and square.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
lol
0 ups, 2y
0 ups, 2y
• how come Biden scored a record low 16.7% of counties but a record high of votes in history?

That would be because the electoral college counts individual popular votes by state, and not votes by county. Biden succeeded in winning more urban and heavily populated cities, while Trump succeeded in winning more rural and less populated counties. The key word is populated areas where the individual vote succeeds any overall county or state simplified voting system.

• If the only motivation was just to vote President Trump out of office- how come such a vast number of Biden votes were cast after Nov3- risking forfeit or being thrown out?

This is also a big question and seems to have an informed bias behind it. First, no votes were "cast" after November 3rd. Votes were /counted/ after November 3rd for a variety of reasons.

1. It takes time to count all votes. It usually takes weeks to determine but sometimes it can be only one or two days, especially if the victory is a landside.

2. Mail-in votes were a huge controversy in the 2020. Many states elected to count these separately and days after November 3rd to quell any concerns of election fraud. (Naturally, that didn't work.)

3. There were ballots mailed-in that didn't come until days after the election. These still had to be counted but they were more heavily (and rightly) scrutinized for their validity. To my knowledge, there is no catalogue anywhere that shows how many of these "late" votes were counted or thrown out.

• how come this wasn't a nationwide trend but occurred in six populous counties in crucial swing states that stopped the count on Nov-3, assessed the election outcome then extended the deadlines until they flipped?

First of all, counting did not stop on November 3rd. It continued well into December, which is common for any election. Presidential or mid-term. Voting stopped after November 3rd, which is totally different from counting. An error Trump made frequently so it's understandable for your informed error to think votes stopped being counted on November 3rd.

The media's coverage naturally focused on the swing states as non-swing states had already assessed who'd won by each candidate reaching it's targeted majority count a day or two. While it took much longer to make this same assessment in swing states because, naturally, they were much closer.

A higher percentage of voters than usual voted by mail-in ballot because we were, and still are, in the middle of a pandemic.
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
News sources and liberals alike are calling a right-wing slur and dangerous.
1 up, 2y
I guarantee you the people that say "F**k Trump" out loud do not think it's a slur.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Lmao yes they are.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Did you read that article?

It's an opinion piece that concludes that it is not hate speech. Good grief.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
That's what I could find on a Google search. Yes, I know it's a piece that concludes it isn't hate speech. Why is the question even being posed in the article though??

Answer: Because some people are calling it hate speech.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Or conservative opinion pieces are blowing it up.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Noooo they are reporting on the blowing up from liberal sources and laughing out loud doing it
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • paste:image.png
  • image.png