Ignorance Can Be Fixed; Stupidity Is Forever

Well, I see where you went wrong...
.
.
.
.
the current administration and its supporters within the MEDIA are only interested in one thing...
CONTROL OVER ITS CITIZENS via UNBRIDLED POWER.

Do you copy everything I do?

You asked that already.
Alzheimer's??

At least you are aware and admit you have Alzheimer's.
Too bad it's progressive and nothing can be done about it.

See...right there! You twisted what I said. You are deranged.
Seriously, why do you spend so much time obsessing over me. You stalk my comments and my memes. Get a life, loser.

Guy, YOU'RE the one that got up supposedly at 4am - after going to sleep late - and gave me a storm of notifications and had been stalking my comments all day yesterday.

I had left you alone because, well, it's kinda sad watching you have a meltdown over what are regular basic words (did you look up what "you don't know squat" means in the US yet?) here but turn out to be old meanypants slang over in the UK that I hadn't even heard on Benny Hill back when I was a kid.

Anywho, gots ta catch some zzzzzzzz's muhself, toodles!

More bullshit from whoever you are

40 years of ivermectin killing covid?

that doesn't make sense.

to somebody with a brain.

What Covid?
I am immune

only if you had covid.

and only for a limited time.

I was offered the jab from my school (I'm 14), and I refused. Everyone's asking me why I didn't get it and I responded:

"I'm a kid, I don't need it. Also, I'm allowed to make my own decisions." and I walked away.

Kudos to you, Pollard, as you definitely made the right choice to walk away. You don't need it at your age and are smarter at 14 than a whole lot of adults! Great job....

Smart. Very smart!

Ivermectin is good enough to be given to "refugees" pouring into the country tho.

https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/guidelines/overseas-guidelines.html

is this for covid?

no

are refugees horses?

no

ivermectin treats other parasites that humans get.

that's why they recommend it.

not for covid.

The thing that is most alarming is the "fact check" at the bottom...

somebody has to think critically...

...for conservatives who suspend critical thinking to believe in creationism.

Upvote

https://www.habingfamily.com/obituary/michael-mike-granata?fbclid=IwAR3b8zIaSqJV9rvCmpQQ6BdS_DuO5SCg0dDzJPlerpFbCGaKPbyH5tUeFKg

“Zero” is most definitely an exaggeration there

I’m a minor. I got my shot over half a year ago. I’m perfectly fine. Also
“This tweet is misleading”

stop lying you liberal boomer :)

I’m not a liberal nor a boomer

just playin. even conservatives get the jab. just not the ones making memes in politics :)

So, you're advocating for horse dewormer that had no evidence that it impacts the virus inside the human body at all. And you're fearmongering a vaccine for which there is a lot of evidence that it works. And you're adding in some "your children will be sterile!!!!!!" for fun.

Because there's 0 amounts of evidence for that.

But, fun fact, ivermectin does reduce male fertility. So, there's that.

Why is CDC recommending 'horse dewormer' to "refugees" entering our country???

https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/guidelines/overseas-guidelines.html

No, ivermectin does not reduce male fertility, but the vaccine does. Thank you for taking yourself out of the gene pool.

Oh, and there is 0 evidence that the vaccine reduces fertility.

There is zero evidence because five year-olds haven't had time to get pregnant, Genius. There probably haven't been tests done on women yet due to the rush on this experimental jab either. There have been adverse reactions reported from women hemorrhaging and also many spontaneous abortions.

More lies and misinformation from you.

"could affect their fertility!!!!!!" meaning you don't know anything and are literally making it up. You're trying to cover yourself with "It cooooouuullllld happen, but we don't knooooooooooow."

These are lies. You are lying

And you honestly think that women who get vaccinated suddenly go and get an abortion?

Because that's what abortion means. Terminating a pregnancy.

You're using that word on purpose instead of the correct word miscarriage. More lies and misinformation from you.

And the Lyons-Weiler analysis of CDC study is falsified. They cherry picked data and claimed the spontaneous rate of miscarriages was 8 times higher. They were wrong.

You need to educate yourself and quit calling out others who follow facts and not agendas. Hard to believe you aren't familiar with the term 'spontaneous abortion' but I guess that is the case.

A total of 96 of 104 spontaneous abortions (92.3%) occurred before 13 weeks of gestation (Table 4), and 700 of 712 pregnancies that resulted in a live birth (98.3%) were among persons who received their first eligible vaccine dose in the third trimester. Adverse outcomes among 724 live-born infants — including 12 sets of multiple gestation — were preterm birth (60 of 636 among those vaccinated before 37 ...

weekhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969 …

Receipt of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccines and Risk of Spontaneous Abortion

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2113891

3qdmpj.jpg (click to show)

it's like you hit Ctrl-F on that study and searched for abortion. Because if you'd actually read it (like I did) you would have found this:

"827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester)."

So... 13.9% loss of pregnancy. That's what we're looking at. Seems pretty high, right?

But what's the expected rate of pregnancy loss in a pre-vaccine population?

One google search later... 10 to 20% loss of pregnancy, varying by age and other factors.

So... 13% is right what you would expect to see in a pre-vaccine population. That's what we're getting in a vaccinated population.

More lies from you. More deception.

You keep telling yourself that.

As it's a fact, yes.

So you believe, the guy who openly said during TedTalk "First we’ve got population… if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%." All of the sudden he is a spokesperson behind a vaccine that wont do that?
LOL Mental!

If you could point out where I referenced Bill Gates? Anywhere? Especially referencing him as an authority, that'd be great.

Because otherwise, it's more of your fantasy land nonsense that puts your feelings first and facts as a distant last.

for other diseases not covid silly

It does however sink your ivermectin-is-a-horse-dewormer battleship tho.

it still deworms horses silly.

it just doesn't cure covid.

Stop consuming water, it's used as engine coolant.

EVs don't need cooling systems.

Because they come from areas with high levels of parasitic infection.

Which is what Ivermectin is freaking fantastic at treating.

So, what you're pointing out is that the CDC is recommending that a medicine be used for its intended purpose.

You know. Facts. Not your feelings.

But, sure, go ahead with your fantasy life.

"they come from areas with high levels of parasitic infection" - you mean like shithole countries?

"for it's intended purpose" LMFAO Didn't know refugees qualify as livestock?

I called them areas of high levels of parasitic infection. A fact.

Calling them shithole countries is on you, your boy Trump, and your feelings.

Where do we find areas of high levels of parasitic infection?

You're the one calling them shithole countries.

Come to terms with who and what you are.

Come to terms that it is you who does not like facts, and it is you who's feelings got the better of.

meanwhile in Japan

Except the group that recommended ivermectin made that recommendation in February, not August. They "recommended the emergency use of drugs mainly to prevent the aggravation of home caregivers", so it wasn't recommended for all patients.

Also, this is slide is all messed up. It is cases, not deaths or hospitalizations. Ivermectin is given to patients with COVID, so the linkage between a decline in cases due to ivermectin isn't clear.

recommendation: Aug-!3.

daily deaths: zero (Nov-7)
severe symptoms: 12

https://www-tokyo--np-co-jp.translate.goog/article/123988

https://www.nippon.com/en/news/yjj2021110700325/

Lying? I missed that article, but I assure you I wasn't lying.

Granted it didn't translate well, but that was a reiterating of the February recommendation. Correlation is not causation, especially when he are talking about a recommendation, not implementation.

Did Japan actually start prescribing it for all patients? It seems like a stretch though to give ivermectin credit since no other country that has tried it and even the trials that suggested it was useful haven't claimed anything like these results. Some studies have shown it is effective, to be sure, and I would have no issue with it being recommended... But at this point we have other treatments such as monoclonal antibodies that are more effective.

Japan isn't "prescribing" or mandating anything. They're less regulatory and more open-minded apparently.
Omnipotent all-knowing governments being in charge of making life decisions for you or your kids or your doc is but sheep-think.

Japan and the US are the same in regards to Ivermectin from a policy standpoint. It isn't off shelves and doctors can prescribe it. However, it isn't recommended for the treatment of COVID. Its the same in Japan, with the exception that a non-regulatory medical association has recommended its use.

No they're not. These MDs existed in the US as well, but they were heavily bullied. Even if you can find yourself a doctor who prescribes it pharmacies often won't fill it, as they are vehemently being threatened by big pharma interest groups.
This- and only this- is why people are resorting to the lifestock version.

Pharmacists have that right to refuse to fill a drug if they believe it is being prescribed inappropriately. So the question becomes are they refusing to fill a drug based on their professional opinion and guidance from the CDC and FDA or a conspiracy?

Nothing is preventing a pharmacist who believes Ivermectin has been legitimately prescribed from filling it. Insurance probably won't cover it, but it isn't a super expensive drug.

"So the question becomes are they refusing to fill a drug based on their professional opinion and guidance from the CDC and FDA or a conspiracy?"

Neither nor.
Your sly rethoric and loaded wording speaks for itself btw.

I sure am sneaky saying what I mean and saying what I mean. Crazy.

You might want to go source that data. Because according to the Japanese health department ivermectin still isn't being used. You can verify that here: https://www.pmda.go.jp/english/about-pmda/0002.html

Also, they have been wearing masks and getting the vaccine.

So, which do you think it is? A line graph that makes a claim without sourcing ANY of its data, and when you go to the official Japanese health website it clearly shows that ivermectin is not being prescribed OOOOOOORRRRRRR

Is it the vaccines that are being used?

Vaccines that have hard numbers of usage OR line graphs with made-up stuff?

Your official japanese health website looks like an Agency for Approval of new drugs to me. (kinda FDA, see 'about PDMA').

Ivermectin is not a new drug. Nor a livestock drug. It has been approved safe for human use decades ago. Not for deworming- for malaria treatment and more.

Source of Japanese Covid data is given in the graphic: Ministry of Health, Labor, Welfare. It's not up to me to verify government data. But it speaks volumes.

Source of Ivermectin Recomendation is also given in the graphic: Tokyo Medical Association.

So my take is this: it's not a Government program. But Covid patients and MD's in Japan are more free to use alternative treatments and exercise evidence-based medicine and are less restricted and bullied by big pharma interests.

Yes- Ivermectin is being prescribed in Japan.
https://twitter.com/hirt_benjamin/status/1427279396612755458

This not 'made-up stuff' was brought to you not by Pfizer.

fyi
https://rumble.com/vqtsng-the-full-interview-between-joe-rogan-and-dr.-peter-mccullough.html

FYI "Dr" Peter Mccullough is one of the people constantly pushing misinformation and just some real dumb shit.

Such hits as: the Gates Foundation was in Wuhan with a lab, working on the vaccine for covid before covid was actually a thing and is using it to "control" people.

He has also claimed that asymptomatic people can't spread covid.

He has also claimed that "officials" have deliberately withheld effective treatments from people in order to force them to take the vaccine (once it was developed).

He is also being sued by the hospital he used to work at for his bullshit.

He's a nut and responsible for people dying because of his nonsense.

you forgot claims of mass psychosis.