Free Kyle Rittenhouse!

We can all see it- why can't you? I think you're lying, but I have no idea what value you find in lying like this.

Then again, you're a liberal- lying is your native tongue.

No you can't because you Americans literally make up shit

... about Australia.

Nope, the Brits made up Australia.

P

Pretty sure they made up America too.

"Not even remotely true"

See? Another lie.

You're really good at it, too. Have you considered a role in Democrat politics? Or perhaps getting involved in the Democrat Media?

There are typically only two options when it comes to you:
1. You are lying, either by omission, direct lying, or obfuscation, the last of which is your frequent MO.
2. You are ignorant and have no real idea what you are talking about. This also happens a lot, but usually combined with one or more of the first three variations of lying.

Even on that rare occasion when you have some facts correct, your interpretation of them is skewed to the point of missing reality. I think the reason you say what you say here is because you are so steeped in lies- external lies from the MSM and other sources that you choose because they align with your internal compass (broke as it is), and the fact that you first and foremost lie to yourself.

Your biggest lie is that you think you have anything figured out, when it is crystal clear you do not. You have put turd colored glasses on your face, and you think the whole universe is turd colored. You cannot see clearly because you do not want to.

John 8:44-47
You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires.
He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him.
When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

But because I tell the truth, you do not believe Me.
Which one of you convicts Me of sin?
If I tell the truth, why do you not believe Me?
Whoever is of God hears the words of God.
The reason why you do not hear them is that you are not of God.”

"Did I ever say fetuses aren't human? Nope"

Congratulations on finally admitting to be the wicked monster I knew you were. This is why you see God as being a big meany- you're projecting.

You don't think I didn't know that?

All I said was that Pence is a coward.

Well you're entitled to your opinion...

He wasn't. He knew all about the election rigging, and did nothing.

Sounds like a coward to me.

It's not an opinion. It's a fact.

Our constitution prevents tyrants from declaring an election illegitimate just because he failed to win or because some bellwether counties didn't elect him. That's just not how our Electoral College works.

I'm sure he was aware of the election fraud claims. He was probably in the room when they were cooked up. I know it seems cowardly to you that exceptions to the constitution weren't made for Trump but the ends do not justify the means.

Yep. Sure... :D

Yes, it does.
If only Trump was a dictator. (News flash: he wasn't). Then your claim would make sense. Numerous laws prevent fake votes and other kinds of election rigging... But we can make an exception to get rid of the evil orange man.

Fake image, and Trump tried to end democracy.

Haha tried to end democracy.

Do you really understand how pathetically stupid you are? Like if a 5 yo waded into politics.

Yes, our constitution (when it's followed) can prevent dictators.

Isn't it a wonderful (and inconvenient to people like Trump and his supporters) thing?

There were maybe thousands of voter fraud incidents. This is well documented.

If only there were exactly 11,780 votes in Georgia. Not that that would've got him elected, of course. He still would've been short 22 electoral votes.

The only exception being asked for is the man, you claim, is an evil orange man.

Tyrants aren't evil, after all.

At least, not according to Trump.

He is quite fond of Tyrants and envies their power.

Kind of like our election laws...

It is! Long live the First and Second Amendments!

"Maybe thousands" LOL

Your point?

Look up the word "sarcasm"

Yes they are. Trump is not one :).

In your imagination he does... LOL

The VP is chairman of the senate. It's in the constitution. So yes, he could do something.

I agree on your second point, though.

Yes, she's just a glorified rubber stamp when the next election's votes are counted as well.

Right now she is the glorified rubber stamp that casts the decisive vote in a hung Senate. She will also be that glorified rubber stamp in a Senate that approves or rejects the votes in a presidential election.

The Constitution gives the VP no power to do anything but count the votes presented to her, and the Electoral Count Act confirms that's all she can do.
And the Electoral Count Act is BINDING CURRENT LAW, so...

The Electoral Count Act is subject to another law called a "Constitution". If it is not constitutional, it is null and void.

And doesn't give her power over the electoral votes.

Very well. I tire of trying. You win. I will write to the U.S. Congress and the several states and tell them to rewrite the U.S. Constitution to your tastes so you can have the U.S. president you crave according to the electoral process you want.

Take it up with the law.

This is enjoyable.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJqyKEWg6cg

"The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;"
Nothing about being able to dispute them.
And go read the Electoral Count Act for the exact and ONLY procedure to reject or dispute electoral votes (hint: the VP is and can ONLY be a glorified rubber stamp when the votes are counted).

The chairman of the Senate a "glorified rubber stamp"? I'll let Kamala Harris know...

She's a rubber stamp *when counting the electoral votes*
Any other time she has a tie breaker vote. But when the electoral votes are being counted, she's just there for show (and to tell out of order politicians to shut up).

If the Senate votes on whether or not to approve the counting of the electoral votes, then the "rubber stamp", as you are pleased to call the chairman of the Senate, ACTUALLY MAY CARRY THE DECIDING VOTE!!!

Once more, please tell me which of the words you didn't understand!

And it's not unconstitutional. If you think it is take it up in court.

Your understanding of the Constitution is exemplified by the way you misinterpreted the 12th amendment.

Not for counting electoral votes.

The constitution states the VP's roles, whether or not you like it.

Yes, when counting the votes.

Ah, smell that Aussie "freedom" . . .

Suckers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFt2Uu1c0-k

Nope, only the congressmen and congresswomen take part in that vote - and it has to be a simple majority vote in both chambers in favour of throwing out an electoral vote(s) for said votes to be thrown out, no tiebreaker option. A tie means the votes in question aren't thrown out.
This is pretty basic absolute fact. Again, READ THE ELECTORAL COUNT ACT!
Schooling adult constitution-idolising Americans (typically Republicans) on what their Constitution and laws actually say. Not how my Australian ass imagined adulthood.

I don't for a moment believe your Aussie ass ever imagined adulthood.

But in case you haven't yet understood what I said:

THE VICE PRESIDENT IS THE CHAIRMAN OF THE SENATE!

IN CASE OF A HUNG SENATE (I.E., A 50-50 VOTE) THE CHAIRMAN OF THE SENATE CASTS THE DECISIVE VOTE!

It's in the Constitution, not in the electoral act!!

And, BTW, NOT the 12th amendment, which describes how the VP is elected, not the VP's functions!

Nope, absolute fact of reality: the tie breaker vote doesn't exist when voting on whether to keep an electoral vote.

The tie breaker vote is in the constitution.

You're describing the right and think you're describing me. Read the Electoral Count Act, binding law

Like I said, I surrender the field. You've successfully worn me out. Go bask in your glory.

So what? Go read the 12th Amendment and the Electoral Count Act.

The twelfth amendment states that the president and VP are elected together. Before that it used to be that the president was the one with the most electoral votes and the VP was the one with the second-most. What does that have to do with the VP's powers?

He. Is. The. Chairman. Of. The. Senate.

Please let me know which of the words you don't understand.

It's amusing that Biden is acting more like a king than Trump ever did.

How so?

Mandates in the face of a public health crisis and virtually toothless executive orders that change only executive policies notwithstanding...

Biden does not appear to be bringing in his decedents and in-laws into the cabinet, nor is he drooling at the authority of dictators.

By this time in Trump's presidency, he was ironically trying to do away with the second amendment and a few other basic rights to individuals simply if the government deemed them a threat regardless of evidence...

So, no. I can't really agree to your assessment. Unless, of course, you have any facts to back up your opinion.

Look who's back from the Prison Island!

How's all that tyranny working out for you, Aussie?

Afraid you've got your countries mixed up. Or you've been watching F**ker Carlson and turning off your brain. Or both.

I admire your tenacity at sticking to your lie.

"F**ker Carlson"? You seem a lot triggered.

He's a limp wristed soyboy on an island of criminally descended Chads, no shit he's triggered.

And yet he literally did.

Projecting?

Nope, realiting. We've seen your picture, because you're dumb enough to use your real name on an anonymous meme site lol why would you do that?

".html"

Male model

BWHAHAHAHAHAHA

Still projecting. And I can't help that you can't change your username.

That's not me, .html.

What military state?

You mean the facts.

Yes Australia is free, thanks for acknowledging.

As free as subjects can be. As long as you do as you are told.

Why are you changing the subject?

We're not subjects, and we're freer than you.

What caliber do you carry?

Cope, the post.

Yes, cope with the fact that we're free.

Well, you're certainly free to say that you're free- that is an approved statement by the military state of Australia. For now . . .