What we lost with the stolen election.

Hahahahahaha. Psaki is Chuckie.

Up Chuckie.

https://i.imgflip.com/5rlw1e.jpg

https://i.imgflip.com/5rd6bz.jpg

Yes, leftist women have thoughts. Irrational and illogical thoughts. Like when Psaki said that businesses have been passing taxes on to the consumer and the American people won't stand for that. Clearly this woman has never worked in the private sector. She doesn't have the slightest clue if how businesses are run. All overhead expenses must be passed on to the consumer. Most businesses try to reduce their overhead expenses. The government is an overhead expense that keep expanding.

Dems have been hiding tax increases that way for years because then they can blame inflation on corporate greed. What about government greed. Government greed is by far the worst kind of greed because you don't get anything in return.

every time conservatives cut taxes,
the debt goes up.

in scandinavia, you DO get a lot back from your taxes paid - free medical and social programs that pay for isolation in covid so you don't need lockdowns :)

And what are conservatives always screaming about? Cut taxes AND cut spending. We've spent ourselves into oblivion and Biden just keeps spending more and more and more and more.

Taxes have nothing to do with the debt increasing. Congress does. The debt increases if taxes are raised and if taxes are lowered. What must stop is spending. Trump was awful with spending. He was almost as bad as Obama.

I think Biden in about to surpass them all. How stupid does he think we are??? He has a 3.5 TRILLION bill that he is telling everyone that it will cost nothing. Then he and the rest say they are taking it from the rich. So are the rich not Americans? Aren't they part of "us" when they say it will not cost "us" anything. Every time the Dems play that wealth redistribution game the economy goes down. Pretty much every time Dems are in control of the government the economy goes down regardless of how much more money they steal from the rich. Oh and by the way. The Dems definition of rich is anyone who gets a paycheck.

You just cannot make the poor's lives any better by stealing from the rich.

Taxation is theft.

Taxation without efficiency if theft.

And neither party wants it.

Taxation for any reason is theft.

Nope. Taxes are good thing. Without them we would have libertarian chaos and corporate feudalism.

Nonsense. We still have the rule of law. The income tax was forced on us by an idiot socialist control freak. The purpose was not about funding the government, it was about controlling the people. That is why the laws are so nebulous that the IRS can nail anyone for anything at any time regardless of how honest a person is.

Freedom does not cause chaos. In a free market system a businesses only hope for survival is to appease their customers. This corporatism that corrupt politicians gave us is exactly that chaos and corporate feudalism that you are complaining about. The free market ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS benefits the consumer.

crony capitalism is bad.

truly free market means no industrial subsidies.

that means the computer/phone you're typing this on would not have come along until much farther into the future.

be careful what you wish for.

Crony capitalism is bad and it is also not capitalism, it's corporatism or what the founding fathers called mercantilism.

No subsidies is a good thing. Businesses are completely dependent on their customers and their employees to survive. That is the way it should be.

Some things are a direct result of the military and NASA but that does not mean things would have happened any slower. Because of the freedom of the United States we have advanced civilization at about a 2000 year leap. Since then technology has been leap frogging over itself at an exponential rate.

The government didn't cause it they just helped move it along a little bit. Mostly the government has done much, much more harm to progress than any help they have given us.

Roads are socialist.

When you're willing to privatize them, run for office.

All of the technological advancements we have today are the results of industrial subsidies.

Without them we would be living like the old west.

Yes they are. Roads are very socialist, mainly because local, county, state and the federal government have outlaws private road building.

Do they have to be socialist? NOT IN THE SLIGHTEST. Private businesses can build roads cheaper and better than the government ever will.

Very little technical advancement comes from subsidies. I am not sure where you get this idea. It is always someone who sees a need that hasn't been met or someone who thinks they can do it better. Innovation in the private sector is what made America great.

The government always does more harm than good. Giving them credit for miniaturization from tubes to solid state circuitry was just one of a small handful of things that the government did right. It was going to happen with our without the government because of consumer demand.

We would not be living like the old west. Did you know that the so-called "wild west" only lasted 20 years and it was limited only to a few areas in the west.

How the left talks about shutting down everything that contributes to climate change they will be sending us back to medieval times with about the same population.

Then go there.

Every time Congress raises the debt limit, the debt goes up. They are forced to do this, because they cannot default on the debt, they cannot cut entitlements, and costs always rise. And every new politicians has some legacy idea that costs even more. They think in terms of spreading payments over a decade instead of what can be paid for right now, this year. Like a college kid with a credit card.

Conservatives should have worked with Democrats to make government efficient to provide better services without raising taxes not just cut services because they are against "socialism".

Democrats should have worked with conservatives to make government efficient to provide better services without raising taxes not just keep it inefficient to maintain employee voters.

Both parties want inefficient government because lobbyists for suppliers pay them to keep it inefficient.

Without those donations other parties could win and end the 2 party system.

Conservative women don’t have dicks. Big plus in my book.

Or brains.

You like the ugly ones?

women with brains are ugly?

You defined conservative women as lacking brains now you change to two dimensions. That’s the dishonesty of your argument and goal post moving. Some women with and some without are ugly. Some are pretty, some are conservative.

the one i sited in my meme does not.

Transgender who identify as women aren’t women?

Not all liberals are transgender.

Not all conservative women lack brains.

That's true, too. In fact no conservatives lack brains. No humans lack brains, for that matter, because if they literally did lack brains, then scientifically speaking, they'd be dead.

Or…..gasp, undead!

Ann coulter might.

after all that ivermectin it's probably a horse dick

Scandinavians and everybody else in the world know more about America than most Americans silly.

Most Americans know nothing about the rest of the world.

Change my mind.

People in the rest of the world know about American TV. They know very little about real America.

No they actually are taught about America in school

Okay, ask me a question, any question, about world history.

were nazis and confederates conservative or liberal?

*sigh*
National Socialists were liberal.
Confederates are a hard topic since many did not own slaves and thought simply because their state had seceded.

so why do conservatives fly confederate and nazi flags?

They're not real conservatives ;)

Well if they're flying a National Socialists flag, anyway. The Confederate flag can mean different things in different situations.

if they aren't real conservatives, why are they voting for trump?

Nobody who flies a National Socialist flag is a real conservative.

so white nationalists are liberals?

They're Leftists.

then why do they support trump?

This isn't mine, but I think it's pretty accurate...

you realize those are trumpers right?

:o

When you claim there has only been 1, but has been "so effective and severe" that it's multiple

what the f*ck are you talking about dude

They say riots when there "was only one riot"

Ok. Now that we have established what you're talking about ... Why are you using quotation marks in random places?? Lol

to make it make more sense

Um... Ok i'm not the sharpest spoon in the drawer but I'm pretty sure they should be on "riots"... (Quoting the article)....

there were many riots.

but only one ashli babbitt :)

Yes, she is a dark Void.

She sure is

https://i.imgflip.com/5rjv3n.jpg

Yup triggering Libtards trying to defend unwarranted deadly force against an unarmed women.

how was anybody supposed to know if she was armed?

The same way they didn’t know if she was armed and therefore considered a deadly threat. I can live with it. Shoot first and ask questions later. I didn’t know if the looter running out of the store had a gun so I shot him. Good shoot!

When antifa breaks into the capitol the same will happen to them.

Oh wait, right wing says antifa DID break into Capitol lol

How about when they break into and loot stores? Shoot them on sight? Ok, I’m for that

A store is not a high security government building silly.

So what breaking and entering is breaking and entering. If you’re there you shoot them because they might be armed all
Good righteous kill. And Trevon Martin was justified homicide too because by your definition how did he know he wasn’t armed.

Trevon didn't break into anything.

Ashli did :)

He was suspected of it wasn’t he? He showed aggression. Doesn’t matter by your definition he was a threat because no one could tell if he was armed. Shoot first ask later. Good kill.

There was no break in. Trevon had every right to refuse to comply with a random person who wasn't an officer.

Unlike Ashli :)

Ya but the citizen didn’t know if he was armed and he showed aggression so shoot away right. If you don’t know if they are armed you can assume they are, right? That’s your argument isn’t it?

Like so many black men receive from police?

Oh, you defend it if used on black men but give it a pass if used on someone else. Guess you are a hypocrite and a racist.

ashli isn't a man.

but she DID do something to deserve getting shot.

But if she was and black it would still be a clean justified police shooting? Bwhahaha we both know the answer. You just won’t admit it.

when black people believe their cult leader didn't lose fairly and take the capitol, the same will happen to them.

So you admit it’s about the political motivation for you and not the act involved. If you agree with their politics like the leftist riots then its f**k da police, right? Fry’em like bacon! Right?

evidence?

crickets

So you admit that you like going to McD's just to snatch an array of condiment packets so you can smudge graffitti on the pickup trucks of rednecks because there [sic] white and your [sic] racist against tuna casseroles? Guess your [sic] part of the Marilyn Manson Family.

Evidence of what your Bias? That’s all over your comments. You believe unarmed people should be shot if you don’t like their politics.

like trayvon martin?

If he was white and conservative you would say he deserved to be shot. Good shoot.

if trayvon was white the right wing would call his latino killer to be hanged.

your move.

So you agree you judge by skin color and politics

trayvon is a victim.

ashli is a martyr.

has nothing to do with race, just ashli & zimmerman's stupidity.

Of course because you use skin color as the basis of determining victim. Black = Victim. Poor you.

i'm not the one changing topics.

you are.

So

leftist riots didn't break into the capitol silly.

No they did into other state and federal
Government building though. So now it’s location based?

a little fed building in portland was caught up a riot.

the capitol thing was planned.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWJVMoe7OY0

Ya it seems the DOJ had people agitating the crowd to go inside the building that haven’t been charged yet.

what did trayvon do wrong?

What does it matter. If he was white you would have cheered his murder. That’s cause you are intellectually dishonest. You weigh what skin color and politics they have over what happened.

bacon goes against 2 religions. couldn't you pick something more inclusive like soy?

I’m sure you are a soy boy but nope you lefties chose it, not me.

soy would make you less angry, more accepting.

Ya, don’t want to be a weak soy boy that needs a government check to exist.

ashli got what she deserved.

her race had nothing to do with it.

Sure, hypocrisy is not surprising from the left. The guy that fought with police and went to get a knife and got shot and paralyzed deserved it too right?

you'd love soy AND a welfare check.

in fact you probably on both right now :)

😂 no, I’m not you. I’m sure you enjoy salty milk like substances but not something I will do.

atone for your white privilege by accepting salty milk where the angry black nationalist puts it. it will heal your racism and his victimization.

😂😂😂 Black Nationalist? Your the salty milk drinker and I knew you were a racist, it comes through in everything you say. Poor little inadequate hater. Maybe you wouldn’t be broken if dad stayed at home.

stick to trayvon who did nothing wrong.

unless of course he's a crisis actor too? https://i.imgflip.com/5s56a3.jpg

Typical leftist, let’s just talk about what I say. You can’t escape your own need to be a petty tyrant.

i bet you wish you knew who YOUR dad was.

Haha 😂 must have hit a nerve. Unlike you I know my pops.

LOL i don't think you do, but if that makes you feel better, good for you!