They don't use those words, but they use that connotation whenever they talk about whatever mumbling came out of Biden's maw.

So do you think biden is worst than trump?

*worse if you're using worst, the "than Trump" is a moot point.

Yeah, memer should've used 'man-child'.

Well, that's one way to get every fruitcake in the PoliticsTOO stream to venture over. lol

The inmates will be happy, lol
https://i.imgflip.com/5o5xxl.jpg

Lost the popular vote- twice
Lost the House
Lost the Senate
Lost the GA runoff
Lost the Presidency

Wouldn't have been caused by any press falsely labelling and questioning Trump about "white supremacy" have the time, would it?

you're a slow kid arent ya? recall what was released a month before the election about Hilary?

Hilary had been building a list for people to say stuff about since the early 80s.

I’m sure it wasn’t just the hysteria around how Trump surrounded himself with known white nationalists. Glad he fired most of them because they turned out to be quite incompetent if not just insane. There were a plethora of reasons to not like Trump.

The pandemic, unfortunately, highlighted his shortcomings despite the sickening barrage of attacks that the fat orange man just dodged like healthy food at a McDonalds. Not to mention that his biggest achievements turned out to be his only achievements. Low unemployment and the “best economy” (whatever that means), All deflated by a little virus that could’ve been avoided by a federally coordinated lockdown. But no… he gave it to the states so he could bail out Republican governors while pointing the fingers at Democrats. Using the Pandemic as a partisan move really didn’t sit well with most Americans even though his base swelled and gobbled down his poisonous rhetoric like a cop in a donut factory.

If he had taken the pandemic seriously, I really do believed he could’ve pulled a second term out of his ass but alas. Now we’re stuck with Sleepy Joe. Better luck next time. Let’s pick a Republican that can actually win that popular vote. It isn’t that hard. 14 Republicans have won the popular vote before. And heck, most who didn’t win the popular vote got re-elected. Maybe try finding a candidate that appeals to everyone rather shit talking about how everyone sucks and he’s so great. I mean, yeah, it’s funny but it’s still not productive. And at this point, it was just sad.

TLDR;

Do you want to know why I didn't like Trump? Didn't end the Stratospheric Aerosol Injections(that happen almost daily, almost everywhere over United States, we get like 1 or 2 days of clear skies per week, it's annoying to me as an organic gardener, to have government indiscriminately use J8 jet fuel, instead of a cleaner ecologically-friendly alternative like Hemp methanol or other biofuels(that aren't GMOs, the last thing we need is more ghyphosate, which they'd gladly put into our air and then they'll say "see clean green biofuel only *wink wink*, while the corn they grew was sprayed with toxic chemicals).

And because he pushed for vaccines to be hurried, because I believe they need more testing than they were already getting, plus, as you and I have talked about, I'd like them to undo the legal liability for vaccine manufacturers.

I don't care about your MSM talking points being repeated, they're not worth my time, but just wanted to let you know why I didn't like Trump. I would've liked Rand Paul and Tulsi Gabbard, a split ticket, so Rs and Ds would be "happy" and the rest of independent voters and such, would find them both together, a reasonable duo, compared to Trump, compared to Pence, compared to Harris, compared to Biden.

How would you feel about Rand Paul and Tulsi Gabbard? (either or on who is POTUS or VP, both of them are reasonable)

TLDR;

If you're not going to read my comment, I'm not going to read your garbage.

LMAO, I was kidding about the TLDR, you know, a joke?

You know I read everything you comment.

I just assumed you tried to match my word limit. I try to keep my rants on topic but, occasionally, they tend to tangent. I'm working on that. You should too by the look of your previous comment. Barely anything you wrote had anything to do with what I was talking about except maybe Republicans needing to get over Trump and try picking more broadly appealing Republican candidates.

I wouldn't call Paul or Gabbard those things either. Most of the popular politicians lean radical left or right. Gabbard and Paul just lean right. Though Gabbard is a Democrat and can pull off being somewhat of a moderate. Truth be told, I don't know much about her other than she pisses other Democrats off. That's not really a good basis for me to "root" for her. If it came to it, I'd probably pick Paul over Gabbard.

"I don't know much about her other than she pisses other Democrats off."

What? The other Democrats are morans, Hillary felt threatened by Tulsi, so Hillary made up Russian collusion lies again, at Tulsi this time, and Tulsi wasn't having it. (I wouldn't either, if Hillary accuses me of anything, I let her know, every time she speaks against Americans, I'm at her heels pissing on her feet).

So yea, if Clintons, Bush's and Obamas get PISSED OFF, at Tulsi, then GOOD, that's a GOOD thing that WAR MONGERERS fear a REAL Democrat(Tulsi).

Trust me, Paul/Gabbard ticket in 2028 (but better if it's 2024) would be awesome duo, to run through into the 2030s with some reasonable governance.

Pissing people off isn't a great way alone to determine how well one governs.

See Trump.

We need someone who won't kowtow to the elite (the people making more than a million a year), and we need someone who won't just use their political platform for personal profit. The paradoxical problem with for a politician to progress up to the path of the president is to embrace populism. Because, without it, they remain unknown or can't get elected.

That's why there are three real solutions to this problem.

1. Remove the electoral college. It's just a way for political parties to have bragging rights as to whom controls the executive branch.

2. Further reduce the power of executive privileges.

3. Establish term limits for Supreme Court judges.

These are great steps to prevent the partisan hackery that has savaged our politics into this false narrative that only one party gives a damn about the country and freedom.

It is very clear that neither do.

Term limits, for sure.
Restoration of a Constitutional Republic, no more than Military and some minor interior infrastructure, no endless federal agencies(those executive privileges you mentioned).
Abolition of the Federal Reserve.

Those are some solutions to think about too.

Yea, I agree the Secession is dumb, wouldn't know how to make it work, but could look to old Europe of the 1990s, before the EU.

Did you think of a better way to a peaceful solution, to the nation's divide? Why couldn't we have free-trade in the Republic side, so that the fascist-leftists can spend their fash-money in our productive sector.

Not my job.

Would you be for secession? Two nation states, one for conservative/libertarian, and then your nation: authoritarian/fascism?

Nope, that's a dumb move no matter how it's sliced nor who proposes it.

There is little difference between secession and segregation. And those are what the extreme sides of what the right and the left preach, respectively.

"Trump and try picking more broadly appealing Republican candidates."

Not f**king Mitch McConnell.

But yes, if it's Rand Paul.

"I wouldn't call Paul or Gabbard those things either."

No way, bro. F**k that. No. Paul and Gabbard are sensible, compared to the old career politicians.

Our definition of sensible is not the same as mine.

Moderate candidates are typically bland and overlooked. Paul and Gabbard are just more of the same in terms of populist choices.

"Paul and Gabbard are just more of the same in terms of populist choices." -- Prove that point first. How do you figure this?

"Most of the popular politicians lean radical left or right. Gabbard and Paul just lean right."

Yea.. if that "right" is towards more freedom for Americans, more accountability from government.

That's not a bad thing.

Generalizing.

Vague comment, add more effort.

You are generalizing.

So you can criticize ideas but you can't create your own ideas?
But you'll poo-poo/naysay an idea, yet you have no solutions but spewing trash and hate?

I mean, if you really want a solution, it's going to have to be that we need to start agreeing with the facts. There has to be a foundation from which to build and a majority of the right seem to have an unhealthy distrust of all media, experts, and anyone with significant education or experience in general when they say anything they don't like.

And I'm not saying we should BLINDLY trust these people but reasonable arguments cannot happen if we're constantly questioning the sources of data from people who lack the education or experience or are simply trying to get attention or influence.

I don't even have a problem with criticisms.

But here is the thing. I could care less about whether or not Trump had tissue paper stuck to his heels, or if Joe Biden tripped going up stairs. I could care less for ever Trump typo, or Biden's gaffes.

If our criticisms stuck to policy, there can be a real discussion rather than allowing every political debate devolving into petty figurative mudslinging.

I just don't care for it and it isn't going to just take ME to do it.

I'm a Democrat and don't trust the media. You have 5-6 outlets that pander to the left, then Fox and SkyNews pandering to the right.

None of it is actually "news" anymore. It's opinion on things that happen in society, nothing more.

Right and Left seems to digest the News like it's Oxygen.

"unhealthy distrust of all media, experts, and anyone with significant education or experience"

No. It's a healthy distrust of KNOWN mass-murdering lying thieves.

You let the neighborhood gangs f**k your wife? You trust the sperm of your enemy to not impregnate your wife, while you watch them f**k her? Just wondering.

Exaggerations. That isn’t happening.

You are blindly believing in vaccines without ever been shown physiological proof of any benefits, you've been lied to.

I don't believe. I know vaccines work.

You believe they don't, despite the evidence.

"And I'm not saying we should BLINDLY trust these people but reasonable arguments cannot happen if we're constantly questioning the sources of data from people who lack the education or experience or are simply trying to get attention or influence."

Then the media better do it's ACTUAL job, and report the facts, not opinions and conspiracy theories that we should just automatically ASSUME that vaccines are "safe and effective" because the TV-teleporter said so.

Opinions sell. Most of conservative media that you may find reliable is mostly opinionated.

Well stated.

The solution to the nation's divide is not more division.

The difference between you and me is I don't see Democrats, nor their misguided voters, as the enemy. The reason why I don't is because I have no delusions about how divided we actually are. The people will always stand up against fascism in the end. That's why it doesn't work.

Basing a system of government on a religion, class, or eugenics will never work.

Our differences are the solution. Trying to impede those differences or call them an irrecoverable, inconsolable divide that NEEDS fixing leads to fascism.

"Our differences are the solution. Trying to impede those differences or call them an irrecoverable, inconsolable divide that NEEDS fixing leads to fascism."

Yet, you go pushing the vaccine, as if everyone needs to take it, f**k you, you lying piece of shit hypocrite.

You don't tolerate my differences, you're the fascist here, bitch, pushing giant corps to run our government and run our bodies.

But I’m not. I seriously know the vaccine is medically safe and our best bet against the virus so of course I recommend it.

The government has tried to entice people who are overly skeptical and now they’re upping their rhetoric. Not to flex their power but to ensure the public health.

I do tolerate your differences but I don’t tolerate your petty namecalling and your gross exaggeration of tyranny and fascism.

To me you just sound like a child refusing to take their medicine. I sympathize with your position but I do not take it seriously.

Nor will this end in violent civil war. Unless that is what people want. And the people who refuse to organize, who stand by their convictions, who justify their ignorance with random data that any moron on the internet can put out there - will ultimately lose.

"I seriously know" -- No you don't. You assume. Anti-science scum.

"the vaccine is medically safe" --- Nope. Another lie.

"and our best bet against the virus" --- Nope, quite the opposite.

"so of course I recommend it." --- Anti-science Nazi.

No, I've done the reading. I know the pros and cons to taking the vaccine and the risks. They are extremely low. Lower than catching covid and dying from it. That is what the statistics have continued to reflect.

Name one Con of the vaccine that you're aware about for yourself. What is the risk, when you-personally take it?

The biggest one is an increased risk of Thrombosis with Trombocytopenia Syndrome just after taking any of the vaccines (some more than others, particularly the J&J single dose), which can not only cause serious problems of blood clotting but death if the symptoms are not caught in time.

Fortunately, guidelines and repercussions have been put in place to monitor those who are vaccinated as the symptoms appear very quickly after the injection and medical personnel are on stand by with the appropriate treatments to ensure patient survival. At the time of this writing, only 3 known cases of those exposed to this vaccine, in the US, were killed as a direct result from TTS.

"They are extremely low. Lower than catching covid and dying from it." --- That's not accurate, because we don't know the true number of who actually died from the virus and not from ventilators, we've been over this.

We do. You just don’t trust the sources.

Nazis do not recommend going into the gas chamber, after using them on themselves.

"The solution to the nation's divide is not more division"

Says the guy that thinks like "get the jab, get the jab, f**k your freedom"

Maybe you should respect other's medical freedom, you f**k.

I do, but your problems are largely self-inflicted.

"Your problems" ?

Explain your delusions.

There is a pandemic.

You don't want to take the vaccine.

You have to deal with a social stigma and potential employment setback.

You will likely have to have a low paying job that doesn't have much public exposure.

It is your problem.

"There is a pandemic."

No. 99.6% survival rate is not a pandemic.

No, social stigma is not injecting stupid useless unproven vaccines into my body, thanks.

This is why I call you Neo Nazi's, you take the poisons and recommend them lol

I have three separate incomes, that does not require vaccines, you're a wild assumer.

99.6% was never the fixed survival rate.

In fact it remained closer to 98% than 99%. Any virus that has a higher death rate than 1% triggers the medical community to act, monitor, and enact the cautionary methods seem worldwide.

The fatality rate in many European countries reached as high as 10% at the start of the pandemic. And by Fall of 2020, as high as 5%. It even held at 5% in individual states during the 2020 Election. Necessitating alternative methods of voting being essential despite the enormous push back which resulted in the above normal security and restrictions for common mail-in voting procedures.

Which was good as many fraudulent mail-in votes were caught and not counted. Unfortunately, while conservatives dominated the 2020 election in wins, Republicans lost their Presidential figurehead.

To me, it remains no real loss. Biden, too, will be a single term President. We’re very likely to see one-term Presidents be the norm until the two parties get their head out of their collective asses and remove the restrictions that all but impossible for not only third to grow and flourish but keep their direct influence out of the executive branch.

I think it is your "job" you're a citizen, it's your Duty to help overthrow tyrannical government that we're experiencing now.

There is no tyrannical government.

Get a jab.

Get a job.

"There is no tyrannical government." --- Lie. There is, you're just too sissy to stand up for freedom cause you're a neo-nazi needle-pushing fool.

Or, you’re just too sissy to get a jab, and get a real job.

See, I can flip this on you too!

Vaccinations are incompatible to gas chambers. Your argument is devolving into rather childish strawman.

Bioweapons are bioweapons, my friend.

Vaccinations are incomparable to gas chambers.

Legal death sentences in their nations, yes they are.

No one is legally sentencing anyone to death.

This is alarmist rhetoric and has no source as a foundation to back the claims.