Laughing Horse

except that it does, but in order for Pfizer and Moderna to maintain their special "emergency use" exemption status, all other drugs must be deemed ineffective as treatments.

Look at the list.

Now I ain't saying I've seen anything to convince me either way on this medication (I'd been leaning towards, "naah"), but his post merely shows a list of studies, not conclusions. He's not even trying.

It doesn't matter. Ivermectin doesn't treat covid, observed by direct testing and recording. It makes no difference whatsoever what anyone else's intentions are.

The virus does not go "well, chemically, that's not very impressive, but it would really stick it to big pharma so I'd better get out of here."

Actually there are a number of studies that show it weekends and you've seen them and replied in other connects, why do you keep acting like it doesn't work? Paid troll?

Yo. There are search results in your image contrary to your point. It is being studied and it is returning positive results. Why are you against it?

You haven't read them, have you?

"Moreover, repurposed ivermectin safety has been well established recently in clinical studies against COVID-19."

Dueñas-González 2021 is a paper looking into its anti-CANCER properties. Covid is not cancer.

From your list of search results. I don't know why people are so against this being a possibility of helping?
If a conservative was trying to convince you and others like you that Humans need water to live, you would argue.

If it's about cancer, disregard it. You're not looking for conjectures - YOU'VE ALREADY MADE THE CONJECTURE. You're looking at CONCLUSIONS. EVIDENCE. And this was a paper on something else.

If you'd said hey, don't include that in your list, that would be a fair cop! But it's NOT a chance to go "ah ha! This one agrees with me" because IT DID NOT TEST THAT CONJECTURE. IT WAS ABOUT CANCER. COVID IS NOT CANCER.

And why don't you try arguing that humans need water and see what happens? Try being right for once, I'd actually find that remarkably refreshing.

Dude. Your whole argument was that ivermectin didn't show anything promising so you sent a screenshot of results to show. I looked at two of them. They both said it was promising.
The image of the "conclusions" I did, was from a different article in your list. It was only abt studying ivermectin for covid.

Again, why be so against it?

Wrong. Maybe you go read some. I have read several outside of your list and they are solely about Ivermectin having an impact on covid 19. If a study says it didn't help then it didn't help. I don't care. If it says it helped, great. I have no idea why you're fighting this so much. They are literally saying it has a positive result but it's some weird thing where people are mad and don't want to believe it.
Says plainly again in this conclusion from one of your publications. And yes they say it would help with a vaccine but no vaccines were used and it still had a significant impact.

"Adjunct" means in addition. i.e. not a substitute.

And because our healthcare is too important to be cowboying your way through the research the way you are. You are LITERALLY SENDING PEOPLE TO HOSPITAL as they dose up on anti-parasites for a virus, because they read YOU on the internet saying that they could.

And - this is the part you struggle to understand - I am against people getting sick.

Wow.
1. Watch your accusations. I'm only pointing out studies. I am not LITERALLY anything. Drs have been prescribing it and if some idiot takes horse version that's on them.

2. I know what they're saying with adjunct means. All results in this trial were without vaccines. It was in Aug 2020. So this study and multiple other studies show effectiveness. So with that, we will see if anything advances past off-label use.

You're pointing out studies you barely read to try to make a point you've already assumed that the study IS NOT MAKING.

Would you like me to type in the proper search words for you too?

Your continued laziness only serves to make your assertion look weak at most, and desperately and lamely fabricated at worse.

I'm beggining to worry about you.

worst*

dont tell the CULT45 followers- their leader claims it works, culling the flock

Yeah, but they take innocent people with them.

Darwinism at work