The democrat plantation

ahahahaha next time you want to prove a point, try not using an image of a bird-faced, batshit crazy actor

Did you parents have any children that lived?

LMAO

Everything about this is true. Yes, 13th abolished the slavery. It was just irrelevant to the question.

Eleven is a right answer, if the question was what's 14 - 3?

Yes, on paper it was. BR is talking about reality. We're all slaves in present times. Not many can see it, tho.

Go educate yourself on the Federal Reserve, for example - debt, one form of slavery casted on the people.

If you have as little as $1, there is a $0.02 debt associated with that note. So, now for you to get out of debt, you must pay it off. You either earn or borrow $0.02 to pay off that debt, but that $0.02 comes with it's own debt assign top it. You can't get out of it.

There are other forms of slavery, but if it's taken two f**king days to explain this meme to you and you still don't get it. There's not point of going into that.

I swear, Octavia, combine your absolute zero sense of humor an your utter inability to grasp nuance, and we get... Octavia; an always almost crying, whining Octavia.

-__-

There wasn’t even a question.

LMFAO!!! You can't be real!!! Yet here we are!!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

People like you think you can deny reality and substitute it with your own.

And that is exactly why many hold onto the delusion that Trump won.

Because you can't believe Republicans and conservatives saw actually saw Trump as the greater of the two evils this time around.

I'll even give you this, Trump may be right about everything he has said about the so-called swamp and deep state, but let's be honest here for a moment. He's just as much as the elite as the rest of them. All he wanted was his cut. The Republicans and conservatives sick of the elites? They saw Trump for what he was.

More of the same. If not worse. And obvious.

And you can downvote my comments into oblivion but it just goes to show you’d rather bury the truth than recognize it.

There was no question. Someone said something that could be regarded as philosophically correct but was factually wrong. Octavia then stated facts, which were quite relevant to the topic.

Your intellectual dishonesty is staggeringly hilarious but has no real merit nor bearing to the conversation.

Like a f**king 5 year old, barging into a conversation he does not understand.

What BR said went right over your head.

Since you brought it up. Tell me again who opposed the passing of 13th Amendment, cuz I forgot.

that would be the democrats

They know that they need to hide it now.

“cAn’T FiNd AnYtHiNg fRoM mOdErN TiMeS”

Here’s your DemoKKKrat racism, not only from “decades ago”, but also some stuff that’s a little more “modern”, as you requested.

Wow. Defending racism IS strong with you leftists, isn’t it?

Every single one of those is racist, and you’re defending them, so you are being racist.

Whoa... you haven't displayed this much ignorance since you said Ashli Babbitt deserved to be murdered!

ALL of those comments are racist.

And you would think so, if Dementia Joe hadn't said them.

Let's play a bit of a mind game here, Octavia...

This is going to require some abstract thought, so you may want to park it in a Lazy Boy and tighten up your seat belt.

Picture the exact same meme, but with a photo of Trump, instead of Dementia Joe.

Then tell me again, how YOU believe that not all of those comments are racist?

How about this, Octavia? Is this racist?

It certainly doesn't qualify under your definition of racism, right? ("In neither of those comments did he say that black or Indian people are inferior to white people or anything like that.")

Full article here: https://news.yahoo.com/jalen-smereck-will-not-play-another-game-until-deniskin-punished-for-racist-taunt-175940161.html

I can't believe I'm just now seeing your reply... Dayum, Octavia, you reply so infrequently that I need to pay closer attention. My bad.

You know, if I had to find the post where you said she deserved to be murdered, I might not be able to find it... so maybe what you said was that she wasn't murdered.

Which, btw, to someone who believes she was murdered, is probably actually worse than saying she deserved to be murdered.

To not even acknowledge a murder, when it's done in broad daylight, by an agent of your govt, is about as blind as the blind can get.

Hell, it's willful blindness. And that's just about as bad as willful ignorance.

I guess if it was a Biden supporter, then that would be murder, hey?

Racist is when you say something about a group of people (a group that lumps the people together by race) that you wouldn't say about another group of people. Usually the comment is negative, but not always.

A very good example is calling someone white trash. The very term white trash, means that ordinarily white people are not trash. You see, if a person is trash, they're trash. Race has nothing to do with it.

But let's use your own quotes as an example, which btw, is painfully obvious to most, so I'm not sure why you can't see it. Wait, wait... yes of course I'm sure why you can't see it. You've got your lefty blinders on. Those blinders, Octavia, allow democrats (a very rough grouping I'm using for the sake of illustration) to say and do the most horribly racist things, all the while believing they're not racist.

Here we go...

"Saying that conservatives want to put black people back in chains is racist, how?

"Making a joke about people of Indian descent working at 7-Eleven is racist, how?

In neither of those comments did he say that black or Indian people are inferior to white people or anything like that."

First quote: To say that, is using race as a weapon against another group of people who are not in the same group as those referenced in the quote. Would you at least agree that putting Black people in chains is racist? If so, then using a racist statement as a tool to make your point is about as racist as it gets.

Second quote: This one is beyond obvious, which actually makes it harder to explain to someone like you, who is in total racism denial. Maybe an illustrative comment of a similar nature would make the point for me? Let's say that you made a joke about Mexican people working as black people all working at some kind of similar job. Let's get real racist (so you can identify) and say the joke was about black basketball players and how you get them to stop raping a white woman. (sure, throw in some misogyny...) I'm sure you've heard that joke, but if you haven't, it should be easy for you to find. So that's a very similar joke about black people, and I'm curious to find out if you think it's racist, and if not, why not.

Your comment: so *that* is your threshold for racism? So, without the inclusion of white people, or "or anything like that" is a required element for you to consider something racist? Un-freaking-believable.

Please provide your source reference for the date of the photo, Octavia.

Or, do you just ASSume it's from decades ago because you want to make a point?

(you're probably right about the time frame in which the image was taken, but of course, you'll entirely miss the nuance of the point I'm making... as usual)

Lancaster PA, 1925.
If you want to get more conservative you have to build a time machine to get you back to 1491.

The, um, captioning on that one was a little off for something too perfect.

Look at it this way, when was the last time you saw an Alt Rightie post something that was even slightly almost true? The Smollet incident? And that was by chance, as it was automatically pronounced bogus before any details were known about it.

100% Republican support
23% Democrat support

they all do