facepalm

Actually it is an automatic counting system that compares views and upvotes. The winners get featured, and in any game that has NOT BEEN RIGGED . . . conservatives almost always win. That's was why the rigged came called Leftist operated PoliticsToo was created . . . so that ONLY leftists would have any sort of chance on that stream.

I was just thinking about the losers complaining about the election because they cheated and still expected to win and now are acting like typical Karen lol

Sure I believe you, show me the code if your'e so smart

Good gosh, fella, you ramble on even more than I do, and you make no sense to boot, 'logic' being something of an inverted pretzelated pile of poo with you.

eww.
Um, I passed on seeing that pic unblurred...

Wonder if it's selfie of a certain noxious rodent from the past with a subreddit chock full of its butthurt gleaned from the pages of this site...

And Twitter and Facebook favor Left Wing. So go post your shit there.

How did you get unblocked lol

No, it favors good memes - and as everyone knows....

Your echo chamber garbage does not good memes make, just a right wing circle jerk and you're the pivot point.

Says the guy who can't make good memes.....After all, it couldn't possibly be you - your mommy said that you're perfect in every way.

All major TV networks, movies and colleges all lean so far to the left that you can see their communism showing right out in the open. And leftists on ImgFlip are complaining that they can't get recognized on Politics??? How much more do you need to take over and control???

Everything . . . that is the end goal of the political Left. The very concept of "enough is enough' is entirely alien to their way of emoting -- er -- thinking.

Who said that? This country would have reset itself back to freedom if it wasn't for the fact that the left took control of television and movies, all news networks and nearly every single college and universities. That is not a majority, that is a small handful control freaks trying to rule the world.

Yep.

The Founding Fathers, for starters.
That's why we Yanks ain't property of ye olde Crown anymore, and have since continued to steer farther from the regimented British heirarchy Conservatives oh so yearn for.

Yep. It's the American Tories that are the problem. When they say freedom what they really mean is WHITE freedom.

Even though a bunch of Whites risked their lives and died to get rid of slavery in US. .what a bunch of Honkies they were! Oh, and FYI, NAACP was co-founded by a Whitey.

Utter and complete BS. When we say freedom we mean for all races. But leave it to a leftist to ALWAYS make everything about race. Can you, just for 10 seconds, stop believing what the TV tells you to believe. The world is not centered on race. It is not about whites trying to oppress all other races and it has never been about that. This about how the government is oppressing everyone and you're helping them.

The goal that the founders had was a government that stayed out of your way and left you alone. Many of the founders wanted that to apply to blacks as well but they had to compromise in order to defeat the British. The 13th and 14th amendments ended slavery and there is not a single freedom oriented conservative that wants to bring slavery back. We don't want the Democrats Jim Crow laws back. We don't want socialism either because it is slavery.

All of that happened and yet I still say that race is not what the world is centered on. People have been enslaving and oppressing others of their own race and those of other races for centuries. Race is not always the issue.

Muslims began enslaving Africans (and just about anyone else) ever since they begin. It was the Muslim slave trade that the Europeans picked up on but it took Europeans 500 years to finally get corrupt enough to go along with what the Muslims started. And by started I do not means that Muslims started slavery, I mean the African slave trade was started by the Muslims. Muslims are still enslaving Africans, especially if those Africans are Christians but they have also enslaved Muslims Africans as well.

Is slavery and oppression somehow worse if you do it to someone of another race than if you do it to someone of your own race? Is it somehow worse if a white person does to to someone who is not white than a non-white person doing to someone who is white or non-white?

I am not saying that white people haven't done bad things in history but I am also not blind to the fact that what the white people were doing was not exclusive to white people. All races have enslaved their own race and those of other races. That is part of human history.

It is the desire to control another human being. Those are the exact some control freaks that I am opposed to. I don't care if it is one person enslaving many people or a government enslaving the citizens of that nation. It is all the same.

But the world has never seen the kind of oppression and slavery as what the socialists did in the Soviet Union, China and Nazi Germany. Those nations were the worse that mankind has ever seen. No dictator, king or emperor has ever murdered that many people before or since.

"'The goal that the founders had was a government that stayed out of your way and left you alone'

As long as you were a white male property owner, yeah."

Seriously, what does that have to do with being left alone by the government? So if you were a white male that did not own property then did you have the right to vote? NO!!!!! Stop making it about race. Not everything is about race.

Stop being so short sighted and believing that if it wasn't for white people the world would be a better place. The world would have had just as many problems without white people as it does with white people. There would have been just as much slavery and oppression.

This is sad that the left has been so indoctrinated with anti-colonialism Marxism that they don't even know the facts.

I'm sorry but white people are not the scourge of the earth. We are not the cause of everything bad that has ever happened.

It is true that white Europeans advanced more technologically than other civilizations and because of that many of them spread out around the world and some of them were just bad people. But had any other civilization advanced like the Europeans did they would have done the same thing.

Case in point, Asians had huge advancements before the Europeans did. They didn't travel the world looking for items to trade for, instead the stayed local and found intensely with other Asians. Japan surpassed Europeans in tempering steel and as a result created the katana sword that the Chinese could not defend themselves against. Japan did atrocious things to China.

Africans pretty much stayed where they were. They never had the technology to sail the world. If the did they very well could have sailed to North America and started killing Indians. Who knows. Many Africans profited hugely from the slave trade. The would capture other tribes and sell them to the Dutch slave traders.

Several Native Americans and free blacks owned black slaves.

The point is that given the opportunity there will always be evil people in all races who do bad things to their own race or to other races. It is just not a white problem, it is a human problem.

The fact that England colonized so many countries had its good and bad sides. Of course the left only see the negative. But England brought technology to those nations that they did not otherwise have. Yeah the English were total jerks in thinking they were superior but after those nations kicked the English out they kept their technologies and expanded on it.

The US was founded on the idea that we were to colonize the world. After all we were just another English colony at one point. The US was founded on liberty and as a whole we did not bother the indigenous people until Democrat Andrew Jackson came up with his notion of "manifest destiny". That is when the US began slaughtering Indians by the millions.

The aggression against native Americas was not one sided. The indigenous people were very protective of their land and would wipe out entire wagon trains of while people unprovoked.

Bad people exist and will always exist.

"Many of the founders wanted that to apply to blacks as well but they had to compromise in order to defeat the British"

Compromise with themselves, as many were slave owners.

His statement is also deliberate bunk - and he was already told this weeks ago - because it was ratification of the Constitution that gave cause for the compromise, and this was AFTER the defeat of the British in the Revolution. Wasn't exactly a case of "Mine crystalle balleth predicteth the British from over yonder cometh 1812" either, but that the larger the body, the better for not just defense but economy and keeping each other in check with common goals rather than squabbling over borders and currency and trade as they already began to once freed of the British Crown.

"We don't want the Democrats Jim Crow laws back"

He had originally claimed to be a Democrat from Georgia who switched parties for Reagan, and that his mother's lineage was of slave owners. So he knows what the REAL Conservative movement was about since the 1960s, and that's is:

1. A preservation of segregation on the basis of the notion that WASPs were supposed to be the pinnacle of evolution,

and

2. To teach only Creationism in school because the Theory of Evolution is bunk.

3. Hide in the potato cellar lest the Ruskies bomb us because expanding the USSR into fallout zones is way awesome for them Siberian toasted folks.

4. Only Southerners should recieve public assistance because the War of Northern Aggression done fhucked thangs up while Big City Yankees are rollin in the dough like it was air...

Something sure inhibited the fine art of basic logic with that lot who claim evolution made them superior yet believed said evolution is a farce. Oh, wait, perhaps the Torie throwbacks are on to something...

Gotta love that faux news for turning brains into mush

Is that what it did to you?

{{shhhhh, we're not supposed to say that out loud because there's an algorithm in the air that makes those who aren't them the racists...}}

You see that vB meme about how there's - !EGADS! - a tsunami of non-'Whites' inundating our tv commercials at the expense of our cherished conservative tradition of exclusion?
Saw it before going to bed yesterday and didn't have time to comment then I forgot.

okaaaaay you realize how paranoid you sound right

You think I'm paranoid???? This has nothing to do with your silly meme. This has to do with how completely out of control the left has taken our government in the last century. How much freedom we have lost because of the left. Somehow you think that the damage the left has done and is still doing is normal. We are less free now then when we were under British rule.

Remind me who did the insurrection

Antifa and BLM. They have been fighting against America for years now but all last year they were destroying every city they rioted in. The destroyed lives, in a few cases the murdered, they did everything they could to fight against this nation.

There was no insurrection on Jan 6th. The insurrection was the one sided war that was being waged by the Communists in Antifa and BLM (the organization, not the movement).

What happened on Jan 6th with a protest against a stolen election. That is NOT insurrection. That is a complaint against corruption. It does not matter if you believe that this last election was honest or not, there is just over half of the nation who believe that or election process was shot to crap in 2020. That is very important because that is our strongest voice in the government. If that was stolen from us then we have a serious problem. Any type of action taken by citizens of this nation to protest that is NOT insurrection but rather correction.

The left wants to call it insurrection mainly because they want to replace our government with Marxism. I will stand all day and night in insurrection against a Marxist regime. I will fight for America and the Constitution, never against it. The insurrection was when Joe Biden was illegally installed as president.

I don't support what 300 protesters did inside the Capitol building but they went in there peacefully and were calling for peace and cooperation with the police. Something happened to trigger that into a riot.

But 300 people rioting for a few minutes in Washington DC is a drop in the ocean compared to what Antifa and BLM did all year long last year. I just cannot understand why the left is so blind to that. It is like you are all living in some bizarro world. Is it because you approve of Antifa and BLM but you don't approve of anyone protesting for their right to have their votes counted properly? Again that is just bizarre. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

There is no such a thing as an acceptable riot. You either oppose them all or you oppose none of them. Outside of the 300 rioters on Jan 6th the rest of the people had all the right in the world to be there in protest. It is our Constitutional right to do so. The left does not own that right exclusively.

Flagged and I hope you are banned for promoting disinformation.

Yeah because only the left has the right to free speech. Any other speech must be shut down. I call it as I see it. Insurrection is an overthrow of an existing government with a new government. Did anything close to that happen Jan 6th?

It does not matter if you think the election was fair, those people were in their Constitutional right to protest what they thought was a stolen election. Can you understand that? If the election wasn't stolen they were protesting by mistake. If the election was stolen then they were protesting corruption within our government. Either way it was NOT insurrection. Learn the meaning of words and stop letting the idiots in the Democrat party tell you what to think.

Here is what insurrection was. In 1972 Bill Ayers and the Weather Underground bombed the very same Capitol building with the idea of overthrowing our government and replacing it with a Communist government. They had been committing these acts of violence all throughout the 60's. BTW It was in Bill Ayers home where Barack Obama announced he was running for president in 2008. Obama was a Communist.

Do your own research. Look up everything I said and prove me wrong.

Did you see that gallows? I don't think Pence had anything to worry about. It was never intended to be used other than as a prop.

Did you see that image of comedian Kathy Griffin holding up a bloody decapitate head of Donald Trump. I am sure she and the entire left hated Trump just that much but do you think Kathy Griffin was actually intended in decapitating Trump?

People on all sides will do things in very poor taste to make a point.

"And their solution was violence and brute force."

There was much, much, much, much less violence and brute force exhibited on Jan 6th then was demonstrated by Antifa and BLM all year long.

However it wasn't the protestors on Jan 6th who said "the tree of liberty sometimes needs to be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots". That comment is in the DNA of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence.

If our government is going stop the American people from exercising our right to voice our opinion of who we choose to be president, senators and congressmen then we have a tyrannical government. A government that picks and chooses who they want to rule over us.

It matters not that you think the election was fair. What matters is that those people who protested and then had a small segment of them get triggered into rioting believe they had their voice shut out. Regardless if they are right or wrong if there is a perception of impropriety and the left only stoked the flames by only denying it happened without any evidence to support their claim. The point they were making was valid and it should have been enough to raise serious concerns but instead it was met with coverups and denials and nothing else.

"Yeah, and that "something" was Trump's incessant claims that the election was unfair and stolen and he should've won because everything belongs to him and life is so unfair."

Not true. Trump didn't have to say a word about the election and nothing would have changed. It was extremely obvious. I knew it was going to happen 4 years ago.

"I'm still waiting for you guys to show any proof that the looting and rioting and fires were actually done by antifa and BLM. You keep saying that over and over. I want to see the actual proof."

Have you ever watched the news?

"I don't support violence from the left or the right."

I hope so. Don't act like Jan 6th was the worst thing since the Civil War. It was only as bad as about an hour of Antifa and BLM.

"they weren't out destroying cities last year, either."

Who was, or was the destruction imaginary because they were peaceful protests?

You mean the majority of the population

We were much, much, much freer back then than we are now. And with the 13th and 14th amendments slavery has ended meaning that all of that freedom that we once had would now apply to blacks as well. Everyone would be free to live their lives as they best saw fit. The government would be just a blip on the radar of things that interfered with our lives.

But none of you control freak leftists even understand what we have lost. You think this is normal to have such a controlling and powerful government.

So more people means less freedom? Is that what you are saying?

And what is government if not control. Why do we need more government? With more people do we become to unruly for some people?

What George Washington said back in his day still applies today. "Government is not reason, it is not eloquence,—it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant, and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action."

And yet here we are with the most irresponsible and unresponsive government we have ever had. And I am not just talking about the Biden administration, I am talking about how our government has been progressing over the years since the founding.

Yes things have changed since then. The founders didn't have cyber-crime back then. But how many laws do we to put limits on how businesses operate? Why do we need laws telling us what we can do with our own property? Why are there parts of the United States that the government will not allow people to even step foot on? Like, in the state I live in, Utah, the government under Obama forbid anyone from visiting the Grand Staircase - Escalante National Monument and the Bears Ears National Monument. Fortunately Trump reversed that.

For that matter why does the Federal Government own over half of my state? Why do they own 3/4th of Nevada?

The point is freedom NEVER goes out of style. Liberty is not proportionate to the number of people in a nation.

Better rate than the Post Office for mail? Who?

I don't remember what Trump did exactly, but I do know he made it so that people can hike through that land. Obama made it off limits to everyone.

"'Liberty is not proportionate to the number of people in a nation.'

I agree"

Wow!!!! We agreed on something. I'm glad you agree on that point because liberty is our most valuable possession. We must cherish it and protect it as much as we can. Liberty is not the norm. There are just too many control freaks throughout history. If we do not protect it in the United States it will be taken from us. The left has robbed us of much of our liberty in the last century. The right seems to be the only ones who recognize that but you still want to call us Nazis and fascists. Can you begin to see how utterly absurd that is. Neither of those governments offer freedom to the individual. Our country was not founded on either of those regimes. We fought a war and freed the slaves so that everyone can be free. The last think anyone on the right wants is Nazism and fascism. We want our country back from the Nazis, fascists, socialists and Communists who are trying to take over and enslave us.

We need government that is only large enough to accomplish what is outlined in the constitution.

There actually aren't many functions that the federal government is allowed to carry out constitutionally. Everything else is big government.

Why does the government have to be the only business to deliver mail? We have a bunch of parcel delivery services that can offer a better rate at mail delivery than the post office.

I do understand your point but I still think that our government is about 90% too large. When you have a government that employs more people than the top 25 international businesses then you have a massive overhead problem. It is you and I who have to pay for all of those salaries plus all of the crap the government spends money on and the money they give to every other nation on the planet, even the ones who hate us.

When you get a government that size it becomes very easy to hide corruption. And just from what I heard about the State Department alone is enough to curdle your blood.

The government and the unions take a whole lot of credit for what the free market did. I am not saying that the government or the unions haven't had any influence. In order for a business to survive they have to appease their customers AND their employees. The government imposes on businesses to provide certain benefits but they don't need to because many businesses go way above and beyond what the government imposes.

Everyone always thinks that if the federal or state governments do not take ownership of land that it will all become strip mines. Perhaps some areas might but not every area. The best decision should be made by the people that live in those areas. If they want a strip mine or an oil well then they can have it. If they do not then they can tell those businesses to take a hike.

We have all sorts of zoning regulations imposed by the city or county. We have environmental regulations imposed by the state. It used to be that if you owned a piece of land then you could do whatever you wanted to that land. The only regulations was water rights disputes. And then there are taxes. If you fail to pay them the government takes your land away from you. Under socialism there is no private property ownership but what is the difference between that and what we have now? You technically own the land but it is not fully your land.

I just read about some guy in California that cut a Joshua Tree down to build his house on his own property. The state fined him for doing that. I don't think Joshua Trees are endangered. If they are they shouldn't be because they have spread all over So. Cal, Western Arizona and Southern Nevada. They're everywhere.

Ask China.

So you want our nation to be like China? If that is the case you may be the only who voted for Joe Biden. Every other Democrat voted against Trump. Biden is wholly owned by China.

<sigh> follow the thread, you asked the question. Also your claims are rather over the top especially since you appear to be ignoring many facts about rumptlstiltskin.

What facts are these that you are in possession of about a fictional character? You do not that Rumpelstiltskin does not exist?

BTW the left has no "facts" about Trump. All they have is accusations that they have repeated enough to where they now believe them to be fact. So I will ignore those "facts" about Trump just as much as I would if you were laying down facts about Rumpelstiltskin. Because they are both fictional.

Why apologize? Jesus preached as much but they are blinded by hate to understand

Me, a christian, who sounds nothing like that: LMFAO

Oh dear

I would not like to be one dealing with people like this..

How do you do it-