Imgflip Logo Icon

political

political | image tagged in political meme | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
602 views 15 upvotes Made by MoozaHooza 3 years ago in politics
108 Comments
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
3 replies
It was a sex ed video on what masturbation is. That's kind of her job. And if your complaint was as solid as you say it is then why do you need to misrepresent it?
3 ups, 3y
The teacher admits it's his job to teach 6 yo's degeneracy. Absolutely disgusting.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Face You Make Robert Downey Jr Meme | AT SIX YEARS OLD? REALLY? | image tagged in memes,face you make robert downey jr | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Isn't there a lawn you should be fertilizing?
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Tell me exactly which part is too adult for a six year old:

https://youtu.be/JOcaYIaeEDQ
1 up, 3y
Keep out of children's genitals, degenerate.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
She's a sex ed teacher. She was teaching to a curriculum. All of this would have been pre- approved whether the school wants to back peddle now or not.
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
Naw! The school supervisors disagree....they said that she was not supposed to be teaching what she was "teaching". That was why she ran...because they did not support her deviance.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
If my bosses backed away from something they had already approved, I wouldn't want to work for them anymore either. That's a REALLY shitty thing to do to an employee.
1 up, 3y
But teaching masturbation to 6 yo's is absolutely zero problem LOL
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Bosses did not back away....they were enforcing what she was only supposed to teach. This was not in Texas but New York/Manhattan.....Deviance City....largely democrats live there and when democrat parents complain then you just know what she was teaching was going far beyond deviance.....deep into evilness!
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
They really did sign off on this. They're backpeddling.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
No! they did NOT! If they had signed off on this then they could NEVER have back-peddled, or she would have sued their asses off of them! She played god paedophile groomer with children who were not her own....she would have NEVER taught her own kids to play with themselves! This I know to be true....as I have many Filipino friends and we have discussed her behaviour at length.....They are not impressed with her deviant behaviour and are quite ashamed that she is a Filipina!
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
3 replies
I don't think that she could sue them for that, no. I think you've made that up.

No sex ed teacher EVER runs a class with material that isn't approved first for this exact reason. They backpeddled.

And the video is here, by the way: https://youtu.be/JOcaYIaeEDQ
It is completely harmless. You're crying hysterics over nothing.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Then why are you leaving out your reply option? Look Fonte is a frigging deviant and you know who had also taught at that very same Dalton School in Manhattan? Yeap! Jeffrey Epstein also taught math and physics there and he is well-remembered for his “persistent attention” on teenage girls in the hallways....aka grooming. And we know what he had gone on to do! This was what Fonte was also doing at that very same Dalton school: GROOMING!
And yeah! Teachers can sue if they believe that they were wronged!....every single American can sue....that is their right!
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y
I'm not, it's the last comment in the thread. Imgflip doesn't allow more than 10 layers of comments.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Sure they can if the school board or whatever went back on their words. But maybe she will not because then the world will know how deviant she is and expose liberals' deviance. Maybe the libbies leaders are paying her to be quiet while they sexualize and groom our young ones for early sex! They are well-known and documented great sickos!
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
Actually, she just found a different school to work for. One that isn't such a pushover to hysterical people.

And again, she can't sue. This is a fiction in your mind.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
You are misdirecting....it was not really the video but her verbally telling the kids where it is pleasurable to touch!....GROOMING! And yes! She can sue the pants off of them if they had backpedaled. Americans are the premier litigation experts of the world....they would sue you at the drop of a hat. The last time that I had checked....Americans were responsible for over 95% of the world's litigation cases!
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y
No, a teacher can't sue the school board for telling her to stop teaching a topic. That's bullshit. I've NEVER heard that. You're completely making that up.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
"not in Texas but New York/Manhattan.....Deviance City....largely democrats live there"

Tha Hell you from, some homeschooling cabin in the Yukon?

You know how many 'kinks' are named or associated with Texas? Not just cows in a dress, but everything from 'relations' with tree stumps to co**al f**al play of a sort I'd rather skip the details of - both which I've been trying to forget (hence why I can't recall the names) after some dude posted them on a forum 5 years to make me barf after witnessing my reaction to talk of 'blue waffle.'

Texas IS, as everyone knows, is the only real contender to Florida for the crown in ye olde Degeneracy Olympics.

At $55,000 per yr, that school Manhattan is hardly from a world of deviancy. Which is why that degenerate had to go. Get your planets straight..
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Hahahaha....Then you obviously do not know that Epstein had taught (YES! THAT Epstein) at that very same school that that degenerate left....
Sigh! Are all of the liberal degenerates on this post....WHY ME!
2 ups, 3y,
9 replies
You mean THAT Epstein, the Trump BFF who moved to Florida where Capt Grab Em By The Pussy now permanently resides? The Florida where he got away with barely a slap on the wrist then was set to go on trial in NYC? THAT Epstein?
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
2 ups, 3y
Crack has really aged Hunter.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
I always got the impression that he felt like an elite deigning to stoop and eat the little people's cuisine but I only saw a few so that might be unfair.
2 ups, 3y
YEAH! Like some Upper West 80s rich kid all growned up who got hooked up with this job through daddy!

And they were promoting some special about him calling him the "Punk Rock" chef or some crap which I found oddly unconvincing, as if he ever was.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
That's Anthony Bourdain.
2 ups, 3y
He killed himself, bruh, his life was too difficult to bear, flying first class to eat $78 plates of force-fed duck ovaries sauteed in a white wine mustard reduction with Viennese shallots at Le Grande Chateau Argent du Poo Poo in Le Paris for free one week and Ng Laab Pan Gek Noi (fried dog nuts) in Hanoi the next all for free. Don't make fun.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
He may have been a great chef, but damn, was he annoying.
2 ups, 3y
I caught one or two, that was enough for me.

Actually, come to think of it, all these traveling around and eating folks tend to be rather annoying.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Punk rock? Just because he did coke and whatever else in the kitchen? Marco Pierre White was punk rock. Bourdain was Green Day.
2 ups, 3y
He probably bought "Whip It" a week before it hit the Top 10.

I had to look up that Marco fella. Yeah, he looks it.

Which reminds me, I haven't seen any of the torrent of suicides that used to flood this site, is it because I've not strayed into Emo cutter streams, or did that sad bid for attention fall out of favor when the kidz had to stay home from school because death really has been walking past their door since last year and now they ain't craving it?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
You said one building and I corrected your erroneous and usual liberal lie! That is all....Nothing else to say here. You may stay on this dead meme. Good Luck!
1 up, 3y
He still is known for only one single building.
Unsurprisingly, the opening of 2 of them just last year to no fanfare whatsoever in NYC is hardly surprising, and it WAS only last year, a little slightly past establishing celebrity.
Also, look up what that project was supposed to be, including plans for the world's tallest building and his trying to buy air rights to make the massive Riverside Railyard Project buildings taller than zoning permitted.

What country are you from again, kid?
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Because Epstein had invited Trump on the Lolita Express once, as he had invited every single important person that he could get his hands on....to enjoy his underaged "delicacies." (This was why he was murdered in prison because he knew too much about the to democrats who had partaken in that feast of underaged succulents). That was one of his businesses (sounds more like a Chinese honeytrap to me)....And after that one trip....Trump had publicly remarked dryly that Epstein's taste was into young girls (meaning that teenaged young girls were NOT Trump's taste) and he NEVER went back on that plane again, or anywhere near Epstein's island in the Caribbean! Now Bill Clinton on the other hand....went back 24 times (meaning that this depraved liberal (as are most liberals)....was into young tender girls....and we know that to be a fact because there was Monica Lewinski also).
Naw! Trump Tower was not his only building project in NY. There are also:
- Trump SoHo Hotel: 246 Spring Street
- Trump World Tower: 845 United Nations Plaza
- Trump Palace: 200 East 69th Street
- Riverside South & Trump Place: along the Hudson River between 59th and 72nd Sts.

And these do not include the scores of run down and decaying buildings that he had bought and had either rebuild or massively restored to surpass their former glory such as: CENTRAL PARK SOUTH: Trump Parc and Trump Parc East, 1290 6th Avenue, Trump International Hotel and Tower: 1 Central Park West, Trump Park Avenue: Park Avenue and 59th Street, 610 Park Avenue: corner of 65th street, 40 Wall Street: Between Nassau Street and William Street, The Grand Hyatt Hotel at Grand Central
Grand Hyatt

Just east of Grand Central Terminal
1 up, 3y
So he finally built a couple of buildings on the railyards he had that massive project he was talking about for decades. And they opened in 2020!
Yes, he bought a hotel, and daddy Fred used to build projects, that's how he (Fred) made money, not Donny.
I had seen that in the bottom first when I tapped Full Comment.

"partaken in that feast of underaged succulents"

eww, projection way too creepy much?

Trump said he was friends with Epstein for 15 years, and remained so after.
He invited him over to Mar-a-Lago many times, and not Democratic conventions that you're so fascinated with. Don't like it? Well we got something in common then, and you're from the other side of the world.

Your choice of words is rather vile and exceedingly questionable, and this repetition begins to bore me a lot, so we done?
Yeah, we're done.
1 up, 3y
Yep, Epstein. A real Chinese name. China's riddled with Epsteins.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Trump was one of the most important and certainly the most well-known person in New York....why are you so offended that epstein would want to know him. Epstein had known thousand of high rolling socialites in the USA....that was the crowd that he had mixed with. That crowd was almost 100% democrat....Trump was a democrat at that time also.
1 up, 3y
No, you're lying, and badly.

Trump is well known as a self-promoting buffoon in NYC, which is why 90% voted against him. His 'importance' comes from ONE building, Trump Tower. That's it, one. single. building. that. he. built.

This pic was from a party Trump invited Epstein to, in MAR-A-LAGO (that's in Florida, another state here) featuring cheerleaders as guests for them two sickos to ogle.

How did Don the Con know about Epstein sharing his taste for women on 'the young side' before Epstein was ever charged with it? Why were they friends?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Hahaha....Jeffrey Epstein....the one that Hillary and William had murdered in jail because he knew darn too much of the top democrats' deviances! Photos like these are a dime a dozen....the man took them out with everybody he could get hold of and besides this was when Trump was a democrat and had moved in their circles. I can show you one with Epstein and almost every single democrat leader. Trump barely knew the man but the man knew everybody who was anybody! This photo s not unusual. On grab "them by the pussy"....I am not going to condone that but I used to work with thousands of women (and 99% of them were liberals)....and I have heard a lot of them say "I grabbed them by the cock"....or, "I will grab him by the balls" when they thought that I was too engrossed in my work to hear. Look! some guys....just talk like that....as a matter of fact, most guys and gals talk in some variation of that when they are with their friends and relaxing! So stop being a fuc@ing hypocritical prick!
1 up, 3y
Hillary and William whowha?

Epstein was in Giuliani's territory.
Oh, and Trump's town.

So, shush.
1 up, 3y
You expect an avowed Marxist not to lie through his teeth?
2 ups, 3y
Criminal Law - Corruption of Minors.
This is very much the definition.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
It's only a matter of time until all education will fall under federal control, changing a long standing practice of local boards deciding curriculum for local schools. Then, this will be the norm. Like it or not, it is in our future.
1 up, 3y
Let us hope not!
2 ups, 3y,
3 replies
How is her gender relevant to the story?
Who are "these Liberals" and in what way are they perverted?
She taught a course that a school requested she teach and she had to resign, how does that not make her a victim?
She taught the course to 120 students, only two parents complained, the rest gave great feedback.

Are you interested in facts? If so, check out the text below. If not, just continue spewing lies that make you feel justified in your hatred, I guess.

"Multiple sex educators interviewed for this article said there was nothing inappropriate about her classes there or at Columbia. All of it was in line with current National Sex Education Standards and the World Health Organization’s International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education.

The national standards are also used in public schools in New York City, where students in grades 6 through 12 take lessons on sexuality as part of their health education. Parents can opt out of certain aspects of the program.

The material for her first-grade class never used the term “masturbation,” Ms. Fonte said recently. The lesson was about private parts being private and included a cartoon in which two characters use anatomically correct names for their genitals and say that sometimes it feels good to touch them. “It’s OK to touch yourself and see how different body parts feel, but it’s best to only do it in private,” the narrator tells viewers.

The W.H.O. guidelines state that between the ages of 5 and 8, children should learn to “identify the critical parts of the internal and external genitals and describe their basic function” and “recognize that being curious about one’s body, including the genitals, is completely normal.”

“I equip them with a way that they can exercise body agency and consent, by knowing exactly what those parts are, what they are called, and how to take care of them,” Ms. Fonte said."
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Who taught 5 and 6 year olds to masturbate? The teacher in the meme didn't.
The teacher in the meme taught kids about body parts, you guys are turning perfectly normal, healthy behavior by children into something deviant.

Kids do touch their genitals, that's completely normal, it's not Liberal behavior, it's human behavior.

If you tell kids that it's wrong/sinful/dirty etc, you are going to make them feel shame and self-loathing, do you honestly think that is kind or healthy?

If you tell kids that it's ok but not to do it around other people and teach them about consent and how to keep themselves clean, they will grow up with a healthy relationship with their own bodies.

If what you are experiencing here are feelings of anger or pain because someone made you ashamed of your own body and it feels unfair that other people are getting a healthier education than you did, that's your own issue to deal with.

In case this wasn't clear enough for you: NOBODY IS TEACHING KIDS TO MASTURBATE, THEY ARE TEACHING KIDS NOT TO BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES FOR TOUCHING THEIR GENITALS BECAUSE ALL KIDS DO.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
THEY DON'T NEED TO TEACH WHAT PARTICULAR THING TO FIVE AND SIX YEAR OLDS YOU FREAKING PEDO?

Y'know, the cool thing about the internet is even if someone is reeeeeally far away, you still don't need to shout.

If you're doing it for catharsis because you were made to feel shame about your body as a kid, that's fine, you fill your boots.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
You didn't answer the question.

What don't they need to teach?

Consent?

Are you aware that kids get abused and it's important for them to know other people shouldn't touch them?

Hygiene?
I honestly can't imagine what your argument against that would be.

That it's ok to touch themselves in private?

Are you able to articulate what your issue with that is, if you have one?
1 up, 3y
I think I clearly stated my position already, sorry your reading comprehension is so poor or you political
Affiliation doesn’t allow you to compute anti pedo sentiment. Indoctrination to masturbation and touching yourself should not be part of a “series” sexual indoctrination for 1st graders.
0 ups, 3y
Naw! That was not what she was supposed to teach...her supervisors did not agree and that was why she had fled....because she knew that her deviant behaviour was wrong!
Sure....no one is saying that children should not be taught why and where people should not touch them....but that is completely different from telling kids that touching themselves is pleasurable.....that is teaching them to masturbate....grooming them for early sex!
Also, she is Filipino....you have to know the history also of where she is coming from at her age. They are strict and rigid over there, especially in the rural areas.....no boyfriends...only girlfriends. And once you are over 30 then you are considered an "old maid"....no one wants you after that age if you are not married but old washed-up foreigners......and often forcing girls to turn to girls....
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
These people are disgusting. A 6 yo doesn't need to know this and it's the parents job anyway. See how brazen these degenerates are about it now? Next they'll be defending pedophilia.
1 up, 3y
Oh many of them already do. They can’t wait to jump to the defense of kid touchers. Nothing more disgusting than an adult that defends child sexual exploitation.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
I suspect that those who encourage this teaching also defend pedophelia
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Why? What's your reasoning?
0 ups, 3y
Very simple the desire to indoctrinate children into sexuality infers a proclivity to sexualize children and think of them as sexual beings rather than as children.
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Very relevant....because she is living in a Lala Land thinking that "she" is a "they".....and she is teaching that ship! There are only 2 genders....male and female! I sure hope that she does not teach English because those children will be FUC@ED when they come to singulars and plurals.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Sure! As in "Someone left their umbrella....I hope "they" come back for it because it is going to rain." But not for the gendered shit that you would like to use it for today! And you can do that because English does not yet have a universally accepted ‘gender-neutral’ pronoun in the singular to refer to living beings (specifically, to human beings) as other languages do. This is why it has only recently been co-opted for this purpose in the singular as part of the ‘gender-neutral’ movement. However, that is bullshit and ambiguous, as ‘they’ is plural in number, not singular. This is only an English-speaking world phenomenon! Such utter nonsense!
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y
NOPE! You are reading that into it....Not my fault that you are stupid!
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
Hah! You obviously weren't paying attention while you were supposed to be learning English.

The Oxford English Dictionary traces singular they back to 1375, where it appears in the medieval romance William and the Werewolf. Singular they is older than singular you.
0 ups, 3y
Never mind the argument that to be what they are claiming it to be then it should have read “each man hurried till 'he' drew near”)
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Naw! No one had taught that in any school....I grew up in an English classroom of Shakespeare, Chaucer, Bronte, Wilde, and their likes....at least not unless you are under 20 years and had been taught by some idiot "woke" gender-neutral transgender professor who does not know what the unholy shit what they are talking about! And even if that was true then language does change over time, and one can now argue that gender-neutral idiots are now trying to include "they" as part of a liberal political movement because English has that "strangeness" where it does not have a universally accepted ‘gender-neutral’ pronoun in the singular to refer to living beings (specifically, to human beings) as other languages do. This is why it has only recently been co-opted by these idiots for this purpose in the singular as part of their ‘gender-neutral’ political movement. However, that is bullshit and ambiguous, as ‘they’ is plural in number, not singular. This is only an English-speaking world phenomenon! Such abject and utter nonsense by asinine people!
And as for its origin in Willian and the Werewolf....SHRUG! That is just libbies making up shit as they go along. That poem was from 1375 and had its origin in a French romance story from the 1200s. One would have to go back to see how that same sentence was used in that same story to understand whether singular or plural was used. Poets are not known for their great fortitude of sticking to the truth, or of mastery of the English language generally, but rather of creating worlds of fantasy and then building their worlds around those fantasies...... molding worlds (and words) that fit with the prose and rhythm of their poems.....denying any adherence to correct and strict English language. For one to use that single instance to try to prove that "they" "were" really once singular....would be like trying to push an elephant through the eye of a common household needle....and reeks of the utter desperation and the shamelessness that would have to go along with that!
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
"For one to use that single instance to try to prove that "they" "were" really once singular....would be like trying to push an elephant through the eye of a common household needle....and reeks of the utter desperation and the shamelessness that would have to go along with that!"

I'm not sure whether you are being obtuse or whether you have genuinely misunderstood; I referenced William and the Werewolf because it contained the first example of singular "they" in print, not because it is the only example of singular "they" in print.

You: "I grew up in an English classroom of Shakespeare, Chaucer, Bronte, Wilde, and their likes"

Also you: "And even if that was true then language does change over time..."

Seriously?

You grew up in an English classroom and managed to learn nothing, that's some sort of achievement in itself.

You have invalidated your own argument.

I was curious about how you think gender can be a "political movement" and what it's aim could possibly be (world domination?), but you're making such ridiculous comments about the English language that I'm not optimistic you'd say anything of value and it seems a bit mean to ask you to try.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y
Hahaha....No! I do not expect that you could follow along as intelligence is not one of your strong points! I am answering like 5 of you deluded libbies at once....on various topics.
0 ups, 3y
" YOU: I referenced William and the Werewolf because it contained the first example of singular "they" in print, not because it is the only example of singular "they" in print."

But it was the one that you had referred to....and I will assume that it was the very best you had to produce! I cannot respond to any other if they are not referred!
And besides, that is just a red herring....a distraction if you will....because you will have to go back to its origin in the 1200s to see what was said there. Again poets are not known to be bastions and mastery of the English language and its correctness, that is NOT what poetry is for, but rather for their mastery of how to mould works to rhythm in their poems. I am sure that there are multiple instances in the past and modern English where the singular and plural are used interchangeably instead for their rhyming utility, rather than for their correct grammar!.
Again, it is the mark of forlorn and "singular" desperation when one is forced to use an obscure poem by an obscure poet from the 1300s to try futilely prove that a plural word was really....you know, a singular word in the long long long long long long long paaaasssstttttttt!
FUC@! Just how desperate must you be to score a liberal political point, or to defend the indefensible! You must be utterly brainwashed! You went online and saw this poem example that every single deviant liberal is quoting online....and what did you do....fuc@ing also wholesaled quote it just like all of the other sheep liberals!
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator