President Puddin Head

:P

Out of context, sure. 5d9m5r.gif (click to show)

He obviously has a problem with female fingernails and his problematic masculinity kicked in and he tried to viciously attack them with his teeth, like a base animal.

Maybe her fingers smelled like cookies or something. Low blood sugar can lead to some odd decisions.

I never thought of the cookie angle. Who wouldn't have done the same?

Out of context? And the context changes what exactly?

That is some truly desperate stupidity on your part!

You can look up the video, or look at the nice GIF I created (first time I've done that, it worked well).

His wife was talking and waving her hands in his face. She almost hit him by mistake. So he jokingly bit her finger.

Why don't you make fun of him for lying about his transcripts or any of the genuinely stupid things he's done? I really don't understand. Its like planting evidence on someone when you already have them for something else. The lack of respect for facts blows my mind.

You weren't here for 4 years of 'Trump had TWO SCOOPS!!!' tier TDS memeing.

Wow. I had never seen that. I think that was tongue in cheek. Do you remember Obama and the tan suit?

That was weak but I think only Hannity or someone whined. Poor Obama, had it so rough. Remember all those cutting skits about him on SNL? Me neither. Meanwhile CNN...

Honestly, it does look like him. How is this the first time I’m seeing these? I still see jokes about Michelle being a man. Granted that wasn’t the media, but still. I don’t know for sure that there was equal disrespect, but there was significant on both sides. Probably always will be. Looking back at political cartoons, probably always have been.

Okay, this is what I was searching for. You were mentioning a tan suit?

Having said that, i agree with your statement about going after the real issues but it goes both ways.

Agreed. It’s why I generally stick to reading instead of watching news.

If your point is hypocrisy, yes. Both sides are hypocrites. Especially in politics with political strategists.

I could point the same happens on the right. A lot. Media is about sales, and the headline and content don't always match. I don't wish to defend a specific writer who I know nothing about, but in looking:

https://www.inquirer.com/philly/news/politics/presidential/Trump-said-Phillys-murder-rate-is-terribly-increasing-Its-not.html

The first article was written in January. If you read past the headlines:
The city has had an unusually deadly January. As of 12:01 a.m. Thursday, the city had recorded 27 homicides, according to the most recent police statistics. That is the highest total since 2012, and if the pace continues, it would represent a higher rate than the city has experienced in a while.

But experts often warn against reading too much into small sample sizes. In September, for example, the murder tally was 9 percent higher than a year before — and the city still ended the year with fewer overall homicides than in 2015.

That last one is an opinion piece.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/05/30/opinions/trump-budget-paid-leave-calder-opinion/index.html

When the majority of media outlets fail to cover all of those real issues, the point of reiterating all of those truly nasty details about Biden accomplishes what? Morons voted for him anyway, and not just the 2020 bumper crop. Biden has been re-elected time and time again, even though his opponents likely bring this stuff up time and time again.

What this particular image helps illuminate is just how ignorant his loyal followers are, many of whom rabidly defend him on this website. It is a subtle enjoyment, to be sure, but one that is sweet because it goes effortlessly over the heads of most liberals.

Tasty.

Morons voted for him anyway - or we compared the two liars and made a decision. I honestly hate defending him... but for the love of God, attack with facts.

If people have to lie I assume there is no actual evidence to prove their point.

Are you saying the morons didn't vote for Biden? I am not sure where you think I am lying. If you are saying that not as many morons voted for Biden as the fraudulent elections showed, well, I can agree with you on that one.

And as for choosing between two liars, here's a clue: every time you choose between two people, you will be choosing between two liars. The more recent, so-called lies of Trump were almost without exception nothing more than exaggerations, whereas Biden literally has a lifetime of lies while in public office.

The real difference between the two? Trump actually accomplished a tremendous amount of good while in office, and while opposed, for no good reason, on every side. He actually kept a lot of his campaign promises, something that is never done in DC politics, and one of the reasons so many of the DC Swamp Creatures™ went after him with any made up story they could concoct- the more outrageous, the better, because it convinced unthinking liberals (but I repeat myself) that peeing Russian prostitutes just HAD to be real because who would make something like that up?

Some other fool liberal on this site threw out a request that someone show him/her/beep/boop how the GOP had done anything good for veterans. After I posted a number of links, I note that said liberal fool failed to have a comeback.

So, for which of these non-lies do you condemn Donald Trump?
- Historically low black unemployment.
- Energy independence for the first time in around 50 years.
- Historic peace agreements between ancient enemies in the Middle East.
- Record breaking economy with companies flocking back to the US.

The best part of that short list? We can now see just how corrupt the Democrat Party is, working hard as they are to undo that which proved to be beyond beneficial for this country.

And there is so much more, all of which shows that Trump was one of the most incredible presidents this country has ever seen: www.magapill.com

As for the love of God, I am quite certain you know nothing of that, else you would not be a liberal.

I think you implied that only morons voted for him. I'm betting our scale of who got more of the moron vote is probably opposite.

I disagree on Trumps lies. After 4 years of him we have so many people who trust no news source other than 'influencers' online. That is dangerous. Its hard to have a society when one side thinks the other is part of an international plot to destroy America, regularly rigs elections, and controls the media. Media bias is a thing - but the move to full on denial is very bad.

He kept some of his campaign promises. He broke others. That is pretty much just being a politician.

Historic peace -> Two countries recognized Israel. Qatar and Bahrain, if I'm not mistaken. While that was good, it also represented a shift in the Israel//Palestinian conflict, which is why we are where we are now. I'm not blaming him -> it was good, but it is also having repercussions.

Unemployment rates were already going down when he took office -> I'm not saying he didn't keep it going, but it was already trending that way.
2015 (5.3%), 2016 (4.9%), 2017 (4.4%), 2018 (3.9%), 2019 (3.7%), 2020 (8.1%)

I wouldn't say they were 'flocking back' to the US. There were some, but not a lot. If I'm wrong - source?

Wouldn't be a liberal - If you think people who disagree with you are bad people, maybe democracy isn't for you.

"Wouldn't be a liberal - If you think people who disagree with you are bad people, maybe democracy isn't for you."

I honestly could not care less on a personal level if someone disagrees with me- I do not find myself to be all that important, and it is impossible for me to be offended by someone disagreeing with me. But where liberals run afoul with reality is in their stance against God. I would have been better off using the word fools vs "morons", as in the biblical sense it is the fear of the Lord that is the *beginning* of wisdom, and it is the fool that says in his heart there is no God. Many liberals will claim to believe in God, but a basic analysis shows that the god they believe in exists only in their imagination.

And it is that wisdom of the Word of God that gives us the only reliable guidelines for what constitutes good and bad- all else is just your opinion vs mine, and in a democracy that amounts to two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner- even in a Democratic Republic it seems.

As for, "After 4 years of him we have so many people who trust no news source other than 'influencers' online.", that notion is sadly wrong. The major news outlets had earned their reputation for being dishonest, and hopelessly bent towards the Left, LONG before Trump showed up. Trump, being the first politician to truly push back, only brought this more clearly into focus. Or are you saying that the MSM pushing every false narrative about Trump while ignoring the decades of examples of how truly corrupt and pathetic Joe Biden is was somehow Trump's fault? "The Bad Orange Man made us do it!! Waaaaaaa!!!" There is a video compilation out there of what the MSM was saying when Biden first ran for president, and he had to bow out in utter disgrace. Today's media has NO problem bringing up nonsense from an alleged past (e.g. Brent Kavanaugh), but all of this very real dirt on Biden never saw the light of day.

People have always had the tendency to surround themselves with others that sooth their guilty consciences. Whenever I see someone defend NBC/ABC/CBS as being somehow truly moderate, I know a lot more about that person without them even realizing it. And it could be more obvious to me because I was once on that side. I had not better arguments than most of you have when it comes to defending liberalism (as it works itself out today), but I am well aware of the general mindset of that from which I defected.

I don't know about that. The bible says it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter heaven, so the 'prosperity ministries' on the right are pretty odd. Then there is guidance on the treatment of strangers and foreigners. I don't think the faithful on the left are the only ones cherry picking their truth.

I don't think either party is really making a passing grade if you want to look at it that way: There are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers.

Oh if we are going to imitate people "Waaaaa, the media is so mean to me! Nobody has ever been more unfair."

Not all media is equal, and all is biased to a degree, but that goes both ways. The Steele dossier was an intelligence report - raw intelligence and and it hadn't been corroborated. I'm pretty sure everything I read was clear on that point, but I will confess its been a while.

Other than those examples of lies told as part of running for election, Biden hasn't been demonstrably corrupt. There are also video compilations of Trump contradicting himself, and a fun one of Trump and Obama saying almost the exact same thing and then Fox News reacting. These things are on both sides.

All news is suspect, but they hardly ever lie flat out. that credibility is important. Skepticism is good. Ignoring is bad. Thinking there is some grand organized conspiracy...I wish I had that kind of faith in humanity. Two can keep a secret if one of them is dead.

"My take away from Matthew is that you will be judged on how you treated those you had no reason to help."

And that is the reason the Gospel is Good News. Christ has taken all of my sins, and given me His righteousness. My actions will be judged when it comes to rewards in Heaven, but I will not be judged, for Christ has already taken my judgment.

As to your faith, which I know next to nothing about, I will say this- faith is only as good as the object in which that faith is placed. That you would even consider voting for any Democrat is an indication of either severe Christian immaturity, or being a false convert. A vote for any Democrat is vote supporting the murder of unborn children, so long as the Democrat Party has as its National Platform the rabid support and defense for abortion.

There is no escaping that, and not voting for Trump over the bad, politicized "science" that concludes man can alter the climate is an absurd reason to look past the murder of millions of children every year. Your faith, were it rooted in the true God, the God of the Bible, would inform you that God is in control of the weather, and nowhere in all of Scripture does He ever hint at ceding that responsibility to anyone else. And there is ever so much information that counters the bad science you have accepted regarding this topic. I recommend Tony Heller's work on YouTube- he does an excellent job of exposing the dishonest manipulation of both current and historical data used to "prove" that mankind is altering the climate.

p.s. "dismissive corpulent rightist"

Odd, I am not especially fat to be honest. My line of work keeps me active enough to avoid that . . .

I'm not particularly little. I have the opposite problem.

I find it odd that you would label "prosperity ministries" as being on the Right. They are apostate heretics, and they likely rarely if ever dabble in politics. That would limit their reach, something they desperately need in order to con the unsuspecting and/or greedy.

The guidance, as you call it, when it comes to the treatment of strangers and foreigners, is oft used by whiny little leftists who have no idea what it is that they are copying and pasting. It is usually all the same- apparently they find the same website that has put it together. And of course, they get it all wrong when it comes to that, missing both the immediate context, the audience to which it was directed by God, and the far reaching results of those commands. I have challenged a number of them, and they have no answer, because the original thought was not their own.

As for the "faithful left", they are faithful only to their idolatry, as the "god" they believe in does not exist. Certainly some may actually believe in God, but have yet to mature in that belief enough to realize that everything the Left, and the Democrat Party, stands for is contrary to what God tells us. I had that experience, though I left the Left first, realizing that they were wholly inconsistent with the ideals they claimed to believe in, and were chaotic in their actions. But there were long held beliefs that I had to investigate thoroughly to let them go as they clearly did not align with the truth found in the Word of God.

"Oh if we are going to imitate people "Waaaaa, the media is so mean to me! Nobody has ever been more unfair."" If you can find me a link to a video where Trump literally cries, "Waaaaa", I will likely change my mind a little about him, though his struggle with the lying leftist media hardly discounts all of the good he did while in office.

And given that we literally have a video of Biden explaining his quid pro quo with Ukraine, I am not sure how you have arrived at him not being demonstrably corrupt. And your concept of what constitutes corrupt is too small. The man has a history of being on the wrong side of civil rights, and his undying support for abortion makes him as corrupt as it gets. I get that you do not believe in the verses you posted, and therefore you are confused about what constitutes murder and what is a simple choice of convenience, but it really is not all that complex- basic biology at the very least.

Matthew 25:31-40 Go ahead and explain to me how this doesn't apply to everyone.

You don't get to decide who is on the right and who isn't anymore than I get to claim that Antifa's militant tactics and anarchism make them not left.

Joel Osteen and Kenneth Copeland were both very loud supporters of President Trump.

I don't know if you are prepared to laugh at these morons yet but...
https://youtu.be/SJGXLoYtzok

And one more: If Fox news treated Trump like Obama.
https://youtu.be/b-cZG81-MPQ

He didn't actually say waaaaa. I'm sure you think he did good in office. I imagine you don't believe in climate change (hate to assume, but there it is). Honestly, that single point was enough not to vote for him He was making progress with China before COVID. He didn't derail the economy. He did abandon the Kurds, which...that was not cool in any way. And you will never convince me the strike on Soleimani was anything but an attempt to distract from the impeachment.

When something happened in the past and people keep telling you what happened...look into it. Look at what was being said at the time. Look up news articles being published at the time. They say Shokin was corrupt, were they saying it before Hunter Biden? Yes.

The last article on this list is a NYT article that actually discusses Hunter and is the closest you will find to a smoking gun. But it doesn't match the timeline. Burisma's investigation was ended before Shokin was fired.

Biden may have had ulterior motives for his activities in Ukraine, but he was over there pushing for these exact things before Hunter was hired. Maybe he somehow benefited from Shokin being fired, but the firing itself was on the up and up. I repeat: the firing itself is nothing.

Here's a custom search for news stories the time Shokin was fired:
https://bit.ly/3gc596x

Radio Free Europe
Scores of protesters have rallied in the Ukrainian capital, demanding the resignation of the country’s top prosecutor, who has been repeatedly criticized as an impediment to badly needed anticorruption reforms.

Kyiv Post
Deputy Prosecutor General Vitaly Kasko, who was given the job of cleaning up a corrupt, politically subservient and ineffective institution employing 15,000 prosecutors, quit on Feb. 15. In this farewell press conference, Kasko cited corruption and sabotage by General Prosecutor Viktor Shokin in combatting corruption and instituting the rule of law.

https://foreignpolicy.com/
Enough Carrots for Ukraine. Time to Break Out the Sticks.
Although Poroshenko finally sacked his widely hated prosecutor general, Viktor Shokin, this was primarily thanks to growing pressure from Western officials.

The Irish Times
EU hails sacking of Ukraine’s prosecutor Viktor Shokin

This one is probably the closest you are going to get to something that supports your beliefs:
NYTimes - Joe Biden, His Son and the Case Against a Ukrainian Oligarch
But Edward C. Chow, who follows Ukrainian policy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the involvement of the vice president’s son with Mr. Zlochevsky’s firm undermined the Obama administration’s anticorruption message in Ukraine.

“Now you look at the Hunter Biden situation, and on the one hand you can credit the father for sending the anticorruption message,” Mr. Chow said. “But I think unfortunately it sends the message that a lot of foreign countries want to believe about America, that we are hypocritical about these issues.”

"I'm not particularly little. I have the opposite problem."

I would wish it if I could, that your eyes would be opened to the deadness of the worldview you hold. The wit and intellect you have are being misused for evil, though I imagine you do not find it particularly evil from where you sit.

Being open to new information, and digging deeper into all things is commendable, but you have arrived at the wrong place with it all. I speak from experience, having been where you are once myself.

The Bible describes the born again experience as having a veil removed from one's eyes- "I was blind, but now I see." As far as I am concerned, our back and forth is for no other purpose than exposing you to a side you do not give enough credence to, and therefore dismiss, perhaps without even realizing it. No other explanation suffices for coming to the conclusion that Trump was not good for this country, and thus the world, his obvious imperfections notwithstanding.

I was once a rabid atheist, liberal, and rabid Democrat, and I hated Christians for what I thought their stance was. I now understand that the Word of God is where our starting point needs to be, and from there we run all things around us through that filter, shunning that which is against the principles of a holy God, and embracing that which is affirmed.

Your experience isn't mine. I don't hate Christians. I do hate hypocrites, but they exist regardless of religion.

My faith... Sometimes I feel it sometimes I don't. I want to believe, but I don't trust that impulse. I won't believe something because it is convenient, and my desire for a higher authority to make things simple is too much to dismiss. So. I live my life the best I can. I go by the harm principle - the law has no right to force actions unless those actions harm another. I find not wearing a mask to be very selfish, but I understand why people wouldn't. I support your to right to not get the vaccine, though scotus has previously decided they can be enforced.

I have no issue with Christians who think homosexuality is a sin and would preach that in an effort to save a soul. I do have issue with people using that to look down on people. It is the difference between making fun of someone's weight and genuinely being concerned for their health.

"Matthew 25:31-40 Go ahead and explain to me how this doesn't apply to everyone."

Either a person is a goat, bound for Hell, or they are a sheep, bound for Heaven. Of course it applies to everyone, for there is no one who will not stand in judgment one day. The overriding point of that passage, however, is did you confess Jesus as Lord (Romans 10) and did you do what you did in obedience to Him? Good works will save no one, but those who are His will do good works.

You are on the outside looking in when it comes to the Scriptures, but I am more than happy to help you out with that.

"Joel Osteen and Kenneth Copeland were both very loud supporters of President Trump."
I will have to take your word for that, for I have no time to waste on either one of them. At least you are aware that there is such a thing as bad doctrine and heretics- those two are among the "best" of the worst of today's crop.

As for the video of some of the other heretics, while the format is funny, what they do is not funny. I get that whiny little Leftists like yourself find amusement in videos like this, if only because of your TDS, but I imagine you enjoy using this as another excuse in your rejection of Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord. More's the pity . . .

"I'm sure you think he did good in office."
Wrong. I know he did good in office- the facts and data bear this out. I often provide this link even knowing that "brilliant" political analysts like yourself will never bother checking out the facts, but nonetheless here it is: www.magapill.com

"I imagine you don't believe in climate change (hate to assume, but there it is)." That was one heck of a left turn to nowhere- the context isn't there, so it must be on your mind. Technically, I do not believe that the facts support anthropogenic climate change- the climate is always changing.

"And you will never convince me the strike on Soleimani was anything but an attempt to distract from the impeachment." You assume motive while having no access to back that up- ad hominem without any basis. You have much bigger problems to be wasting time making stuff like that up in your fertile little mind.

Your understanding of the Scriptures is less than minimal, as you appear to only use it as a tool to attack others. I get most cannot likely defend their position because they do not know the Scriptures very well- not the case here. As I said- glad to help you dig deeper.

My take away from Matthew is that you will be judged on how you treated those you had no reason to help.

My faith is not impacted by people like the any more than I would judge any other group by a few members. Many Christians and Christian charities are good people doing good works. These guys are false and it's no surprise they were willing to bind their faith to a candidate.

Whiny little leftist. - dismissive corpulent rightist

Climate change - not a hard turn to me. His policies, agenda of he'd won, and actions all lined up. It alone is enough to not get my vote.

Ad hominem - that doesn't fit. I'm not attacking a person instead of the argument. Maybe hasty conclusion falacy, but that assumes I don't have reasons. I just didn't bother listing them.

" . . . and my desire for a higher authority to make things simple is too much to dismiss."

The Christian life is anything but simple, and God never promises to "make things simple".

John 16:33
I have said these things to you, that in me you may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation. But take heart; I have overcome the world.

And elsewhere Jesus explains that the world will hate anyone that follows Him because they first hated Him. Those who truly take a stand for truth face hardships of one sort or another- some are unquestionably more severe than others- there are Christians around the world losing their lives for their testimony.

No, simple would be going through life thinking you can do whatever you want, and if perhaps there is a God somewhere out there, all I have to do is to ". . . live my life the best I can.", but I probably won't be held accountable for my choice of what I did with the Son of God. The problem I hope you see in what you are saying is that you are making your opinion of what is the best way to live your life preeminent over what God has told us.

The Bible makes it clear that no one will ever be saved by the works they do.
We will not be graded on a scale.
There is only one way to be saved from the righteous wrath of God. People like to complain about God being wrathful, and yet this same God made the ultimate sacrifice so we could avoid what is rightfully ours.

I know this. At one point in my life, I angrily cried out to the God I did not believe existed, saying, "I really don't care if You are real, I just want to know what is true!" I had not been raised in the church, and what little contact I had with any of them I used as an excuse to discount God all the more. And even though I did not know this verse in the Bible existed, I still fulfilled the basics of it on that day when I declared my desire to know what was real.

Jeremiah 29:13
You will seek Me and find Me, when you seek Me with all your heart.

There are too many evidences that God is real as described in the Bible, so there is no reason whatsoever to approach God on an "impulse". Ultimately it ends with faith, and this is something that only God can help us with. He knows which hearts are open and which are not.

finger-lickin' good