Lando Listens to Vader

You nailed it!

The people doing the research admit they don't even really know about the spikes.

"After 2000, scientists made many attempts to create coronavirus vaccines. For the past 20 years, all ended in failure because the animals in the clinical trials got very sick and many died, just like the children in the 1960s.

- In 2004, attempted vaccine produced hepatitis in ferrets.
- In 2005, mice and civets became sick and more susceptible to coronaviruses after being vaccinated.
- In 2012, the ferrets became sick and died. And in this study, mice and ferrets developed lung disease.
- In 2016, this study also produced lung disease in mice.

The typical pattern in the studies referenced above is that the children and the animals produced beautiful antibody responses after being vaccinated. The manufacturers thought they hit the jackpot. The problem came when the children and animals were exposed to the wild version of the virus.

When that happened, an unexplained phenomenon called antibody dependent enhancement, also known as vaccine enhanced disease, occurred where the immune system produced a “cytokine storm” (i.e. overwhelmingly attacked the body) and the children/animals died.

Here’s the lingering issue: The vaccine makers have no data to suggest their rushed vaccines have overcome that problem.

In other words, never before has any attempt to make a coronavirus vaccine been successful, nor has the gene-therapy technology in mRNA “vaccines” been safely brought to market.

We might assume that because the companies received billions of dollars in government funding, they must have figured out that problem.

Except they don’t know if they have."

Actually they have known for quite a while that the vaccine is very effective at preventing severe illness and death if you are among the few who still happen to catch "the wild version" of covid.

Based on what? Their proof of "effectiveness" percentages consists of press releases. They haven't shared their data and none of them have been confirmed by 3rd parties.

Their benchmark was preventing mild symptoms, not preventing severe cases, and they have no proof that it has done so. The wild version of human coronaviruses are seasonal and cause mild symptoms.

The median age for "covid deaths" is 83, and "Saving an 82 year old with the common terminal event of a winter lower respiratory tract infection has always been difficult."

"Gibraltar has lost 94 lives to Covid-19 – the highest Covid mortality rate, proportional to its population, in the world. With it also being the world leader in vaccinating its people, the question naturally arises: could there be a connection? Seventy-eight of the 94 deaths occurred after the vaccination campaign began on January 10, mainly using the Pfizer injection.

Covid-19 arrived in Gibraltar in March last year, but by early September there had been only 217 confirmed cases. The first three deaths, all in the elderly residential service, were registered in November.

By January 10, when the vaccine rollout began, the Covid toll was 16. By 18 January it had risen to 45, prompting Chief Minister Fabian Picardo to describe the crisis as ‘the worst loss of life of Gibraltarians in over 100 years. Even in war, we have never lost so many in such a short time’."

Looks like Gibraltar started their vaccine rollout almost right smack in the middle of a spike in new daily cases.

Imagine my surprise when a peak in daily deaths occurs a couple weeks later.

Yeah, because in nature viruses spread in unnatural "spikes" and not curves right? And a massive vaccine rollout is a perfectly normal occurrence and never resulted in epidemics of the disease they purported to prevent, right?

You're arguing language now?? The spike/curve/increase whatever you want to call it occured over a span of roughly 2 months.... in the winter.. shocking.

Interesting that however many years of flu seasons doing the exact same thing never raised an eyebrow as far as being "unnatural".

And idk what red herring you're talking about now but to imply that the covid vaccine caused the epidemic would imply time travel considering the cases peaked about 2 days prior to the beginning of the vaccine rollout.

More thread mucking, pretending not to understand, as if you don't know the basics of a graph. So transparent. Do you think everyone is as dumb as you and can't see through it? Shill harder.

Again.. let me know when you have an actual response to the topic at hand.

You were trying to make a connection between cases in Gibraltar and the vaccine as supportive evidence to your claim that the vaccine is worse than the virus. I refuted that by pointing out the.... wave .. of covid cases was peaking just about right when their vaccinations began.

The whole concept is fishy. According to their own theory the antibodies attack infected cells, so the protien spikes won't make any difference.

"The T-cell receptor fits with its antigen like a complex key. When the perfectly shaped virus antigen on an infected cell fits into the Killer T-cell receptor, the T-cell releases perforin and cytotoxins. Perforin first makes a pore, or hole, in the membrane of the infected cell. Cytotoxins go directly inside the cell through this pore, destroying it and any viruses inside. This is why Killer T-cells are also called Cytotoxic T-cells. The pieces of destroyed cells and viruses are then cleaned up by macrophages."

So the actual professionals have said you'll need a shot every 3 months. When are you people gonna stop falling for the nonsense? How many days till the two weeks to flatten the curve is up?

You have to get a Flu shot annually and seeing as the viruses are somewhat similar it makes sense that you may need more than one vaccine.

Hmm. I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that they're getting money from it.

Well it is essentially a flu shot, so yes you need it annually b/c it doesn't last forever. Common sense.

Yeah, bitch some more, don't take the vaccine and take your chances. It's slim, but if you get it, you have a good chance of surviving it. Of course, unless you're one of those that just doesn't respond to the treatment and end up either dead, or worse... lose a lung or 2.

But yeah, just do whatever you want. You don't want vaccine? That's fine.

Meh. I had COVID 19 and recovered. I have natural immunity as my body knows how to produce antibodies, so I neither need nor want this vaccine, but go ahead and think otherwise.