Imgflip Logo Icon

Voter Fraud - Like A Nazi

Voter Fraud - Like A Nazi | PEOPLE WHO SAY THERE IS NO PROOF 
OF VOTER FRAUD; EITHER COMMITTED IT, CONDONED IT
OR HAVEN'T BOTHERED TO CHECK | image tagged in nazi germany approves | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,197 views 82 upvotes Made by JimboTexas 3 years ago in politics
Nazi Germany Approves memeCaption this Meme
87 Comments
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
3 replies
There is a massive effort both in and out of this country to put their puppet in. The entire argument that the left has is just denial and name calling. They have no evidence, proof or research to back up their denial. It is just an empty denial that they repeat over and over and over hoping that enough people will eventually believe it.

Then Dominion and Smartmatic started filing lawsuits in an attempt to save their butts. They have no teeth because their algorithms for cheating has been discovered. They cheated, in all 50 states and it is clearly obvious that they cheated once you know what to look for. They tried to hide their fraud but there was just too much of it.

Trump won re-election in such a landslide that they actually had to stop the counting and create new algorithms to dump millions of Trump votes and replace them with fake Biden votes.

We have sworn affidavits, video and statistical evidence of impossibilities occurring (such as more votes than registered voters and negative Trump vote counts, neither of which can ever happen under any circumstance, ever). Eventually the courts will have to look at the evidence because it just keeps piling up.

There is nothing in the Constitution, that I am aware of, to hand situations like this but if the mountain of corrupt people trying to hide all of this can ever be overcome I suppose we will find out when the Supreme Court gets involved.

What the left is condoning by just believing the denials is the fact that the Dominion and Smartmatic voting machines very likely stole Bernie Sanders win over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 primaries. That affects Democrats where they live so they should be concerned that some outside force is controlling our elections even in the primaries and state elections, ever since Obama got these wretched machines in the United States.

So just keep denying away, Dummycrats, until we have no country.

Biden works for China, not the American people.
1 up, 3y
Great comment man. Thanks.
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
Abbey, Have you seen patrick byrnes inside description of what happened? Truly historical info. Been following him a long time, he fought SEC fraud a long time. Honest guy. Site is deepcapture. He took his blog posts and made an ebook for 4.95 (he has this stupid theory that charging something will make it more legit. Hes already quite rich.), but I found the blogpost series better. Inside the white house, the dark web which has many people for militias apparently, and inside the lawsuits. He headed the compound setup by gen flynn to investigate the fraud.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Thanks. I haven't heard of him. I'll have to look him up.
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Have you heard this either? imgflip.com/i/546w3u
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
I haven't heard about that article. I saved it to my desktop to read later (I'm about to go to bed). But Mike Lindell mentions China in his latest documentary about voter fraud.

https://wethepeopleconvention.org/articles/Lindell-video-DrFrank?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=mewe&utm_source=socialnetwork

But it makes perfect sense because Biden is owned by China.

The left sure has a whole lot of denying to do. The absolute proof of voter fraud and Hunter Biden's laptop. You would think it would be hard to be a Democrat but then ignoring facts, logic and reason is something they do very well.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
I probably have heard of Patrick Byrne and didn't remember it. I just found out that he was the CEO of Overstock .com located in Utah. I live in Utah. Several years ago the current CEO of Overstock, Jonathan Johnson, ran for governor. I voted for him and unfortunately he lost.
0 ups, 3y
I used your exact words on this meme, perfectly said dude imgflip.com/i/54ia29

Sorry not tryin get clicks, dunno how else to send it
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
That entire post was nothing but rhetoric.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
And your point Is?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
https://rumble.com/vdp7df-share-unmasked-have-we-uncovered-the-truth-about-the-2020-election.html

Final answer
0 ups, 3y,
3 replies
Yeah, there's nothing new there. Already saw it. Recycled claims that were debunked.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Yeah video of counters blocking observation and observers and video of the tcf admins presenting video of them lying and sending everyone home and scanning the same otes all night and ststistical impossibilities. Nothing new 🥱 yawn. Lol
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/10/fact-check-videos-crowd-locked-out-detroit-center-lack-context/6195038002/

Please stop embarrassing yourself and climb out of the rabbit hole.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Are you paid to lie, or do you believe whatever youre lying for is big enough to make it ok? Sincere question.
0 ups, 3y
Ah, there it is. That denial of reality I've come to expect from the pro-fraud crowd. It's time for you to climb out of the rabbit hole.
0 ups, 3y
Lol
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
GA Senate Hearings (full of lawyers) admitted them as experts starting here: https://youtu.be/u5ZP_HpBKos?t=16708
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
I already responded to that. Now you're just repeating yourself.
0 ups, 3y
Ok
3 ups, 3y,
3 replies
I agree, let’s investigate and prosecute every case of voter fraud

And get John Fetterman his damn reward, he could use it for his Senate run
2 ups, 3y,
4 replies
Exactly, who says it was only fraud in Biden’s favour.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
The security footage at the tcf center did
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Nope, the footage showed normal counting
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Normal meaning they lied to the administrators and said there was a water main break and sent home all observers and pulled covered boxes from under Dollies and scanned the same ones over and over all night. On camera. That what I saw when I watched it being presented. You?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Nice BS.
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/02/fact-check-video-does-not-prove-biden-oval-office-is-filmed-in-a-studio.html
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Lol you posted an irrelevant video about other topic to cloud the issue for anyone reading this. Which is no one at this point btw
0 ups, 3y
I thought I'd posted the wrong link somewhere. Thank you for replying.
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/12/fact-check-video-from-ga-does-not-show-suitcases-filled-with-ballots-pulled-from-under-a-table-after-poll-workers-dismissed.html
1 up, 3y
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Watch it yourself. The data experts give you their background
GA Senate Hearings (full of lawyers) admitted them as experts starting here: https://youtu.be/u5ZP_HpBKos?t=16708
0 ups, 3y
"experts"
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
The director of national intelligence did: imgflip.com/i/546w3u
1 up, 3y
This should be enough for anyone
0 ups, 3y
Except he didn't say the election was rigged...
1 up, 3y
GA Senate Hearings (full of lawyers) admitted them as experts starting here: https://youtu.be/u5ZP_HpBKos?t=16708
1 up, 3y
Oh golly, one person. Did the director of national intel not say china interfered? Suddenly media doesnt investigate foreign interference cause their side won: imgflip.com/i/546w3u
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Incorrect. It's been checked for numerous times. This narrative that it hasn't is bullshit.
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
Not sure who youre listening to. Probably the msm

GA Senate Hearings (full of lawyers) admitted them as experts starting here: https://youtu.be/u5ZP_HpBKos?t=16708
0 ups, 3y
Also, I'm not sure the GOP-led state legislature in Georgia was going to believe anything that didn't help justify passing crap election laws later down the line.
0 ups, 3y
Seen it, found it unimpressive, and it's been debunked.

https://nickdepsky.medium.com/the-data-integrity-group-and-its-claims-of-election-fraud-debunked-c8307867667c
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Check out Greg pallast on it-he is truly a nonpartisan. OP is so dumb he is a fascist calling other people fascists. The fraud happened in the democratic primary, not the general. Trump's little buddies pumped the mass disenfranchisement efforts of Krish Kobach and the cross check list. The whole republican strategy was to keep black people from voting. It always has been. Keep drinking that wrong juice tho.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
GA Senate Hearings (full of lawyers) admitted them as experts starting here: https://youtu.be/u5ZP_HpBKos?t=16708
2 ups, 3y
Greg Pallast is an expert. Who TF are these clowns
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
....Or participated in it.

Liars and cheats will always be liars and cheats though.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
No evidence of widespread fraud.
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
GA Senate Hearings (full of lawyers) admitted them as experts starting here: https://youtu.be/u5ZP_HpBKos?t=16708
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Like Ramsland, the guy who confused Minnesota and Michigan?
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
I guess if you’re familiar w the evidence and end-up in the tiny minority arguing there wasnt fraud then youre not sincere and honest or worth talking to. Im looking for some honest people unfamiliar with the evidence because no soncere look ends where you are. Good luck. 👍🏻
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
"tiny minority"
Tell that to the two thirds of Americans who accept the results.
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
I said tiny minority OF THOSE FAMILIAR WITH THE EVIDENCE who dont acknowledge there was mass fraud. I did not say OF THE POPULATION. And accepting the results doesnt mean thinking it was legit. I accept the results.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
There is no evidence. Plenty of BS falsely presented as evidence AND DEBUNKED REPEATEDLY, but apparently Trump's word supersedes reality.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Paid liar or..?
1 up, 3y
Truth seeker
0 ups, 3y
There is a difference between mass fraud and fraud. You had me there with the tiny minority who are saying there was no fraud. But to pass off that there was mass fraud, when there wasn't, is not as intellectually honest as you are demanding those whom you are arguing with.

What you are confusing with mass fraud is called voter integrity. And even that is suspect. We didn't have a problem with the integrity of mail-in and absentee (and in some cases early voting is even being targeted) until the 2020 election. Lo and behold, it's now being called fraud to have participated in these legal activities. That is not honest language. It is quite the opposite.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Exactly how I'm feeling,I'm done talking in circles to these idiots who are willing to just completely overlook and deny the truth, hope they know the general rules of cheating though. If you go hand and hand into a relationship with a cheater, don't cry later when you get cheated yourselves.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
You will definitely solve it in meme comments. I am certain of it.
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
By the logic of these experts... more than 75% of precincts is suspicious... so I guess Reagan's Presidential win should also be suspicious? Oh, and for the record. I preferred Reagan to Mondale and Carter. Though, admittedly, I don't think Carter would've been bad as a two-term President. Mondale, however, was so green he couldn't argue his way out of a wet paper bag.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Trump won 17 of 18 bellweather counties. And the 18th had big demographic change from a flood of liberal retirees. Many many vote entries have decimal votes, include one precinct update of 0.6 votes for biden and 0.4 for trump
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Do bellwether counties determine election results?
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
This is the comment I needed to be 100% sure you not sincere. This little misdirection, add confusion thing. Thanks. Good luck.
0 ups, 3y
So, yes. Bellwether counties do not determine an election every time. The current bellwethers have only been in operation for forty years. They are almost always rural. In this election, most of the deciding counties were predominantly urban areas.

The logic you're using is that because Iowa, who has almost always determined the winning President every time chose Donald Trump, it is suspicious that Biden won the 2020 election. When, in fact, Iowa alone has only been right eight out of eleven times in forty years. Not to mention that the popular vote has accurately represented the Presidential win 54 out of the 59 votes. However, just as bellwethers do not determine the election results, neither does the popular vote.

As I've already indicated with my original statement that Reagan alone won more states than most Presidents have in the last forty years does not mean his election was any more suspicious than Biden's.

And suspicions of election fraud are not the same thing as evidence of mass election fraud. The only thing you've proven is that you're suspicious. Not evidence.

If there was evidence, Republicans would still be arguing about the 2020 election results. Pence would've not accepted the election results, or done so under great protest, and we would be in quite a political upheaval.

Instead, Republicans have changed tactics because this was never about election fraud but rather voter integrity. Which is the current issue at hand that any reasonable person would be arguing.

Not that the 2020 election was stolen.
0 ups, 3y
Also, this is not misdirection. This is a fact. You're the one who brought up bellwethers and I absolutely am allowed to argue within the parameters you established.

Misdirection would be saying that because 17 of 18 bellwether counties voted for Trump, that that is proof of election fraud, or at the very least, enough to insight suspicion.

It completely ignores the variables that we had a Pandemic in 2020 and that major cities were more largely affected by this than not. That Trump might not have polled well enough with the urban population than he did with the rural is consistent. That urban counties may be outnumbered by rural counties is true, but the number of urban voters outnumbered rural voters is true. This is why Biden won and Trump lost.

Just because Trump won popular rural areas that are often correct in their determinations as to whom will win a Presidential election does not mean he secured the population vote he still needed within the individual states. Counties do not determine the Presidential election. Nor does nationwide population determine Presidential elections. Individual statewide populations DO determine the presidential election.

That is why Biden won.

Trump was already at a great disadvantage with the overall population vote with not only losing the Popular vote in the 2016 Presidential election but also having one of the the lowest approval ratings in history.

It isn't as hard to believe that Trump lost than it is for some to believe that Biden won.

Because he did.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Nobody wins Ohio by 7 points and loses PA. I saw the footage myself of them blocking observers from Pittsburgh polling stations. Man, it’s not even close. Massive vote dumps. Just go away youre not for real
0 ups, 3y
When the Native Americans first saw colonial ships coming over the horizon; they did not know what they were looking at. If you were to ask them, they would've told you that they only saw strange clouds. The human mind sometimes only sees what it wants to see and it is true, biases can be even strong enough for people to deny the visual evidence in front of them. That does not mean, however, you're innocent of such erroneous perceptions.

Clearly you can win Ohio by 7 points and lose PA.

You're operating under the delusion that states have to vote a certain way every time, that political shifts are slow, or that political shifts cannot be quick. You were the one who wanted to argue with honest people. You assume that anyone who disagrees with you is unfamiliar with the evidence.
Show More Comments
Nazi Germany Approves memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
PEOPLE WHO SAY THERE IS NO PROOF OF VOTER FRAUD; EITHER COMMITTED IT, CONDONED IT OR HAVEN'T BOTHERED TO CHECK