Imgflip Logo Icon

The hypocrisy of the Democrats is astounding.

The hypocrisy of the Democrats is astounding. | 1.5 MILLION PEOPLE HAVE SIGNED A PETITION TO RECALL DEMOCRAT CALIF. GOV. NEWSOM; SUDDENLY, DEMOCRATS NOW WANT AGGRESSIVE SIGNATURE VERIFICATION. | image tagged in memes,laughing leo | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2,078 views 103 upvotes Made by Perspicacity 3 years ago in politics
Laughing Leo memeCaption this Meme
35 Comments
[deleted]
8 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Considering the GOP in California set up hundreds of fake ballot boxes all over the state, yes, we definitely need to check these signatures. It's obvious you guys have no problem committing voter fraud.
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
4 replies
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
The irony is real
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
And Just Like That Meme | AND JUST LIKE THAT REPUBLICANS DON'T WANT TO INVESTIGATE VOTER FRAUD | image tagged in memes,and just like that | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Fake.ballot.boxes... ring a bell? Republicans did that to try to hijack votes in California. The GOP has proven itself to be highly untrustworthy already. Now we're supposed to just take them at their word? Seriously? Cult45 must think everyone is as gullible as they are.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
And where is the proof?
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
BlueBunny isn't bright enough to see the incredible irony in his own statements...
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Fat Elvish needs to go back Australia and hang out with his white power buddies and worry about the government of his own country.
0 ups, 3y
Gee, and here I thought it was only VagabondDouché who had the utter ignorance and stupidity to believe I'm from Australia. I guess I have to take back all those complimentary thoughts I was having about you BlueBunny!

Particularly in light of your pathetic use of the liberal playbook 101, which states, and I quote: "when you can't argue a point on its merits, accuse them of being a white supremacist."

I guess my non-white wife, and the Black, Mexican, and Asian members of my immediate family just sort of tolerate my being a white supremacist, yeah?
1 up, 3y
1 up, 3y
Meh, don't care.
10 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
3 ups, 3y
tu quoque is a very weak argument.
1 up, 3y
Politicians and politcs imply hypocrisy by "dictionary definition" when people who recognize that hypocrisy vehemently defend their political views by observing it (especially in a case where one of the implicated is NOT a career politician) it's just pathetic.
8 ups, 3y,
1 reply
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
No dead voters.
6 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Why not? There were some I the presidential election along with underage voters.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
DEBUNKED
7 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Nope, truth. Bothe underage and dead people voted.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Your source?
[deleted]
5 ups, 3y,
2 replies
What is your source? I have been looking all over the place for anywhere that the left ever did their due diligence in the case of voter fraud. All of the judges where Trump's legal team filed a case were dismissed "on standing". That means the judge would not hear any evidence at all.

The ONLY thing the left has ever done has said, voter fraud didn't happen and that it has been debunked. Please show me the actual investigation.

There are tons of evidence and actual proof, even video evidence of people talking about running the same ballots through the vote readers multiple times.

If this ever was tried in a court of law Biden would be told to step down and Trump would be the next president. It is clear that Trump won and I believe he won in a landslide because the left got real sloppy trying to overcome all of the fraudulent votes they created to get Biden elected.
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Courts heard evidence. Arizona: "Over a day and a half of testimony and oral arguments, her team failed to prove anything beyond a handful of garden variety mistakes," Superior Court Judge Randall Warner said.

Nevada Supreme Court: “We also are not convinced that the district court erred in applying a burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence, as supported by the cases cited in the district court’s order.”

Pennsylvania: "[F]ailures to include a handwritten name, address or date in the voter declaration on the back of the outer envelope, while constituting technical violations of the Election Code, do not warrant the wholesale disenfranchisement of thousands of Pennsylvanian voters," wrote Justice Christine Donohue, who was joined in the opinion by two others.

"Charges of unfairness are serious,” Bibas said. “But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

In Georgia: Batten and his aforementioned four colleagues are all conservative and/or Republican-appointed federal judges who’ve denied requests from the campaign and its allies to block certification or invalidate election results based on flimsy allegations of fraud.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
The biggest travesty was Trump's legal team. They were like the Keystone Cops. The only court case where they tried to specifically target a problem and not all of the problems was in Pennsylvania. But then it was the Pennsylvania courts that were the problem from the beginning.

Pennsylvania's courts changed their election laws prior to the election. The courts are legislators and therefore cannot write law. In addition, Article II of the U.S. Constitution specifically says election laws are to be determined by the state legislators.

Pennsylvania changed the law to allow the counting of mail in ballots that had come in after the polls were closed. The ballots did not have to have a postmark or a signature on the envelopes. What the courts did by doing that was to legalize voter fraud.

Just because someone is a Republican does not mean they are not part of the problem. I left the Republican party close to 10 year ago (and I should have left years earlier) because I saw far too much corruption in the party. And the party keeps moving to the left.

So when you tell me that some Republican joined in on this voter fraud it means nothing to me. A ton of Republicans in party leadership positions and politicians HATED Trump. I am not Trump's biggest fan, myself. What I am a fan of is the truth and voter fraud has been going in this country long enough. This election was the absolute worst and there wasn't much of an attempt to hide it.

There are videos of people running the same batch of ballots through the machines multiple times. Videos of ballot counters that were brought in AFTER the regular crew was sent home for the night (which was another anomaly in itself, because that has never happened before) talking on camera about running multiple ballots through. Then there are the numbers. At around the same time in the morning, in several states, after votes stopped being counted (which never happened before) magically Biden and Trumps numbers were switched and in some cases by the exact same number. Trump's lead became Biden's lead.

In a few states at certain points in the counts the numbers started going up and down and up and down for both candidates. At one point Trump had a negative vote count. It is impossible to have a negative vote count. There is no situation in counting ballots were any candidate could ever have a negative vote count because votes are only additive.

Explain that away. Those facts are verifiable.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Where is all this irrefutable evidence, though? I keep hearing about it but certainly no one has posted links to it here. I mean, one would think, if someone like you has seen it and it's convincing beyond a shadow of a doubt, that it could easily be shared here? A link, or an article with a link? A video on youtube or infowars? Where is all this evidence that has you all so convinced that millions of votes - millions, mind you - are fraudulent?

William Barr said there wasn't enough to change the entire election. The Dept of Homeland Security said there wasn't to where the guy even got fired over it.

Over 30 states changed their election laws because of the pandemic including Texas, where the guy was from who brought the lawsuit. Courts have changed election laws in the past, it's not unheard of. There is precedent. I just don't get how people are so convinced that Trump won when there is so much more proof that he lost, backed up by all the courts, the Justice Department, and SCOTUS.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
This certainly not all but here are two links that prove beyond a shadow of a doubt:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=4268&v=uSfbEiV-Uxg&feature=youtu.be
https://rumble.com/vdloi7-absolute-proof-exposing-the-theft-of-america.....html

Did those 30 states change the law to accept mail in ballots that arrived after the polls closed with a postmark and without a signature? I'm just asking because I don't know. I've only heard Pennsylvania change their voter laws to legalize voter fraud.

Barr could be right but I serious doubt it. I would just like to know for sure.

Some guy got fired from DHS because he said there was no voter fraud?? Who? That makes no sense at all. He must have said something slightly negative about the left. That is how you get fired and then have your life destroyed these days.
[deleted]
6 ups, 3y
7 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y
4 ups, 3y
Same with Amazon and their union vote.
2 ups, 3y
Laughing Leo memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • Chelsea Cat logo
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    1.5 MILLION PEOPLE HAVE SIGNED A PETITION TO RECALL DEMOCRAT CALIF. GOV. NEWSOM; SUDDENLY, DEMOCRATS NOW WANT AGGRESSIVE SIGNATURE VERIFICATION.