Can you kindly explain why this is acceptable?

but if killed with a bullet- its ok.

Funny, the "pregnancy complications" they're talking about is laying down women on their back, during childbirth, which doctors/nurses KNOW that compresses the pelvic opening by an average of 2 inches, which leads to complications. Women are designed to give birth while in a squat position.

Yeah, yeah, it’s all good when many innocent babies are killed, people are killed daily due to people misusing guns, but when one person gets kill all heck breaks lose? Ok 👍 sound good 🙄

If you read the small print, it specifically references complications. In other words, this particular billboard is advocating maintaining access to medically necessary or medically advised abortions. It is unfortunate that in people's fervor to prevent elective abortions, many are willing to deny women lifesaving care.

Third, even in the one-tenth of one-percent of abortions that are done to save the life of the mother, in the vast majority of these cases, an early induced delivery of the baby or a C-section is what is necessary, not an abortion. This early inducement may result in the death of the baby, but it is extremely rare that a baby must be actively aborted in order to save the life of the mother. Some doctors say that abortion is never medically necessary to save the life of the mother

Im aware that there are varying opinions on whether abortions are ever really medically necessary. But I'll err on the side of preventing suffering and defer to the mom who is aware of her existence.

Read for yourself why: https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Abortions-save-lives-Satanists-say-in-new-15812637.php

babies are the most innocent being on earth, according to the Bible. you are choosing someone who has already had the chance to live and inevitably sinned over someone who has not had a chance at life and has not sinned.

It's acceptable because women vote.

Ok, Nino women voting has nothing to do with abortions.

I'm saying this is what happens when they do.

I believe those who vote for security in place of freedom deserve neither and will lose both.

The only reason you're still asking is you're trying to catch me saying a no no.

I know. And from the context you can come to your own conclusion.

Don't make ASSumptions. He's just pointing out that women vote.

Are you saying children should be aborted(eugenics) ?

There is nothing cowardly about avoiding traps.

i think he was just saying that it was women's choice to make it legal, so it was their decision (tho obviously not all women think it should be legal, a majority did)

thank you. you can't kill a baby if it isn't a baby yet. it's in the first stages.

Why do you think that abortion should be legal option?

Dude
Whatever choices she made for herself ( that also includes her health) she must bear the consequences of her choices.
If she had sex voluntarily with her partner and got pregnant, then both woman and man should be responsible for the child.

It is a big deal when someone discard it

By that logic, having a duel to the death should be a legal option for people who want it.
I would actually argue that having a duel to the death could be viewed by people as morally superior to abortion. Here's why.
By showing up at the predetermined location of the duel at the predetermined time, the challenged/challenger has consented to dueling. This means that the person has indirectly consented to the possibility of losing and, by extension, the possibility of being killed in the duel by the other duelist.
In abortion, the party being killed did not consent to being killed.

"That's entirely unrelated, so it doesn't logically follow" False.
"An embryo is not a legal party and can't make any decisions" That means that it is unable to give consent, since consent is a decision.

It's false because both thongs involve intentional homicide of another human, making them related.

False, because, people who get hit by a drunk driver are people who did not consent do dying.

Thank you