Imgflip Logo Icon

Crumbs Divided by 2 = Significant

Crumbs Divided by 2 = Significant | BEFORE:  $1200 IS CRUMBS IF IT COMES FROM TRUMP! AFTER:  $600 IS SIGNIFICANT IF IT COMES FROM THE  DEMOCRATS! | image tagged in nancy pelosi,trump,biden,covid,relief | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,853 views 66 upvotes Made by gisli 4 years ago in politics
50 Comments
5 ups, 4y
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
only the finest wines... only fiji bottled water.... and yes, only Jeni's luxury ice cream <3 lol this country is a circus act.
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
In both cases it’s crumbs but it would be better spent getting schools and businesses back open.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Honestly for families 2000 dollars would be amazing
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I get that, especially in states other than California where it would only cover about a month of bills. Getting the kids back to school and businesses open would unleash the economic recovery that is needed for recovery
0 ups, 4y
True dat. It's sad how bills in California are so high now
1 up, 4y
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
I'm not a Pelosi fan. But I can smell Bullshit from a mile away. How did your toe taste? Still sucking on your foot?
0 ups, 4y
She agreed with Trump on giving Americans $2000. Which of course they’d agree on this. There was more in the bill in regards to relief besides the check. Her comment on the overall bill was that it was significant. Not the specifically amount of the bail-out.
[deleted]
5 ups, 4y,
3 replies
If you think that is the narrative going on, you don't deserve shit.
10 ups, 4y,
1 reply
First of all, it's not a narrative. It is simply Nancy Pelosi saying two things that she factually and actually said. It's a statement of fact. Second, I don't deserve shit from anyone else, including the Government. And I don't want shit from the government. I earn the the income that I have and do not want to depend on the Government or on others.
[deleted]
6 ups, 4y,
2 replies
First of all, the dems tried to get Americans $2k relief, even after trump pushed for it 3 days ago and AOC and Tlaib crafted said bill for Pelosi, repubs denied, on monday pelosi is tableing another bill to give Americans that $2k again, and it's entirely up to the repubs, who may I remind you, are in control, to either say yeah or nay and trump to sign off on it. Pay the f**k attention.
9 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I think you have failed to pay attention. Pelosi flatly turned down a $2.1 billion stimulus package and is happy for $800 million now. Just because she hated Trump. Pay attention.
[deleted]
5 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You're not even close on your numbers or your facts. Again for the slow people in the back, she is tableing a bill on monday for more money for Americans
12 ups, 4y,
2 replies
My bad. She rejected a $1.8 Trillion package and was demanding $2.1 Trillion. I was off. Now she's happy with $800 Billion.

https://www.barrons.com/articles/news-updates-u-s-in-talks-to-open-safe-travel-corridors-with-other-countries-51602346337
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
nancy is a dictator
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Dictators typically have absolute power taken by force. Nancy has done neither. Just because you disagree with her political priorities doesn’t necessarily make her a dictator.

Now, Trump trying to use the courts and the military to overturn the election with little to no evidence and advocating he be President for life? Now that is grounds for accusations of tyranny.
0 ups, 4y,
7 replies
Then Andrew Cuomo is a dictator and Nancy is still. They have had terms longer than 2. By your definition Franklin D Rosevelt is a dictator. Also there are many types of dictators. Theres absolute dictators and the un-seen dictator and a regular dictator. Point is you dont need to be a dictator just by taking office

And who said Trump wants to be president for life he has not even had over 2 terms
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
"Well for the voter machine one I said could and we have tried to present it in court and for the "suspend the democratic processes" didn't Al Gore do that with Florida?"

Yes, and when he lost, he conceded. He did not beg Clinton to impose martial law, nor did Clinton advocate they he do so, and Gore did not continue to say the election was a sham after he lost the election and his claims in court.
0 ups, 4y
no thats not what happened. What happened was the court said the re-counting FROM AL GORE was un-constitutional and
1 up, 4y
"lets stop arguing"

I accept your concession.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"no thats not what happened. What happened was the court said the re-counting FROM AL GORE was un-constitutional and"

Yeah? And he conceded. That's why I said...

Yes, and when he lost, he conceded. He did not beg Clinton to impose martial law, nor did Clinton advocate they he do so, and Gore did not continue to say the election was a sham after he lost the election and his claims in court.
0 ups, 4y
lets stop arguing
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
trump is not a dictator as dictators also hurt the people.

That has no basis within the definition of what it is to be a dictator. Many world leaders, including Presidents, often hurt people. That doesn't mean they're dictators. It is common for dictators to murder and arrest their opponents. Which Trump has also "joked" about doing.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/08/trump-appears-to-joke-about-gun-nuts-killing-clinton.html

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/521436-trump-says-he-agrees-100-percent-with-lock-her-up-chants-about

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/01/protesters-william-barrs-virginia-home-demand-joe-biden-arrest/6112424002/

"point is how is trump a dictator for liking a second term"

He isn't. He's a dictator for threatening to suspend the democratic process.

"that we believe he won and we have proof."

Then show it in court.

"The voter machines were online during the election and if something online it can get hacked"

Agreed. Voting machines shouldn't have access to the internet. Doesn't mean that this was evidence that they were hijacked at all or to the point where Donald Trump could've won without them.
0 ups, 4y
Well for the voter machine one I said could and we have tried to present it in court and for the "suspend the democratic processes" didn't Al Gore do that with Florida
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"okay but back to dictators: technically speaking Bentito Musslimoi and Hitler were both elected into office (source oversimplified) but they are dictators"

And they suspended their respective democratic processes during a rather ugly and unpopular term to hold on to that power. Much as Trump is doing.
0 ups, 4y
trump is not a dictator as dictators also hurt the people (say murder) point is how is trump a dictator for liking a second term that we believe he won and we have proof. The voter machines were online during the election and if something online it can get hacked
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
No, being democratically elected within set term limits isn’t a dictatorship. Suspending the democratic process is. Neither Cuomo, Nancy, or Roosevelt advocated doing away with our democratic process or extending their own terms. The two-term limit for Presidents came after Roosevelt and he wasn’t tyrannical for going for a third term within the legal parameters of the time.

Trump has previously praised President Xi Jingping move to overturn term limits so that he can be President indefinitely.

“I think it's great. Maybe we'll give that a shot someday,” said Trump to a crowd who laughed at the notion. Yet given Trump’s current actions, it raises legitimate doubts on whether what he said was intended to be a joke.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/world/president-for-life-not-a-bad-idea-trump-says-of-china-proposal.amp
0 ups, 4y
Fox is democratic just like all the other news channels now other than Newsmax so its like all dem stations v 1 republican station. Also its in the constitution you CANT have over 2 terms
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"Fox is democratic just like all the other news channels now other than Newsmax."

At the time of the article, Fox was still trusted among Trump Supporters. In fact, it asserts with bias that the President was simply joking in the article. (Maybe you should've read it.)
In either case, the source is irrelevant. There is video of it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=107&v=_b0HXZfj3Cw&feature=youtu.be&ab_channel=CityNewsToronto

Trump said it. Deal with it and move on.

"Also its in the constitution you CANT have over 2 terms."

Term limits vary depending upon the office. You can indeed have more than two terms with the exception of the position of the President. Since the time of Roosevelt, Presidential Term limits have been limited to two, nor can you run for office after serving two. The same isn't so for other positions specifically within Congress. Hence why there are many who still advocate for additional term limits for the legislative branch. Furthermore, the rules of the constitution are not set in stone. That is why we call it's legislation amendments. They are amendable.
0 ups, 4y
okay but back to dictators: technically speaking Bentito Musslimoi and Hitler were both elected into office (source oversimplified) but they are dictators
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
lenta unius crustulum...

Qui vir odiosus!

Quo usque tandem abutere patientia nostra?
0 ups, 4y
My thoughts exactly.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
The Democrats constantly rejected a stimulus package in favor of their own, which had lots of extra money that had no clear and immediate benefit for Americans trying to get by. They literally held constituents hostage instead of setting aside their wants to vote on the smaller stimulus package fronted by Republicans. That we're getting "progress" now is an insult to all Americans, not some bipartisan victory.
7 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I sexually identify as the nation of China. Gimme all your muneez!
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
As a representative of the Afghanistan gender studies program how do you feel about people who identify as Taiwan?
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I feel it is racist. and will invade anyone who disagrees.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Dude, she is obviously in contradiction to herself. Tell me, is $1200 more than $600?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
She agreed with Trump on giving Americans $2000. Which of course they’d agree on this. There was more in the bill in regards to relief besides the check. Her comment on the overall bill was that it was significant. Not the specifically amount of the bail-out.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Maybe so. But it is safe to say, from her own words, that she is dishonest.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
How so?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Because she said so.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
When?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Look at the meme.
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
The one I just disproved?

Again...

She referred to the direct payments of $1200 as crumbs for the first relief bill. And on the second relief bill, she was referring to the overall bill (not specifically the $600) as significant.

The only dishonesty here is from the meme for taking her words out of context.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Whatever. I know it's true. Whether you do or not makes no difference.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Uhuh, no. She referred to her bill as "significant" but turned down Trump's 1.8 Trillion.
0 ups, 4y
That’s not what the meme was about.

You’re still misapplying her reference to the “significant” bill as if she claimed Trump’s wasn’t. She didn’t.
1 up, 4y
and then just have trump raise it up to 2000 just to make the gop support him in overturning the election. smart. now the check is delayed. thanks trumpster fire
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • Pelosi Crumbs.jpg
  • Pelosi Significant.jpg
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    BEFORE: $1200 IS CRUMBS IF IT COMES FROM TRUMP! AFTER: $600 IS SIGNIFICANT IF IT COMES FROM THE DEMOCRATS!