Broken promises, Joe?

They are too smart for that. They'll start refusing services to people that own guns.

If they can control a whole country of the "fact" of covid, and stupid, unscientific masks, then they can find a euphemism to take away our second amendment. They've already done it with the first.

Umm... no, they can't!

3/4 of all the states would need to vote and approve an amendment to the constitution. THAT AIN'T HAPPENING!

I don't give a f**k if masks are stupid or unscientific. It ain't hurting anyone to wear one and it just might help if we do. It doesn't take an amendment to the constitution to bring a freakin mask with you when you go out in public.

The Constitution doesn't mean anything anymore to these people. They have violated it this way and that. They can do whatever they like, under any "policy" they decide. If you actually believe that they would stop at forcing masks, lockdowns, and ruining the economy, then you'd be a fool

Yes, it does hurt you. The mask is a symbol for all the tyranny, all the unconstitutional crap that is going on. It is the American Swastika. To wear it means you comply with the party.

The mask is just a mask. No one would be asking anyone to wear one were we not in the middle of a, "world wide pandemic". That is the framework and the reason for wearing one.

If you want to talk tyranny, let's talk about our current President listening to the traitor he pardoned, suggesting martial law to rerun elections in swing states so he can remain in office!

Again, no one is taking anyones guns away. It's not going to happen. They don't have the majority vote to make it happen. They have been talking about guns forever. Obama couldn't get a damn thing past and neither will Biden.

In fact, more change happens under a Republican Pres than a dem. Dems are all too ready to work with a repub prez to create new laws when they see the need to govern. Trump banned bump stocks. That's more than Obama got done.

That suggests that masks actually work, which they don't.

HERE IS A VIDEO PROVING THAT THEY DON'T: https://www.wevideo.com/view/1983119542

Wonder why he wants to do that? Because he has extreme evidence, and the Judges are being bought off, they are scared that they will get killed, that there will be riots, so no cases are being seen. The reason he wants to enforce that is that if there is an enemy within, there is no traditional legal way to root that out because traditional law has been turned against him.

Yes, they are. FOOL. You can't see it. They can enforce any policy they want. Who said they are going to do it legally? Who? They have violated the Constitution so many times during covid, they can find a way to do it with this.

No, they are not ready to work with a Republican, they hate us, because we are in the way of their plans.

The judges are not being bought off. Jesus Christ.

You'll make up any excuse you can dream of to protect this f**king bullshit.

"If you read anything about the murderers and criminals Trump has been pardoning, a lot of things should be obvious to you."

This claim has nothing to do with what we were just talking about.

If you have read about any of the information on these court cases, it will be obvious to you.

If you read anything about the murderers and criminals Trump has been pardoning, a lot of things should be obvious to you.

No, they can, and they will.

You’ve been wrong about everything else. They say that s what they are gonna do openly. I believe that means they are gonna try.

In this divided government, there is no way they get 2/3rds majority and states to agree to take away the 2nd. It ain't happening.

Yes, they say they will but just listen to how uninformed most of them are. The 2nd has nothing to do with hunting, which is already heavily regulated yet they keep asking, "who needs that for hunting".

They say they are doing forced buy backs, they already limit ammunition as soon as they start allowing suing the gun manufacturers it will in effect end the ability to acquire ammo and hardware. They will try because the socialist can’t have an armed populace. They must have complete submission.

Gun owners really screwed the pooch with the anti- Smith & Wesson bs. Manufacturers need to embrace safer weapons, along with the public. What's so wrong with a handgun requiring a keyed ring by the user in order to fire?

What's so wrong with a weapon not being able to fire at its own user? They could make this stuff today if people didn't flip out over a manufacturer doing so. Most gun deaths are due to suicide. Ending that aspect would go a long way.

Limiting ammo will do nothing to stop people who make their own.

Gun Suicides are the most successful suicide attempts followed by hanging. However the number one method of suicide attempts is prescription drugs. Let’s sue drug manufacturers too then.

Limiting ammo will Obviously limit availability. Brass can only be reused so much before it has to be recast. It will kill all aspects of the shooting sports.

I don't see it happening. Also, people don't need to go out every sunny day and shoot rounds for hours on end. If guns are truly to protect the populous from their government, save that shit in case of emergency.

What if that’s how you pursue happiness? Why does anyone have to limit it because you aren’t interested in it. Hypocrisy? The things you do should not be limited but what others do should be limited because you think so.

How you pursue your happiness is a completely different thing.

I don't give a f**k about your, "hobby" and neither does the 2nd amendment.

Of course you only care about how you pursue happiness thus the support for pedophelia and minimal crime prosecution.

See I didn’t say that was my hobby, because it’s not. It’s somebodies hobby though and deserves the same consideration as your drinking or heroin habit. Freedom is a funny thing you either all have it or you don’t.

We have laws against pedophilia. We have laws against drinking and heroin. We have laws against hunting and limit hunting in a most extreme way. We also make people buy a license to do so and limit how much they can do it.

We have a long history with limiting what Americans can and can't do. The 2nd amendment says nothing about a hobby. Your argument is a joke.

Your a joke as you miss the point completely. It’s not up to you to decide who’s hobby is important or not. You are a little tyrant that wants to dictate what is and isn’t acceptable according to your standards. America was set up to protect its citizens from all the petty tyrants like you who want to impose their will on the masses. Thank all the Americans who fought for freedom from tyrants like you.

Great non-answer.

We are way more divided than we were in the 80's. We're not getting anything worse than the Brady bill, if that!

The Brady bill had absolutely no affect on me and no guns were confiscated.

It would take a monumental effort to reinstitute the Brady bill. With our divided gov today, I don't see it happening.

The NRA is great at scaring people. Fear is a primary driver for their revenue. There isn't a whole lot to fear in the reality of our political climate. Maybe in 10yrs.

An election was defrauded and the media is blatantly no longer objective or inquisitive. What makes you think they will start playing by the rules now.

Include just one link to any legitimate story, proving the election was defrauded.

“When did I state I was okay with fraud to get Trump out? What are you talking about?”

I just won a bet with Dr Strangelove on it and had to go back and find it. You don’t remember saying you were ok with fraud?

Numbers don’t add up, maths are racist, but truthful and if the numbers don’t fit you can’t acquit the allegations, and they don’t fit. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it m. Tough titty if you don’t like it. It’s a sham as are you.

My logic is funny business went on and I am suspicious and believe there were efforts to defraud the election. I saw something I’ve never seen I. An election. States saying they were stopping counting for the night on election night. Then we find they didn’t stop, they just wanted everyone to think they had. Anyway as naseum you don’t care because you are ok with fraud if it gets the result you want. So your credibility is zero 0.

Yes, there were efforts to defraud the election. Republicans tried to suppress voters in every way they could. Breaking laws in nearly every swing state in America. They failed. They failed in state courts and in the SC and their arbitrary demands were overruled. They didn't stop the vast majority of Americans from voting this pos out of office.

Can’t prove it if you don’t investigate. There is plenty to investigate. Not that it would matter since you stated you were totally ok with fraud to get Trump out. I suspect that sentiment is prevalent among leftists.

If you can't prove it, stfu.

So pathetic. You state your philosophy on a lie.

When did I state I was okay with fraud to get Trump out? What are you talking about?

Virtually EVERYONE has been plenty patient with this asshole president as he tries every level of lawsuit he can dream up, to overturn this election. Patient to listen to what he has.

HE HAS NOTHING!